戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 .001 and also used simulation methods to estimate power for a sample size of 10 families.
2 or of SRB, using a one-sided type I error rate of 0.05 with a sample size of 100 eligible patients in each arm.
3 ost proteases from the sample while concentrating BoNT from a sample size of 100 to 500 microl to 20 microl.
4 acy by 27.99%, 16.44%, and 13.11% over random selection for a sample size of 100, 500, and 1,000 in the MNIST dataset, re
5                                          In 14 studies with a sample size of 108,416, MetS significantly increased the ri
6         Assuming a difference of 2.5% between the 2 groups, a sample size of 1154 patients was needed to prove superiorit
7   A cross-sectional clinical study was conducted comprising a sample size of 120 participants divided into four groups (n
8                      On the basis of our power calculation, a sample size of 120 women was anticipated.
9                      Data from a prior study indicated that a sample size of 13 would have >80% power to detect a statist
10 3 contained no active MMP-2, and only one palate fused from a sample size of 15.
11       The limits of detection were below 7 pg/mL when using a sample size of 2 mL of urine, except for 1- and 2-naphthols
12 t data set that certain features achieve a power of 0.8 for a sample size of 20 samples or that a cross-validated predict
13                                          Power analysis for a sample size of 20 subjects revealed that changes in IMCL(W)
14                           One participant withdrew, leaving a sample size of 21.
15                     Using a power of 0.8 and alpha of 0.05, a sample size of 220 patients was calculated.
16                      Results show that for a power of 0.90, a sample size of 24 is required for the crossover trial and o
17  CMI grading (none, incomplete, or ungradable MRI), leaving a sample size of 243 for final analysis (mean [SD] age, 72.8
18 intervention measures was used as the outcome variable with a sample size of 25, the model falsely rejected the null hypo
19       Women with prior arthroplasty were excluded, yielding a sample size of 26,321 subjects.
20  a confirmatory screen or a primary screen with replicates, a sample size of 3 is not large enough, and there is a large
21 onstant flow capture efficiencies (up to 39% +/- 11%), with a sample size of 3 uL.
22                                                             A sample size of 332 participants was calculated to detect in
23                  Our prespecified statistical plan required a sample size of 36 taxane-treated men.
24  main focus is the selection of siRNAs with strong effects, a sample size of 4 or 5 is a good choice.
25 as stopped at the fourth interim analysis for futility with a sample size of 479 patients.
26              A statistical power analysis demonstrated that a sample size of 50 patients was needed to show a 22% differe
27 parameter combinations for the procedures, and we show that a sample size of 50-100 individuals achieves consistent resul
28                                                         For a sample size of 6-12, the time frame is 2-3 d.
29 lation-based cross-sectional study in England was used with a sample size of 7225 men and women aged >/=35 years (age ran
30                       Of 729 studies, 86 were included with a sample size of 8,515,431 from 22 countries.
31                     Using previous data, we determined that a sample size of 88 subjects would provide 90% power to detec
32                                   The analysis was based on a sample size of 9 108 county-month observations (ie, 66 coun
33  power, a one-sided alpha = .025, and two interim analyses, a sample size of 900 patients was planned.
34 tribution with four peaks and a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, a sample size of about 500 trials was needed for 95% of sampl
35                          A power calculation indicated that a sample size of about 5000 twin pairs is required to detect
36  of a proteolytic digest of a tissue extract, equivalent to a sample size of approximately 1000 cells injected, is presen
37 thesis using samples on the order of a few hundred SNPs and a sample size of approximately 20 and power to distinguish be
38                       Trapping of N2O is quantitative up to a sample size of approximately 4 L, with an optimal sample si
39 urvey data that were collected through random sampling with a sample size of at least 100 individuals, were representativ
40 iteria included patients undergoing any major surgery, with a sample size of at least 100 patients with chronic kidney di
41  studies also focused on adults aged at least 18 years with a sample size of at least 100.
42     We included data from randomized controlled trials with a sample size of >1 000 patients and designed for follow-up >
43     We included data from randomized controlled trials with a sample size of >1,000 patients and designed for follow-up >
44 , spherocytes, and swollen RBCs) with high confidence using a sample size of just 21 RBCs.
45    For non-double-blinded randomised controlled trials with a sample size of less than 200 overall or within any principa
46  For foods where anaphylaxis is common, cohort studies with a sample size of more than 100 participants were included.
47  When simulating data with a large effect size of d = 1 and a sample size of n = 18 per group, sequential frequentist ana
48  tensor-derived regional metrics from 26 cohorts leading to a sample size of N = 3033 (1482 BD and 1551 HC).
49                                                       Using a sample size of over 1,500 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV
50 es are effective at estimating the mean concentrations, but a sample size of ten or more is necessary to describe the pop