コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 CPAP (centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein) was pr
2 CPAP (MCPH6) and STIL (MCPH7) are required for centriole
3 CPAP adherence was ensured by continuous supervision.
4 CPAP corrected OSA and hypoxemia (RDI: 42 +/- 4 vs. 4 +/
5 CPAP improved objective sleepiness (p=0.024), mobility (
6 CPAP is an important therapy in OSA patients undergoing
7 CPAP is safe and improves respiratory rate in a non-tert
8 CPAP machines were allocated to one hospital during each
9 CPAP or no therapy while maintaining usual blood pressur
10 CPAP reduced baseline mean arterial pressure (94 +/- 2 v
11 CPAP reduced ESS by 2.1 points (95% CI -3.0 to -1.3; p<0
12 CPAP reduced GFR (124 +/- 8 ml/min vs. 110 +/- 6 ml/min,
13 CPAP therapy resulted in higher AF-free survival rate (7
14 CPAP therapy was associated with improved renal hemodyna
15 CPAP tracking systems are able to reliably track CPAP ad
16 CPAP treatment improves quality of life (QoL) in men wit
17 CPAP treatment is accompanied by changes in cardiovascul
18 CPAP usage can be reliably determined from CPAP tracking
19 CPAP was associated with modest improvement in sleep-rel
20 CPAP was more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP
21 CPAP with surfactant but without any positive pressure v
22 CPAP-30 worsened markers of potential epithelial cell da
23 52 protein interacts with Sak/Plk4 and Sas-4/CPAP and is required for centriole duplication, although
24 nd SAS-5/Ana2/STIL, which then recruit SAS-4/CPAP, which in turn helps assemble the outer centriole m
25 by either bubble CPAP (5 L/min starting at a CPAP level of 5 cm H2O), standard low-flow nasal cannula
26 ether, our results indicate that CEP120 is a CPAP-interacting protein that positively regulates centr
27 tations [Y254L/T257A (YLTA) and C186P/A220P (CPAP)] stabilize the naturally occuring AR domain of hum
33 eding the observed median (>4.5 mm Hg) after CPAP, which were not present in the nonresponder group (
35 oxygen virtually abolished the BP rise after CPAP withdrawal and, compared with air, significantly re
36 s more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP AHI, 4.5 +/- 6.6/h; MAD AHI, 11.1 +/- 12.1/h; P < 0
38 of CEP135(full) binding proteins (SAS-6 and CPAP) and the pericentriolar localization of gamma-tubul
39 how that centrobin interacts with CEP152 and CPAP, and the centrobin-CPAP interaction is critical for
41 ffer significantly between the high-flow and CPAP groups (15.5% and 11.5%, respectively; risk differe
42 n, adherence to a regimen of weight loss and CPAP may result in incremental reductions in blood press
43 ere similar after 1 month of optimal MAD and CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSA.
44 the effectiveness of three years of NIV and CPAP on structural and functional echocardiographic chan
52 termittent positive pressure ventilation and CPAP, both when used as primary support and as postextub
53 nt and WT proteins reveals that the YLTA and CPAP consensus mutations cause unexpected long-range eff
54 ts with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP combined with a weight-loss intervention did not re
55 10 were diagnosed with OSA and classified as CPAP-treated (adherence >/= 4 h/d) or untreated (adheren
56 nd leak data are not as easy to interpret as CPAP usage and the definitions of these parameters diffe
59 reatment or a healthy habit assessment, auto-CPAP titration (for CPAP indication), health-related qua
60 There was no significant difference between CPAP and MADs in their association with change in SBP (-
61 to determine the differential effect between CPAP and NIV.Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1
63 in pulmonary acute lung injury, whereas both CPAP-30 and STEP-30/30 yielded endothelial injury in ext
66 children to receive oxygen therapy by bubble CPAP, 67 (30%) to low-flow oxygen therapy, and 79 (35%)
67 a to receive oxygen therapy by either bubble CPAP (5 L/min starting at a CPAP level of 5 cm H2O), sta
70 ldren, of whom five (6%) had received bubble CPAP, 16 (24%) had received low-flow oxygen therapy, and
71 ure was noted between patients in the bubble CPAP and those in the high-flow oxygen therapy group (RR
72 Significantly fewer children in the bubble CPAP group had treatment failure than in the low-flow ox
73 the low-flow oxygen group than in the bubble CPAP group, and we acknowledge that the early cessation
75 to test the feasibility of scaling up bubble CPAP in district hospitals and to improve bubble CPAP de
76 owever, there are no standards for capturing CPAP adherence data, scoring flow signals, or measuring
77 he CPAP binding site, could restore cellular CPAP levels in centrobin-depleted cells, indicating that
79 d cells restored the cellular and centriolar CPAP expression, suggesting its ubiquitination and prote
82 acts with CEP152 and CPAP, and the centrobin-CPAP interaction is critical for centriole duplication.
83 ed MADs with an inactive control, 1 compared CPAP with an MAD, and 3 compared CPAP, MADs, and an inac
85 in the analysis (4888 patients), 44 compared CPAP with an inactive control, 3 compared MADs with an i
88 or on treatment with MAD compared with CPAP (CPAP-MAD difference, 0.2 mm Hg [95% confidence interval,
89 at loss of centrobin expression destabilizes CPAP and triggers its degradation to restrict the centri
93 ther via a thin endotracheal catheter during CPAP-assisted spontaneous breathing (intervention group)
94 Women were randomized to receive effective CPAP therapy (n = 151) or conservative treatment (n = 15
97 (1:1) into parallel groups to receive either CPAP with best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone for 12
99 y habit assessment, auto-CPAP titration (for CPAP indication), health-related quality-of-life questio
100 CPAP usage can be reliably determined from CPAP tracking systems, but the residual events (apnea/hy
102 nd 24 patients (2%) in the control group had CPAP-related adverse events, such as vomiting, aspiratio
104 atients with OSA and resistant hypertension, CPAP treatment for 12 weeks compared with control result
112 ASQ score (-17.8 vs. -24.7; P = 0.018), less CPAP use (4.5 vs. 5.3 hours per night; P = 0.04), and lo
114 cannulae was noninferior to the use of nasal CPAP, with treatment failure occurring in 52 of 152 infa
117 ed with 180 of 490 infants assigned to nasal CPAP (36.7%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence
120 cannulae failed could be treated with nasal CPAP; infants in whom nasal CPAP failed were reintubated
122 CPAP throughout, whereas on the other night, CPAP was reduced only in REM sleep, allowing REM OSA to
125 In patients with prediabetes, 8-hour nightly CPAP treatment for 2 weeks improves glucose metabolism c
126 o determine the comparative efficacy of NIV, CPAP, and lifestyle modification (control group) using d
127 6.5% were randomized to CPAP (n = 26) or no CPAP (control; n = 24), while their usual medication for
131 ls of CEP152, it caused the disappearance of CPAP from both the preexisting and newly formed centriol
132 f centrobin also caused the disappearance of CPAP from both the preexisting and newly synthesized cen
134 , we compared the effects of 1 month each of CPAP and MAD treatment on cardiovascular and neurobehavi
135 ized clinical trials comparing the effect of CPAP or MADs (vs each other or an inactive control) on B
138 ults may be explained by greater efficacy of CPAP being offset by inferior compliance relative to MAD
139 ficant positive correlation between hours of CPAP use and the decrease in 24-hour mean blood pressure
141 e examined asthma outcomes after 6 months of CPAP in 99 adult asthma patients (mean age 57 years) wit
142 men with moderate or severe OSA, 3 months of CPAP therapy improved QoL, mood state, anxiety and depre
143 Interestingly, exogenous overexpression of CPAP in the centrobin-depleted cells did not restore CPA
149 teraction is critical for the recruitment of CPAP to procentrioles to promote the elongation of daugh
151 h-flow nasal cannulae was similar to that of CPAP as respiratory support for very preterm infants aft
152 e a pressure-time product similar to that of CPAP-30; and 3) stepwise airway pressure increase (5 cm
154 ATION: In the unadjusted analysis the use of CPAP did not decrease all-cause 2-week mortality in chil
157 Forced overexpression of either CEP120 or CPAP not only induced the assembly of overly long centri
161 ptimally controlled type 2 diabetes and OSA, CPAP treatment for 6 months resulted in improved glycemi
165 erular pressure) were measured pre- and post-CPAP using inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance tech
168 o nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a means of respiratory support for newborn infa
169 lthough continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can mitigate these risks, effectiveness can be red
170 nd that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with sham was significantly associated wi
172 fits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea (O
173 o nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for noninvasive respiratory support of very preter
175 bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improved outcomes compared with standard low-flow
181 d using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem
182 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of patients with OSA on renal hemodynamics at base
183 NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on cardiac structure and function assessed by echo
184 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
185 ts with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) preserves surfactant and keeps the lung open but i
186 AP), 3) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) rather than noninvasive ventilation be offered as
189 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in
190 olonged continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with supplemental oxygen was also associat
191 onse to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment is highly variable and could be associat
192 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure in patients with resis
194 making, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or a healthy habit assessment, auto-CPAP
195 rant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, submitted to DISE between June 1, 2013,
196 IV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients with OHS, information regarding ef
197 f nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) when used as postextubation support in neonates.
198 , after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) withdrawal in patients with moderate to severe OSA
199 mine if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a form of non-invasive ventilation, decreases all
200 nt with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a weight-loss intervention, or CPAP plus a weight
201 OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but its value in patients without daytime sleepin
202 tion of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which remains a primary therapeutic approach for
203 r nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)--at the time of the first use of noninvasive respi
206 and Klebsiella OTUs) and need for prolonged CPAP oxygen signal increased risk of NEC in presymptomat
207 by interacting with the centrosomal protein CPAP, negatively regulates CPAP-dependent peri-centriola
209 centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein (CPAP), achieved by its degradation at mitosis, is consid
210 Centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein (CPAP), centrosomal protein of 152 kDa (CEP152), and cent
212 y in patients who did versus did not receive CPAP (18.1% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidenc
214 140 patients were allocated to and received CPAP plus BSC and 138 were allocated to and received BSC
216 tervention group than in the group receiving CPAP only, but there were no significant differences in
217 at 12 weeks was lower in the group receiving CPAP than in the control group (-2.4 mm Hg; 95% confiden
218 ntrosomal protein CPAP, negatively regulates CPAP-dependent peri-centriolar material recruitment, and
219 igh-flow therapy failed could receive rescue CPAP; infants in whom CPAP failed were intubated and mec
224 ous positive airway pressure for 30 seconds (CPAP-30); 2) stepwise airway pressure increase (5 cm H2O
226 annulae are noninferior to or no better than CPAP when used to support preterm infants after extubati
227 y higher incidence of treatment failure than CPAP when used in nontertiary special care nurseries as
228 he basis of these results, we recommend that CPAP treatment should be offered routinely to older pati
233 ower in the nasal-cannulae group than in the CPAP group (P=0.01), but there were no significant diffe
234 roup and in 38 of 373 infants (10.2%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 10.3 percentage points; 95%
235 roup and in 38 of 286 infants (13.3%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 12.3 percentage points; 95%
236 group and in 27 of 338 infants (8.0%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 6.5 percentage points; 95%
237 roup and in 39 of 151 infants (25.8%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 8.4 percentage points; 95%
240 , IL-6, and adiponectin also improved in the CPAP group compared with the control group after 6 month
241 at the 12-week follow-up was greater in the CPAP group than in the control group (35.9% vs 21.6%; ad
242 , the odds ratio for 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was 0.4 in children
243 important variables, 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was significantly de
244 37 serious adverse events occurred in the CPAP group, and 22 in BSC group; all were independently
245 ortality was ten (3%) of 374 patients in the CPAP group, and 24 (7%) of 359 patients in the control g
246 r enrolment, 26 (3%) of 1021 patients in the CPAP group, and 44 (4%) of 1160 patients in the control
248 iod were compared between groups by ITT, the CPAP group achieved a greater decrease in 24-hour mean b
249 obin, but not its mutant form that lacks the CPAP binding site, could restore cellular CPAP levels in
251 be performed examining the usefulness of the CPAP tracking systems and how these systems affect OSA o
255 ts in human disease and also reveal that the CPAP-STIL interaction constitutes a conserved key step i
257 ormally consolidated with use of therapeutic CPAP throughout, whereas on the other night, CPAP was re
258 continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) but were dissatisfied with it (n = 56), were studi
260 score <10) were randomized to auto-titrating CPAP (n = 122) or no positive airway pressure (n = 122).
267 w therapy was not shown to be noninferior to CPAP and resulted in a significantly higher incidence of
268 qual to or exceeding 6.5% were randomized to CPAP (n = 26) or no CPAP (control; n = 24), while their
272 tion of S428 promotes the binding of STIL to CPAP, linking the cartwheel to microtubules of the centr
273 imilar amounts, although MAD was superior to CPAP for improving four general quality-of-life domains.
275 me-independent accumulation of ubiquitinated CPAP and abnormal, ubiquitin-positive, elongated centrio
276 that centrobin interacts with ubiquitinated CPAP and prevents its degradation for normal centriole e
277 25590163
279 diovascular risk reduction in those who used CPAP for >/=4 versus <4 hours per night or did not recei
284 "CPAP users" the remaining 30 patients were "CPAP nonusers." The recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhyt
286 d could receive rescue CPAP; infants in whom CPAP failed were intubated and mechanically ventilated.
288 he treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP, but not nocturnal supplemental oxygen, resulted in
290 inferior on treatment with MAD compared with CPAP (CPAP-MAD difference, 0.2 mm Hg [95% confidence int
299 e to 35.3 +/- 1.33 mm Hg at three years with CPAP, and from 41.5 +/- 1.56 mm Hg to 35.5 +/- 1.42 with