ライフサイエンスコーパス: significant differences

1 alysis of variance with post hoc analysis for statistically significant differences.

2 unpaired t test and chi(2) analysis were used to determine significant differences.

3 measured and compared against a commercial sensor giving no significant differences.

4 There were no significant differences among the treatment groups with regar

5 Significant differences are noted with respect to lactate, al

6 total of 16 flavonoids by HPLC-MS and 4861 genes exhibited significant differences at transcript levels by microarray an

7 lysis of chromatin accessibility in F3 and F4 sperm reveals significant differences between control and TBT groups and si

8 There were no significant differences between groups in patients' growth pa

9 Results There were no significant differences between morning and afternoon shear s

10 Our results show significant differences between the pressure and density depe

11 We find evidence of significant differences between the two groups in the composi

12 e optic disc during the acute phase showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups of animals.

13 Significant differences exist among ICU clinician's perceptio

14 ompared in multiple ways to determine whether statistically significant differences existed.

15 However, no significant differences in (18)F-FDG-derived SUVs were observ

16 Our findings revealed no significant differences in 5-year OS (36.7% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.

17 ents and family members compared to controls, there were no significant differences in allele frequencies between affecte

18 There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or transplan

19 pertriglyceridemia who were taking gemfibrozil did not show significant differences in CAL and PD compared with untreated

20 chimpanzees that have learned to produce these sounds show significant differences in central sulcus (CS) morphology, pa

21 Secondary clinical outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in composite major adverse cardiac ev

22 ical outcomes when used as carriers for the B-KPro, with no significant differences in device retention, visual rehabilit

23 r regression models and the t-test were employed to compare significant differences in GQL-15 scores and to generate mean

24 There were also significant differences in growth of EFW between countries.

25 g DCDD Outcomes in Liver Transplant consortium demonstrates significant differences in IC among centers, the importance o

26 We detected no significant differences in local or systemic adverse events o

27 Between these groups, significant differences in mean age, gender distributions, an

28 RNAseq and qPCR confirmed significant differences in mean expression for 10 genes previ

29 rect observation checklist is demonstrated by statistically significant differences in mean scores between ICUs, between

30 In the RD analysis, we found no significant differences in MI risk between patients who start

31 beneficiaries treated by a general internist, there were no significant differences in overall 30-day mortality rates amo

32 (1000 muatm, HCL, pHT : 7.70) for 1860 generations, showed significant differences in photosynthesis and growth from a p

33 No significant differences in postoperative anterior chamber rea

34 There were significant differences in sputum proteomics and transcriptom

35 Significant differences in SVR12 and relapse rates were obser

36 Significant differences in the community structure were deter

37 nificantly in the moderate-severe group (p = 0.008); (3) no significant differences in the mean rod-mediated responses.

38 y coupled to mass spectrometry, we identified statistically significant differences in the metabolic profile among uninfe

39 There were no significant differences in the odds ratios for treatment rete

40 There were no significant differences in transplant and pretransplant covar

41 Results No significant differences (P > .63) were seen between breath-ho

42 These algorithm-detected colonies show no significant differences (Pearson Coefficient) in terms of the

43 No significant differences were found between B2A-CIC-negative a

44 Significant differences were found between preinfusion and 24

45 tion and production of viral progeny in SCG neurons, but no significant differences were found in TG neurons.

46 No significant differences were found in the moral distress tota

47 Significant differences were observed between treated teeth (

48 No significant differences were observed for sugar (difference:

49 No significant differences were observed in sleep timing/aMT6s r

50 In the cleft region, no significant differences were seen in primary or permanent dec