戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              CPAP (centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein) was pr
2                                              CPAP (MCPH6) and STIL (MCPH7) are required for centriole
3                                              CPAP adherence was ensured by continuous supervision.
4                                              CPAP corrected OSA and hypoxemia (RDI: 42 +/- 4 vs. 4 +/
5                                              CPAP improved objective sleepiness (p=0.024), mobility (
6                                              CPAP is an important therapy in OSA patients undergoing
7                                              CPAP is safe and improves respiratory rate in a non-tert
8                                              CPAP machines were allocated to one hospital during each
9                                              CPAP or no therapy while maintaining usual blood pressur
10                                              CPAP reduced baseline mean arterial pressure (94 +/- 2 v
11                                              CPAP reduced ESS by 2.1 points (95% CI -3.0 to -1.3; p<0
12                                              CPAP reduced GFR (124 +/- 8 ml/min vs. 110 +/- 6 ml/min,
13                                              CPAP therapy resulted in higher AF-free survival rate (7
14                                              CPAP therapy was associated with improved renal hemodyna
15                                              CPAP tracking systems are able to reliably track CPAP ad
16                                              CPAP treatment improves quality of life (QoL) in men wit
17                                              CPAP treatment is accompanied by changes in cardiovascul
18                                              CPAP usage can be reliably determined from CPAP tracking
19                                              CPAP was associated with modest improvement in sleep-rel
20                                              CPAP was more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP
21                                              CPAP with surfactant but without any positive pressure v
22                                              CPAP-30 worsened markers of potential epithelial cell da
23 52 protein interacts with Sak/Plk4 and Sas-4/CPAP and is required for centriole duplication, although
24 nd SAS-5/Ana2/STIL, which then recruit SAS-4/CPAP, which in turn helps assemble the outer centriole m
25 by either bubble CPAP (5 L/min starting at a CPAP level of 5 cm H2O), standard low-flow nasal cannula
26 ether, our results indicate that CEP120 is a CPAP-interacting protein that positively regulates centr
27 tations [Y254L/T257A (YLTA) and C186P/A220P (CPAP)] stabilize the naturally occuring AR domain of hum
28                                Additionally, CPAP treatment significantly altered a total of 47 plasm
29                                     Adequate CPAP treatment seems to reduce this risk.
30 A at baseline and after 3 months of adherent CPAP use.
31 tile range, -31.0 to -16.3; P < 0.001) after CPAP withdrawal.
32 come was the change in home morning BP after CPAP withdrawal for 14 nights, oxygen versus air.
33 eding the observed median (>4.5 mm Hg) after CPAP, which were not present in the nonresponder group (
34 fferent than in the control group only after CPAP compliance adjustment.
35 oxygen virtually abolished the BP rise after CPAP withdrawal and, compared with air, significantly re
36 s more efficacious than MAD in reducing AHI (CPAP AHI, 4.5 +/- 6.6/h; MAD AHI, 11.1 +/- 12.1/h; P < 0
37 definitions of these parameters differ among CPAP manufacturers.
38  of CEP135(full) binding proteins (SAS-6 and CPAP) and the pericentriolar localization of gamma-tubul
39 how that centrobin interacts with CEP152 and CPAP, and the centrobin-CPAP interaction is critical for
40 s including PLK4, CEP192, CEP152, CEP63, and CPAP.
41 ffer significantly between the high-flow and CPAP groups (15.5% and 11.5%, respectively; risk differe
42 n, adherence to a regimen of weight loss and CPAP may result in incremental reductions in blood press
43 ere similar after 1 month of optimal MAD and CPAP treatment in patients with moderate-severe OSA.
44  the effectiveness of three years of NIV and CPAP on structural and functional echocardiographic chan
45 c parameters improved similarly with NIV and CPAP relative to the control.
46                                      NIV and CPAP therapies similarly improved left ventricular diast
47                                      NIV and CPAP were more effective than lifestyle modification in
48 condary effects were similar between NIV and CPAP.
49 invited, based on their expertise in OSA and CPAP monitoring.
50 effects of nocturnal supplemental oxygen and CPAP on markers of cardiovascular risk.
51 es the stable incorporation of both STIL and CPAP into the centriole.
52 termittent positive pressure ventilation and CPAP, both when used as primary support and as postextub
53 nt and WT proteins reveals that the YLTA and CPAP consensus mutations cause unexpected long-range eff
54 ts with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP combined with a weight-loss intervention did not re
55 10 were diagnosed with OSA and classified as CPAP-treated (adherence >/= 4 h/d) or untreated (adheren
56 nd leak data are not as easy to interpret as CPAP usage and the definitions of these parameters diffe
57       Here we show that Cenpj, also known as CPAP, a microcephaly gene, is a transcriptional target o
58 ibility was quantified as the ventilation at CPAP of 0 cmH2O.
59 reatment or a healthy habit assessment, auto-CPAP titration (for CPAP indication), health-related qua
60  There was no significant difference between CPAP and MADs in their association with change in SBP (-
61 to determine the differential effect between CPAP and NIV.Measurements and Main Results: A total of 1
62  patients with obstructive sleep apnea, both CPAP and MADs were associated with reductions in BP.
63 in pulmonary acute lung injury, whereas both CPAP-30 and STEP-30/30 yielded endothelial injury in ext
64       Children who received oxygen by bubble CPAP had significantly lower rates of death than the chi
65           Oxygen therapy delivered by bubble CPAP improved outcomes in Bangladeshi children with very
66 children to receive oxygen therapy by bubble CPAP, 67 (30%) to low-flow oxygen therapy, and 79 (35%)
67 a to receive oxygen therapy by either bubble CPAP (5 L/min starting at a CPAP level of 5 cm H2O), sta
68  in district hospitals and to improve bubble CPAP delivery technology.
69                                Use of bubble CPAP oxygen therapy could have a large effect in hospita
70 ldren, of whom five (6%) had received bubble CPAP, 16 (24%) had received low-flow oxygen therapy, and
71 ure was noted between patients in the bubble CPAP and those in the high-flow oxygen therapy group (RR
72   Significantly fewer children in the bubble CPAP group had treatment failure than in the low-flow ox
73 the low-flow oxygen group than in the bubble CPAP group, and we acknowledge that the early cessation
74       Three (4%) children died in the bubble CPAP group, ten (15%) children died in the low-flow oxyg
75 to test the feasibility of scaling up bubble CPAP in district hospitals and to improve bubble CPAP de
76 owever, there are no standards for capturing CPAP adherence data, scoring flow signals, or measuring
77 he CPAP binding site, could restore cellular CPAP levels in centrobin-depleted cells, indicating that
78 ly protein Cep63, required to localize CENPJ/CPAP/Sas-4, a final common target.
79 d cells restored the cellular and centriolar CPAP expression, suggesting its ubiquitination and prote
80  cells led to the reappearance of centriolar CPAP.
81            Hence, we conclude that centrobin-CPAP interaction is critical for the recruitment of CPAP
82 acts with CEP152 and CPAP, and the centrobin-CPAP interaction is critical for centriole duplication.
83 ed MADs with an inactive control, 1 compared CPAP with an MAD, and 3 compared CPAP, MADs, and an inac
84  1 compared CPAP with an MAD, and 3 compared CPAP, MADs, and an inactive control.
85 in the analysis (4888 patients), 44 compared CPAP with an inactive control, 3 compared MADs with an i
86           Compared with an inactive control, CPAP was associated with a reduction in SBP of 2.5 mm Hg
87                                  Conversely, CPAP was undetectable in centrobin-depleted cells, sugge
88 or on treatment with MAD compared with CPAP (CPAP-MAD difference, 0.2 mm Hg [95% confidence interval,
89 at loss of centrobin expression destabilizes CPAP and triggers its degradation to restrict the centri
90 ly higher rate of treatment failure than did CPAP.
91 respiratory functional improvements than did CPAP.
92 ally abolished the rise in morning BP during CPAP withdrawal.
93 ther via a thin endotracheal catheter during CPAP-assisted spontaneous breathing (intervention group)
94   Women were randomized to receive effective CPAP therapy (n = 151) or conservative treatment (n = 15
95 e and mean arterial pressure than did either CPAP or weight loss alone.
96  group) or, in addition to education, either CPAP or nocturnal supplemental oxygen.
97 (1:1) into parallel groups to receive either CPAP with best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone for 12
98 -to-treat analysis, although adjustments for CPAP and NIV compliance were also analyzed.
99 y habit assessment, auto-CPAP titration (for CPAP indication), health-related quality-of-life questio
100   CPAP usage can be reliably determined from CPAP tracking systems, but the residual events (apnea/hy
101 alt balance pre- and post-CPAP therapy (>4 h CPAP use/night for 1 mo).
102 nd 24 patients (2%) in the control group had CPAP-related adverse events, such as vomiting, aspiratio
103 e effect was greater in patients with higher CPAP usage or higher baseline ESS.
104 atients with OSA and resistant hypertension, CPAP treatment for 12 weeks compared with control result
105 ate in their own care, and doing so improves CPAP compliance.
106 n and explain how a microcephaly mutation in CPAP compromises complex formation.
107               AF recurrence following PVI in CPAP nonuser patients was significantly higher (HR: 2.4,
108                Depletion of CEP120 inhibited CPAP-induced centriole elongation and vice versa, implyi
109         In extrapulmonary acute lung injury, CPAP-30 and STEP-30/30 increased vascular cell adhesion
110              In pulmonary acute lung injury, CPAP-30 yielded lower surfactant protein-B and higher ty
111 roviders need to understand how to interpret CPAP adherence tracking data.
112 ASQ score (-17.8 vs. -24.7; P = 0.018), less CPAP use (4.5 vs. 5.3 hours per night; P = 0.04), and lo
113          A 1-hour-per-night increase in mean CPAP use was associated with an additional reduction in
114 cannulae was noninferior to the use of nasal CPAP, with treatment failure occurring in 52 of 152 infa
115 cannulae (5 to 6 liters per minute) or nasal CPAP (7 cm of water) after extubation.
116 with either nasal high-flow therapy or nasal CPAP.
117 ed with 180 of 490 infants assigned to nasal CPAP (36.7%) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence
118 eated with nasal CPAP; infants in whom nasal CPAP failed were reintubated.
119 pport with nasal IPPV as compared with nasal CPAP.
120  cannulae failed could be treated with nasal CPAP; infants in whom nasal CPAP failed were reintubated
121                                        Newer CPAP machines can track adherence, hours of use, mask le
122 CPAP throughout, whereas on the other night, CPAP was reduced only in REM sleep, allowing REM OSA to
123 and were randomly assigned to either nightly CPAP as add-on therapy or no CPAP.
124 ly assigned to receive either 8-hour nightly CPAP (n = 26) or oral placebo (n = 13).
125 In patients with prediabetes, 8-hour nightly CPAP treatment for 2 weeks improves glucose metabolism c
126 o determine the comparative efficacy of NIV, CPAP, and lifestyle modification (control group) using d
127  6.5% were randomized to CPAP (n = 26) or no CPAP (control; n = 24), while their usual medication for
128 omly assigned to receive CPAP (n = 98) or no CPAP (control; n = 96).
129  either nightly CPAP as add-on therapy or no CPAP.
130 of centrioles due to massive accumulation of CPAP in the cell.
131 ls of CEP152, it caused the disappearance of CPAP from both the preexisting and newly formed centriol
132 f centrobin also caused the disappearance of CPAP from both the preexisting and newly synthesized cen
133               We show that the TCP domain of CPAP constitutes a novel proline recognition domain that
134 , we compared the effects of 1 month each of CPAP and MAD treatment on cardiovascular and neurobehavi
135 ized clinical trials comparing the effect of CPAP or MADs (vs each other or an inactive control) on B
136                    Common adverse effects of CPAP and MADs included oral or nasal dryness, irritation
137  characteristics and the reported effects of CPAP vs inactive control.
138 ults may be explained by greater efficacy of CPAP being offset by inferior compliance relative to MAD
139 ficant positive correlation between hours of CPAP use and the decrease in 24-hour mean blood pressure
140                       However, the impact of CPAP therapy on PVI outcome in patients with OSA is poor
141 e examined asthma outcomes after 6 months of CPAP in 99 adult asthma patients (mean age 57 years) wit
142 men with moderate or severe OSA, 3 months of CPAP therapy improved QoL, mood state, anxiety and depre
143   Interestingly, exogenous overexpression of CPAP in the centrobin-depleted cells did not restore CPA
144 ughter centrioles and for the persistence of CPAP on preexisting mother centrioles.
145 pleted cells, indicating that persistence of CPAP requires its interaction with centrobin.
146         Genetic and chemical perturbation of CPAP-tubulin interaction activates extra centrosomes to
147                      Routine prescription of CPAP to patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA did not sig
148                        AF recurrence rate of CPAP-treated patients was similar to a group of patients
149 teraction is critical for the recruitment of CPAP to procentrioles to promote the elongation of daugh
150       Our study indicates that regulation of CPAP levels on the centrioles by centrobin is critical f
151 h-flow nasal cannulae was similar to that of CPAP as respiratory support for very preterm infants aft
152 e a pressure-time product similar to that of CPAP-30; and 3) stepwise airway pressure increase (5 cm
153                                    Trials of CPAP and other treatments have not established whether t
154 ATION: In the unadjusted analysis the use of CPAP did not decrease all-cause 2-week mortality in chil
155                                       Add-on CPAP therapy resulted in no significant changes in 24-ho
156                                       Add-on CPAP treatment had no significant changes in 24-hour BP
157    Forced overexpression of either CEP120 or CPAP not only induced the assembly of overly long centri
158 ssure (CPAP), a weight-loss intervention, or CPAP plus a weight-loss intervention for 24 weeks.
159 tions as compared with either weight loss or CPAP alone.
160 o treatment with either high-flow therapy or CPAP.
161 ptimally controlled type 2 diabetes and OSA, CPAP treatment for 6 months resulted in improved glycemi
162         Screening for compounds that perturb CPAP-tubulin interaction led to the identification of CC
163                                         Post-CPAP demonstrated a blunted GFR response (-9 +/- 3 ml/mi
164 e studied in high-salt balance pre- and post-CPAP therapy (>4 h CPAP use/night for 1 mo).
165 erular pressure) were measured pre- and post-CPAP using inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance tech
166                               A singular pre-CPAP treatment cluster of 3 plasma miRNAs predicts blood
167         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and mandibular advancement device (MAD) therapy ar
168 o nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a means of respiratory support for newborn infa
169 lthough continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can mitigate these risks, effectiveness can be red
170 nd that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compared with sham was significantly associated wi
171 (SASQ), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) compliance, and physician decision making.
172 fits of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea (O
173 o nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for noninvasive respiratory support of very preter
174 nt with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has metabolic benefits.
175  bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improved outcomes compared with standard low-flow
176         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in asthma patients with concomitant obstructive sl
177         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the treatment of choice for obstruct
178         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice in patients with sympto
179 apeutic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) levels.
180 tolerate continous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines or intraoral devices.
181 d using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) manipulations indicated that the hypnotic zolpidem
182 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of patients with OSA on renal hemodynamics at base
183 NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on cardiac structure and function assessed by echo
184 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on glycemic control in patients with diabetes.
185 ts with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) preserves surfactant and keeps the lung open but i
186 AP), 3) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) rather than noninvasive ventilation be offered as
187         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces blood pressure, but adherence is often sub
188         Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the most common treatment used for obst
189 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in
190 olonged continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with supplemental oxygen was also associat
191 onse to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment is highly variable and could be associat
192 fect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on blood pressure in patients with resis
193 role of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on this association.
194 making, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment or a healthy habit assessment, auto-CPAP
195 rant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, submitted to DISE between June 1, 2013,
196 IV) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use in patients with OHS, information regarding ef
197 f nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) when used as postextubation support in neonates.
198 , after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) withdrawal in patients with moderate to severe OSA
199 mine if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a form of non-invasive ventilation, decreases all
200 nt with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a weight-loss intervention, or CPAP plus a weight
201  OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but its value in patients without daytime sleepin
202 tion of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which remains a primary therapeutic approach for
203 r nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)--at the time of the first use of noninvasive respi
204 rapy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
205 nt with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
206  and Klebsiella OTUs) and need for prolonged CPAP oxygen signal increased risk of NEC in presymptomat
207  by interacting with the centrosomal protein CPAP, negatively regulates CPAP-dependent peri-centriola
208                     The microcephaly protein CPAP (also known as MCPH6) promotes procentriole growth,
209  centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein (CPAP), achieved by its degradation at mitosis, is consid
210  Centrosomal protein 4.1-associated protein (CPAP), centrosomal protein of 152 kDa (CEP152), and cent
211  whom high-flow therapy failed could receive CPAP.
212 y in patients who did versus did not receive CPAP (18.1% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidenc
213 4 patients were randomly assigned to receive CPAP (n = 98) or no CPAP (control; n = 96).
214  140 patients were allocated to and received CPAP plus BSC and 138 were allocated to and received BSC
215 changes were observed in the group receiving CPAP alone.
216 tervention group than in the group receiving CPAP only, but there were no significant differences in
217 at 12 weeks was lower in the group receiving CPAP than in the control group (-2.4 mm Hg; 95% confiden
218 ntrosomal protein CPAP, negatively regulates CPAP-dependent peri-centriolar material recruitment, and
219 igh-flow therapy failed could receive rescue CPAP; infants in whom CPAP failed were intubated and mec
220 the centrobin-depleted cells did not restore CPAP localization to the centrioles.
221                                  Restricting CPAP withdrawal to REM through real-time monitoring of t
222 cluding spindle assembly defective-4 (SAS4) (CPAP/CENPJ), is required for centriole biogenesis.
223                         The Tetrahymena Sas4/CPAP protein is enriched at assembling BBs, localizing t
224 ous positive airway pressure for 30 seconds (CPAP-30); 2) stepwise airway pressure increase (5 cm H2O
225           In older people with OSA syndrome, CPAP reduces sleepiness and is marginally more cost effe
226 annulae are noninferior to or no better than CPAP when used to support preterm infants after extubati
227 y higher incidence of treatment failure than CPAP when used in nontertiary special care nurseries as
228 he basis of these results, we recommend that CPAP treatment should be offered routinely to older pati
229                            Here we show that CPAP levels and centriole elongation are regulated by ce
230 ion of CCB02, which selectively binds at the CPAP binding site of tubulin.
231  group, and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.43-1.95) for the CPAP-treated group.
232         Compared with the control group, the CPAP group achieved a significantly greater improvement
233 ower in the nasal-cannulae group than in the CPAP group (P=0.01), but there were no significant diffe
234 roup and in 38 of 373 infants (10.2%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 10.3 percentage points; 95%
235 roup and in 38 of 286 infants (13.3%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 12.3 percentage points; 95%
236 group and in 27 of 338 infants (8.0%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 6.5 percentage points; 95%
237 roup and in 39 of 151 infants (25.8%) in the CPAP group (risk difference, 8.4 percentage points; 95%
238 Final analysis included 1021 patients in the CPAP group and 1160 patients in the control group.
239                      28 patients (3%) in the CPAP group and 24 patients (2%) in the control group had
240 , IL-6, and adiponectin also improved in the CPAP group compared with the control group after 6 month
241  at the 12-week follow-up was greater in the CPAP group than in the control group (35.9% vs 21.6%; ad
242 , the odds ratio for 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was 0.4 in children
243 important variables, 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was significantly de
244    37 serious adverse events occurred in the CPAP group, and 22 in BSC group; all were independently
245 ortality was ten (3%) of 374 patients in the CPAP group, and 24 (7%) of 359 patients in the control g
246 r enrolment, 26 (3%) of 1021 patients in the CPAP group, and 44 (4%) of 1160 patients in the control
247                                       In the CPAP group, PaCO2 improvement was significantly differen
248 iod were compared between groups by ITT, the CPAP group achieved a greater decrease in 24-hour mean b
249 obin, but not its mutant form that lacks the CPAP binding site, could restore cellular CPAP levels in
250                          After 6 months, the CPAP group achieved a greater decrease in HbA1c levels c
251 be performed examining the usefulness of the CPAP tracking systems and how these systems affect OSA o
252        Moreover, exogenous expression of the CPAP-binding fragment of centrobin also caused the disap
253                          Nomenclature on the CPAP adherence tracking reports needs to be standardized
254  timescale, compared to either the WT or the CPAP mutant IkappaBalphas.
255 ts in human disease and also reveal that the CPAP-STIL interaction constitutes a conserved key step i
256 to the control group but not relative to the CPAP group.
257 ormally consolidated with use of therapeutic CPAP throughout, whereas on the other night, CPAP was re
258 continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) but were dissatisfied with it (n = 56), were studi
259                                        Thus, CPAP treatment may be beneficial for metabolic risk redu
260 score <10) were randomized to auto-titrating CPAP (n = 122) or no positive airway pressure (n = 122).
261 d difficulty either accepting or adhering to CPAP therapy.
262 al and no significant harm was attributed to CPAP use.
263 erved site, S428, to promote STIL binding to CPAP.
264  site of microtubule nucleation and binds to CPAP for triplet microtubule formation [13, 14].
265 ntify patients who will respond favorably to CPAP treatment.
266                   OSA patients intolerant to CPAP have a strong positive correlation between the FTP
267 w therapy was not shown to be noninferior to CPAP and resulted in a significantly higher incidence of
268 qual to or exceeding 6.5% were randomized to CPAP (n = 26) or no CPAP (control; n = 24), while their
269  such a favorable blood pressure response to CPAP (area under the curve: 0.92; p = 0.01).
270  miRNAs predicts blood pressure responses to CPAP treatment in patients with RH and OSA.
271 les that predict blood pressure responses to CPAP treatment.
272 tion of S428 promotes the binding of STIL to CPAP, linking the cartwheel to microtubules of the centr
273 imilar amounts, although MAD was superior to CPAP for improving four general quality-of-life domains.
274  tracking systems are able to reliably track CPAP adherence.
275 me-independent accumulation of ubiquitinated CPAP and abnormal, ubiquitin-positive, elongated centrio
276  that centrobin interacts with ubiquitinated CPAP and prevents its degradation for normal centriole e
277           25590163
278 icantly in the 13 patients with OSA who used CPAP at least 4 hours per night.
279 diovascular risk reduction in those who used CPAP for >/=4 versus <4 hours per night or did not recei
280 24-hour BP measures except in patients using CPAP efficiently.
281             The percentage of patients using CPAP for 4 or more hours per day was 72.4%.
282     5 cm of water pressure was delivered via CPAP nasal prongs.
283 er on MAD (MAD, 6.50 +/- 1.3 h per night vs. CPAP, 5.20 +/- 2 h per night; P < 0.00001).
284 "CPAP users" the remaining 30 patients were "CPAP nonusers." The recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhyt
285                      While 32 patients were "CPAP users" the remaining 30 patients were "CPAP nonuser
286 d could receive rescue CPAP; infants in whom CPAP failed were intubated and mechanically ventilated.
287 fidence interval, 0.03-1.52]; P = 0.04) with CPAP as compared with placebo.
288 he treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP, but not nocturnal supplemental oxygen, resulted in
289 serum triglyceride levels when combined with CPAP.
290 inferior on treatment with MAD compared with CPAP (CPAP-MAD difference, 0.2 mm Hg [95% confidence int
291 gulated protein that directly interacts with CPAP and is required for centriole duplication.
292 alth-care costs were marginally reduced with CPAP (- pound35, -390 to 321; p=0.847).
293 and 24-hour blood pressure were reduced with CPAP as compared with placebo.
294 nce results improved more with NIV than with CPAP.
295 atients were analyzed: 102 were treated with CPAP and 94 were treated with NIV.
296 nnulae failed were successfully treated with CPAP without reintubation.
297                     In patients treated with CPAP, mean nocturnal oxygen saturation and baseline IL-1
298 mited value to OSA patients not treated with CPAP.
299 e to 35.3 +/- 1.33 mm Hg at three years with CPAP, and from 41.5 +/- 1.56 mm Hg to 35.5 +/- 1.42 with
300 se breathing and reduce OSA severity without CPAP.

 
Page Top