ライフサイエンスコーパス: family practice

1 ary care (internal medicine, pediatrics, and family practice).

2 on issues that are of ongoing importance to family practice.

3 subjects were recruited from a single urban family practice.

4 lycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes in family practice.

5 s, and data on characteristics of individual family practices.

6 ed experts in neurology (9), cardiology (2), family practice (1), nursing (1), physician assistant pr

7 nty than the 10th-percentile county (eg, for family practice: 10th percentile HHI = 1023 and 90th per

8 e, including 32608 physicians who identified family practice, 129 general practice, 21 family practic

9 and neurology, -0.1%) but were positive for family practice (+2.7%).

10 , presence of pus in the nasal cavity) at 58 family practices (74 family physicians) between November

11 of Family Physicians, the American Board of Family Practice (ABFP), and the American Medical Associa

12 courses (31%) were offered by departments of family practice and 14 (11%) by departments of medicine

13 Of 47905 adults invited from family practices and 163 from community groups, 5110 par

14 recognized specialties--emergency medicine, family practice, and critical care--originated from tren

15 s for patients treated in internal medicine, family practice, and geriatrics practices.

16 of pediatrics, oncology, internal medicine, family practice, and gynecology, as well as subspecialis

17 13% to 5.2%; p < 0.0001), internal medicine/family practice (appropriate: 51.1% to 70.4%; inappropri

18 are, this article reviews the development of family practice as a specialty, provides a current asses

19 English family practices attained high levels of achievement in

20 Freshman-year plan for family practice, being in the PSAP, having a National He

21 ly morning and evening glucose for review by family practice clinicians who were not blinded to alloc

22 Although both internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) physicians frequently provide care

23 six specialties (anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, and

24 tates in 2009 in anesthesiology, cardiology, family practice, general surgery, internal medicine, ped

25 ed family practice, 129 general practice, 21 family practice-geriatric medicine, and six family pract

26 e quality of clinical care was introduced to family practice in England in 2004.

27 To reflect on and reconsider the role of family practice in US health care, this article reviews

28 rial that recruited participants mostly from family practices in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5,

29 lly from clinical computing systems for 8105 family practices in England (96% of all practices), data

30 inal follow-up October 2014) conducted in 54 family practices in England among 401 adults with acute

31 lly from clinical computing systems for 8105 family practices in England in the first year of the pay

32 lled trial with centralized randomization in family practices in four regions of the United Kingdom a

33 low-up completed April 2015) conducted in 42 family practices in South and West England, enrolled 576

34 rvey of people aged at least 75 years in 106 family practices in the UK.

35 gnosed between 1996 and 2006, drawn from 197 family practices in the United Kingdom General Practice

36 y, 32764 (91%) identified their specialty as family practice, including 32608 physicians who identifi

37 bers were drawn from psychiatry, psychology, family practice, internal medicine, managed care and pub

38 ms in 6 core specialties (internal medicine, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery, ped

39 specialties (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, obstetrics/gynecology, general surgery,

40 mmunodeficiency syndrome or substance abuse (family practice) or nursing home patients (internal medi

41 e physicians (internal medicine, pediatrics, family practice, or general practice) from those groups

42 a single clinical site with male and female family practice patients of different ethnic backgrounds

43 To help the general pediatrician and family practice physician become aware of several new ca

44 OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) and general and family practice physicians had lower rates (OR, 0.78; 95

45 into primary care residencies, particularly family practice programs (20% decrease compared with 199

46 in-training from 17 internal medicine and 23 family practice programs in the Mid- Atlantic area of th

47 A total of 8 internal medicine and 23 family practice programs of the mid-Atlantic area.

48 tion regarding medical school graduation and family practice residency completion was reported by the

49 Among the 3324 family practice residency graduates (9%) who identified

50 The vast majority of family practice residency graduates are self-designated

51 Of the 36088 family practice residency graduates who designated a pra

52 pecialty was designated by more that 0.5% of family practice residency graduates.

53 by a physician nutrition specialist within a family practice residency program can be effective in in

54 ded by a physician nutrition specialist in a family practice residency program.

55 These data suggest that family practice residency programs are an effective mech

56 il for Graduate Medical Education-accredited family practice residency programs from 1969 through 199

57 Of the 38659 physicians who graduated from family practice residency programs from 1969 through 199

58 icians, nursing staff, and office staff in a family practice residency.

59 from 0 to 85 for both internal medicine and family practice residents (median = 40).

60 tween 0 and 7 for both internal medicine and family practice residents (median, 2.5 and 2.0, respecti

61 On average, internal medicine and family practice residents recognized 20% of all cardiac

62 ple of community-based internal medicine and family practice residents, unsupervised prescription wri

63 hip, male sex, and taking an elective senior family practice rural preceptorship (the only factor not

64 In the family practice setting, both disadvantaged white and Af

65 A total of 7,770 patients at 25 family practice sites across North Carolina self-reporte

66 l practice specialty (OR, 1.54 compared with family practice specialty; 95% CI, 1.10-2.14) were indep

67 family practice-geriatric medicine, and six family practice-sports medicine.

68 ensive care medicine, internal medicine, and family practice that competency in end-of-life care requ

69 Both internal medicine and family practice trainees had a disturbingly low identifi

70 On average, internal medicine and family practice trainees recognized less than half of al

71 ry proficiency between internal medicine and family practice trainees, and suggest the need for revis

72 Since family practice was first recognized as a specialty in t

73 in a rural area and freshman-year plans for family practice) were 78% as likely as PSAP graduates to

74 walking and randomly selected from three UK family practices, were invited to participate in a paral

75 years) identified from a UK-wide database of family practices, who were obese (BMI >/=30 kg/m2) and d

76 ; RR, 4.0), and to have combined a career in family practice with practice in a rural area (21% vs 2%

77 of the quality of care in 42 representative family practices, with data collected at two time points

78 In general practice and family practice, women earned more than men, after adjus