コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 fluence susceptibility to pathogens, such as Clostridium difficile.
2 re-forming pathogens, Bacillus anthracis and Clostridium difficile.
3 ation among LFAs for influenza, malaria, and Clostridium difficile.
4 and TcdB are the major virulence factors of Clostridium difficile.
5 nzyme, SrtB, is conserved between strains of Clostridium difficile.
6 of TcdB varies between different strains of Clostridium difficile.
7 tion resistance against pathogens, including Clostridium difficile.
8 creasing susceptibility to pathogens such as Clostridium difficile.
9 a, Eggerthella, and the potential pathobiont Clostridium difficile.
12 500 muM and are known to block the growth of Clostridium difficile(1), promote hepatocellular carcino
13 tracheostomy (21.6% vs 4.5%), development of Clostridium difficile (4.5% vs 1.7%), and incidence dens
14 gens detected by the FilmArray GI panel were Clostridium difficile (55.0%), Campylobacter species (20
15 nfective aetiology (112/1207 (9.2%)) such as Clostridium difficile (97/1048 (9.3%) tested) or virolog
18 agents also increase the risk of developing Clostridium difficile (also known as Clostridioides diff
19 than 30 residents included those related to Clostridium difficile, anaerobes, Candida spp., Streptoc
20 mice datasets, investigating infection with Clostridium difficile and an immune-modulatory probiotic
21 TcdB) are produced by the bacterial pathogen Clostridium difficile and are responsible for the pathol
22 (endospores), such as those of the pathogens Clostridium difficile and Bacillus anthracis, are unique
23 outcomes of hospitalized patients tested for Clostridium difficile and determine the correlation betw
25 nzymatic activity of DisA-like proteins from Clostridium difficile and Methanocaldococcus jannaschii.
26 fections of Gram-positive bacteria including Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylo
27 microbiota of gnotobiotic mice infected with Clostridium difficile and the core microbiota of the sea
28 applies to the CD27L endolysin that targets Clostridium difficile and the CS74L endolysin that targe
29 ssociation of proton pump inhibitor use with Clostridium difficile and ventilator-associated pneumoni
30 aphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Clostridium difficile, and fungal infections) in pediatr
31 rio cholerae, the hydrosulphide channel from Clostridium difficile, and the uncharacterized channel f
33 a key prevention strategy for resistance and Clostridium difficile Antibiotic stewardship programs (A
37 d mortality rates associated with nosocomial Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD), a seri
44 lt from a polymerase chain reaction test for Clostridium difficile (CD) toxin 8 weeks after the alloc
47 transplantation (FMT) utilized for relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis successfully eradicated co
48 ated hospital length of stay, development of Clostridium difficile colitis, and total hospital cost.
58 r expressing the HIV-1-derived Gag Ag or the Clostridium difficile-derived toxin B resulted in signif
60 Many factors may cause diarrhoea, including Clostridium difficile, drugs (e.g. laxatives, antibiotic
61 s that are not reported at this institution (Clostridium difficile, enteroaggregative Escherichia col
62 an acquire multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile from inadequately disinfected envi
63 eliable tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from unformed (liquid or soft) sto
69 and metagenomic shotgun sequencing (MSS) for Clostridium difficile identification in diarrhea stool s
70 , drug-product-related impurities of an anti-Clostridium difficile IgG1 mAb drug substance were profi
73 for treatment of recurrent infections (i.e., Clostridium difficile) in the human gut and as a general
75 were rated >6 in all criteria: 2 measures of Clostridium difficile incidence, incidence of drug-resis
76 h daptomycin (MIC90 0.5 vs 2 mug/mL) against Clostridium difficile including NAP1 epidemic strains.
78 ently encountered infectious etiologies were Clostridium difficile infection (13.3% and 11.8%, respec
79 plification tests (NAATs) do not distinguish Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and asymptomatic C
81 e advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and prevention eff
82 s of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and vancomycin-res
84 es suggest that most cases of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are unrelated to o
85 methods may underestimate the true burden of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) because they fail
91 dences of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been demonstra
92 icrobiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited t
96 id suppression medication is associated with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults and is i
97 dies on risk factors for and transmission of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in China have been
98 ) is highly effective for treating recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in observational s
99 e an appropriate therapeutic option for mild Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in select patients
112 mal therapy for critically ill patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known.
113 f fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not well-known.
120 rganism bloodstream infection (MDRO-BSI) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates in the 12 mo
122 innate immune response to the resolution of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remains incomplete
125 crobiota transplant (FMT) is recommended for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment; however
126 for the efficacy of probiotics in preventing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but guidelines do
127 (FT) is a promising treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but its true effe
131 es have evaluated risk factors for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), the vast majority
132 ens, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), were also conside
144 h care-onset health care facility-associated Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) is overdiagnose
145 actam (PIP/TAZO) shortage and hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) risk in 88 US m
148 ed hospitalization, and hospitalization with Clostridium difficile infection [CDI]) were associated w
150 ts it has been successfully used in cases of Clostridium difficile infection and IBD, although contro
152 ctors affecting a person's susceptibility to Clostridium difficile infection are well-understood, lit
153 s is not observed in subjects with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection but is observed in the s
165 Their use as probiotics for prevention of Clostridium difficile infection is prevalent among consu
171 reports found addressed the use of FMTs for Clostridium difficile infection or inflammatory bowel di
172 dmission rates, central venous catheter use, Clostridium difficile infection rates, and hospital leng
174 e-level association test of the reduction in Clostridium difficile infection recurrence in patients t
175 Whereas many antibiotics increase risk of Clostridium difficile infection through dysbiosis, epide
176 cohort of 109 subjects treated for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota tr
177 t serious cephalosporin-associated ADRs were Clostridium difficile infection within 90 days (0.91%),
178 ated charges for inflammatory bowel disease, Clostridium difficile infection, and chronic liver disea
179 with outcomes (antibiotic-days, incidence of Clostridium difficile infection, and in-hospital mortali
180 numbers of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, Clostridium difficile infection, and vancomycin-resistan
181 viously used to cure patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, could also protect agai
182 for the same infection, acute kidney injury, Clostridium difficile infection, or drug-related adverse
183 py, and frequency of complications including Clostridium difficile infection, readmission, and all-ca
184 ation (FMT) is effective in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, where efficacy correlat
185 acious and inexpensive therapy for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection, yet its safety is thoug
195 or-associated complication or pneumonia, and Clostridium difficile infection; minor outcomes included
196 trum antibiotic approved for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in adults, is ass
203 d dysbiosis is a key predisposing factor for Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs), which cause int
204 al microbiota transplantation to face severe Clostridium difficile infections and to perform decoloni
205 n-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile infections declined across the UK
206 biotic-based strategies for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections disrupt indigenous micr
209 as oral non-systemic antibacterial drugs for Clostridium difficile infections were active against pat
210 han 9000 nosocomial infections, 1000 to 5000 Clostridium difficile infections, and 2 to 6 cases of an
211 den of antimicrobial-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile infections, halting unnecessary an
213 riptions) ADRs, with Clostridiodes (formerly Clostridium) difficile infections pivotal to its ADR pro
220 jor cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile is a serious problem in health car
223 orming, healthcare-associated enteropathogen Clostridium difficile is actively undergoing speciation.
227 tion with the opportunistic enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile is an increasingly common clinical
250 ts to the health service and predisposing to Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococ
251 ntamination, colonization, or infection with Clostridium difficile, methicillin-resistant Staphylococ
256 on of spores is critical for the survival of Clostridium difficile outside the host gastrointestinal
262 ACKGROUND & AIMS: Nosocomial infections with Clostridium difficile present a considerable problem des
263 w that toxins A or B of the enteric pathogen Clostridium difficile recapitulate the salient features
266 pansion of several potential pathogens (e.g. Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, and Escherichia coli)
267 ansplantation led to resolution of recurrent Clostridium difficile, significantly decreased recurrent
268 obiota, which consequently enables toxigenic Clostridium difficile species to proliferate and cause i
269 hotspots associated with mobile elements in Clostridium difficile ST6 and a previously undescribed 3
270 infections (HAIs), including those caused by Clostridium difficile, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomona
276 metalloprotease from the bacterial pathogen Clostridium difficile that cleaves two endogenous adhesi
277 TcdB is one of the key virulence factors of Clostridium difficile that is responsible for causing se
278 n that we identified from the human pathogen Clostridium difficile The crystal structure shows that t
281 inococcus obeum, Salmonella typhimurium, and Clostridium difficile) to quantify, expand, and characte
287 ly from stool specimens: Campylobacter spp., Clostridium difficile (toxin A/B), Plesiomonas shigelloi
289 acid amplification test for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins in stool specimens, with th
290 ve and quantitative methods for detection of Clostridium difficile toxins provide new tools for diagn
291 r concentrations of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile toxins A and/or B in the stool of
292 us antibodies (eAbs) against Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile toxins may protect against recurr
295 y additionally produce the binary CDT toxin (Clostridium difficile transferase) that ADP-ribosylates
297 cy, or benign disease (diverticular disease, Clostridium difficile) undergoing major abdominal surger
298 ared to those of mapping-based approaches in Clostridium difficile, using repeated sequencing of the
300 ient stools, it detected the toxin B gene of Clostridium difficile with 95% sensitivity and 95% speci