戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              APAP administration began at 0 h and continued to 'ALF',
2                                              APAP and IB were found to interact with proteins involve
3                                              APAP and IB were found to target vital proteins involved
4                                              APAP hepatotoxicity-induced liver regeneration involves
5                                              APAP pretreatment inhibited activation of the early step
6                                              APAP treatment inhibited complex II activity ex vivo, bu
7                                              APAP-ALF survivors had significantly lower serum FABP1 l
8                                              APAP-induced liver toxicity was mirrored by significantl
9                                              APAP-treated snakes had decreased lymphocyte and increas
10  IU/l vs. 7,585 +/- 5,336 IU/l, p = 0.0013), APAP-alone-treated mice vs. APAP + neostigmine-treated m
11 pha (184 +/- 23 vs. 130 +/- 33, p = 0.0086), APAP-alone-treated mice vs. APAP + neostigmine-treated m
12                       Serum samples from 198 APAP-ALF patients (nested case-control study with 99 sur
13  subset of 121 adults with ALF (including 66 APAP-related patients) had baseline serum samples tested
14                               Acetaminophen (APAP) and ibuprofen (IB) are drugs commonly used to alle
15                               Acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity is associated with a high rate of g
16                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is a commonly used analgesic responsible for more
17                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is a proven lethal oral toxicant in reptiles but t
18                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is an effective antipyretic and one of the most co
19                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is the active component of many medications used t
20                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is the main cause of acute liver failure in the We
21                               Acetaminophen (APAP) is widely used as an antifebrile and analgesic dru
22                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose (APAPo) is predominant in the NIH Pediatr
23                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a frequent cause of drug-induced liver
24                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is a major cause of acute liver failure (
25                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose is one of the leading causes of hepatotox
26                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdose represents the most frequent cause of acu
27                               Acetaminophen (APAP) overdoses are of major clinical concern.
28                               Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced acute liver failure (ALF) is associated wi
29                               Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced acute liver injury (AILI) is a major healt
30                               Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury in humans is associated with
31                               Acetaminophen (APAP, paracetamol) poisoning is a leading cause of acute
32                               Acetaminophen (APAP; ie, Paracetamol or Tylenol) is generally self-medi
33 on and poor outcomes in acute acetaminophen (APAP)-related liver failure.
34 itical for liver repair after acetaminophen (APAP) overdose.
35 f autophagy protected against acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury in mice by clearing damaged m
36 liver failure (ALF) and in an acetaminophen (APAP)-induced ALF mouse model.
37 patocytes in ALF, and in both acetaminophen (APAP)- and carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-treated mice.
38 gnaling pathways activated by acetaminophen (APAP) and insulin signaling in hepatocytes with or witho
39 d plasma ALT values following acetaminophen (APAP) exposure in mice.
40 s and patients suffering from acetaminophen (APAP, paracetamol)-induced acute liver failure (ALF) sho
41 abolism-dependent hepatotoxin acetaminophen (APAP) or the direct nephrotoxin cisplatin.
42 he albumin-bound hepatotoxin, acetaminophen (APAP).
43      The diurnal variation in acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity (chronotoxicity) reportedly is driv
44      The role of lysosomes in acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity is poorly understood.
45 me P-450 isoforms involved in acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity were examined in HepaRG cells treated wit
46                            In acetaminophen (APAP)- or carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injur
47 , and ALF etiologies included acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity (29%), indeterminate ALF (23%), idi
48 administered a 1:1 mixture of acetaminophen (APAP) and (13)C6-APAP resulted in mass spectra that cont
49 trasensitive determination of acetaminophen (APAP) in the presence of its common interference isoniaz
50                   Overdose of acetaminophen (APAP) is the leading cause of acute liver failure (ALF)
51 ntal or intentional misuse of acetaminophen (APAP) is the leading cause of acute liver failure in the
52 ted in the plasma or serum of acetaminophen (APAP) overdose patients.
53 ure 12 h after application of acetaminophen (APAP).
54 ALB/c mice by a toxic dose of acetaminophen (APAP).
55 dney injury in the context of acetaminophen (APAP; paracetamol)-induced liver injury is an important
56 of phospholipase D2 (PLD2) on acetaminophen (APAP)-induced acute liver injury using a PLD2 inhibitor
57 reement with in vivo studies, acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity was most profound in HUVEC mono-cultures;
58      Although necrosis in the acetaminophen (APAP) model is known to be regulated by c-Jun NH2-termin
59 eceptor (PAR)-4 contribute to acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver damage.
60  coagulopathy in 10 pigs with acetaminophen (APAP)-induced ALI compared to 3 Controls.
61 o mediate alcohol- (ALC) and acetaminophen- (APAP) induced toxicity in hepatic and extra-hepatic cell
62 R341H, or R341C in mice predisposes to acute APAP hepatotoxicity, thereby providing direct evidence f
63 poietic cell PAR-4 deficiency did not affect APAP-induced liver injury or plasma TAT levels.
64 nduced liver injury (AILI) without affecting APAP bioactivation and detoxification.
65 xpression but increased JNK activation after APAP administration, which exacerbated APAP-induced live
66 -molecule PUMA inhibitor, administered after APAP treatment, mitigated APAP-induced hepatocyte necros
67 y used drug, its potential application after APAP overdose in patients should be further explored.
68 egulation of proinflammatory cytokines after APAP overdose.
69 faster progression of injury and death after APAP overdose.
70 rtant regulator of macrophage function after APAP overdose.
71 a key regulator of macrophage function after APAP-induced liver injury.
72                                  2 hrs after APAP injection, the APAP challenged mice were randomized
73 ived macrophages into necrotic lesions after APAP overdose.
74 ocated to mitochondria in mouse livers after APAP treatment followed by mitochondrial protein ubiquit
75 these dynamic functions of macrophages after APAP overdose, however, are not fully understood.
76 occurred in Parkin knock-out (KO) mice after APAP treatment based on electron microscopy analysis and
77 t LC accumulation and higher mortality after APAP overdose compared to ASMase(+/+) littermates.
78  hepatocytes under basal conditions or after APAP and RIPK3(-/-) mice were not protected.
79 and increased hepatocyte proliferation after APAP treatment in their livers compared with WT mice.
80 te, N-acetylcysteine, declines rapidly after APAP ingestion, long before patients are admitted to the
81 ion of compensatory liver regeneration after APAP hepatotoxicity is critical for final recovery, but
82  kinase 3 (GSK3) in liver regeneration after APAP hepatotoxicity using a pharmacological inhibition s
83 gnaling pathways in liver regeneration after APAP overdose and highlighted canonical Wnt signaling as
84 vel role of GSK3 in liver regeneration after APAP overdose and identified GSK3 as a potential therape
85 athways involved in liver regeneration after APAP-induced acute liver injury using a novel incrementa
86 t the mechanisms of liver regeneration after APAP-induced ALF have not been extensively explored yet.
87 c target to improve liver regeneration after APAP-induced ALF.
88                     Liver regeneration after APAP-induced liver injury is dose dependent and impaired
89 y the mechanisms of liver regeneration after APAP-induced liver injury, more comprehensive research i
90 t activation of beta-catenin signaling after APAP overdose is associated with timely liver regenerati
91  regeneration is critical for survival after APAP overdose, but the mechanisms remain unclear.
92 ted ASMase(-/-) mice and hepatocytes against APAP hepatotoxicity, effects that were reversed by chlor
93      MB can effectively protect mice against APAP-induced liver injury by bypassing the NAPQI-altered
94 cal PKC inhibitor (Go6976) protected against APAP by inhibiting JNK activation.
95 ors from mitochondria, and protected against APAP-induced hepatocyte necrosis and liver injury in mic
96 s, and Parkin KO mice were protected against APAP-induced liver injury compared with wild type mice.
97 kin-mediated mitophagy in protection against APAP-induced liver injury.
98 P treatment, resulting in protection against APAP-mediated hepatic insulin resistance and alterations
99 ternative electron carrier, protects against APAP-induced hepatocyte injury.
100  essential for NAC-mediated recovery against APAP-induced hepatotoxicity.
101 ating monocyte-derived macrophages aggravate APAP hepatotoxicity, and the pharmacological inhibition
102              Further, both exosomes- and ALC/APAP-induced toxicity was reduced/abolished by a selecti
103 atic (monocytic) cells with exosomes +/- ALC/APAP.
104 rinking animal model and their effect on ALC/APAP-induced toxicity in monocytic cells.
105              These findings suggest that ALC/APAP-induced toxicity in the presence of exosomes are me
106 , CO gas inhalation significantly alleviated APAP-induced liver damage in vivo and correspondingly re
107 duced by overdose of N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) and defined three distinct MF subsets that populat
108 d by acetaminophen (acetyl-para-aminophenol [APAP]) is the main cause of acute liver failure and live
109       Acetaminophen (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol, APAP) and (13)C6-APAP were incubated with rat liver micr
110    Acetaminophen (N-acetyl-para-aminophenol; APAP) overdose is the most common cause of acute liver f
111 ing CYP2E1 cargo further exacerbate ALC- and APAP-induced toxicity in both hepatic and monocytic cell
112 plasma exosomal CYP2E1 in mediating ALC- and APAP-induced toxicity.
113  of exosomal CYP2E1 in exacerbating ALC- and APAP-induced toxicity.
114 onist inhibited APAP induced hypothermia and APAP was without effect on body temperature in Trpa1(-/-
115 icriviroc) reduces monocyte infiltration and APAP-induced liver injury (AILI) in mice.
116  without (N = 27) organ injury (APAP-TOX and APAP-no TOX, respectively).
117       Livers from control mice given VPA and APAP accumulated cholesterol in the mitochondria and had
118                   The combination of VPA and APAP increased expression of CYP2E1, formation of NAPQI-
119 ere resistant to induction of ALF by VPA and APAP, despite increased mitochondrial levels of glutathi
120 toxicity following administration of VPA and APAP.
121 elop ALF following administration of VPA and APAP.
122 lcysteine to control mice prevented VPA- and APAP-induced ER stress and liver injury.
123                 Patients with ALF as well as APAP-treated mice displayed increased ferritin and dimin
124      2G7 treatments significantly attenuated APAP-induced serum elevations of alanine aminotransferas
125 r microsomes, which are known to bioactivate APAP to the reactive metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone
126 t in the treatment of liver damage caused by APAP.
127 -ol rescues mice from liver injury caused by APAP.
128           Whereas direct toxicity exerted by APAP metabolites is a key determinant for early hepatocy
129 Bcl-2 family member, was markedly induced by APAP in mouse livers and in isolated human and mouse hep
130                            PUMA induction by APAP was p53 independent, and required receptor-interact
131 talk between signaling pathways triggered by APAP and insulin signaling in hepatocytes, which is in p
132 1 mixture of acetaminophen (APAP) and (13)C6-APAP resulted in mass spectra that contained "twin" ions
133 en (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol, APAP) and (13)C6-APAP were incubated with rat liver microsomes, which are
134 pathways were modulated in mice with chronic APAP treatment, resulting in protection against APAP-med
135  miRNA classifier model accurately diagnosed APAP-TOX in the test cohort.
136                              However, direct APAP hepatoxicity and liver injury at early times post-A
137 lation during NAC treatment can discriminate APAP hepatotoxicity from ischemic hepatitis.
138 retic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, APAP elicits hypothermia in addition to its antipyretic
139 eased and prolonged JNK activation; elevated APAP protein adducts; K8 hyperphosphorylation at S74/S43
140 ls (HIF-2alpha(mye/-) ) markedly exacerbated APAP-induced liver injury (AILI) without affecting APAP
141 after APAP administration, which exacerbated APAP-induced liver injury.
142 hepcidin decreases early during experimental APAP-induced ALF, is an independent predictor and might
143                            Upon experimental APAP overdose in mice, monocyte-derived macrophages (MoM
144  represent a promising therapeutic agent for APAP-induced liver injury.
145 y histology and immunohistochemistry and for APAP metabolism, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and
146 help identify future therapeutic targets for APAP-induced hepatotoxicity.
147 c insights and novel therapeutic targets for APAP-induced liver injury.
148 ential target for regenerative therapies for APAP-induced acute liver failure.
149  to develop novel regenerative therapies for APAP-induced acute liver failure.
150 -/-) hepatocytes display lower threshold for APAP-induced cell death and defective fusion of mitochon
151 ing hits, 2) overlap of expression data from APAP overdose studies, and 3) predicted affected biologi
152  monocyte-derived macrophages, isolated from APAP-treated mice, with necrotic hepatocytes decreased e
153 knockout mice, which were not protected from APAP.
154 ations in fasted Stard1(DeltaHep) mice given APAP alone.
155 ere significantly older, less likely to have APAP overdose, and had a lower overall 3-week survival c
156 d lysosomal cholesterol (LC) accumulation in APAP hepatotoxicity.
157              The proximate cause of death in APAP-treated snakes was likely acute methemoglobinemia a
158                            No differences in APAP serum levels, glutathione, or adenosine triphosphat
159 y, the data suggest that miRNA elevations in APAP toxicity represent a regulatory response to modify
160 the role of reactive metabolite formation in APAP-induced chemical stress, both the hepatotoxicity an
161 al signaling and apoptosis in hepatocytes in APAP liver disease.
162 types of immune cells are also implicated in APAP-induced liver injury.
163 bution of sterile postinjury inflammation in APAP-induced acute liver injury (APAP-ALI) and justifies
164 onfirmed that necroptosis is not involved in APAP toxicity by using mixed lineage kinase domain-like
165 tematically identify novel genes involved in APAP-induced hepatotoxicity and to provide potential tar
166 9)/JNK phosphorylation is mainly involved in APAP-induced liver injury.
167 d therapeutic window, as compared to NAC, in APAP-ALI.
168 es in oxygen carrying capacity were noted in APAP-treated snakes indicated by a 50-60% increase in me
169 n-driven platelet activation participates in APAP hepatotoxicity.
170                        RIPK1 participates in APAP-induced necrosis upstream of JNK activation whereas
171 ticularly autophagy, play a critical role in APAP cytotoxicity.
172 hepatocyte necrosis plays a critical role in APAP-induced liver injury (AILI).
173 on of FABP1 as a clinical prediction tool in APAP-ALF warrants further investigation.
174 ute liver injury after any insult, including APAP overdose, is followed by compensatory liver regener
175 xtraction by 25-hydroxycholesterol increased APAP-mediated mitophagy and protected ASMase(-/-) mice a
176    In contrast, a TRPA1 antagonist inhibited APAP induced hypothermia and APAP was without effect on
177 er recovery from acute toxic liver injuries (APAP and carbon tetrachloride) by increasing tumour necr
178 ammation in APAP-induced acute liver injury (APAP-ALI) and justifies development of anti-inflammatory
179  (N = 27) and without (N = 27) organ injury (APAP-TOX and APAP-no TOX, respectively).
180                               Interestingly, APAP induced translocation of RIPK1 to mitochondria, whi
181 ales were injected i.p. with 50 or 250 mg/kg APAP or phosphate-buffered saline on gestation day 12.5;
182 T cells significantly increased on 250 mg/kg APAP.
183  4 and 18 hours after injection of 300 mg/kg APAP.
184                      The effects of a lethal APAP oral dose on methemoglobin (MetHb, non-oxygen carry
185 cted localised bioluminescence in the liver (APAP) and kidneys (cisplatin) in vivo and ex vivo, whils
186 ation of STARD1 following ER stress mediates APAP hepatoxicity via SH3BP5 and phosphorylation of JNK1
187              We conclude that TRPA1 mediates APAP evoked hypothermia.
188 administered after APAP treatment, mitigated APAP-induced hepatocyte necrosis and liver injury.
189 -Cas9 gene knockouts were treated with 15 mM APAP for 30 minutes to 4 days.
190 using an AMPK activator oppositely modulated APAP cytotoxicity, suggesting that p-AMPK and AMPK regul
191 re not detected in control spectra (i.e., no APAP administered).
192  responsible for the hypothermic activity of APAP.
193 eous, but not intrathecal, administration of APAP elicited a dose dependent decrease in body temperat
194  of yeast induced pyrexia, administration of APAP evoked a marked hypothermia in wildtype and Trpv1(-
195 ministration of VPA before administration of APAP increased the severity of liver damage in control m
196 eneration was not secondary to alteration of APAP-induced hepatotoxicity, which remained unchanged af
197 an clock in modulating the chronotoxicity of APAP, we used a conditional null allele of brain and mus
198                               In a cohort of APAP overdose patients (N = 74) with and without establi
199  candidate for the accurate determination of APAP and INH within human fluids and pharmaceutical form
200            An orally-ingested lethal dose of APAP appears to be a humane method for lethal control of
201 tarting from 4 hours after 600 mg/kg dose of APAP, resulted in early initiation of liver regeneration
202       Our aim was to identify the effects of APAP in pregnancy using a mouse model.
203         Consistent with the toxic effects of APAP in the liver and cisplatin in the kidney, immunohis
204 ere less susceptible to the toxic effects of APAP, including parameters of oxidative stress and ATP d
205 se inhibitor that ameliorates the effects of APAP-induced acute liver failure in the mouse and theref
206 ase (JNK) mediate the hepatotoxic effects of APAP.
207 of characteristic spatiotemporal features of APAP hepatotoxicity within hepatic lobules.
208                 The direct hepatotoxicity of APAP triggers a cascade of innate immune responses that
209                                 500 mg/kg of APAP challenge caused acute liver damage.
210         Mice were injected with 600 mg/kg of APAP or underwent bile duct ligation (BDL).
211 oRNA-122 and completely abrogated markers of APAP-induced inflammation (tumor necrosis factor, monocy
212                   However, the mechanisms of APAP-induced necrosis and liver injury are not fully und
213 nd that the reactive oxidative metabolite of APAP, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine (NAPQI), caused the s
214 a indicate that all the major metabolites of APAP and multiple low-abundance metabolites (e.g., aceta
215 te liver regeneration in the murine model of APAP induced liver injury, which was associated with a m
216 Using various strategies in a mouse model of APAP overdose, the authors demonstrate that platelets pa
217 dy treatment improves survival in a model of APAP-ALI.
218 ers are higher in serum from nonsurvivors of APAP-induced ALF (AALF), compared to survivors.
219 at recommended doses, whereas an overdose of APAP can cause severe liver damage.
220 y of hepatocytes driving the pathogenesis of APAP-induced acute liver injury, and PLD2 may therefore
221 ll known, those that halt the progression of APAP liver disease and facilitate liver recovery are les
222             The electroanalytical sensing of APAP and INH are possible with accessible linear ranges
223 iO-SPEs were evaluated toward the sensing of APAP and INH in human serum, urine, saliva, and tablet s
224 ctrocatalytic activity toward the sensing of APAP and INH with an enhanced analytical signal (voltamm
225 e ability of VPA to increase the severity of APAP-induced liver damage was observed in FRGN mice with
226 antidote N-acetylcysteine (NAC) treatment of APAP-induced liver injury in wild-type mice, the liver i
227 our in vivo data suggest that chronic use of APAP may be associated with insulin resistance in the li
228 s study was to evaluate the effects of CO on APAP-induced hepatotoxicity and CO's relationship to reg
229 e found that the protective effects of CO on APAP-induced liver damage were mediated by down-regulati
230 em cells in the fetal liver were observed on APAP treatment.
231 nd the mitophagy regulator protein Parkin on APAP-induced expression of the ER stress-associated apop
232                       For years, research on APAP overdose has been focused on investigating the mech
233 e administration of CAY10594 at 6 hours post APAP challenge.
234 ome than serum creatinine concentration post-APAP overdose.
235 y exert proinflammatory functions early post-APAP, thereby aggravating liver injury.
236 infiltrate liver as early as 8-12 hours post-APAP overdose and form dense cellular clusters around ne
237 f monocytes and attenuated liver injury post-APAP overdose at early time points.
238 (mye/-) mice compared to wild-type mice post-APAP challenge.
239  (10 mg/kg, IP, administered 90 minutes post-APAP) protected against hepatotoxicity, whereas mice tre
240 prognostic biomarker of patient outcome post-APAP overdose.
241 oxicity and liver injury at early times post-APAP overdose were unaffected by syndecan-1, suggesting
242  and is elevated in clinical and preclinical APAP-ALI.
243 ified its mechanism of action in preclinical APAP-ALI.
244 arison with h2G7 in vitro and in preclinical APAP-ALI.
245 udies reveal an association between prenatal APAP use and an increased risk for asthma.
246 r data provide strong evidence that prenatal APAP interferes with maternal immune and endocrine adapt
247 on and hepatic platelet accumulation promote APAP-induced liver injury, independent of platelet PAR-4
248 nti-CD41 antibody also significantly reduced APAP-mediated liver injury and thrombin generation, indi
249 of the hepatocyte clock dramatically reduces APAP bioactivation and toxicity in vivo and in vitro bec
250          By a manual search for all reported APAP metabolite ions, no additional twin-ion signals wer
251 151a-3p and miR-382-5p specifically reported APAP toxicity - being unaffected by drug-induced kidney
252  is dose dependent and impaired after severe APAP overdose.
253 rmic activity was independent of TRPV1 since APAP evoked hypothermia was identical in wildtype and Tr
254  be potentially modulated even in late-stage APAP-induced acute liver failure.
255                   PUMA deficiency suppressed APAP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and release of ce
256                    The data demonstrate that APAP treatment leads to HIF-2alpha stabilization in hepa
257                          Here, we found that APAP overdose in mice caused liver damage accompanied by
258                  In-vitro studies found that APAP protein adducts were increased at 1 h, followed by
259                             We observed that APAP challenge caused stabilization of hypoxia-inducible
260                            Here we show that APAP interferes with the formation of mitochondrial resp
261             Numerous studies have shown that APAP hepatotoxicity in mice involves mitochondrial dysfu
262 cantly attenuated liver damage caused by the APAP challenge, eliciting an enhanced survival rate.
263 -3beta (Serine 9)/JNK phosphorylation in the APAP-induced acute liver injury model.
264              2 hrs after APAP injection, the APAP challenged mice were randomized to receive treatmen
265 leviating acute hepatotoxicity attributed to APAP overdose.
266 ting that necroptosis does not contribute to APAP-induced necrosis and RIPK1 has a unique, independen
267     Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to APAP-induced liver injury but the mechanism by which APA
268 le data points), 9 doublets corresponding to APAP metabolites were identified.
269 susceptibility of ASMase(-/-) hepatocytes to APAP and the impairment in the formation of mitochondria
270 ferase (NNMT) levels and were predisposed to APAP-induced hepatotoxicity.
271                           This resistance to APAP is also observed in a primary human hepatocyte (PHH
272 ic deletion of FcRn results in resistance to APAP-induced liver injury through increased albumin loss
273 own of Parkin have differential responses to APAP-induced mitophagy and liver injury in mice.
274  transplantation restored the sensitivity to APAP in a GPBAR1-dependent manner.
275 rug-mediated ASMase disruption sensitizes to APAP-induced liver injury.
276  of nonhematopoietic cell PAR-4 signaling to APAP hepatotoxicity.
277 LC accumulation determines susceptibility to APAP hepatotoxicity by modulating mitophagy, and imply t
278 ed mitophagy and increased susceptibility to APAP.
279 tective against, or cause susceptibility to, APAP-induced liver injury.
280 ng anti-HMGB1 neutralizing antibody to treat APAP overdose for 24-48 hours.
281 f HMGB1-specific therapy as a means to treat APAP-ALI and other inflammatory conditions.
282             Although mechanisms that trigger APAP-induced liver injury (AILI) are well known, those t
283          The molecular mechanisms underlying APAP-induced liver damage remain incompletely understood
284 o unopposed progression of liver injury upon APAP overdose.
285 33, p = 0.0086), APAP-alone-treated mice vs. APAP + neostigmine-treated mice) and histopathological s
286 /l, p = 0.0013), APAP-alone-treated mice vs. APAP + neostigmine-treated mice), inflammatory cytokine
287 uced liver injury but the mechanism by which APAP causes hepatocyte toxicity is not completely unders
288 -administered mice which are challenged with APAP.
289               Serum samples of children with APAP overdose had significant elevation of miR-122-5p, m
290                                Compared with APAP-treated wild-type mice, biomarkers of hepatocellula
291 ed and 46 were 3-fold or more decreased with APAP-TOX.
292 ignificantly decreased in dams injected with APAP, accompanied by a morphologically altered placenta.
293 f intracellular ATP without interfering with APAP bioactivation.
294                             In patients with APAP-ALF, FABP1 may have good potential to discriminate
295 y were examined in HepaRG cells treated with APAP (20 mM).
296 Subsequently, control mice were treated with APAP (350 mg/kg) followed by the beta-adrenoceptor agoni
297           In male C57BL/6J mice treated with APAP (450 mg/kg, intraperitoneally [IP]), MB (10 mg/kg,
298  HC-specific HMGB1-null HC were treated with APAP + NAC.
299 st hepatotoxicity, whereas mice treated with APAP alone developed massive centrilobular necrosis and
300 TP1B-deficient mice chronically treated with APAP.
301 +2(DeltaHep)) were given VPA with or without APAP.

 
Page Top