ライフサイエンスコーパス: two groups

1 In a proof-of-concept study, we defined two groups (1) an acute STEMI group (n = 6, 83% male, age 54

2 Clear separations between each two groups were obtained using the partial least squares disc

3 A passive oddball paradigm was adopted to examine two groups (16 in the autism group and 15 in the control grou

4 Using clinical samples from two groups of patients, our study revealed that higher levels

5 We identified two groups of abundant OTUs important to this system; one was

6 rotrusions of migrating fibroblasts can be distinguished in two groups, which are differentially enriched in distinct typ

7 The four species investigated were categorized into two groups: species with the ability to harbour large number

8 Interestingly, the patients could be classified into two groups: those who were infected and those who were not, a

9 Quadrants were randomly distributed into two groups: cyanoacrylate (n = 218 teeth) or laser (n = 216 t

10 They were then divided into two groups based on whether they had undergone IBT.

11 In this retrospective study, 116 patients were divided into two groups with a total of 151 local recurrent HCC lesions ab

12 ients with ANCA-associated vasculitis could be divided into two groups, on the basis of whether DNA methylation increased

13 Patients with BAPT were divided into two groups: those admitted before (referred to as the prealgo

14 The cohort was divided into two groups: those with and those without concomitant mood-sta

15 ide a rationale for categorizing fluid-feeding insects into two groups, depending on whether muscular energy is spent on

16 patients from the other countries, we divided patients into two groups for analysis; Egypt versus other African countries

17 To address this question, we analysed the performance of two groups of participants on reinforcement learning tasks us

18 ness, tinnitus, and nervousness than did those in the other two groups, and new-onset mania developed in 2 patients in th

19 uent sleepiness and obstipation than did those in the other two groups.

20 and increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp., two groups of bacteria previously shown to be associated with

21 ssigned to two groups, stratified by serum ferritin so that two groups with similar iron statuses could be formed.

22 ant difference in overall survival was observed between the two groups (102.7 v 115.7 months, respectively).

23 cranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the two groups (6% in the thrombectomy group and 3% in the contro

24 here was still no significant difference in TVR between the two groups (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.42; p = 0.53).

25 There was no difference in mean ICH-volume between the two groups (standard mean difference: -0.24; 95% CI -0.52 to

26 (0.2 [SD 1.1] vs 0.1 [1.1], p=0.010) difference between the two groups in change from baseline in total cholesterol to HD

27 There was no significant difference between the two groups in OI at day 7 (mean 62.3 [SD 57.8] in the KGF gro

28 We find evidence of significant differences between the two groups in the composition of autosomal as well as mtDNA,

29 There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of death or any other neonatal illnes

30 showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups of animals.

31 at intrinsic cell parameters are very different between the two groups of BD neurons, those derived from lithium (Li)-res

32 The cost difference between the two groups was $648 ($87,476 in the gold-standard monitoring

33 p was 16.90 +/- 1.71 (p = 0.85); the difference between the two groups was insignificant (p = 0.21).

34 ces in brain structure and function that we saw between the two groups were not consistent with variations typically asso

35 depositional mixing, rather than an association between the two groups, although more work is required to show this defin

36 ents were reported as expected and were similar between the two groups.

37 anch - left branch) was significantly different between the two groups.

38 ous adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

39 leeding and stroke did not differ significantly between the two groups.

40 [7%] patients vs 31 [8%] patients) were similar between the two groups.

41 Herein, we compare the outcomes between the two groups.

42 viral suppression and adherence to ART were similar in the two groups.

43 s Pre-TIPS demographics and clinical characteristics of the two groups were comparable.

44 The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar.

45 in that a gene duplication occurred after divergence of the two groups.

46 studied, to determine whether effects differ between these two groups.

47 ir conventional counterparts, the fluid viscosity for these two groups is very similar, as measured with either technique

48 tween S and NS populations was similar to that within these two groups.

49 In study 1, women were randomly assigned (1:1) to two groups.

50 In study 2, women were assigned to two groups, stratified by serum ferritin so that two groups w