コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ATG should be added to myeloblative and non-myeloblative
2 ATG treatment resulted in highly significant increases o
3 ATG-exposure measures were determined with a validated p
4 ATG/G-CSF therapy was associated with relative preservat
19 nal regulator SKN-1/Nrf1, ATG-18/WIPI1/2 and ATG-16.2/ATG16L exert their function through the DAF-16/
20 IR, BEC-1/BECN1/Beclin1, ATG-18/WIPI1/2, and ATG-16.2/ATG16L all promote cell-cycle progression and a
25 phagosomes and that defects in transport and ATG-4.2-mediated maturation genetically interact to enha
26 significant increases of both IgM (for anti-ATG and anti-Neu5Gc) and IgG (for anti-ATG, -Gal, and -N
27 anti-ATG and anti-Neu5Gc) and IgG (for anti-ATG, -Gal, and -Neu5Gc), peaking at 1 month and still de
28 ibited significantly elevated titers of anti-ATG (P = 0.043) and anti-Neu5Gc (P = 0.007) IgGs in late
29 treatment were then assessed for total anti-ATG, anti-Neu5Gc, and anti-Gal antibodies using ELISA as
30 the START study to decipher the various anti-ATG specificities developed by the patients in this stud
31 ped by the patients in this study: antitotal ATG, but also antigalactose-alpha1-3-galactose (Gal) and
33 or alternative initiation of translation at ATG-40, are the predominantly expressed p53 variants in
35 Both MV and stretch first induce autophagy (ATG 5-12 [autophagy related 5-12] and LC3B-II [microtubu
38 Similar to DAF-2/IIR, BEC-1/BECN1/Beclin1, ATG-18/WIPI1/2, and ATG-16.2/ATG16L all promote cell-cyc
40 nflammation are two key pathways affected by ATG treatment, and mass spectrometry analysis identified
46 divergence also was observed to several core ATG genes, such as highly divergent ATG8 paralogs in der
50 re studies should determine whether low-dose ATG might prevent or delay the onset of type 1 diabetes.
52 o reveal alternative isoforms and downstream ATG sites, which will aid users in avoiding the expressi
53 ed autophagy by phosphorylating an essential ATG protein, Beclin 1, at serine 90, and that this phosp
54 codon is inserted downstream from the first ATG and the open reading frame is disrupted by a 1-bp in
55 lear LacZ cassette is knocked into the first ATG codon of Prom1, we confirmed that Prom1 is expressed
57 ributing factor of late graft loss following ATG induction and that anti-Neu5Gc antibodies increase o
59 h our results confirm the recommendation for ATG to be added after PBSC transplantation, no obvious b
61 itiation codon and rely on a second in-frame ATG codon to produce an enzymatically active isoform lac
63 to probe the role of autophagy-related gene (ATG)14, a PI3KC3-C1-specific subunit implicated in targe
65 characterization of autophagy-related genes (ATGs) in the wheat pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearu
66 ents received rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of the conditioning regimen (ATG group), wh
73 onal induction using antithymocyte globulin (ATG) reduces rates of acute rejection in adult kidney tr
74 radiation (TBI), and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) with or without fludarabine (FLU), followed by T-ce
75 tions of four drugs: antithymocyte globulin (ATG), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a d
76 irradiation without antithymocyte globulin (ATG), whereas the relapse risk was similar in the group
78 (n = 241) or without antithymocyte globulin (ATG; n = 491) following reduced-intensity conditioning r
79 n of antihuman T-lymphocyte immune globulin (ATG) in a myeloablative conditioning regimen for patient
80 rated that low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (2.5 mg/kg) preserved beta-cell function and reduce
81 ination of low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and pegylated granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) would preserv
82 tation (AHSCT) with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) conditioning as treatment of active multiple sclero
83 Pretreatment with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) decreases the occurrence of chronic graft-versus-ho
86 Usage and timing of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG), introduced to the conditioning to prevent graft-ve
87 ymocyte rabbit IgGs (antithymocyte globulin [ATG]) are popular immunosuppressive drugs used to preven
88 inical equivalent of antithymocyte globulin [ATG]) facilitates immune tolerance after bone marrow tra
91 ophagosomes recognize lipid droplets and how ATG proteins regulate membrane curvature for lipid dropl
93 ssing and T cell pathogenicity, and identify ATG-dependent phagocytosis in DCs as a key regulator in
95 5% CI, 65%-84%) and 68% (95% CI, 60%-78%) in ATG and BSX group, respectively, without significant dif
96 C-peptide was not significantly different in ATG+G-CSF (0.49 nmol/L/min) versus placebo (0.29 nmol/L/
97 ) regulatory T cells (Treg) were elevated in ATG+G-CSF subjects at 6, 12, and 18 but not 24 months.
99 cular events that distinguish how individual ATGs function promises to improve our understanding of t
100 d) PB1-F2, and PB1-F2 lacking the initiating ATG in mammalian and avian cells had no effect on cell a
103 show that these CIAO (cross-over insensitive ATG-out) vectors virtually eliminate leak expression.
104 ation of orf-I expression by mutation of its ATG initiation codon abolishes the infectivity of the mo
106 Here we systematically identified 41 known ATG genes in 331 species and analyzed their distribution
107 a mutated PB1-F2 start codon (i.e., lacking ATG) was 1,000-fold more virulent for BALB/c mice than a
112 compared with 16 (16%) of 97 who received no ATG (adjusted odds ratio 4.25 [95% CI 1.87-9.67]; p=0.00
116 idespread RNA foci and repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translated dipeptides, which were suppressed b
118 se sense and antisense repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation proteins accumulate most abundantl
120 eins (MBNL), undergoes repeat-associated non-ATG (RAN) translation, and potentially causes microRNA d
121 NA biogenesis and (ii) repeat associated non-ATG (RAN) translation, in which repeating transcripts ar
124 NAs and six dipeptide repeat-associated, non-ATG (RAN) proteins, but their roles in disease are uncle
125 y by the expanded RNA or dipeptides from non-ATG-initiated translation are responsible for the pathop
129 val was similar in the ATG group and the non-ATG group (59.4% [95% CI, 47.8 to 69.2] and 64.6% [95% C
132 G4C2) expansions undergo unconventional, non-ATG-dependent translation, generating toxic dipeptide re
134 gh the transcriptional regulator SKN-1/Nrf1, ATG-18/WIPI1/2 and ATG-16.2/ATG16L exert their function
135 d with steroids plus ATG, as the addition of ATG improves both response rates and graft survival.
136 e III rejection treated with the addition of ATG, and graft survival rates were significantly better
143 trials could determine whether the doses of ATG used in this trial are optimum, and could also provi
145 ther, independent losses and duplications of ATG genes have occurred throughout the fungal kingdom an
150 dge, this work presents the first example of ATG transcript regulation via 3' binding factors and exo
151 cellular cues that activate the function of ATG proteins during amino acid starvation are incomplete
152 ective analysis to investigate the impact of ATG in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysp
157 ts demonstrate a renoprotective mechanism of ATG via PP2A activation and establish PP2A as a potentia
158 posure or, in selected patients, omission of ATG may contribute to improved outcomes in pediatric CBT
161 egulated in neurons through the transport of ATG-9 by KIF1A/UNC-104 to regulate neurodevelopment.
164 ere, we define common processes dependent on ATGs, and discuss the challenges in mechanistically sepa
166 Here we demonstrate that ATG16L1 and other ATG proteins mediate protection against alpha-toxin thro
168 In the ATG group, on 64 evaluable patients, ATG was discontinued 1 (n = 27), 2 (n = 20), or > 2 days
169 should usually be treated with steroids plus ATG, as the addition of ATG improves both response rates
172 rates of acute rejection in this population, ATG appears to be safe and reasonable for HCV+ recipient
173 n rabbit ATG plus standard GVHD prophylaxis (ATG group) or standard GVHD prophylaxis alone (no ATG gr
174 ion in the cell body depends on the protease ATG-4.2, but not the related ATG-4.1, and that ATG-4.2 c
175 1B-light chain 3, autophagy-related protein (ATG)7, ATG2b, and autophagosome formation Unc-51 like ki
177 ion of conserved autophagy-related proteins (ATGs) that mediate bulk degradation of cytosolic materia
181 both types of transplant (PTCY versus PTCY + ATG) investigate their influence on patient outcomes.
182 h a slower T cell reconstitution with PTCY + ATG may limit GVHD occurrence, the quicker reconstitutio
186 t regimens: rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG)/EVR (N = 85); basiliximab (BAS)/EVR (N = 102); BAS/
190 f developing clinical or subclinical WHAE (r-ATG/EVR vs BAS/MPS hazard ratio 1.30; BAS/EVR vs BAS/MPS
192 ins are also strongly immunogenic and rabbit ATG induces serum sickness disease in almost all patient
193 method, to either pretransplantation rabbit ATG plus standard GVHD prophylaxis (ATG group) or standa
194 arms included induction therapy with rabbit ATG, mycophenolate sodium, or mycophenolate mofetil and
197 in a 1:1 ratio to receive ATG or not receive ATG, with stratification according to center and risk of
198 randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ATG or not receive ATG, with stratification according to
199 HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, adjusted odds ra
200 HCV+ recipients were less likely to receive ATG than HCV- recipients (living donor, aOR=0.640.770.91
202 SSD(+) and SSD(-) patients that had received ATG induction treatment were then assessed for total ant
203 rformed on 25 subjects: 17 subjects received ATG (2.5 mg/kg intravenously) followed by pegylated G-CS
204 ntially more common in patients who received ATG (20 [one of whom died-the only death due to an adver
205 sion was attenuated in patients who received ATG by changes in maximal intimal area (1.0 +/- 1.2 vers
206 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for ind
207 HCV- KT recipients in 1999-2016 who received ATG or interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA) for ind
208 In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to th
209 In contrast, HCV+ recipients who received ATG were at lower risk of acute rejection compared to th
213 ation of recipient HCV status with receiving ATG (versus IL2RA) using multilevel logistic regression.
219 on the protease ATG-4.2, but not the related ATG-4.1, and that ATG-4.2 can cleave LGG-1/Atg8/GABARAP
221 vered virtually all known autophagy-related (ATG) factors as well as previously uncharacterized facto
223 558 genes, including the autophagy-related (ATG) gene MoATG4, was altered in MoHMT1 deletion mutants
224 tes, and homologs of many autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been found in Arabidopsis thaliana.
225 ations in any of the core autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been reported in human patients to date.
229 , mediated by a number of autophagy-related (ATG) proteins, plays an important role in the bulk degra
231 inds a specific subset of autophagy-related (ATG) transcripts and prevents their 3' to 5' degradation
232 rs, including the protein autophagy-related (ATG)-9A and the lipid, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate
233 graded by autophagy in an AUTOPHAGY-RELATED (ATG)5-dependent manner, and this degradation is promoted
234 nt discoveries are revealing that these same ATGs orchestrate processes that are related to, and yet
238 recipients without CMV prophylaxis, a single ATG dose decreased the risk of CMV infection without inc
239 or clinical and transplant factors, a single ATG dose was associated with a lower risk of CMV infecti
240 May 21, 2015) to determine whether a single ATG dose was safe and effective in patients without CMV
241 These results suggest a model for how some ATG genes bypass the general translational suppression t
242 t type 1 diabetes is ongoing and may support ATG+G-CSF as a prevention strategy in high-risk subjects
243 G-4.2, but not the related ATG-4.1, and that ATG-4.2 can cleave LGG-1/Atg8/GABARAP from membranes.
251 two ascomycetes and deletion of FgATG11, the ATG gene with the most editing sites in Fusarium affecte
255 nfidence interval [CI], 22.1 to 46.7) in the ATG group and 68.7% (95% CI, 58.4 to 80.7) in the non-AT
256 ear relapse-free survival was similar in the ATG group and the non-ATG group (59.4% [95% CI, 47.8 to
257 l at 2 years was significantly higher in the ATG group than in the non-ATG group (36.6% vs. 16.8%, P=
259 ere included in the BSX group and 179 in the ATG group with the average age of 71.0 and 70.5 years, r
261 tivation is dependent on the function of the ATG conjugation system, which mediates LC3 lipidation.
263 t an unbiased RNA interference screen of the ATG proteome to reveal numerous noncanonical roles for A
264 nsertions in the region just upstream of the ATG start codon in the LAP varities, which might be the
267 rovide preclinical support for trials of TLI/ATG/alkylator regimens for MHC-mismatched BMT for hemogl
270 ication H3K9ac is added at promoter close to ATG and coding sequence of HvS40 after onset of senescen
273 es (duration 4-24 months) were randomized to ATG and pegylated G-CSF (ATG+G-CSF) (N = 17) or placebo
275 ns shortly after the start codons of the two ATG mRNAs are necessary for their translational regulati
280 us reactivation (EBV-R) following AHSCT with ATG for severe autoimmune conditions is an underrecogniz
281 ogic parameters are drastically altered with ATG induction, long-term clinical benefits remain unclea
287 reduced at 2 years in subjects treated with ATG (P = 0.011) and ATG/GCSF (P = 0.022) versus placebo.
288 ignificantly higher in subjects treated with ATG versus placebo (P = 0.00005) but not ATG/GCSF versus
291 without ATG (P = .001), as well as URD with ATG (P = .01), relative to haploidentical transplants.
292 etween URD without ATG (P = .21) or URD with ATG (P = .16), relative to haploidentical transplants.
296 III-IV acute GVHD was higher in URD without ATG (P = .001), as well as URD with ATG (P = .01), relat
297 g no survival difference between URD without ATG (P = .21) or URD with ATG (P = .16), relative to hap
299 , and 36% in the haploidentical, URD without ATG, and URD with ATG groups, respectively (P = .07).
300 , and 17% in the haploidentical, URD without ATG, and URD with ATG groups, respectively (P = .44).