コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 /=290 pg/mL) serum NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide).
2 nd, and biomarkers (including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide).
3 troponin T) and dysfunction (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide).
4 e, hematocrit, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide).
5 ricular ejection fraction and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
6 ore, left ventricular ejection fraction, and B-type natriuretic peptide.
7 en for C-reactive protein and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide.
8 ed preoperative end-systolic volume index or B-type natriuretic peptide.
9 ted by further adjustment for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
10 r matrix turnover), ST-2, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
11 endothelin-1, creatinine, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
12 r elevated baseline levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide.
13 imer, cardiac troponin T, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
14 measurement of the ventricular stress marker B-type natriuretic peptide.
15 tration, and 0.76 (0.60-0.93) for changes in B-type natriuretic peptide.
16 other risk factors including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
17 lated with the cardiac marker N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
18 rognostic variables including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
19 markers (including NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]).
21 ection fraction (ejection fraction=63+/-15%; B-type natriuretic peptide=431+/-366 pg/mL) was conducte
22 Secondary endpoints were quality of life, B-type natriuretic peptide, 6-min walk distance, and EF.
23 124 (69-197) ng/L, NT-proBNP (N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) 624 (307-1312) ng/L, hs-cTnI
24 troponin (83.0 vs. 28.5 ng/L; P < 0.05), and B-type natriuretic peptide (7,424.5 vs. 3,209.5 pg/mL; P
27 Patients with AF had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, endothelin-1, t
30 concentration, hemoglobin concentration, and B-type natriuretic peptide also significantly increased
31 lded modest improvement over a model without B-type natriuretic peptide and ankle-brachial index (C s
32 Patients had echocardiograms and measures of B-type natriuretic peptide and C-reactive protein before
34 ial infarction (AMI) by using N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and Global Registry of Acute
37 ncludes age, biomarkers (N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity cardiac
38 tional impairment, and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin
39 estimate the values of serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and procalcitonin and the cha
40 ence of heterogeneity between N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and saxagliptin (P for intera
41 blished biomarkers of post-MI HF: N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin T, and newly eme
42 rdial wall stress and injury (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and troponin) versus enalapri
43 use of natriuretic peptides (N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide) and rest/exercise echocardio
44 omes were (1) mean NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide) and (2) proportion of patien
45 levels of cardiac biomarkers (troponins and B-type natriuretic peptide) and cardiac dysfunction for
47 In contrast to NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and hs-TnT (high-sensitivity
48 -terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and B-type natriuretic peptide) and lower blood concentratio
50 change in primary (change in N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) and secondary (change in lef
51 eft atrial volume, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), and fibrosis biomarkers; an
52 ty troponin T (hsTnT), NT-proBNP (N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide), and growth differentiation
54 le combination of standard CVD risk factors, B-type natriuretic peptide, and ankle-brachial index (mo
55 Operative Risk Evaluation II, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and cardiac troponin T conce
56 sed plasma norepinephrine and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and chemosensitivity to hype
57 line body mass index, height, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and cystatin C, with longer
58 based on cardiac troponin I, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and d-dimer levels at baseli
60 high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity C-react
61 or conventional risk markers, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and hs-TnT, hs-TnI levels in
62 ficantly greater reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and improved clinical outcom
63 rular filtration rate, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and ischemic cause of heart
64 of angiotensin inhibition therapy, elevated B-type natriuretic peptide, and larger left ventricular
65 n, d-dimer, homoarginine, and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, and lower levels of low-dens
67 , glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and peak oxygen consumption
68 ctional class or Ross class), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and quality of life (QOL) we
69 cle ergometry, measurement of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and subjective health assess
70 tive protein, lipoprotein(a), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and transferrin), and apolip
72 sensitivity troponin and N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide], and clinical history of pri
74 oncentrations, hemoglobin concentration, and B-type natriuretic peptide are reliable alternatives to
75 retic peptide) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) are widely used to aid diagn
76 tic resonance imaging and BNP/N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, are emerging as promising in
77 rasound (28-scanning point method), and BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) assessment during supine exe
78 rement of soluble ST2 and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide at 12 hours added value to Ca
80 ive troponin-T and NT-proBNP [N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]) at baseline (pre-ERT) and 1
81 and are associated with HF more closely than B-type natriuretic peptide (AUC = 0.97 versus 0.84, p =
83 natriuretic peptides, such as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide/B-type natriuretic peptide, t
84 cted to define the association between serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) activation and survival
85 rial, we determined whether plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and cardiac troponin I
86 las Heart Study underwent measurements of 1) B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-ty
87 dy was to determine the relationship between B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and survival in patient
88 peptide (NP) family, which also includes the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the C-type natriure
90 designed to monitor daily concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and to determine how th
93 h-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations at 72 h
95 eptides are substrates of neprilysin; hence, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations rise wit
96 eptides atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in heart tissue may als
97 secrete atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in response to mechanic
99 Numerous experimental studies suggest that B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is cardioprotective; ho
100 correlation between TMAO concentrations and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (r = 0.23; p < 0
103 nators in serum by LR were troponin I (TnI), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and creatine kinase-MB
104 lated with an established biomarker for CVD, B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), and echocardiographic
105 ardiograph, a decreasing or normalization of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and hemodynamics with
107 (NPs), atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), have central roles in
109 trial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), thereby demonstrating
113 , were divided into a labeled data set (with B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] result as a marker of C
114 L/m(2) (P=0.0042) and reduced N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide by 28% (2%-47%), P=0.038.
115 ion, the levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) by 36% (32 800 +/- 24 300 ng
116 for mortality in addition to N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (C-statistic: 0.59 versus 0.6
117 in T, creatine kinase, myoglobin, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and leuk
118 tudinal changes in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), cardiac reverse remodeling,
119 n, lower expression of cardiac stress genes (B-type natriuretic peptide, collagen gene expression), l
120 (48 versus 40), higher median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (403 versus 320
121 in extracellular fluid volume, and in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (ratio of inter
122 (-5.1 to -0.8, p=0.0070), and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide concentration in plasma -970
123 as associated with NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) concentration (0.57 on a log
124 the kallikrein B locus were associated with B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations in blacks.
125 After extensive adjustments, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentrations predicted ICU
127 cretoneurin measurements, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide did not improve patient class
128 ty of disease as indicated by N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, E/E', and left atrial volume
129 ent after adjustment for age, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ejection fraction, E/E', and
130 e from baseline to week 12 in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, ejection fraction, global lo
131 ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide) and BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide), encoded by the clustered ge
132 hared HF proteins (NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide], ESM [endothelial cell-speci
133 ignificantly raised levels of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, ferritin, D-dimers, and card
134 6.2% to 27.1+/-6.6%; P=0.23), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (from 3322+/-3411 to 3672+/-5
135 ; P=0.001), and a decrease in N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (from 3672+/-5165 to 1488+/-1
137 high-sensitivity troponin T, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, growth-differentiation facto
138 elevated cardiac biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [>40 pg/mL] or troponin T [>0
139 DS(2) score >2, or NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) >=40 pmol/L and among partic
140 le ST2, >/= 500 ng/mL and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, >/= 4,500 ng/L) had higher 3
142 traditional risk factors and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio per SD incremen
143 n time, left atrium dimension, E/e', and pro B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% conf
144 0.84 to 0.99; p = 0.027) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% conf
145 CI, 1.1-1.39]) and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; hazard ratio, 1.73 [95% CI,
146 reactive protein), NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), HbA1C (glycated hemoglobin)
147 on functional class [WHO-FC], N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, hemodynamics) and lung-trans
148 ECG, coronary artery calcium, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac tro
149 ECG, coronary artery calcium, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac tro
151 sponse to LCZ696 for lowering N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; however, left atrial volume
152 We also assayed NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), hs-cTnT, CRP (C-reactive pr
154 elevation in inflammatory markers, D-dimer, B-type natriuretic peptide, IL-6, and IL-10 levels were
155 luding clinical variables and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) improved discrimination (C-s
156 ssment (11 risk factors) plus N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in terms of discrimination, c
158 11% vs. 55 +/- 10%; p < 0.001; n = 259), and B-type natriuretic peptide increased (median [interquart
159 eight loss, reduction in amino terminal, pro B-type natriuretic peptide, increased plasma renin activ
160 res of cystatin C, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), interleukin (IL)-6, and E-s
161 erum ferritin, procalcitonin, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6 level, and D-d
162 , matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40
163 , matrix metalloproteinase-3, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, interleukin-6, soluble CD40
164 after myocardial infarction, indicating that B-type natriuretic peptide is required to preserve posti
166 eraged proportional change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level from baseline to 180 da
167 se (CVD), a 10-year risk of CVD < 20%, and a B-type natriuretic peptide level greater than their gend
168 of 25% [IQR, 19%-33%]; median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level of 2049 pg/mL [IQR, 105
169 variable HR for a 1-SD higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.2
170 level, troponin T level, log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide level, fibroblast growth fact
171 water indexed for ideal body weight, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level, hemoglobin, and plasma
175 CI, 1.55-2.44), and abnormal N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels (defined as >400 pg/mL
176 currence rates in addition to an increase in B-type natriuretic peptide levels (P=0.01), C-reactive p
180 hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes, B-type natriuretic peptide levels measured at admission
181 ad NT-proBNP levels of 1000 pg/mL or more or B-type natriuretic peptide levels of 250 pg/mL or more,
182 both), in contrast to plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels that were not (area un
187 worse quality of life, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and a poorer prognosi
188 ntricular function, decreased N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and better exercise c
189 minute walk distances, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and the presence of r
193 umin had significantly higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels; in addition, early ri
194 interleukin-6) and NT-proBNP (N terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide) levels were examined in mult
195 uble receptors and NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) levels were important across
196 ejection fraction, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels, cardiac output/index
198 ss, mitral regurgitation, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, lower TAPSE, and assignment
199 nin-T) <6 ng/L and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) <100 pg/mL), and those with
201 d glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, mineralocorticoid receptor a
202 s strong as that obtained for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (multivariable HR for a 1-SD
203 oplasmin, nitrotyrosine-bound ceruloplasmin, B-type natriuretic peptide, norepinephrine, and high-sen
205 ad normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration le
206 on fraction (LVEF) >=55%, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) >=300 pg/ml.
208 was drawn for the biomarkers N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitiv
210 rdiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are at high risk
211 nship with N-terminal fragment of prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are unknown.
212 ombining microRNA panels with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) clearly improved
213 ed proportional change in the N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration fro
215 rse; however, the role of amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations am
216 sacubitril-valsartan reduces N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentrations.
218 ssess the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with
220 assess whether a reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated wit
222 on (P < .001); and had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (P < .001)
223 ronolactone and usual care on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels compared w
226 -minute walk distance, plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels, and healt
229 tivity troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) strongly predict
230 herapy (GDMT) by reducing amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was not superior
231 cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured usi
232 cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensiti
233 rs- C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiac troponin
234 ity C-reactive protein (CRP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth different
235 We studied the association of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitive t
236 edian percent change in serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity
237 ost important biomarkers were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity
238 or age, sex, body mass index, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), renal function,
239 ined whether repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T (Trop
240 ntemporary biomarkers such as N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), urine output (UO
241 igate the association between N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), which is a marke
242 To determine whether an amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-guided treatment
249 natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); and 2) body fat
250 ysfunction: C-reactive protein (CRP); NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP); troponin I; matr
251 s been questioned, and use of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) has been preferr
252 ponin T >=6 ng/L] and stress (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] >=100 pg/mL) can
254 ardiac troponin I, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), or high-sensitivity C-react
255 porated LA volume, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), or left ventricular E/e' (a
257 es showed excellent discriminative power for B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.001; 95% CI, 0.99-1.00
258 tein cholesterol (p = 0.005), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.004), and left ventric
259 sease (p = 0.003), and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (p = 0.02) than those with <=
263 .001), decrease in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; P=0.002), and lower levels o
264 nd men, as well as in the total cohort, were B-type natriuretic peptide, peak oxygen consumption by c
265 le risk model assessing 4 clinical variables-B-type natriuretic peptide, pkVO2, NYHA, and angiotensin
267 sults for soluble ST2 and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide provides early risk assessmen
269 ute kidney injury increased in parallel with B-type natriuretic peptide quartiles (5%, 9%, 15%, and 2
270 ly with hs-TnT (r = 0.44) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.39) but only weakly wi
271 = -0.24; Meng test p = 0.03), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (r = 0.56 vs. r = 0.17; Meng
272 h higher myeloperoxidase (r=0.42, P<0.0001), B-type natriuretic peptide (r=0.25, P=0.001), and asymme
274 phy, cardiomyocyte death, and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide release; all are classical ha
275 ge, diabetes, renal function, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide serum concentration, and righ
276 nation of soluble ST2 and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide showed excellent discriminati
277 ficantly from "no sepsis" for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, systemic vascular resistance
278 ationships between NT-proBNP (N-terminal Pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), systolic blood pressure, an
280 culating levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) than HF patients without AF.
281 ure, and change in NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), there was a significant in
282 x, (4) circulating NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-12, IL-
283 rement of soluble ST2 and amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to clinical parameters for ri
284 ore, left ventricular ejection fraction, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin I, and C-reactive p
285 F included the combination of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin-T, and urinary albu
286 ces were found between any 2 time points for B-type natriuretic peptide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha,
289 roponins were normal, whereas N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide was 10 times the upper limit
291 s; in addition, early rise in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was associated with a better
294 (interquartile range) concentration of BNP (B-type natriuretic peptide) was 124 (69-197) ng/L, NT-pr
297 ular function, end-systolic volume index and B-type natriuretic peptide were most strongly associated
299 V, RVESRI, and log NT-proBNP (N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide) were retained (chi(2), 62.2;