戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 d provide a mechanical benefit not seen with Dacron.
2  ECM implant region, a finding not seen with Dacron.
3 s were obtained with plasma-coated ePTFE and Dacron.
4 d in 9 grafts (native veins, 4; Gore-Tex, 3; Dacron, 2).
5          Sixty-seven prostheses were made of Dacron, 33 of Gore-Tex, and 7 were native veins.
6 TX/Marlex (3.6%), followed by Teflon (4.2%), Dacron (5.6%), Dualmesh (12.4%), GTX (14.8%), Permacol (
7       These results are in sharp contrast to Dacron, a commonly used myocardial patch.
8 umber of propidium iodide-positive ePTFE and Dacron adherent neutrophils.
9                                              Dacron and rayon swabs are an excellent choice for both
10                                    ePTFE and Dacron are potent neutrophil stimuli able to elicit acti
11 al restoration of myocardium frequently uses Dacron as a myocardial patch.
12  was performed of 16 patients who received a Dacron-covered stent-graft during revision or de novo cr
13  patency was observed among patients in whom Dacron-covered stent-grafts were placed during revision
14 he high-pollution areas studied, such as the Dacron factory and a landfill site, and 10(2)-10(3) ng p
15                            We therefore used Dacron for an in situ graft to span the gap, with subseq
16 on via transfemoral placement of a thin-wall Dacron graft occurred 4 +/- 2 months later (n = 23).
17 tween 6 to 8 months after transplantation, a Dacron graft, made impervious to prevent capillary ingro
18 nnealed to the external surface of a knitted Dacron graft.
19 m positively stained cells on the impervious Dacron graft.
20 ) for the transfemoral implantation of woven Dacron grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
21  of noninfected vascular prostheses, more in Dacron grafts than with other materials.
22                   Among prosthetic conduits, Dacron grafts were associated with higher major amputati
23  The ECs were seeded onto 4-mm-ID synthetic (Dacron) grafts.
24 s greater in the ECM group compared with the Dacron group (SAC: 4.1+/-0.9% versus -1.8+/-1.1, P<0.05)
25 a (17.5%), SIS/GTX (26.7%), SIS (34.6%), and Dacron/GTX (37.5%).When analyzed by biomaterial groups,
26 s were similar at baseline and after ECM and Dacron implantation.
27  from a bleeding time wound, (ii) binding to Dacron in an arteriovenous shunt, (iii) binding of mAb P
28                      The effect of ePTFE and Dacron on neutrophil viability appears to be caused by r
29 the right ventricle was repaired with either Dacron or ECM.
30  No inhibition was detected in any PCRs with dacron or rayon swabs.
31          Thrombosis was initiated by knitted dacron or TF-presenting teflon grafts deployed into arte
32 sec(-1)): -44+/-7 versus -17+/-2, ECM versus Dacron; P<0.05).
33                                            A Dacron patch containing an inflatable balloon was placed
34                                         With Dacron polyester or rayon-tipped swabs, there was no con
35         The number of colonies from both the Dacron polyester swabs and medium were significantly low
36    For culture, rayon swabs are superior and Dacron polyester swabs are inferior.
37                            Calcium alginate, Dacron polyester, or rayon-tipped swabs were inoculated
38 te scan was considered false positive due to Dacron pouch.
39 (R)/GTX(R) (n=56), Tutoplast dura(R) (n=40), Dacron(R) (n=34), Dacron(R)/GTX(R) (n=32), Permacol(R) (
40  Tutoplast dura(R) (n=40), Dacron(R) (n=34), Dacron(R)/GTX(R) (n=32), Permacol(R) (n=24), Teflon(R) (
41      Within 6 hours of adhesion to ePTFE and Dacron, respectively, 59% +/- 11% and 44% +/- 5% (n = 7)
42 ensity of uptake was significantly higher in Dacron (SUV-G = 2.35 and SUV-G/SUV-M = 1.72) than in Gor
43 rence swabs (FLOQSwab [COPAN Diagnostics] or Dacron swab [Deltalab]) and swab processing techniques (
44 ubjects enrolled early in the study rolled a Dacron swab across the meatus three times (method 1).
45 disease clinic by use of (1) a saline-wetted Dacron swab alone, (2) a saline-wetted cytobrush, or (3)
46 nto STM and, last, by those collected with a Dacron swab and placed into STM.
47                         We used a single dry Dacron swab paired with a single rayon Bacti-Swab with l
48         A report of favorable results with a Dacron swab without any transport media for GASDT by ano
49 te; 3M) abrasion followed by a saline-wetted Dacron swab.
50 jects between a conical cytology brush and a Dacron swab.
51  between the results obtained with the Copan Dacron swabs and those obtained with the Culturette swab
52 ndocervical brush appeared to be better than Dacron swabs for collecting specimens.
53      Compared to Culturette swabs, the Copan Dacron swabs had a sensitivity and a specificity of 97 a
54                                              Dacron swabs were inoculated with two combinations of fa
55  Subsequently, emery paper and saline-wetted Dacron swabs were used to obtain penile shaft, glans, fo
56 d a comparative clinical evaluation of Copan Dacron swabs with liquid media and Culturette swabs for
57                                        Copan Dacron swabs with liquid media are an acceptable alterna
58           For several years we used rayon or Dacron swabs with liquid transport media for collection
59             Neutrophil adhesion to ePTFE and Dacron triggers a rapid nonapoptotic cell death.
60 as the inhomogeneous uptake was seen more in Dacron vascular grafts.
61 ing the graft with a nonrestrictive external Dacron velour stent significantly reduced intimal hyperp
62 ate that anastomosis of liver allograft to a Dacron vena cava graft can be a feasible solution if tra
63 s (=1 versus >1), AVG thrombosis, AVG types (Dacron versus polytetrafluoroethylene).