ライフサイエンスコーパス: randomized controlled clinical trial

1 This was a single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial.

2 rolled in a large-scale, multiinstitutional, randomized controlled clinical trial.

3 tem and testing its effects in a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

4 INTRO-HCV is a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

5 evidence-based recommendations of the EVS, a randomized controlled clinical trial.

6 e III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

7 ective tissue graft (SCTG) surgery through a randomized controlled clinical trial.

8 gle-center, two-armed, investigator-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.

9 Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

10 sponses to a booster aP vaccine dose in this randomized controlled clinical trial.

11 The DCCT was a large multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.

12 advanced-stage CHL in a multicenter phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial.

13 its management has never been subjected to a randomized controlled clinical trial.

14 advances that have come from the results of randomized controlled clinical trials.

15 linical practice will require the conduct of randomized controlled clinical trials.

16 need to be compared to parathyroidectomy in randomized controlled clinical trials.

17 sults from large, double-blind, multicentre, randomized controlled clinical trials.

18 ly demonstrated in observational studies and randomized controlled clinical trials.

19 o complete the study of fenofibrate in large randomized controlled clinical trials.

20 abilitation should be investigated in future randomized controlled clinical trials.

21 mples from 38 Dutch volunteers enrolled in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials.

22 pate in this single-masked, parallel design, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

23 ls and should be evaluated for efficacy in a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

24 Eighteen-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

25 Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial.

26 gingival recessions (REC), in a prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial.

27 ished literature remains the general lack of randomized, controlled clinical trials.

28 f COVID-19 should be further investigated in randomized, controlled clinical trials.

29 h a level of rigor analogous to multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials.

30 In a randomized controlled clinical trial, 1-year treatment o

31 In the present double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial, 222 volunteer UC p

32 iated OAS to apple were included in an open, randomized, controlled clinical trial: 27 patients consu

33 In a double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial, 44 mothers with ac

34 There are few randomized, controlled clinical trials about the effect

35 Few prospective, randomized controlled clinical trials address the diagno

36 es in four northeastern states, as part of a randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at stress red

37 This randomized, controlled clinical trial aimed to compare t

38 mega-3 supplementation should be tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial and that the analys

39 These results support findings from randomized controlled clinical trials and highlight the

40 Evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials and observational

41 Moving forward, randomized controlled clinical trials are necessary to e

42 Randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to conf

43 ients with acute liver failure, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed to con

44 However, long-term, multicentered, randomized, controlled clinical trials are required to k

45 re now available which require evaluation in randomized controlled clinical trials as adjunct therapi

46 This double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial assessed the effic

47 All English-language articles of large, randomized controlled clinical trials assessing the mort

48 This randomized controlled clinical trial assigned 200 FD pat

49 A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial at 5 centers was co

50 Baseline data from a randomized controlled clinical trial at the National Ins

51 n a cohort of patients who participated in 2 randomized controlled clinical trials at the National In

52 hase 3, three-group, adaptive, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 57 sites in the

53 The PLCO Trial is a 23-year randomized controlled clinical trial begun in 1992.

54 A randomized controlled clinical trial compared intermitte

55 This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial compared changes i

56 This randomized, controlled clinical trial compared the impac

57 Safety and efficacy randomized controlled clinical trial comparing 3 experim

58 onjunctivitis were obtained from the NVC-422 randomized controlled clinical trial comparing auriclose

59 We performed a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing NPWT to s

60 We set up a multicentre non-inferiority randomized controlled clinical trial comparing standard

61 This was an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing use of in

62 Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing a strate

63 Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing DES and

64 Fifty-five randomized controlled clinical trials comparing regenera

65 methodologic article, the extended data of a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing two epoe

66 Twenty-five randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing cytotox

67 Included studies were randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing interfe

68 The present randomized controlled clinical trial comprised 40 indivi

69 The present study was a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial comprising 20 chron

70 We analyzed data from a randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in 17 De

71 In this blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted over 6 m

72 The present study was a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial design in 24 deep p

73 prospective cost-effectiveness study with a randomized controlled clinical trial design that has bee

74 n Study in Children (DISC) is a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to examin

75 However, a metaanalysis of three randomized, controlled clinical trials did not reveal a

76 prospective, participant- and surgeon-masked randomized controlled clinical trial (EudraCT No.

77 This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluated the effec

78 This phase 3 multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluated investig

79 inical use of psychodynamic psychotherapies, randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating such ps

80 We are not aware of any randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the eff

81 There is a major lack of randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating the eff

82 Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials evaluating weight

83 a 36-month extension study of a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the eff

84 No randomized controlled clinical trials exist to definitiv

85 A large randomized controlled clinical trial failed to show effi

86 However, randomized, controlled, clinical trials failed to demons

87 In Phase II/III randomized controlled clinical trials for the treatment

88 vels of evidence, from case reports to large randomized controlled clinical trials, for the possible

89 comes established when "at least two blinded randomized controlled clinical trials from two different

90 valescent plasmas, despite that more than 10 randomized controlled clinical trials have been conducte

91 ta from two large multicenter, multicountry, randomized controlled clinical trials have demonstrated

92 To date, randomized, controlled clinical trials have not reproduc

93 Reports were of randomized controlled clinical trials if available, case

94 The first randomized controlled clinical trial in refractory adult

95 Multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial in which 37 nursing

96 ive COVID-19 disease will now be assessed in randomized controlled clinical trials in humans.

97 sis dataset containing all observational and randomized controlled clinical trials in which disabilit

98 The study was a double-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial in 103 term infant

99 A parallel-group, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial in 150 adults afte

100 ulmonary Exacerbations 2) was a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial in exacerbations a

101 Results of the first randomized, controlled clinical trials in this populatio

102 We conducted a 20-week randomized controlled clinical trial involving patients

103 tify all English-language reports of unique, randomized controlled clinical trials involving recently

104 diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 pat

105 is likely extends beyond the skin and that a randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to confir

106 A randomized controlled clinical trial is the best way to

107 The randomized controlled clinical trial is the gold standar

108 Further evaluation in a randomized controlled clinical trial is warranted to tes

109 s, but robust evidence from population-level randomized controlled clinical trials is lacking.

110 The aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial is to determine wh

111 Eligible studies were phase 2 or 3 randomized controlled clinical trials measuring MRD-nega

112 We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial of clinically stabl

113 Population-based randomized controlled clinical trial of first graders fr

114 A randomized controlled clinical trial of LCP supplementat

115 with at least intermediate AMD enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial of lutein/zeaxanthi

116 ons using high-quality phenotype data from a randomized controlled clinical trial of nAMD.

117 thors' knowledge, this is the first efficacy randomized controlled clinical trial of panic-focused ps

118 In this randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with ac

119 This was a randomized controlled clinical trial of subjects with pr

120 an appropriately powered, preplanned cluster-randomized controlled clinical trial of the impact of a

121 We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial of Treg therapy in

122 We conducted a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled clinical trials of ACE inhibitors

123 Several relatively small randomized controlled clinical trials of anticoagulation

124 Randomized controlled clinical trials of BT in severe as

125 rued rapidly from several sources, including randomized controlled clinical trials of DES versus BMS

126 Three randomized controlled clinical trials of fasting in huma

127 nical endpoint that should be used in future randomized controlled clinical trials of novel therapies

128 Of the 4 beta-blockers tested in large randomized controlled clinical trials of patients with h

129 formed a pooled analysis of weight gain in 8 randomized controlled clinical trials of treatment-naive

130 formed a pooled analysis of weight gain in 8 randomized controlled clinical trials of treatment-naive

131 We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial of a peer mentorin

132 Our results justify a randomized, controlled clinical trial of anti-TNF therap

133 participated as neonates in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of caffeine versus

134 We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of diabetic patien

135 We conducted a large, randomized, controlled clinical trial of these treatment

136 29 randomized, controlled clinical trials of CAM therapies

137 Randomized controlled clinical trials offer the best evi

138 METHODS/DESIGN: In a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with GD w

139 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled clinical trial performed at an urb

140 In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, physicians receiv

141 ke risks with blood pressure (BP) levels and randomized controlled clinical trials providing evidence

142 This randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) called for 12

143 this hypothesis has not yet been tested in a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT).

144 Based on large randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT), ACE inhibit

145 ses were systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in chronic

146 an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) to evaluate

147 Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs), prospectiv

148 omized into pilot (phase I and phase II) and randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

149 The highest level of evidence comes from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs).

150 Randomized controlled clinical trials remain the best me

151 riodontics includes a review of split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial results that speci

152 Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials suggest that most

153 There is a large body of evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials supporting the car

154 ON) trial was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial testing the hypothe

155 The ICTUS trial was a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial that included 1,200

156 PARTNER is a prospective, phase II-III, randomized controlled clinical trial that recruited pati

157 addition, there is substantial evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials that a mean reduct

158 sh language, prospective, retrospective, and randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated imp

159 Randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated the

160 sing sensitive search strategies to identify randomized controlled clinical trials that evaluated the

161 elded limited and inconsistent evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials that greater PAC i

162 and case studies as well as the more recent randomized controlled clinical trials that led to US Foo

163 rvational studies and post hoc analyses from randomized controlled clinical trials that provided data

164 We performed a systematic review of randomized, controlled clinical trials that analyzed pre

165 esophagitis pooled data from 5 prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that assessed the

166 Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials that reported iso

167 Here we show-in two independent randomized controlled clinical trials-that metformin inc

168 in a large-scale, prospective, blinded, and randomized controlled clinical trial the safety and effe

169 currently being evaluated prospectively in a randomized controlled clinical trial, the AREDS2.

170 In this randomized, controlled clinical trial, the questionnaire

171 METHODS AND We performed a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the eff

172 isease study (AREDS) is the only large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial to show a 25% benef

173 The challenge will be to design prospective randomized controlled clinical trials to provide the evi

174 (An Open-label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

175 USTUS trial (An Open-Label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

176 UGUSTUS trial (An Open-Label, 2x2 Factorial, Randomized Controlled, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

177 We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the safe

178 We performed an open, prospectively randomized, controlled clinical trial to determine wheth

179 In AUGUSTUS (Open-Label, 2x2 Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

180 n AUGUSTUS (The Open-Label, 2 x 2 Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

181 ysis of AUGUSTUS (Open-label, 2x2 Factorial, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Sa

182 A 6-center, randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out in

183 This participant-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at 25

184 A single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in so

185 corn-soy blend.A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in wh

186 A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 50

187 A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on tw

188 A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to co

189 A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with

190 A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial was performed to ev

191 The hypothesis of this randomized controlled clinical trial was that local appl

192 Background: The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the b

193 The objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the e

194 The goal of this 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare thre

195 The aim of this parallel-arm randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the

196 A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed with

197 The purpose of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to compare the

198 The primary aim of this randomized, controlled clinical trial was to determine t

199 The purpose of this single-masked, randomized, controlled clinical trial was to evaluate th

200 The awe intervention, a Randomized-controlled Clinical Trial, was delivered in s

201 In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the e

202 In the current prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, we examined the ef

203 As part of a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial, we examined the ef

204 In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patie

205 In a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we compared the e

206 Two independent prospective randomized controlled clinical trials were performed for

207 The aims of the present multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial were: 1) to compar

208 lished serotype 2 challenge virus.METHODSTwo randomized, controlled clinical trials were performed.

209 -related complications data are derived from randomized controlled clinical trials, which report a hi

210 However, long-term, multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trials will be required

211 ter a decade of preliminary studies, ongoing randomized, controlled clinical trials will potentially

212 Randomized controlled clinical trial with 4-week follow-

213 In the present prospective randomized controlled clinical trial with three parallel

214 Other long-term randomized controlled clinical trials with a large sampl

215 We conducted a 24-week randomized, controlled clinical trial with 166 patients

216 our-arm parallel, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial with 480 patients

217 is is being tested in multiple double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trials with durations of