戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (right1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ere based on a modified intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who completed any post-randomisation fo
2                                       The activity analysis included all patients who completed at least one full-schedul
3                                   This retrospective cohort included all patients who had HO bacteremia due to Escherichi
4 sessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who had surgery and completed at least
5           The primary, modified intention-to-treat analysis included all patients who had testable serum samples before a
6 juvant treatment, and in the per-protocol population, which included all patients who had tumour resection and received a
7                                               This analysis included all patients who met eligibility criteria on whom we
8                    The pharmacokinetic-evaluable population included all patients who received all eight weekly daratumum
9                                       The safety population included all patients who received any amount of study drug.
10  efficacy analysis combined the SNF472 treatment groups and included all patients who received at least 1 dose of SNF472
11  analysed in the dose-limiting toxicity analysis set, which included all patients who received at least 90% of the first
12 ary endpoint was analysed using the per-protocol set, which included all patients who received at least one (partial or c
13                                       The safety population included all patients who received at least one daratumumab d
14 e done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who received at least one day of treatm
15                                             Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of any s
16                                             Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of nivol
17                                     The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of rando
18                                       The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study
19                        The safety and activity analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of study
20 re analysed by intention to treat and the safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study
21 acy analysis was by intention to treat, and safety analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study
22                                       The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study
23 ll safety analyses were done based on the safety set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study
24 pressure and HbA1c measured in the full analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of study
25                                       The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study
26                                Activity and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study
27                             The safety evaluable population included all patients who received at least one dose of study
28                                             Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study
29                                       The efficacy analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the r
30                                                    Analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the s
31 vestigator-assessed progression-free survival, and analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the s
32 y endpoints were analysed in the safety analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of tisle
33                                  The activity evaluable set included all patients who received at least one dose of trast
34                                     The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of trast
35 th a centrally confirmed BRCA mutation, and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of velil
36 e done per protocol for all patients who commenced drug and included all patients who received at least one dose of venet
37 sessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, and
38                                             Safety analyses included all patients who received one or more dose of patisi
39                              The safety analysis population included all patients who received study treatment irrespecti
40                                             Safety analyses included all patients who received the study drug (ADS-5102 o
41                                         The safety analysis included all patients who took at least one dose of study med
42     Analysis was done by intention-to-treat analysis, which included all patients who underwent end-of-treatment biopsy.
43                                            Primary analysis included all patients who underwent one of the assigned proce
44       Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study that included all patients who underwent primary isolated CABG bet
45                      This retrospective observational study included all patients who underwent real-time ultrasound-guid
46 o underwent one of the assigned procedures; safety analysis included all patients who underwent surgical intervention (ca
47  dose of study drug, and the per-protocol population, which included all patients who used azathioprine or tocilizumab as
48 e done in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomised and received at lea
49 yses used the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned, had a migra
50 dical center ED with approximately 60 000 annual visits and included all patients who were suspected of having pulmonary