ライフサイエンスコーパス: Chlorella

1 e the absorption spectrum of the pigments in Chlorella.

2 Higher bioaccessibility was found in Se-Chlorella (~49%) as compared to Se-yeast (~21%), Se-supp

3 The impact of Spirulina, Chlorella and Phaeodactylum tricornutum (P. tricornutum)

4 ed on lipids extracted from three species of Chlorella and resulted in close agreement with triacylgl

5 ing feedstock for mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella and synthesis of algal bioproducts and biofuel

6 was used for recovery studies on Spirulina, Chlorella, and Phaeodactylum tricornutum.

7 0, 90, 120 and 180 min) on the extraction of Chlorella antioxidant biomolecules and minerals.

8 about the bioaccessibility of Se-AAs from Se-Chlorella are completely missing.

9 that the A. brasilense T6SS is required for Chlorella-Azospirillum synthetic mutualism.

10 f renewable diesel in the United States from Chlorella biomass by hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL).

11 The methods used in production of Se-Chlorella biomass were also investigated.

12 ruction of the virus in the presence of host chlorella cell walls established that the spike at the u

13 of 7 ns in Bold's basal medium, and 8 ns in Chlorella cells.

14 n, M. conductrix is deeply nested within the Chlorella clade, suggesting that taxonomic revision is n

15 hells containing faster dividing and growing Chlorella clonal colonies can be selected using a fluore

16 moeba, Cafeteria, Cercomonas, Chlamydomonas, Chlorella, Cyanophora, Dictyostelium, Dunaliella, Ectoca

17 and excited photosynthetic fluorescence from Chlorella demonstrated that photoelectrical efficiency c

18 Autonomous Chlorella densities increased monotonically with light i

19 nochloropsis oculata, Isochrysis galbana and Chlorella fusca, were supplemented to the diet of laying

20 Only supplementation of Chlorella gave rise to mainly alpha-linolenic acid enric

21 utilization for host-derived nitrogen in the Chlorella genotypes [12, 13] and symbiont-derived carbon

22 In Chlorella grown in sediments spiked with BaP, in 12 h th

23 ative Nutrient Values results indicated that Chlorella H(2)O-extracts could be used as a mineral sour

24 ern cottonwood, peanut, salt marsh grass and Chlorella have been transformed with these genes.

25 only known host is a eukaryotic green alga (Chlorella heliozoae) that is an endosymbiont of the heli

26 uences from three green algal endosymbionts (Chlorella heliozoae, Chlorella variabilis and Micractini

27 we conclude that Prototheca is an apoplastic Chlorella (i.e., an alga) and that Dictyostelium as well

28 t, and commercially favourable, dominance of Chlorella in cultures that were also inoculated with a c

29 y could be used to maintain the dominance of Chlorella in outdoor cultivation systems prone to contam

30 lipid species of two microalgae strains, Kyo-Chlorella in tablet form and Nannochloropsis in paste fo

31 Chlorella is a green microalga and contains chlorophyll-

32 In this study, Chlorella is grown under a PLA which can optimally simul

33 aliella strains plus strains of Arthrospira, Chlorella, Isochrysis, Tetraselmis and a range of cultur

34 ved phenomenon extends to other green algae (Chlorella kesslerii and Scenedesmus obliquus) and at lea

35 a chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) infects certain chlorella-like green algae and encodes a 120-kDa protein

36 rming viruses that infect certain eukaryotic chlorella-like green algae from the genus Chlorovirus.

37 se genome of the virus PBCV-1 that infects a chlorella-like green algae revealed an open reading fram

38 In particular, chloroviruses, which infect chlorella-like green algae that typically occur as endos

39 rming viruses that infect certain eukaryotic chlorella-like green algae.

40 large double-stranded DNA virus that infects chlorella-like green algae.

41 replicate in certain unicellular, eukaryotic chlorella-like green algae.

42 replicate in certain unicellular, eukaryotic chlorella-like green algae.

43 DNA genomes that infect different species of Chlorella-like green algae.

44 viruses have been isolated using three main chlorella-like green algal host cells, traditionally cal

45 ne loss also characterized the Chlamydomonas/Chlorella lineage, a phenomenon that might be independen

46 0% unicellular plant cells (Chlamydomonas or Chlorella microalgae) and 60-70% muscle cells (C2C12 or

47 sis genes were found in the Nannochloropsis, Chlorella, or Chlamydomonas genomes.

48 ve effect on Synechocystis cell numbers than Chlorella (P < 0.0001).

49 o independent origins of Paramecium bursaria-Chlorella photosymbiosis [9-11] using a reciprocal metab

50 e recovery of antioxidants and pigments from Chlorella (polyphenols 10.465 mg/g, chlorophyll a 6.206

51 Using the PicoShell process, we select a Chlorella population that accumulates chlorophyll 8% fas

52 Q)-based quantitative proteomics to identify Chlorella proteins with modulated expression under short

53 esh water microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella protothecoides) important for nutritional appl

54 lated in higher plants and in the green alga Chlorella protothecoides.

55 r to RDIs in almost all algal samples except Chlorella pyrenoidosa (C) and Palmaria palmata (D), wher

56 eta-glycerol phosphate (beta-GP)) into Pi in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under P deficiency with sunscreen

57 rations between various NPs and algal cells (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) and analyzed influencing factors

58 he growth and biogas production potential of Chlorella pyrenoidosa.

59 ynechococcus lividus], and eucaryotic algae (Chlorella pyrenoidsa, Chlorella vulgaris, Euglena gracil

60 arotenoids in P. tricornutum, Spirulina, and Chlorella, respectively.

61 he in vitro bioaccessibility of Se-AAs in Se-Chlorella, Se-yeast, a commercially available Se-enriche

62 lutein from marine chlorophycean microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana (NIOT-2).

63 Microalgae, such as Chlorella sorokiniana and Dunaliella bardawil, are a sus

64 t optimizing the accumulation of phytoene in Chlorella sorokiniana by using norflurazon and investiga

65 tivity during the life cycle of synchronized Chlorella sorokiniana cells grown with a 7:5 light-dark

66 Chlorella sorokiniana has seven ammonium-inducible, chlo

67 bunits and a truncated mutant subunit of the Chlorella sorokiniana NADP-GDH isozymes were constructed

68 d that most of the kinetic properties of the Chlorella sorokiniana NADP-GDH isozymes were retained af

69 pumilus ES4 on growth of the green microalga Chlorella sorokiniana UTEX 2714 were studied.

70 d experiment in flat-panel photobioreactors, Chlorella sorokiniana was able to remove 100% of the pho

71 The microbiome of Chlorella sorokiniana was extracted and exposed to six r

72 assisted extraction (UAE) using ethanol from Chlorella sorokiniana-derived carotenoids and encapsulat

73 nse is able to associate with the microalgae Chlorella sorokiniana.

74 ith the best quality fruit presented 2.0% of Chlorella sp.

75 suggests that BaP does not aggregate inside Chlorella sp. (average brightness = 5.330), while it agg

76 Chlorella sp. + PSO coatings retarded ripening, maintain

77 t Paramecium bursaria and the algal symbiont Chlorella sp. [10].

78 rosa fruit using edible coatings composed of Chlorella sp. and pomegranate seed oil (PSO) during cold

79 that BaP accumulates in the lipid bodies of Chlorella sp. and that there is Forster resonance energy

80 ents were conducted with Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. in the presence and absence of carbonate a

81 ents were conducted with Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. in the presence and absence of carbonate a

82 irus that infects the unicellular green alga Chlorella sp. strain NC64A.

83 ith the best quality fruit presented 2.0% of Chlorella sp. The effects of preharvest treatments with

84 onic toxicity of copper to the tropical alga Chlorella sp. was compared.

85 d the localization and aggregation of BaP in Chlorella sp., a microalga that is one of the primary pr

86 samples from three strains: Scenedesmus sp., Chlorella sp., and Nannochloropsis sp.

87 onas reinhardtii, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Chlorella sp., Haematococcus pluvialis or Nannochloropsi

88 interacting with single-celled green algae, Chlorella sp., have been found to be bilateral.

89 rgy transfer between BaP and photosystems of Chlorella sp., indicating the close proximity of the two

90 We experimentally demonstrate that Chlorella sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Chinese ham

91 such as milk, egg, fish, rice, soybean, pea, chlorella, spirulina, oyster and mussel.

92 ae which may serve to improve performance of Chlorella spp. for biotechnological applications.

93 Core microbial community taxa included Chlorella spp., Scenedesmus spp., and Monoraphidium spp.

94 ndosymbiosis between Paramecium bursaria and Chlorella spp., we demonstrate that this mechanism is de

95 Annotation of the virus host Chlorella strain NC64A genome revealed 482 putative tran

96 tent is highly variable among the members of Chlorella, suggesting very high rates of gain and/or los

97 ' putative preference for Synechocystis over Chlorella suggests they could be used to maintain the do

98 of intergenomic epistasis in the Paramecium-Chlorella symbiosis and test whether compensatory evolut

99 est that the multiple origins of P. bursaria-Chlorella symbiosis use a convergent nutrient exchange,

100 Global metabolism varied more between the Chlorella than the P. bursaria genotypes and suggested d

101 nd beta-subunit antigens during induction in Chlorella, the larger mRNA is proposed to encode the lar

102 rom sweet sorghum bagasse for cultivation of Chlorella under mixotrophic conditions.

103 en algal endosymbionts (Chlorella heliozoae, Chlorella variabilis and Micractinium conductrix).

104 phy as well as computation, we characterized Chlorella variabilis FAP reaction intermediates on time

105 recently discovered photodecarboxylase from Chlorella variabilis NC64A ( CvFAP) bears the promise fo

106 ell as 7- and 8-heptadecene were detected in Chlorella variabilis NC64A (Trebouxiophyceae) and severa

107 ed data were compared to PBCV-1 and its host Chlorella variabilis NC64A predicted proteomes.

108 irus that infects the unicellular green alga Chlorella variabilis NC64A.

109 large dsDNA virus that infects the microalga Chlorella variabilis NC64A.

110 eactivity to antigens from four other algae: Chlorella variabilis, Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, Nannochl

111 ete their replication cycle in one strain of Chlorella variabilis, systematic challenges emerged.

112 can only replicate within a single strain of Chlorella variabilis.

113 of using the algal virus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus (PBCV-1) as an adenovirus surrogate for

114 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus (PBCV-1) is a large double-stranded DNA

115 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus (PBCV-1) is the prototype of a family of

116 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus (PBCV-1) is the prototype of a family of

117 capsid protein (Vp54) of Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus (PBCV-1) were recently described and fou

118 gue for T4-pdg has been found in a strain of Chlorella virus (strain Paramecium bursaria Chlorella vi

119 us to the chlorovirus Acanthocystis turfacea chlorella virus 1 (ATCV-1) in a metagenomic analysis of

120 he prototype chlorovirus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) contains four Asn-linked glyc

121 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) elicits a lytic infection of

122 The 331-kbp chlorovirus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) genome was resequenced and an

123 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) infects certain chlorella-lik

124 The chlorovirus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) is a large dsDNA virus that i

125 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1) is the prototype of a family

126 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1), a large DNA virus that infec

127 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1), a member of the family Phyco

128 rototype of the genus is Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1).

129 aged capsid structure of Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 (PBCV-1).

130 1 and eukaryotic viruses Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus 1 and adenovirus, suggesting a viral lin

131 ltransferase (vSET) from Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 bound to cofactor S-adenosyl-L-homocys

132 ucture of the homologous Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1 Vp54 MCP.

133 e chlorovirus ATCV-1 (Acanthocystis turfacea chlorella virus 1, family Phycodnaviridae) and that thes

134 94-aa protein encoded by Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1, is the smallest known protein to form

135 ld averaged structure of Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus 1, we unexpectedly found the viral capsi

136 lyltransferase and the crystal structures of Chlorella virus and Candida albicans guanylyltransferase

137 al. show that a DNA glycosylase derived from Chlorella virus and engineered to enhance tissue penetra

138 the RNA triphosphatases of fungi, protozoa, Chlorella virus and poxviruses.

139 eins are absent, causing Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus and the cellular contents to merge, poss

140 olog of this family, the Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus arginine decarboxylase (cvADC), shares a

141 al results with the crystal structure of the Chlorella virus capping enzyme.

142 yotic topoisomerase II, type II enzymes from chlorella virus completely lack the C-terminal domain.

143 ast cells containing only the 298-amino acid Chlorella virus DNA ligase (a 'minimal' eukaryotic ATP-d

144 Chlorella virus DNA ligase (ChVLig) has pluripotent biol

145 Chlorella virus DNA ligase (ChVLig) is a minimized eukar

146 Chlorella virus DNA ligase (ChVLig) is an instructive mo

147 to study the conformational dynamics of the Chlorella virus DNA ligase (ChVLig), a minimized eukarya

148 ly efficient ligation of RNA-splinted DNA by Chlorella virus DNA ligase (PBCV-1 DNA ligase).

149 roRNA (miRNA) detection method that utilizes Chlorella virus DNA ligase (SplintR((R)) Ligase).

150 Using the Chlorella virus DNA ligase as a proof of principle, we r

151 enesis the roles of conserved amino acids of Chlorella virus DNA ligase during the third step of the

152 Our findings indicate that Chlorella virus DNA ligase has the potential to affect g

153 Deletion analysis of the 298 amino acid Chlorella virus DNA ligase indicates that motif VI plays

154 Chlorella virus DNA ligase is the smallest eukaryotic AT

155 Chlorella virus DNA ligase is the smallest eukaryotic AT

156 KDAEAT(196)) in the nick joining reaction of Chlorella virus DNA ligase, an exemplary ATP-dependent e

157 eting Lig1 to the mitochondria or expressing Chlorella virus DNA ligase, the minimal eukaryal nick-se

158 In contrast, fungi and Chlorella virus encode monofunctional guanylyltransferas

159 f the family members resemble the fungal and Chlorella virus enzymes, which have a complex active sit

160 oding R.CviJI was cloned from the eukaryotic Chlorella virus IL-3A and expressed in Escherichia coli.

161 M x CviJI [RGmC(T/C/G)] produced by another chlorella virus IL-3A.

162 The Chlorella virus ligase binds to a nicked ligand containi

163 The domain structure of Chlorella virus ligase inferred from the solution experi

164 We find that the minimal Chlorella virus ligase is capable of catalyzing non-homo

165 phate moiety is essential for the binding of Chlorella virus ligase to nicked DNA.

166 The Chlorella virus ligase-adenylate intermediate has an int

167 ide effect is observed for bacterial LigA or Chlorella virus ligase.

168 cium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) and chlorella virus Marburg-1 (CVM-1) displays an extraordin

169 cium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) and chlorella virus Marburg-1 (CVM-1) topoisomerase II to re

170 Therefore, topoisomerase II from Chlorella virus Marburg-1 (CVM-1), a distant family memb

171 III) typical of C5 MTases, but, like another chlorella virus MTase M.CviJI, lacks conserved motifs IX

172 gnizing the dinucleotide GpC was cloned from Chlorella virus NYs-1 and expressed in both Escherichia

173 A nicking and modification system encoded by chlorella virus NYs-1 is described.

174 log of T4 endonuclease V was identified from chlorella virus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (P

175 Such a pdg was identified in the Chlorella virus PBCV-1 and termed Cv-pdg.

176 Chlorella virus PBCV-1 DNA ligase seals nicked DNA subst

177 Chlorella virus PBCV-1 DNA ligase seals nicked duplex DN

178 We report that Chlorella virus PBCV-1 encodes a 298-amino-acid ATP-depe

179 We report that the A103R protein of Chlorella virus PBCV-1 is an mRNA capping enzyme that ca

180 e 298-amino acid ATP-dependent DNA ligase of Chlorella virus PBCV-1 is the smallest eukaryotic DNA li

181 Chlorella virus PBCV-1 topoisomerase II is the only func

182 xyuridine triphosphatase (dUTPase) gene from chlorella virus PBCV-1 was cloned, and the recombinant p

183 Like the prototype chlorella virus PBCV-1, the SC-1A genome contains invert

184 nsic DNA cleavage activity was isolated from Chlorella virus PBCV-1.

185 one of the major capsid glycoproteins of the Chlorella virus PBCV-1.

186 e known for T4-pdg, homology modeling of the Chlorella virus pyrimidine dimer glycosylase (cv-pdg) pr

187 ytic mechanism has been investigated for the Chlorella virus pyrimidine dimer glycosylase (cv-pdg).

188 sent the biochemical characterization of the chlorella virus pyrimidine dimer glycosylase, cv-PDG.

189 Chlorella virus RNA triphosphatase (cvRtp1) is the small

190 ate the proposal that protozoan, fungal, and Chlorella virus RNA triphosphatases belong to a single f

191 it a yeast-based genetic system to show that Chlorella virus RTP can function as a cap-forming enzyme

192 Chlorella virus RTP is more similar in structure to the

193 The 193-amino-acid Chlorella virus RTP is the smallest member of a family o

194 Chlorella virus SC-1A encodes at least six DNA methyltra

195 ggest that the high DNA cleavage activity of chlorella virus topoisomerase II on unmodified nucleic a

196 intrinsic to the viral enzyme and imply that chlorella virus topoisomerase II plays a physiological r

197 e whether methylation impacts the ability of chlorella virus topoisomerase II to cleave DNA, the effe

198 s critical to the physiological functions of chlorella virus topoisomerase II, then this remarkable c

199 Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus type 1 (PBCV-1) is a very large, icosahe

200 al, internally enveloped Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus was used to interpret structures of the

201 resolved by ectopic expression of a foreign (Chlorella virus) but not endogenous topo II.

202 ctures of the eukaryotic Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus, and the bacteriophage PRD1, and shows a

203 pothesis, the ability of Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) and chlorella virus Marburg-1

204 Topoisomerase II from Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) and chlorella virus Marburg-1

205 Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) is a large double-stranded DN

206 e prototypic chlorovirus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) that functioned as binding pa

207 ase II was discovered in Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1) that has an exceptionally hig

208 ied from chlorella virus Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 (PBCV-1).

209 Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus-1 is an icosahedrally shaped, 1,900-A-di

210 he C-terminal residue of Paramecium bursaria chlorella virus-1 topoisomerase II as determined by BLAS

211 at have either p6 (as in Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus-1) or p3 symmetry (as in Mimivirus).

212 Chlorella virus (strain Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus-1), which contains a gene that predicts

213 (d) Many chlorella virus-encoded proteins are either the smallest

214 tosine-5-DNA methyltransferase cloned from a Chlorella virus.

215 somerase II gene is widely distributed among Chlorella viruses and that the protein is expressed 60-9

216 To this point, the genomes of many chlorella viruses contain high levels of N6-methyladenin

217 Notably, paramecium bursaria chlorella viruses encode a conserved SET domain methyltr

218 Large dsDNA-containing chlorella viruses encode a pyrimidine dimer-specific gly

219 (e) Accumulating evidence indicates that the chlorella viruses have a very long evolutionary history.

220 In addition to their large genome size, the chlorella viruses have other features that distinguish t

221 The chlorella viruses have other features that distinguish t

222 nes were cloned and expressed from two other chlorella viruses IL-3A and SH-6A.

223 he pdg gene was cloned and sequenced from 42 chlorella viruses isolated over a 12-year period from di

224 Unlike the chlorella viruses, large double-stranded-DNA-containing

225 ke proteins were isolated from 40 additional chlorella viruses.

226 omers, M x CviRI and M x CviBIII, from other chlorella viruses.

227 hrospira (Limnospira) maxima (A. maxima) and Chlorella vulgaris (Ch. vulgaris) are among the approved

228 vailable on the market including Se-enriched Chlorella vulgaris (Se-Chlorella) which accumulates Se i

229 elmis chuii) and two fresh water microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris and Chlorella protothecoides) importa

230 in a simple food web consisting of the algae Chlorella vulgaris and daphnid Daphnia magna.

231 Two commonly used algal strains, fresh-water Chlorella vulgaris and seawater Tetraselmis chuii, were

232 Chlorella vulgaris and Tetraselmis chuii are two microal

233 plastid genomes, only that of the green alga Chlorella vulgaris appears to share this feature.

234 Vitamin B12 was extracted from Chlorella vulgaris biomass under aqueous conditions, par

235 oceanica CCAP 849/10 and a marine isolate of Chlorella vulgaris CCAP 211/21A as the best lipid produc

236 In conclusion, the data proved that Chlorella vulgaris cell can be used as a new stable carr

237 bined, according to their ability to degrade Chlorella vulgaris cell wall to access its valuable nutr

238 UAE) and dichloromethane/methanol (DCM) from Chlorella vulgaris cultivated under autotrophic and hete

239 onclusively the presence of selenocyanate in Chlorella vulgaris culture medium by electrospray mass s

240 acidification on the nutritional pattern of Chlorella vulgaris enriched breads.

241 Chlorella vulgaris enrichment resulted in higher pH valu

242 this system by directly observing changes in Chlorella vulgaris genotype frequencies as the abundance

243 The green microalga Chlorella vulgaris has been widely recognized as a promi

244 he photosynthetic activity of the green alga Chlorella vulgaris in presence of different multiwalled

245 quantification method for cellular lipids in Chlorella vulgaris is demonstrated in this study.

246 Chlorella vulgaris NR mRNA levels are very responsive to

247 Experiments with the green alga Chlorella vulgaris presented here compared polyphosphate

248 n and Se removal from the water column was a Chlorella vulgaris strain (designated Cv).

249 venue for monitoring the turbidity of dilute Chlorella vulgaris suspensions in large, stagnant munici

250 For high density Chlorella vulgaris suspensions, this is easily done by m

251 me process of concentrating large volumes of Chlorella vulgaris suspensions.

252 rostatic interaction with negatively charged Chlorella vulgaris upon CO2-treatment.

253 Total protein measured in Chlorella vulgaris using this method compared closely wi

254 n (BOF) in a genome-scale metabolic model of Chlorella vulgaris UTEX 395 over time.

255 this, the accuracy of a model developed for Chlorella vulgaris was assessed against data collected f

256 ntents and water on the Raman spectrogram of Chlorella vulgaris were also addressed.

257 Daphnia magna and Chlorella vulgaris were chosen as model prey and predato

258 hardtii, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Chlorella vulgaris while dealing with photosynthesis, th

259 rotus ostreatus on quinoa, chickpea, oat and Chlorella vulgaris with oat (Cv + O), exemplifying a div

260 Here we show that novel microalgal strains (Chlorella vulgaris YSL01 and YSL16) upregulate the expre

261 ccessfully encapsulated in algae (Alg) cell (Chlorella vulgaris) as confirmed by fluorescence microsc

262 scale of commercially relevant micro algae (Chlorella vulgaris) cultivation using stable Synthetic E

263 hermore, detection of individual algal cell (Chlorella vulgaris) was performed at the SERS substrate

264 Stutzerimonas stutzeri, the green microalgae Chlorella vulgaris, and a consortium of both microorgani

265 microalgal strain, parameterized to resemble Chlorella vulgaris, and a fictive target compound assume

266 Microalgae, such as Spirulina platensis and Chlorella vulgaris, are increasingly explored for their

267 Three BEWS with Chlorella vulgaris, Daphnia magna, and Gammarus pulex we

268 s in different microalgae samples, including Chlorella vulgaris, Dunaliella salina, and Phaeodactylum

269 and eucaryotic algae (Chlorella pyrenoidsa, Chlorella vulgaris, Euglena gracilis, Scenedesmus obliqu

270 ghest protein content were the green species Chlorella vulgaris, Nannochloropsis, and Afanizomenon-fl

271 In response, a Chlorella vulgaris-based photobioreactor was recently pr

272 ris suspensions in large, stagnant municipal Chlorella vulgaris-based wastewater treatment system via

273 ated thermal tolerance in the phytoplankton, Chlorella vulgaris.

274 Chloromonas, Chlamydomonas and Chlorella were found in green blooms but only Chloromona

275 the yield of antioxidants and minerals from Chlorella were investigated.

276 performance and bioelectricity generation of Chlorella when exposed to an optimally-tuned light spect

277 including Se-enriched Chlorella vulgaris (Se-Chlorella) which accumulates Se in the form of Se-amino