ライフサイエンスコーパス: (is|are|was|were) compared (with|to)

1 f acetaminophen metabolite and hGSTP adducts were compared with 10 different cyt P450 enzymes.

2 Twenty eyes of 10 patients with N-CEU were compared with 16 eyes of 9 patients with N-PCG.

3 (rat pancreatic exocrine) tumor-bearing mice was compared with (177)Lu-LuTATE.

4 135 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were compared with 184 historical controls.

5 MRI parameters were compared with 19 HC participants (median age, 39 ye

6 TFV-DP was compared with 2 and 4 week samples from DOT-DBS (NCT

7 marginally above this threshold (pMDA group) were compared to 20 HFCAs marginally below (comparison g

8 n 21 patients (group 1a), and their features were compared with 21 propensity score-matched recipient

9 with a history of impulse control disorders were compared to 26 patients without such behaviours, an

10 f 48 eyes that underwent vitrectomy with PFO were compared to 29 eyes that underwent vitrectomy with

11 Performance was compared with 4 ophthalmologists using a random subs

12 ning, samples from 26 subjects with diabetes were compared with 66 randomly chosen control samples.

13 idylmethyl)-1,6-hexanediamine tether ligand, are compared to a previously reported Ru(II)/Re(I) compl

14 S-specific DARPin fused to the VHL E3 ligase is compared to a pan-RAS intracellular single domain ant

15 ectal swabs from daptomycin-exposed patients was compared to a control group of patients exposed to l

16 for high performance on a plant protein diet was compared to a non-selected strain to identify physio

17 The performance was compared to a reference standard of three laboratory

18 ion separation using flow-through electrodes was compared to a system using flow-by electrodes with t

19 The limit of detection was compared to a WHO-prequalified rapid diagnostic test

20 in-free immunosuppression (group A, n = 264) was compared with a 50% reduction of CNI and introductio

21 born metabolic disorders) in the unknown DBS was compared with a standard analytical procedure using

22 m Qatar Biobank (97 with PCOS, 622 controls) were compared to a Caucasian PCOS biobank in Hull UK (10

23 Clinical outcomes were compared to a control group of patients with SAB wh

24 Whole blood recipients (2016-2019) were compared to a propensity-matched cohort who receive

25 atus, Lantana camara and Talinum triangulare were compared with a bare earth control in a three-way s

26 s, and suicide by means other than poisoning-were compared with a counterfactual estimate of what tho

27 These patients were compared with a historical cohort of patients admit

28 Masked-reader evaluations were compared with a patient-specific standard of truth,

29 Both endpoints were compared with a pre-specified performance goal (PG)

30 The results obtained by the developed method were compared with a reference method based on the sampl

31 -policy cohort (December 2018 to April 2019) were compared with a seasonally matched pre-policy cohor

32 ue, CAC, and average carotid wall volume and were compared with ACC/AHA risk quartiles.

33 Patients were compared to age- and sex-matched controls using 18F

34 lzheimer's disease dementia during follow-up were compared with age and sex-matched dementia-free con

35 They were compared with age-matched IM controls.

36 When use of cyclophosphamide or rituximab was compared with all other treatments, the risk of MMP

37 ese high risk, high cannabis use individuals were compared to all other participants, [(11)C]ABP688 B

38 om the biomedical domain and its performance is compared with alternative approaches.

39 DoseGAN was compared to alternative state-of-the-art dose predic

40 MS cases were compared to an age- and sex-matched control cohort

41 Outcomes were compared with an age-matched control group of 18 su

42 e, and puncture rates of nontargeted lesions were compared with and without AR.

43 Then, 3D scans of ballast stones are compared to artificially rounded meshes.

44 The cohorts were compared to assess demographic variables and clinic

45 Lung-RADS and VRC using the 5% threshold were compared to assess diagnostic performance in determ

46 PDAC as visualized by histologic examination was compared with autoradiography and immunofluorescence

47 Results of QOL questionnaires were compared to average values determined in healthy vo

48 ere selected for further in vivo studies and were compared to benchmark ionizable LNPs (iLNPs).

49 ivity concentrations in the descending aorta were compared with blood samples counted on a calibrated

50 antly, the effects of nitrate-containing BRJ were compared with both 'placebo' (nitrate-depleted) BRJ

51 V ratio-1 (SUVR-1) over several time windows was compared with BP (ND) Results: Regional time-activit

52 MRI and echo indices were compared with BPD severity and clinical outcomes, i

53 res (PESs) of the (18)F-FDG- and Abeta-ADCRP were compared with Braak tangle stage and Thal amyloid p

54 Results were compared with brain stimulation sites previously re

55 ere abstracted by medical record review, and were compared with clinical characteristics of patients

56 ation by electron-induced dissociation (EID) was compared to collisionally activated dissociation (CA

57 The new methodology is compared to competing dimensionality reduction approa

58 Furthermore, dislocation as depicted by MRI was compared to computed tomography (CT) images.

59 oncentrations determined by semiquantitation were compared with concentrations determined by the tota

60 emergent intervention between 2013 and 2017 were compared to consecutive prehybrid patients.

61 Second, DWI was compared with contrast-enhanced MRI regarding detect

62 0 days following outbreak on inpatient units was compared to control units not in outbreak over the s

63 sity, and GM/WM density ratio of BD patients were compared with control subjects.

64 ing algorithms using survival statistics and was compared to conventional algorithms.

65 EAT measures were compared to coronary artery calcium score and ather

66 DIFAT predictions were compared with corresponding clinical ablations to a

67 Gene expression patterns were compared with curated data sets to identify upstrea

68 ntiality predictions made by the draft model were compared to data from individual pooled mutant expe

69 The data for these control tissues were compared with data (measured using identical proced

70 The results were compared with data from Asian and White patients pu

71 9 pandemic between March 11 and May 3, 2020, were compared with data from the same period for the pas

72 eated eyes of infants at 36 +/- 1 weeks' PMA were compared with demographic data and clinical ROP exa

73 Aip+/- mice were compared with double heterozygous Aip+/-, Prkar1a+/

74 ants have identical network connectivity and were compared to each other and to experimental recordin

75 Anthropometry/BC and MSTs were compared with each other and with clinical outcomes

76 ED(MC) was compared to ED(DLP) and ED(NCI).

77 oduce overall group connectivity maps, which were compared with established resting-state networks to

78 Mortality was compared with expected mortality, estimated using th

79 ture forces obtained from CoGEF calculations are compared to experimentally measured forces and demon

80 Materials and Methods DLR was compared with filtered back projection (FBP), statis

81 edical records of their index procedure, and were compared with findings in comparable patients at ri

82 These results are compared with first principles chemical shielding ca

83 The performance of FASPR was compared with four state-of-the-art PSCP methods (CI

84 pectinase on the glass bead and the finding was compared with free enzyme.

85 fter 34 weeks), and early term (37-38 weeks) were compared to full term birth (39-40 weeks).

86 an endometrial cancer cell line, and results were compared with full agonists estrone, E(2), and estr

87 sessments, and investigational-assay results were compared to gold standard reference methods.

88 Nine questions were compared with gold standard clinical examinations (

89 in vamorolone-treated DMD patients (n = 46) were compared to group-matched participants in the CINRG

90 Network hubs' strengths were compared with HCs.

91 is (MAH) or severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH) was compared with healthy controls (HCs) and heavy drink

92 e only for premium subsidies (251%-400% FPL) were compared to high-income controls ineligible for sub

93 The results were compared with hippocampal profiling from other bred

94 ms of metabolic parameters, and observations were compared with histological subtypes.

95 Data were compared with historic cohorts of Kawasaki disease

96 The resulting images were compared with historic images of 25 patients with A

97 A post-intervention OpTrust cohort was compared to historical and pre-intervention OpTrust

98 roscopic analyses of the hadrosaur vertebrae were compared to human LCH and to other pathologies obse

99 ally and chemically stable omega-3 emulsions was compared to hydrolysates obtained from other sustain

100 The results were compared with ICP-OES.

101 ies, the theoretical and observed GPS values are compared to identify the geodetic anomaly preceding

102 r (T1 band) and high-titer (T2 band) results were compared with IMMY LFA titers obtained through seri

103 tion and rate of mangrove vertical accretion were compared with independently modeled rates of RSLR f

104 in those with AN or OED and their relatives was compared with individuals without eating disorder di

105 Performance of the algorithm was compared with interpretations from five experienced

106 Structures of the various acceptor complexes were compared with kinetic data on FUT8 active site muta

107 word activates a visual representation that is compared to known words.

108 Detection sensitivity and specificity were compared with labeling done by three neuroradiologi

109 g glaucoma was included in this analysis and was compared with litigation in ophthalmology as a whole

110 5% higher results was found when PE-LC-MS/MS was compared to MA and AE-LC-MS/MS, respectively.

111 The performance of the PM CDM was compared to manual culture review of the digital ima

112 This automated analysis was compared to manual quantification in several well-ch

113 Model outputs were compared with manual ground truth for accuracy of s

114 Semiautomatically derived results were compared with manual readings in a subcohort (by 1

115 y, two lidar surveys (made in 2011 and 2014) are compared to map forest biomass dynamics across 96 km

116 Incident chronic azithromycin users were compared with matched controls by FEV(1)% predicted

117 Results were compared with matched exercise controls at 22.5 deg

118 Results were compared with matched PN and RN NCDB cohorts.

119 Deep learning models were compared with mean RNFL thickness for identifying G

120 (DD), and PBP2a immunoassay, and the results were compared to mecA PCR results.

121 ecificity of variant-metabolite associations were compared to metabolite associations with ultrasound

122 MBRs) between normal and ischemic myocardium were compared with mixed model analysis.

123 mplify the scan protocol, SUV ratios (SUVRs) were compared with model-based nondisplaceable binding p

124 tabolites were significantly associated with IS compared to NCs.

125 dad Complutense Madrid sky brightness survey are compared to nighttime imagery from multiple sensors

126 for ventilation and ventilation defects and were compared with noble gas MRI scans using the Dice si

127 in two different successive seasonal cycles were compared with non-AIT patients who received at leas

128 ancer risk among antireflux surgery patients was compared to nonoperated GERD patients using multivar

129 pectively (HR when the use of loop diuretics was compared with nonuse: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.94; p

130 different human pancreatic cancer cell lines were compared to normal pancreatic epithelial cells reve

131 The results were compared to Nugent (plus Amsel for intermediate Nug

132 Multiparametric MRI signal was compared with NWU using logistic regression analyses

133 test synthetic urine sample, and the results were compared with obtained results from liquid chromato

134 files were observed when clozapine treatment was compared with olanzapine and the medium control.

135 intimately mixed, and their chemical shifts are compared with other MXenes.

136 d potent Mcl-1 inhibitors, the Mcl-1 protein is compared to other antiapoptotic proteins.

137 Finally, the method is compared to other bioorthogonal labeling methods.

138 own the rapid detection of TM in food, which is compared to other methods very sensitive, specific an

139 Our bottom-water oxygenation record is compared to other similar high-resolution records fro

140 tients with BAD diagnosed by SeHCAT testing, were compared with other IBS-D patients, and healthy con

141 6/18/31/33 genotyping, and the S5 classifier were compared to outcomes, the S5 classifier was the str

142 Results were compared with paleolimnological records in the Ples

143 lts appeared stronger in trials in which LNS were compared with passive control arms.

144 ciated with invasive mechanical ventilation, were compared with patients without COVID-19 infection d

145 with a primary care record for HIV infection were compared with people without HIV.

146 Breast Screening Program (NHSBSP) in England were compared with performance in the test set-based ass

147 n in Cholesterol Levels) trial, atorvastatin was compared with placebo in 4,731 participants with rec

148 mean monthly HAE attack rate for lanadelumab was compared with placebo.

149 cidua basalis and decidua parietalis tissues were compared with pNK and first trimester dNK.

150 These were compared with population-based controls.

151 Visual acuity predicted by foveal grading was compared with prediction by PL, the current gold sta

152 al data are available, the observed human PK are compared with predictions, providing an opportunity

153 Also, DP-CBCT images were compared with preprocedural cross-sectional images

154 we conducted two cases in which our strategy was compared with previous experimentally and computatio

155 he experimental, first-principles CCS values are compared to previously reported experimentally deter

156 only 1 or 2 imaging points for new patients was compared with previously proposed single-time-point

157 Resulting models were compared with previously published FFMI and FMI mod

158 nine pancreas and lymph node control tissues were compared with primary INS and INS-metastatic lymph

159 The PL data were compared with profiles of the impurities obtained f

160 PSMA SUV(max) and metastatic findings were compared with prostate-specific antigen level, Inte

161 isposition were analyzed; allele frequencies were compared with publicly available database.

162 Data were compared with published gene lists.

163 The new definition was compared with putative invasive pulmonary aspergillo

164 evaluation within 24 hours of admission and were compared with reference values.

165 rates of MACE in those without baseline CVD were compared with reported large contemporary populatio

166 several sizes of liposome and DNA structures were compared with respect to their ability to dissipate

167 direct method - DM) used to produce shalgams were compared with respect to their effects on the gener

168 The results of the current study were compared with results of similar recent investigati

169 Cox models for RSClin were compared with RS alone and clinical-pathological fe

170 own wheat (TSW) and delayed sown wheat (DSW) were compared to see the effects of heat stress (HS).

171 med by a commercial laboratory (Karius Inc.) was compared with serology and blood PCR in 40 patients

172 CT was compared with severe acute respiratory syndrome coro

173 The emission factors were compared to ship exhaust plume observations and, fu

174 n sibpairs discordant for treatment exposure were compared with sibpairs concordant for nonexposure (

175 igram equivalents when liposomal bupivacaine was compared to simple bupivacaine and placebo (325 +/-

176 The experimental images of C(18) were compared with simulated images for four theoretical

177 D-19 patients for 7 days, and concentrations were compared with simulated kinetic profiles.

178 The results of the analytic theory are compared with simulation results obtained by the dir

179 was derived, and its diagnostic performance was compared to site-specific thresholds.

180 rips, 220 cm), and all intercropping results were compared with sole maize (SM) and sole soybean (SS)

181 fashion 3 times, and the amount of overspray was compared to spray with no shield and quantified.

182 ed bone scans with half the number of counts was compared with standard bone scans.

183 or end of the perfusion (n = 5) and outcomes were compared to standard, nonoxygenated HMP (n = 6) and

184 This result is compared to state-of-the-art relativistic quantum mec

185 S. grandiops and S. nigriventris were compared with Synodontis eupterus that is known to

186 BALF Iron parameters were compared to systemic markers of iron availability a

187 Here, synchrotron X-ray PDF analysis is compared to techniques commonly used to characterise

188 sing this approach, Nf-L analysis in DBS/DPS is compared to that in plasma obtained from the same blo

189 This activity is compared with that of Doc2b, which contains a conserv

190 MBq dose of (19)F/(177)Lu-rhPSMA-7.3 (n = 7) was compared with that of (177)Lu-PSMA I&T in treatment

191 lan-Meier curve applied to the observed data was compared with that of an inverse probability-weighte

192 The diagnostic accuracy of the test was compared with that of measurement of serum C-reactiv

193 Actinidin efficacy in hydrolysing gliadin was compared with that of other gluten-degrading enzymes

194 during the day (between 7:00 am and 5:59 pm) was compared with that of studies interpreted at night (

195 as measured by the GoCheck Kids application was compared with that of the Amblyopia Treatment Study

196 se to skeletal muscle injury in Speg-KO mice was compared with that of WT mice, leading to the identi

197 , and the allergenicities of treated peanuts were compared to that of untreated peanuts by western bl

198 Energetics are compared to the reaction of maleic anhydride and eth

199 Physiological properties of fish SDs are compared with the properties of frog SDs and analogo

200 with apo-structures, the DGLRDPSO algorithm is compared with the Lamarckian genetic algorithm (LGA),

201 uals who test positive for a target pathogen is compared with the odds of vaccination for individuals

202 The method is compared with the standard MS/MS-based data-dependent

203 A rate-matched random (RMR) forecast was compared to the AI.

204 hieve the desired false positive control and was compared to the asymptotic Chi-square distribution.

205 This was compared to the charge measurements of a plane-paral

206 Next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was compared to the current MAPREC (mutational analysis

207 food products with high protein content and was compared to the ELISA technique.

208 First, cancer risk after antireflux surgery was compared to the expected risk in the corresponding b

209 ibed for Enterobacteriaceae Test performance was compared to the genotypic profile as the reference.

210 he outcome of the cannabinoid reporter assay was compared to the gold standard (LC-MS/MS), showing a

211 or the Shannon index, when TNBC tumor tissue was compared to the matched NAT.

212 nitored the cannabinoid receptor activation, was compared to the quantitative data for JWH-018, obtai

213 ong asthmatics with high levels of total IgE was compared to the response in healthy controls.

214 e proposed Dixon motion correction technique was compared to the state-of-the-art technique (spatiote

215 ted Hb concentration from these measurements was compared to the values measured by UV-visible spectr

216 This original procedure was compared to the well-known Pictet-Spengler reaction

217 c graders) to detect reactivation of disease was compared with the current standard care (face-to-fac

218 riadin knockout myotubes, and their mobility was compared with the mobility of Sec61beta, a membrane

219 ased upon the central 12 points of the 24-2, was compared with the PSD(10-2).

220 The achieved spherical equivalent outcome was compared with the target outcome to calculate the ab

221 iopsied with FNA on the basis of ACR TI-RADS was compared with the total number of nodules biopsied w

222 The acrotelm rates were compared to the catotelm peat C legacies using an e

223 ssifier to develop the system, whose results were compared to the clinical grading of NPDR, the gold

224 robacterales and P. aeruginosa These results were compared to the expected genotypic and mCIM results

225 ecommendations derived from the CORE process were compared to the guideline recommendations.

226 ss all years, 4,796,006 patient observations were compared to the number of diagnoses matched on the

227 the results obtained by the proposed method were compared to the standard Griess method, and showed

228 Both volume measuring methods were compared with the 3D ProSoma software, which is use

229 sional flow cytometry, and the obtained data were compared with the blood samples of healthy controls

230 overall survival (OS; secondary end points) were compared with the COG A3973 historical cohort, in w

231 The results were compared with the cytokine release of isolated peri

232 obiomes of the resulting near-isogenic lines were compared with the microbiome of the disease-suscept

233 The odds for having keratoconus were compared with the normal weight group.

234 The survival outcomes were compared with the published American Joint Committe

235 MRI-based attenuation correction (pCT-IDIF) were compared with the reference standard (AIF) using th

236 The results were compared with the results obtained by inductively c

237 veloped for image processing and the results were compared with the software ImageJ, with good agreem

238 unknown halogenated compounds (or features) were compared with the total polychlorinated biphenyl co

239 ny counts on the 24-hour images, and results were compared with the VLP.

240 Bioplastics are compared to their conventional counterparts with res

241 immunity, MLAV VP35, VP40, and VP24 proteins were compared with their EBOV and MARV homologs for inna

242 the United States, United Kingdom, and India were compared with their previous year's activity.

243 cal coagulation concentrations (CCCs), which were compared with theoretical calculations (Schulze-Har

244 to yield informative backbone sequence ions are compared to those of higher-energy collisional disso

245 the S protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) are compared with those between angiotensin-converting e

246 1 (E(g) =2.2 eV) and 2D-PPQV2 (E(g) =2.2 eV) are compared with those of cyano-vinylene-linked 2D-CN-P

247 es of borophene are thoroughly discussed and are compared with those of graphene and its "cousins." N

248 These data are compared with those of nonplanar nanowire growth und

249 The optical and electronic properties are compared with those of related linear oligomers and

250 The similarity maps produced are compared with those produced by two leading hyperspe

251 crete units and the conditions derived above are compared with those that are observed in the cochlea

252 ications or from authors' unpublished cohort was compared with those in the Surveillance, Epidemiolog

253 Experiment 1, manually-obtained cell counts were compared to those detected via OCFU, IMJM and SCC.

254 from analyses of blueberries and wine grapes were compared to those obtained by a reference chromatog

255 cts obtained by conventional chemical method were compared to those obtained by using electro-activat

256 kits, and the aptasensor sensing properties were compared to those of standard DA reagents.

257 The results obtained were compared to those of the validated HPLC-MS method.

258 dition, their compositions and bioactivities were compared to those of Thymus pulegioides and Thymus

259 s receiving potentially suboptimal treatment were compared to those receiving optimal treatment to id

260 Patients treated with oral vancomycin were compared to those treated with metronidazole after

261 an albuterol rescue inhaler in the past week were compared to those who had and showed a trend toward

262 nd provider-initiated (pi-PTB) preterm birth were compared to those who had term birth.

263 DG PET/CT over 60 min, and quantified images were compared with those acquired using a single mouse b

264 (p > 0.8) were identified and their outcomes were compared with those for low-risk patients and for p

265 The results were compared with those found for RMs generated with so

266 Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were compared with those from a three-dimensional (3D) U

267 Performance trends across DBT rounds were compared with those from DM rounds by using logisti

268 Gametocyte sex ratios from qRT-PCR were compared with those from immunofluorescence assays

269 re optimized and the images obtained with AT were compared with those from scanning electron microsco

270 The brain nicotine kinetics were compared with those from smoking combustible cigare

271 he animal phantom, BMDs from both CT systems were compared with those from the DXA scanner (the refer

272 Observed seasonal seroprevalence patterns were compared with those generated by mathematical trans

273 ized ophthalmologists on the testing dataset were compared with those generated by the DL model.

274 e, 51.3 years +/- 14.3 [standard deviation]) were compared with those in 10 healthy control subjects

275 Cases due to emerging serotypes were compared with those included in the 13-valent pneum

276 l wounding of the cultures and the responses were compared with those obtained using primary AEC2 (pA

277 The results were compared with those obtained with a reference metho

278 MBF estimates obtained with our method were compared with those obtained with the standard meth

279 (18)F-DOPA PET/CT results were compared with those of (123)I-MIBG whole-body scann

280 The results of our models were compared with those of a commonly adopted linear re

281 Responses to this survey were compared with those of a similar previous survey fo

282 The results were compared with those of a spectrophotometry method a

283 from ethnic Asian population living in Japan were compared with those of Caucasians living in the USA

284 Topical effects of IDL in skin were compared with those of ethyl linoleate/oleate, whic

285 hosis due to osteoporotic vertebral fracture were compared with those of the control group.

286 the Revogene C. difficile test, and results were compared with those of the reference method, a comb

287 Patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam were compared with those treated with either polymyxin o

288 nd participants who took statins at baseline were compared with those who did not using Cox proportio

289 Patients with N-CEU were compared with those with neonatal-onset primary con

290 particularly important when exposure values were compared with toxicological thresholds in a risk ch

291 oop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) was compared to traditional rapid diagnostic testing (RD

292 These were compared with traditional behavioural and subjectiv

293 metalloproteinase 2 and 9 (MMP2-9) activity were compared to tropifexor and selonsertib.

294 tomography angiography (WF SS-OCTA) imaging was compared with ultra-widefield (UWF) fluorescein angi

295 These regions were compared to understand if sex determination is cont

296 , pea, and grape seed as recent alternative, were compared to unfined control wines.

297 er of molecules for each vesicle in the MWAC were compared to VIEC on a gold microdisk electrode as a

298 Deep learning scores were compared with visual scores and clinical parameters

299 the common deleted region found in patients, were compared with wild-type littermates.

300 hed to or added an INSTI to ART (SWAD group) were compared to women on non-INSTI ART (STAY group).