ライフサイエンスコーパス: D. miranda

1 s were also sequenced from D. persimilis and D. miranda for interspecific comparisons.

2 species, D. p. bogotana, D. persimilis, and D. miranda, were studied.

3 recombination maps from D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda to explore whether changes in the binding mot

4 oding sequences between D. pseudoobscura and D. miranda, and investigated their patterns of evolution

5 iranda is comparable to conservation between D. miranda and D. melanogaster, which diverged >30 MY ag

6 ent methods of estimation; estimates between D. miranda and D. affinis are more equivocal.

7 rates of chromosomal rearrangements between D. miranda and D. pseudoobscura are far higher than thos

8 of chromatin states between male and female D. miranda is comparable to conservation between D. mira

9 Reduced codon usage bias in D. miranda may thus result from the reduced efficacy of

10 advantage of the younger sex chromosomes in D. miranda (XR and the neo-X) to infer how former autoso

11 nsive transfer of genes among chromosomes in D. miranda.

12 Mean silent site diversity in D. miranda is approximately one-quarter of that in D. ps

13 in D. pseudoobscura, but remains elevated in D. miranda, the species with the younger and larger Y ch

14 vidence for a recent population expansion in D. miranda, in contrast to D. pseudoobscura.

15 Levels of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in D. miranda are comparable to those observed in D. melano

16 50 in situ hybridizations of gene probes in D. miranda.

17 g on either coding or noncoding sequences in D. miranda.

18 here is no general population subdivision in D. miranda.

19 Low levels of variability in D. miranda relative to its sibling species, D. pseudoobs

20 Variability of the neo-Y chromosome of D. miranda is substantially reduced below expectations a

21 e compensation along the neo-X chromosome of D. miranda, the neo-Y chromosome shows surprisingly unif

22 e tandemly duplicated on the X chromosome of D. miranda.

23 chromosome to the ancestral X chromosome of D. miranda.

24 persimilis and 2 mya since the formation of D. miranda.

25 and divergence data, for 12 nuclear genes of D. miranda.

26 e modifications in male and female larvae of D. miranda (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K36me3, H4K16ac, H3K27me

27 exu1 is conserved in the sibling species of D. miranda, as well as in a more distantly related speci

28 The repeat-rich Y of D. miranda still contains many actively transcribed gene

29 Although the neo-Y of D. miranda still contains the majority of its original g

30 ll-studied sibling species D. pseudoobscura, D. miranda has much less nucleotide sequence variation,

31 phila pseudoobscura with its close relative, D. miranda, and the distant outgroup species, D. melanog

32 o separate recombination maps and 31% of the D. miranda physical genome, and we identified both globa