ライフサイエンスコーパス: BOD

1 BOD catalyzes the reduction of ambient O(2) to water and

2 BOD variability was best predicted by particulate OM (PO

3 of 0.1-0.5 mM (equivalent to 10-50 mg L(-1) BOD) was obtained with an estimated detection limit of 4

4 h an estimated detection limit of 4 mg L(-1) BOD.

5 aximal TD reduction of 90.35%, COD (82.11%), BOD (82.38%); TSS (88.84%), and COLR (65.77%) at 0.2 g P

6 While 78% Cr(VI), 91% Fe(III), 91% COD, 89% BOD and 73% Chloride were removed by kaolin under the sa

7 of Cr(VI) (100%), Fe(III) (98%), COD (95%), BOD (94%) and Chloride (78%) was obtained at 15 min by k

8 earlier presented application, the use as a BOD sensor was reviewed.

9 the analyte DNA and its hybridization with a BOD-labeled complementary DNA sequence, electrically con

10 iocathodes, i.e. electrocatalytically active BOD surface coverage (Gamma), heterogeneous electron tra

11 Complete aerobic BOD removal consumes 0.45 kWh and produces 153 g of soli

12 ations: COD (r = -0.84), TS (r = -0.83), and BOD (r = -0.81), while DO exhibited highest negative cor

13 effluents (according to high BOD(5)/COD and BOD(5)/TOC ratios) and improved results in terms of redu

14 emical and biological oxygen demand (COD and BOD) in the aquatic systems into which they are discharg

15 d solids, Suspended solids, Density, COD and BOD.

16 ction of 86.48% from 2000 to 270.4 mg/L, and BOD was declined up to 97.7% from 1095.5 to 25.03 mg/L.

17 10(9) kg/yr each of phosphorus, nitrogen and BOD are produced.

18 dentity with CotA from Bacillus subtilis and BOD from Myrothecium verrucaria, respectively, shows hig

19 deline was subsequently endorsed by the ASCO BOD.

20 robic digestion, can potentially remove both BOD and nitrogen with an energy surplus of 0.17 kWh and

21 for the adsorption of Cr(VI), Fe(III), COD, BOD, and chloride from tannery wastewater were investiga

22 to global organic pollution parameters (COD, BOD, and TOC).

23 orrelate with the same WWTP variables (5-day BOD, flow, ammonia, total phosphorous and suspended soli

24 event sampling of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in samples collected from the outfall of stormwater

25 tor for measuring biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) using Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UICC Y-181.

26 n Demand (COD) and Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD)) significantly overestimated population due to nonh

27 phorus, nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and fecal coliform pollution from human excreta fo

28 en (DO), salinity, biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), electrical conductiv

29 lutants including biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN) and total suspended solids (TS

30 ended solids), COD (chemical oxygen demand), BOD (biochemical oxygen demand), and COLR (color) from A

31 tate and determine biological oxygen demand, BOD), that uniquely enables automated oxygen measurement

32 (g influent 5 day biochemical oxygen demand; BOD(5))(-1) [0.6-9.9 x 10(-2) g CH(4) (g BOD(5))(-1); 10

33 Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors (BOD) approved a policy and a set of procedures for endor

34 ociety of America (IDSA) Board of Directors (BOD) decided to develop a 2019 IDSA Strategic Plan.

35 population estimates had high RSD (>44%) for BOD, COD, and ammonium between sites, suggesting that th

36 BF for BOD POD - HW and -3.0% to 1.7% BF for BOD POD - DXA, are likely due in part to differences in

37 ions among study means, -4.0% to 1.9% BF for BOD POD - HW and -3.0% to 1.7% BF for BOD POD - DXA, are

38 centrifugation and consequently employed for BOD-ErGO biocathode preparation.

39 identify an optimal charge density of GO for BOD-ErGO composite preparation, several GO fractions dif

40 3.6 mg/L, +/- 1.3 mg/L, and +/- 9.5 mg/L for BOD, TN and TSS respectively.

41 le to those made using a standard method for BOD measurement.

42 nd; BOD(5))(-1) [0.6-9.9 x 10(-2) g CH(4) (g BOD(5))(-1); 10th/90th percentiles; mean 5.7 x 10(-2) g

43 th percentiles; mean 5.7 x 10(-2) g CH(4) (g BOD(5))(-1)].

44 y labeled GTP analogue, BODIPY-FL GTPgammaS (BOD-GTPgammaS), that binds to the alpha subunit of trans

45 cing degradable effluents (according to high BOD(5)/COD and BOD(5)/TOC ratios) and improved results i

46 The IDSA BOD has invested in strategic planning at regular interv

47 ity of 58 +/- 27 mg/L COD and 25 +/- 12 mg/L BOD(5) at temperatures ranging from 12.7 to 31.5 degrees

48 This makes BOD from B. pumilus an attractive new candidate for appl

49 atalysis, an electrode modified with the new BOD is more stable, and has a higher tolerance towards N

50 The binding of BOD-GTPgammaS occurs without a change in the intrinsic t

51 The rhodopsin-dependent binding of BOD-GTPgammaS to alpha(T) is slow, relative to the rate

52 , these findings suggest that the binding of BOD-GTPgammaS to transducin causes it to adopt a distinc

53 t catalytically to stimulate the exchange of BOD-GTPgammaS for GDP on multiple alpha(T) subunits.

54 not only leads to a favorable orientation of BOD as validated by fitting a kinetic model to the elect

55 hest kS of (79.4+/-4.6)s(-1) was observed on BOD-GO composite having different negative charge densit

56 a of (23.6+/-0.9)pmolcm(-2) were obtained on BOD-GO composite having the same moderate negative charg

57 The ring was coated with bilirubin oxidase (BOD) "wired" with PAA-PVI-[Os(4,4'-dichloro-2,2'-bipyrid

58 When integrated with bilirubin oxidase (BOD) and single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), the AuN

59 hydrogenase (PQQ-GDH) and bilirubin oxidase (BOD) at anode and cathode, respectively, in the biofuel

60 For the cathode bilirubin oxidase (BOD) has been immobilized on PQQ-modified electrodes.

61 showed that an effective bilirubin oxidase (BOD)-based biocathode using graphene oxide (GO) could be

62 erized as a new bacterial bilirubin oxidase (BOD).

63 rseradish peroxidase with bilirubin oxidase (BOD).

64 ion estimates using hydrochemical parameters BOD, COD, and dissolved ammonia were evaluated for accur

65 0-23)%, and 35 (23-47)% (mean and 95% range) BOD, nitrogen, phosphorus, and fecal coliforms, respecti

66 sible for only 8.0% and 13.1% of the model's BOD and TN output sensitivities respectively.

67 ts were responsible for 92.4% of the model's BOD output sensitivity and 92.8% of the model's TSS outp

68 on of rhodopsin and Gbetagamma from alpha(T)-BOD-GTPgammaS complexes, relative to their rates of diss

69 The BOD looks forward to developing, implementing, assessing

70 stimation of approximate 2-3% BF by both the BOD POD and HW.

71 ember 1995 and August 2001 that compared the BOD POD method (Life Measurement, Inc, Concord, CA) with

72 Few studies have compared the BOD POD with multicompartment models; those that have su

73 tary DNA sequence, electrically connects the BOD label to the electron-conducting redox polymer, whic

74 Moreover, the BOD sensor showed good tolerance against the presence of

75 Nevertheless, the BOD-GTPgammaS-bound alpha(T) subunit is able to bind wit

76 Excellent reproducibility of the BOD sensor was shown with an RSD of 0.9%.

77 Placing the BOD in contact with the redox polymer thus converts the

78 verage of the study means indicates that the BOD POD and HW agree within 1% body fat (BF) for adults

79 at (BF) for adults and children, whereas the BOD POD and DXA agree within 1% BF for adults and 2% BF

80 uring the first flush of runoff, even though BOD concentrations vary both among and within sites in r

81 The sensor was applied to BOD measurements of the water from a lake at the Univers

82 r tolerance towards NaCl, than a T. tsunodae BOD modified electrode.

83 e current obtained with Trachyderma tsunodae BOD.

84 e drop was O(2) at 1 atm pressure, the wired BOD disk scavenged the O(2) so effectively that the gluc