戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s restriction fragment length polymorphisms (DNA fingerprints).
2  bacteria matched the monkey input strain in DNA fingerprint.
3 ut bacterial vaginosis, none shared the same DNA fingerprint.
4  tuberculosis isolates with identical IS6110 DNA fingerprints.
5 he 3 patient-workers' isolates had different DNA fingerprints.
6 parated on analytical agarose gels to create DNA fingerprints.
7  seven M. tuberculosis isolates had matching DNA fingerprints.
8 s, the method provided a set of reproducible DNA fingerprints.
9 ncrease or decrease in the band intensity of DNA fingerprints.
10 ical technique utilized in the production of DNA fingerprints.
11 overed during periodic videogastroscopy were DNA fingerprinted.
12 epetitive-sequence polymerase chain reaction DNA fingerprinting.
13 repeats used for over 20 years in humans for DNA fingerprinting.
14 sis isolates from the study period underwent DNA fingerprinting.
15 their pigs at birth were analyzed by genomic DNA fingerprinting.
16 or observations attributed to reinfection by DNA fingerprinting.
17 s of Mycobacterium avium could be matched by DNA fingerprinting.
18  and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) DNA fingerprinting.
19                                              DNA fingerprint analysis confirmed that once established
20                                              DNA fingerprint analysis of bacterial communities based
21                                              DNA fingerprint analysis revealed the presence of at lea
22                                      Genomic DNA fingerprint analysis was performed on 39 Staphylococ
23 is had sufficient overlap to be confirmed by DNA fingerprint analysis.
24  membranes used previously in routine IS6110 DNA fingerprint analysis.
25                    Zygosity was confirmed by DNA fingerprint analysis.
26 ) is amenable to automatic computer-assisted DNA fingerprint analysis.
27                                              DNA fingerprinting analysis of serial sputum cultures fr
28 25%) of 104 clustered patients shared both a DNA fingerprint and strong antecedent epidemiologic link
29        Genotypic analysis was done by IS6110 DNA fingerprinting and a novel strain-specific polymeras
30                                       IS6110 DNA fingerprinting and automated DNA sequencing of a reg
31 ability in the colonic mucosa as measured by DNA fingerprinting and fluorescent in situ hybridization
32 identified by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting and gene sequencing: one group from s
33                                              DNA fingerprinting and karyotype analysis demonstrated t
34 cin (Gm phenotype), all of which had similar DNA fingerprints and all of which were collected during
35 e of their usefulness as genomic markers and DNA fingerprints and more recently as their role in huma
36 in GelBuddy has been successfully applied to DNA fingerprinting applications, such as AFLP.
37 premise that tuberculosis cases that share a DNA fingerprint are epidemiologically related while case
38  from healthy white South Africans were also DNA fingerprinted as controls.
39 able repetitive-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) DNA fingerprinting assay adapted to an automated format,
40         We investigated whether quantitative DNA fingerprinting, based on allele imbalance (AI) or lo
41           We apply HISAT2 for HLA typing and DNA fingerprinting; both applications form part of the H
42                  The 64 cases with clustered DNA fingerprints but without epidemiologic links shared
43 agment length polymorphism analysis and were DNA fingerprinted by random amplification of polymorphic
44                                      Genomic DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis r
45                                              DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis s
46           In this study, we assessed whether DNA fingerprinting by repetitive element sequence-based
47                                     Unbiased DNA fingerprinting by the arbitrarily primed PCR allows
48 S. mutans were examined based on chromosomal DNA fingerprints (CDF), a hypervariable region (HVR) of
49       Supplementary analyses were done using DNA fingerprinting, cloning, and sequencing.
50 4%) of the remaining 168 isolates were in 15 DNA fingerprinting clusters, which ranged in size from 2
51             L. crispatus CTV-05 had a unique DNA fingerprint compared to all other lactobacilli.
52                                       Paired DNA fingerprint data were available for 130 (64%) of 203
53 and are unlikely to affect findings based on DNA fingerprinting data.
54                                Together with DNA fingerprints derived from AFLP markers, we evaluated
55 ins inferred to be clonally related based on DNA fingerprinting) detected, one, lineage C, dominated
56 acterium tuberculosis by generating distinct DNA fingerprints directly from primary cultures.
57                                              DNA fingerprinting establishes the genetic relatedness o
58       Identification of bacterial strains by DNA fingerprinting facilitates epidemiologic studies and
59 e 301 patients with completed interviews and DNA fingerprints fell into 20 different clusters of 2 to
60 n of (IS6110) can be harnessed to generate a DNA fingerprint for each strain, by digesting the genome
61 The study findings do not support the use of DNA fingerprinting for nosocomial tuberculosis surveilla
62                                              DNA fingerprints for 27 production lots of L. crispatus
63 oach for the computational identification of DNA fingerprints for design of microarray-based pathogen
64       We employed TOFI to identify in silico DNA fingerprints for several bacteria and plasmid sequen
65  and analysis of approximately 150 in silico DNA fingerprints for Yersinia pestis and 250 fingerprint
66              Fosmid paired-end sequences and DNA fingerprints from a query genome are compared to a r
67                                       IS6110 DNA fingerprints from initial and subsequent episodes of
68                       Rep-PCR also generated DNA fingerprints from M. intracellulare (n = 8) and MAC(
69 ogy developed for optical mapping to acquire DNA fingerprints from single genomes for the purpose of
70  the diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA fingerprints from three geographically separate stat
71  a constant enzyme buffer, and the intrinsic DNA fingerprints, from which amplicons may be quantitati
72     Only 20 (24%) of 84 cases with clustered DNA fingerprints had epidemiologic evidence of recent co
73                                              DNA fingerprinting helps determine loci of TB transmissi
74 have unlocked new opportunities to identify 'DNA fingerprints', i.e. oligonucleotide sequences that u
75                 Prospective surveillance and DNA fingerprinting identified the cluster, enabling heal
76 F with this approach, the finding of altered DNA fingerprints in these microscopic lesions suggests t
77                                 Importantly, DNA fingerprinting indicates that the human iPS cells we
78 identifying victims in a mass disaster using DNA fingerprints involves a scale of computation that re
79  the molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis, DNA fingerprinting is used to estimate the fraction of i
80                                      rep-PCR DNA fingerprinting is useful for strain typing and for e
81  sequencing and repetitive element PCR-based DNA fingerprinting, it was found that H. aurati represen
82 e used as controls to create a rep-PCR-based DNA fingerprint library with the DiversiLab software.
83 tion at vegetative incompatibility (vic) and DNA fingerprinting loci.
84 4 culture-positive inmates had isolates with DNA fingerprints matching those of other inmates.
85                                   The use of DNA fingerprinting may be useful in subsequent epidemiol
86         In a pilot study of nine women, this DNA fingerprinting method distinguished CTV-05 from othe
87 North and South America and used a ribosomal DNA-fingerprinting method to compare bacterial community
88 e detection of mRNA expression, and numerous DNA fingerprinting methods have also proved valuable, be
89 ng two polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA fingerprinting methods, arbitrarily primed PCR and i
90 idlands from 2001-05 (n=20) were assessed by DNA fingerprinting (MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping), with a
91 ude qualitative detection, sub-species-level DNA fingerprinting, molecular resistance testing and gen
92 horesis and ethidium bromide staining of the DNA fingerprints obtained were compared.
93                                  IS711-based DNA fingerprinting of 23 isolates from marine mammals sh
94                                          The DNA fingerprinting of all M. tuberculosis isolates from
95                                              DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is used
96 of relapse and reinfection, distinguished by DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains
97  plays during tumor development, we compared DNA fingerprints of 44 aberrant crypt foci (ACF; the ear
98 e for varying information content derived by DNA fingerprints of contrasting pattern complexity.
99 based PCR (rep-PCR) is useful for generating DNA fingerprints of diverse bacterial and fungal species
100                                              DNA fingerprints of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are produ
101 s are illustrated by an analysis of standard DNA fingerprints of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in San Fr
102                A comparison was made between DNA fingerprints of Mycobacterium tuberculosis produced
103 with positive cultures) were identified; the DNA fingerprints of the 13 isolates available for testin
104            Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (DNA fingerprinting) of group A streptococcal isolates ob
105 r epidemiological Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA fingerprint-outbreak database.
106 rent clinical laboratories revealed that the DNA fingerprint pattern of each case isolate was indisti
107  matched an MDR-TB patient-worker isolate by DNA fingerprint pattern.
108                                  The rate of DNA fingerprint-pattern evolution is not linear, and rat
109                                          The DNA fingerprint patterns derived from the SINE probes ar
110                   Among 21 S. aureus genomic DNA fingerprint patterns identified, five clonotypes wer
111 terspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) detected DNA fingerprint patterns in 14 species of salmonid fishe
112                                              DNA fingerprint patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis s
113                            Comparison of the DNA fingerprint patterns with those in international dat
114  Compared with strains having unique genomic DNA fingerprint patterns, the S. aureus clonotypes occur
115 e analysis to the 275 isolates with distinct DNA fingerprint patterns, we observed the same associati
116 r, recent analyses of the URA5 sequences and DNA fingerprinting patterns suggest significant genetic
117 as defined by insertion sequence (IS) IS6110 DNA fingerprinting, polymorphic GC-rich repetitive seque
118 es, and Southern blot hybridization with the DNA fingerprinting probe Ca3 combined with computer-assi
119 cted for DNA fingerprinting with the complex DNA fingerprinting probe Ca3.
120  microevolutionary changes identified by the DNA fingerprinting probe Cg6 and does not involve tandem
121 Molecular fingerprinting with Ca3, a complex DNA fingerprinting probe specific for C. albicans, and C
122 pecific for C. albicans, and Cd25, a complex DNA fingerprinting probe specific for C. dubliniensis, p
123                              A complex 15-kb DNA fingerprinting probe, Cp3-13, was therefore isolated
124 rable for some applications than traditional DNA fingerprinting probes that detect tandemly repeated
125 re cloned and analyzed for their efficacy as DNA fingerprinting probes.
126 for antibiotic susceptibility, O:H serotype, DNA fingerprinting, pulsed-field gel electrophoretic pat
127                     Short tandem repeats for DNA fingerprinting represents an efficient and reproduci
128                                              DNA fingerprints resolved 617 different genotypes among
129                                              DNA fingerprinting results confirm that the NIKS cells o
130                               Microsatellite DNA fingerprinting revealed that a male's relative sperm
131 is, mapping studies, human identity testing (DNA fingerprinting), sequence homology and population st
132 m var. Copenhagen strains) but that had AFLP DNA fingerprints similar or identical to those of strain
133 polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, which revealed DNA fingerprint similarities that correlated with both r
134    We provide a quantifiable definition of a DNA fingerprint stated both from a computational as well
135 l were resistant to 7 drugs and had matching DNA fingerprints (strain W1).
136 h a setting, we performed a population-based DNA fingerprinting study among TB patients in Botswana.
137  identified by computer-assisted analysis of DNA fingerprints submitted during 1996 and 1997 by diffe
138 e patients had indistinguishable profiles by DNA fingerprinting, suggesting common-source exposure.
139                There was a common pattern of DNA fingerprinting, suggesting that the isolates belonge
140                Therefore, we applied a novel DNA fingerprinting technique based on polymerase chain r
141 n site PCR (IRS-PCR) is a recently described DNA fingerprinting technique based on selective amplific
142                    The use of a supplemental DNA fingerprinting technique decreased clustering and im
143              Here we describe results from a DNA fingerprinting technique that overcomes this problem
144  fragment polymorphism (AFLP) is a PCR-based DNA fingerprinting technique.
145 c microbes works by genotyping isolates with DNA fingerprinting techniques and then using these genot
146 opulation from an undisturbed site, and (iv) DNA fingerprinting techniques can be exploited to unders
147 rms at least comparably to other established DNA fingerprinting techniques.
148    We present the use of short tandem repeat DNA "fingerprinting" technology as a method of early, de
149                           It also produces a DNA fingerprint that is distinctive to the flanking sequ
150                                              DNA fingerprinting through tubulin-based polymorphism (T
151             We used multilocus minisatellite DNA fingerprinting to examine the local genetic structur
152  study of sufficient size and duration using DNA fingerprinting to investigate tuberculosis relapse a
153                                      We used DNA fingerprinting to test the assumption that tuberculo
154 the value of MLST relative to those of other DNA fingerprinting tools for discriminating among strain
155 modification of PCR that generates a genomic DNA fingerprint using a single, arbitrarily chosen prime
156 ycobacterium tuberculosis isolates underwent DNA fingerprinting using IS6110 restriction fragment len
157 within the species that had been selected by DNA fingerprinting using probes linked to mating type.
158 e mutation model to describe the dynamics of DNA fingerprint variation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
159                                              DNA fingerprint was significantly associated with region
160                                              DNA fingerprinting was performed on Mycobacterium tuberc
161                   The efficacy of Cp3-13 for DNA fingerprinting was verified by a comparison of its c
162 andem repeats for each specimen and a unique DNA "fingerprint" was obtained from each.
163                                              DNA fingerprints were available for both members of thes
164                                       Paired DNA fingerprints were available in 39 of 65 recurrences:
165                                rep-PCR-based DNA fingerprints were reproducible and were consistent f
166                            Nuclear RFLPs and DNA fingerprints were used to make indirect and direct m
167                                              DNA fingerprinting with a digoxigenin-labeled C. albican
168 f clinical E. coli mastitis were compared by DNA fingerprinting with enterobacterial repetitive inter
169  Candida albicans isolates were selected for DNA fingerprinting with the complex DNA fingerprinting p
170                            Computer-assisted DNA fingerprinting with the complex probe Ca3 has been u
171 urrent infections was assessed by sequential DNA fingerprinting with the following three probes: the
172                                 We performed DNA fingerprinting with the IS6110 insertion sequence of
173                                              DNA fingerprinting with the IS6110 technique was not a s
174                                              DNA fingerprints with >5 bands were considered clustered
175 tical or differed by at most one band, while DNA fingerprints with < or =5 bands were considered clus
176  Bacillus strains and quantitatively compare DNA fingerprints with the known taxonomy of the genus.

 
Page Top