ライフサイエンスコーパス: DMPP

1 DMPP (1-4 microM) had no effect on the rate of spontaneo

2 DMPP produced robust increases with minimal release obse

3 DMPP-induced [3H]-5-HT release was neither sensitive to

4 Cytisine and DMPP seemed to be partial agonists.

5 k order of potency of EPI>>CYT approximately DMPP>NIC.

6 the use of nitrification inhibitors such as DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) has been proposed.

7 erved, since the N(2)O mitigation induced by DMPP was lower than in control soil, demonstrating that

8 nNOS mRNA expression stimulated by DMPP was antagonized by a protein kinase C antagonist, a

9 The fractions of complexed DMPP were determined on the basis of self-diffusion coef

10 receptor agonist dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP) on the evoked release of ACh from motor terminals

11 5380), cytisine, dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP).

12 iation, and both alkyl methyl groups, for FA-DMPP association.

13 s (unfertilized, fertilized and fertilized + DMPP) were assayed under two contrasting soil water cont

14 gonists studied here were similar except for DMPP, which seemed to be a partial agonist compared with

15 th a differing rank order of potency of EPI>>DMPP approximately NIC approximately CYT.

16 pivotal role of the aromatic signal, for HA-DMPP association, and both alkyl methyl groups, for FA-D

17 of the IAS smooth muscle by EFS (0.25-5 Hz), DMPP, and VIP caused a significant increase in the HO ac

18 st evidence that the nitrification inhibitor DMPP can inhibit the N2 O production from nitrifier-indu

19 st 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenlypiperazinium iodide (DMPP) up to 77%.

20 C), 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperzinium iodide (DMPP), cytisine (CYT) and epibatidine (EPI) were investi

21 y 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP) approximately nicotine > acetylcholine > carbachol

22 t 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP) depolarized PPN neurons early in development, then

23 ulant dimethyl diphenyl piperazinium iodide (DMPP), and neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal polypeptid

24 d 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP, 100 microM).

25 1,1-Dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP, 20 microM) or alpha,beta-methylene ATP (50-100 mic

26 t 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenyl-piperazinium iodide (DMPP; in vivo and in vitro) and by high K+ (in vitro); a

27 ,N-dimethyl-l-proline-l-proline betaine (l,l-DMPP), the latter reported here for the first time.

28 loride) and, in the presence of W7, 2 microM DMPP depressed evoked ACh release at 0.5 Hz.

29 n of evoked ACh release at 50 Hz by 2 microM DMPP was abolished by 10 microM of the calmodulin antago

30 n restores neuronal response to KCl, but not DMPP in the distended colon.

31 , and was not impacted by the application of DMPP.

32 Most of the effects of DMPP persisted following application of the sodium chann

33 However, the efficiency of DMPP might be affected by soil amendments, such as bioch

34 hat PROG co-applied with DMPP inhibited peak DMPP-induced current up to 68% and with 3 min pre-incuba

35 , whereas 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (DMPP) was less potent than ACh in some cells (as in the

36 (10 muM), 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperazinium (DMPP; 100 muM) or luminal nutrients (Ensure(R)), in the

37 agonist, 1,1-dimethyl-4-phenylpiperizinium (DMPP, 10(-10)-10(-7) M), for 24 h significantly increase

38 e focused on 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) by placing it in contact with increasing concentra

39 on inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) significantly reduced the N2 O production from the

40 We concluded that DMPP-based NI efficiency may be altered by soil organic

41 Results showed that DMPP reduced N(2)O emissions by reducing ammonia-oxidizi

42 sing an electrophysiological technique, that DMPP can produce changes in the evoked ACh release from

43 The DMPP-induced increase in evoked ACh release was dependen

44 e in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in the DMPP-amended treatments.

45 his biochar diminishes the efficiency of the DMPP both at low and high soil water contents.

46 However, when DMPP was applied to the biochar amended soil, a countera

47 echniques revealed that PROG co-applied with DMPP inhibited peak DMPP-induced current up to 68% and w

48 ergic effect of a woody biochar applied with DMPP on soil N(2)O emissions.

49 d that both humic substances interacted with DMPP, with HA exhibiting a significantly greater affinit