コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 knowledge into potential medicines, known as orphan drugs.
2 c and immunomodulating drugs, biologics, and orphan drugs.
3 g the 14-year study period; 252 (43.4%) were orphan drugs, 139 (23.9%) were therapeutic biologics, an
4 ; special development and approval programs (Orphan drug [1984-2018], Fast-Track [1988-2018], Priorit
5 t at least 1 rare disease, including 25 sole orphan drugs (26%), 20 multiorphan drugs (21%), 13 orpha
10 e leveraged the incentivized benefits of the Orphan Drug Act to develop more of these drugs for orpha
14 een effective as evidenced by an increase in orphan drugs as well as antibacterial drugs approved und
15 least 1 expedited program, 225 (62.0%) were orphan drugs; at least 1 expedited program was used by 9
16 First-in-class (FIC) drugs and drugs with Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) have a higher frequency of
17 n addition, other incentive programs such as Orphan Drug Designation (ODD), Qualified Infectious Dise
20 grouped by product category, review status, orphan-drug designation and therapeutic indication, and
21 igh share of FDA priority review ratings, of orphan drug designations at approval, and of drugs that
25 function, we investigated the effect of the orphan drug dichloroacetate (DCA) on survival in an anim
26 The primary outcomes were the number of sole orphan drugs, estimated Medicare spending on those drugs
27 drugs, pivotal trials for recently approved orphan drugs for cancer were more likely to be smaller a
28 US Food and Drug Administration has approved orphan drugs for neurological diseases without randomize
30 bitor that has been recently approved as an 'orphan drug' for the treatment of patients with unresect
34 From 2012 to 2021, Medicare spending on sole orphan drugs increased from $3.4 billion to $10.0 billio
35 s for AA for oncology NMEs, particularly for orphan drug indications, may facilitate timely FDA appro
38 a previously FDA-approved active moiety, and orphan drugs, intended for diseases or conditions affect
40 First in class, priority review, fast track, orphan drug, or accelerated approval status was retrieve
42 ta were mainly accessible for smaller firms, orphan drugs, products in certain therapeutic areas, fir
44 used and in what combinations, stratified by orphan drug status and drug type (small molecule vs ther
49 f recently approved, novel, mutation guided 'orphan drug' therapies that have established clinical be
51 ents had serious adverse events in trials of orphan drugs vs trials of nonorphan drugs (48% vs 36%; o