コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 though similar advances have been lagging in Culex.
2 er mosquitoes, advances have been lacking in Culex.
3 ansmitting mosquito vector species Aedes and Culex.
4 S functions as a suitable larval habitat for Culex, Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus in southern Califo
6 ed, predominantly belonging to three genera: Culex, Aedes, and Anopheles, with significant difference
7 ene drives have been demonstrated to include Culex alongside Anopheles and Aedes, and pave the way fo
8 er of RVFV into other anthrophillic vectors (Culex and Anopheles sp. mosquitoes), and, importantly, c
11 avior of a Culex subgenus Micraedes species, Culex antillummagnorum (Dyar), and provide the first evi
13 itoes of three genera, Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex are able to locate and land on surface-active mana
14 he evolution and drivers of such an atypical Culex behavior and indicate that our understanding of Cu
17 ith host preference were identified on all 3 Culex chromosomes, and these genomic regions contained c
22 anko iflavirus-1 was especially prevalent in Culex eknomios (88.4%) and Ochlerotatus serratus (88.0%)
23 lacement of species for Aedes, Anopheles and Culex genera clustering in single clades as expected.
24 hould be utilized in habitats containing non-Culex genera while a mix of AIs should be utilized where
25 r abundances than those of mosquitoes of the Culex genus, within which the viral abundance reached 16
27 , distance to rubber plantations (100 m) and Culex larval presence were identified as risk factors fo
28 health belonging to the genera Ochlerotatus, Culex, Limatus, Mansonia, Psorophora, and Sabethes, with
30 assays identified VEEV complex RNA in three Culex (Melanoconion) vomerifer pools, leading to VEEV is
31 , including Culex pipiens, Aedes albopictus, Culex modestus, Anopheles maculipennis sensu lato and Oc
32 lified esterase genes in a highly dispersive Culex mosquito have suggested that insecticide resistanc
34 PBOH and PBCHO, both of which are toxic to Culex mosquito larvae, can be further metabolized by CYP
35 ated to each other and to those from a local Culex mosquito pool and an Alphamesonivirus-1 previously
36 s that were up-regulated in highly resistant Culex mosquito strains, HAmCq(G8) and MAmCq(G6), respect
37 he expanding distribution of its vector, the Culex mosquito, and climatic changes causing heavy monso
39 ort future technology development to control Culex mosquitoes and provide valuable insight for improv
40 through matching of flight-tone harmonics in Culex mosquitoes and suggest that difference tones are u
43 ngoing transmission after MDA in areas where Culex mosquitoes are the main transmission vector, sugge
46 nome level between resistant and susceptible Culex mosquitoes identified one and three GPCR-related g
47 , leading to significantly higher catches of Culex mosquitoes in traps baited with binary than in tho
49 d that the survival of Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex mosquitoes is negatively impacted by consumptive e
52 ffective inhibitors of the CO(2) response in Culex mosquitoes that transmit West Nile fever and filar
53 egulated expression in insecticide resistant Culex mosquitoes through transcriptional profiling compa
55 ide resistance has threatened the control of Culex mosquitoes, advances in CRISPR genome-editing tool
56 (RVF) is a zoonosis transmitted by Aedes and Culex mosquitoes, and is considered a priority pathogen
57 enylacteate, which was demonstrated to repel Culex mosquitoes, and secondarily to citronellal, a know
58 were effective against strains of Aedes and Culex mosquitoes, demonstrating that electrostatic netti
59 tions in other field and permethrin selected Culex mosquitoes, finding that the co-existence of all 9
60 iously shown to strongly repel Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes, we examined the bioactivities of the i
67 Here, we establish the mosquito-infecting Culex narnavirus 1 (CxNV1) as a model to investigate the
68 or the ambigrammatic genome configuration in Culex narnavirus 1, which suggests a model for how trans
69 sociated with one specific mosquito species (Culex nebulosus), which increased in relative abundance
70 irions (ODVs) of the nucleopolyhedrovirus of Culex nigripalpus (CuniNPV) were purified by Ludox densi
75 We then performed competition assays between Culex pipiens and Aedes albopictus in low nutrient envir
76 le virus (WNV), previously was isolated from Culex pipiens and Aedes rossicus mosquitoes in the Czech
77 was isolated from two species of mosquitoes, Culex pipiens and Aedes vexans, and from brain tissues o
78 after blood feeding in two other mosquitoes (Culex pipiens and Anopheles gambiae) and the bed bug, Ci
80 ctipennis, and Anopheles punctulatus groups; Culex pipiens and the Culex subgenus Melanoconion; and t
81 fied between surface-dwelling populations of Culex pipiens and the so-called molestus form found in t
83 opictus and a representative native mosquito Culex pipiens by three native and widespread cyclopoid c
85 of the vector mosquitoes Aedes aegypti, the Culex pipiens Complex, and, most recently, Aedes albopic
86 ruses, including WNV, Culex tarsalis and the Culex pipiens complex, increased 17-21-fold with irrigat
90 a widely cited example of urban adaptation, Culex pipiens form molestus, also known as the London Un
91 was vertically transmitted to 2 F(1) female Culex pipiens from a naturally infected female collected
92 cDNA from a WN virus isolate recovered from Culex pipiens in Connecticut was expressed in Escherichi
93 ticide resistance gene Ester in the mosquito Culex pipiens in the Montpellier area, southern France.
94 rmone signaling direct entry of the mosquito Culex pipiens into its overwintering adult diapause, and
97 intering dormancy (diapause) in the mosquito Culex pipiens is the switch in females from blood feedin
99 this hypothesis using different incompatible Culex pipiens mosquito strains and show that CI persists
100 he function of sfRNA during WNV infection of Culex pipiens mosquitoes and evaluated its role in deter
102 nyavirus close to Umbre virus, were found in Culex pipiens mosquitoes captured in the south of France
103 l-sib design was set up in which families of Culex pipiens mosquitoes collected from the field were r
104 HCR), a phenotype first described in 1999 in Culex pipiens mosquitoes surviving chlorpyrifos doses 1
106 lly tested using larval Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens mosquitoes to assess mortality and percent
112 sly associated with pyrethroid resistance in Culex pipiens pallens was also over-transcribed in VK.
113 of mosGCTL in another major mosquito vector (Culex pipiens pallens) also impairs the survival of gut
115 y receptor neurons (ORNs) on the antennae of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (Cx. quinquefasciatus).
118 LPs to address biological questions in vivo, Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus mosquitoes were orally an
119 tected USUV RNA in host-seeking adult female Culex pipiens s.l. as well as in adults reared from fiel
122 . quinquefasciatus is one species within the Culex pipiens species complex and can be found throughou
123 bachia strains circulating in the California Culex pipiens species complex, (2) investigate Wolbachia
124 lengths of late summer program the mosquito Culex pipiens to enter a reproductive diapause character
126 The populations of an aquatic invertebrate (Culex pipiens) exposed over several generations to repea
128 ceptibility to S-methoprene was evaluated in Culex pipiens, a globally important vector species.
129 h detected high species diversity, including Culex pipiens, Aedes albopictus, Culex modestus, Anophel
130 n of 10 vector-pathogen pairs of mosquitoes (Culex pipiens, Cx. quinquefascsiatus, Cx. tarsalis, and
137 The expansion of insecticide resistance in Culex populations could affect the effectiveness of curr
138 In this study, female Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciastus were exposed to sub-lethal doses
140 allography and NMR 3D structures of OBP1 for Culex quinquefasciatus (CquiOBP1) bound to an ovipositio
141 ecies, Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), representin
142 was obtained from the common house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) through cloning and sequenc
144 d replication in C7/10 mosquito cells and in Culex quinquefasciatus after intrathoracic inoculation.
146 indings reveal the extensive distribution of Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes albopictus, with Aedes
147 ons in the entire mosquito sodium channel of Culex quinquefasciatus and analyzing their evolutionary
148 sis, Armigeres subalbatus, Aedes albopictus, Culex quinquefasciatus and Cu. tritaeniorhynchus) collec
150 ants improve transgenesis efficiency in both Culex quinquefasciatus and Drosophila melanogaster and b
151 rimiphos methyl CS was highly active against Culex quinquefasciatus and gave control for 10 months in
152 together act as a toxin toward the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus and have potential use in biocont
154 n where the mosquitoes Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus are resistant to pyrethroids but
158 hole-body microbiome of the mosquito species Culex quinquefasciatus in various larval stadia and foll
159 al and fungal microbiota from two laboratory Culex quinquefasciatus isolines (wild type and tetracycl
160 at gravid Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus laid significantly more eggs in c
162 Aa1/Cry49Aa1 proteins (LC50 for third instar Culex quinquefasciatus larvae: 15.9 ng/ml and 6.3 ng/ml
163 gical relevance of two D7 long proteins from Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito, the vector of filaria p
164 Finally, we used an in vivo fitness assay in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes and chickens to determ
165 ion rates in surviving S411A Kunjin-infected Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes were observed, but S41
166 ession profiles of resistant and susceptible Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes, using a combination o
174 artment visits for asthma and skin rash, and Culex quinquefasciatus species-specific vector index (an
176 evaluate the susceptibility of the mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus to bacterial agents, a population
178 of two common disease vectors, the southern (Culex quinquefasciatus) and northern (Culex pipiens) hou
179 Anopheles gambiae genomes, Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus), tick (Ixodes scapularis), body
180 pecies: Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus, a body louse Pediculus humanus a
181 A similar phenomenon was also observed in Culex quinquefasciatus, a natural vector of WNV, further
182 tentially virus transmitting insect species (Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti) as well as scient
183 vector species including Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Aedes aegypti, the latter an
184 Diptera (Stomoxys calcitrans, Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Culicoides nubeculosus) from
185 are favorable for the sole mosquito vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, and extrinsic sporogonic develop
186 we test a CRISPR-based homing gene drive for Culex quinquefasciatus, and show that the inheritance of
187 king females of the southern house mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, and the yellow fever mosquito, A
188 ed toxicity against larvae of the mosquitoes Culex quinquefasciatus, Anopheles gambiae, and Ochlerota
189 to CryIV proteins in larvae of the mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, can be suppressed or reduced mar
190 f the mosquito disease vectors Aeaegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus, each consisting of three scaffol
192 mosquito; Aedes aegypti, Ae. albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus, representing the two most signif
193 ed four model vector species (Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, Stomoxys calcitrans, and Culicoi
194 ons in the entire mosquito sodium channel of Culex quinquefasciatus, the prevalence of which were str
196 ment of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes Culex quinquefasciatus, we conducted a whole transcripto
198 cies-Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Culex quinquefasciatus-and all four gonotrophic stages o
209 e the first evidence, to our knowledge, of a Culex species aerially and skip-ovipositing, rather than
211 virus diversity than sampling location, with Culex species harboring more viruses at higher abundance
212 us (WNV), a neurotropic flavivirus spread by Culex species mosquitoes, is the leading cause of mosqui
213 he viromes were very similar among the three Culex species studied, suggesting that the host taxon pl
219 Culicine mosquitoes such as Aedes spp. and Culex spp. are important vectors of other human pathogen
220 Field results demonstrated elimination of Culex spp. from treated containers while container breed
222 on a measure of infection prevalence in the Culex spp. mosquitos, its primary vectors, known as the
223 Here we show variation between incompatible Culex strains in two Wolbachia ankyrin repeat-encoding g
225 es punctulatus groups; Culex pipiens and the Culex subgenus Melanoconion; and the tribe Sabethini.
226 s, we document the oviposition behavior of a Culex subgenus Micraedes species, Culex antillummagnorum
227 ed AO activity by a range of insecticides in Culex, suggest that this AO may play a role in insectici
229 ctors of several arboviruses, including WNV, Culex tarsalis and the Culex pipiens complex, increased
231 erences data, we provide strong support that Culex tarsalis is the most important vector of human WNV
232 f Anopheles stephensi, Aedes albopictus, and Culex tarsalis larvae-substantially increasing the poten
233 th WNV through the bite of a single infected Culex tarsalis mosquito exhibited 5- to 10-fold-higher v
238 ism in five mosquito species: Aedes aegypti, Culex tarsalis, Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles stephensi,
239 Here, we determine whether WNV enzootic (Culex tarsalis, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and Cx. pipiens) a