戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ion, compared to the closely related species Drosophila simulans.
2 to be absent from close relatives, including Drosophila simulans.
3 e chromosomes to modulate gene expression in Drosophila simulans.
4  last 5.4 million years since its split from Drosophila simulans.
5 e since the most recent common ancestor with Drosophila simulans.
6 es of Drosophila melanogaster and 6 lines of Drosophila simulans.
7 parent in Drosophila melanogaster but not in Drosophila simulans.
8 hila melanogaster with their divergence from Drosophila simulans.
9  10 times faster than its generalist sibling Drosophila simulans.
10 ulations and four moderately inbred lines of Drosophila simulans.
11 hia and mtDNA, using a large inbred panel of Drosophila simulans.
12 rom several loci across chromosome arm 2R in Drosophila simulans.
13 eference laboratory strain and one strain of Drosophila simulans.
14 of nucleotide polymorphisms and fixations in Drosophila simulans.
15 Drosophila melanogaster and in one strain of Drosophila simulans.
16 mal loci from a North American population of Drosophila simulans.
17  individual X chromosomes in a population of Drosophila simulans.
18  of Drosophila mauritiana into the genome of Drosophila simulans.
19 in the genetic background of sibling species Drosophila simulans.
20 referred and unpreferred silent mutations in Drosophila simulans.
21 ster that is absent from its sister species, Drosophila simulans.(12-14) This species-specific DNA sa
22 s species diverged from its closest relative Drosophila simulans, 2.3 +/-.3 million years ago.
23  polymorphism and evolutionary divergence of Drosophila simulans, a close relative of Drosophila mela
24 n comparisons of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, a divergence of approximately 2.5 m
25 e leading to Drosophila melanogaster than in Drosophila simulans, a finding that agrees with other fe
26 stributed across chromosome arms X and 3R of Drosophila simulans, a sibling species of D. melanogaste
27  well as divergence with its sibling species Drosophila simulans, across 24.2 kb of noncoding DNA ide
28                The origins and divergence of Drosophila simulans and close relatives D. mauritiana an
29 t to function in the innate immune system of Drosophila simulans and compare these data to those from
30                                              Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana differ markedly in
31 loci misexpressed in sterile male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana relative to parent
32                           In hybrids between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana, males are sterile
33 m heads of recently diverged sister species, Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana, to enable detaile
34 leading to male sterility in hybrids between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.
35 uctive isolation between the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.
36 le genital arch differs dramatically between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana.
37 ies of Drosophila and polymorphism data from Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster.
38 , a Drosophila NF-kappaB/IkappaB protein, in Drosophila simulans and D. melanogaster.
39 es that affect mating discrimination between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia, quantitative trait
40 portant behavioral isolating barrier between Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia: male mate choice.
41 s can be estimated and apply it to data from Drosophila simulans and D. yakuba.
42 minus of the TIMELESS (TIM) clock protein in Drosophila simulans and D. yakuba.
43 ome-wide patterns of gene expression between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana.
44  the generalists Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia that specia
45 id rescue (Lhr) has functionally diverged in Drosophila simulans and interacts with Hybrid male rescu
46 ence using genomewide polymorphism data from Drosophila simulans and the divergence between D. simula
47  sterility between Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila simulans and were able to verify such a predi
48 eptopilina boulardi) from its infected host (Drosophila simulans) and subsequently undergo diminishin
49 sophila species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, and find that pulse song responses
50  the generalists Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, and the noni fruit specialist Droso
51  of D. melanogaster from its sister species, Drosophila simulans ( approximately 5.4 Mya).
52 omosomes from either Drosophila sechellia or Drosophila simulans are introgressed into a common D. si
53 ales of Drosophila melanogaster and males of Drosophila simulans are mated, the male progeny are invi
54  Hybrids between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans are sterile, and phenocopy mutations
55 of Drosophila mauritiana introgressed in the Drosophila simulans background.
56 lecular divergence, the three species of the Drosophila simulans clade are closely related to and ess
57 lower in Drosophila melanogaster than in the Drosophila simulans clade, primarily due to Y-linked ret
58                     The three species of the Drosophila simulans clade--the cosmopolitan species, D.
59  close evolutionary relationships within the Drosophila simulans clade-D. simulans, D. sechellia, and
60 found for crosses between the species in the Drosophila simulans clade.
61      Finally, we identified species from the Drosophila simulans complex as the likely origin of the
62 tion in three closely related species of the Drosophila simulans complex, which diverged only 250,000
63 he Winters cryptic sex-ratio drive system of Drosophila simulans comprises a driver, Distorter on the
64 ion, we established replicate populations in Drosophila simulans containing multiple Y-chromosomes (Y
65 id genotypes involving three sister species: Drosophila simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia.
66 is seen in the population genomic studies of Drosophila simulans described here and in other Drosophi
67 is sex-ratio (SR) meiotic drive occurring in Drosophila simulans Driver HP1D2 alleles prevent the seg
68 lex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila ya
69 riation in genome-wide gene expression among Drosophila simulans, Drosophila yakuba and four strains
70  a newly compiled data set of 115 genes from Drosophila simulans, each with each orthologs from D. me
71  species such as Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, few estimates of these parameters a
72 hia can cause cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans flies: if an infected male mates wit
73  nucleotide polymorphism in three paralogous Drosophila simulans genes, janusA (janA), janusB (janB),
74 utations among five alleles of each of eight Drosophila simulans genes.
75 ve compared the complete D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans genome sequences to estimate mean se
76              We create a new assembly of the Drosophila simulans genome using 142 million paired shor
77  mitochondrial genomes of the three distinct Drosophila simulans haplotypes with intron 1 of the alco
78 an extreme example, a domesticated strain of Drosophila simulans harbored both strongly photopositive
79 etween adults of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans has uncovered the evolution of genes
80                                          The Drosophila simulans HI gene Lethal hybrid rescue (Lhr) i
81  Drosophila melanogaster carrying mtDNA from Drosophila simulans in a D. melanogaster Oregon-R chromo
82 pressed genes (janusA, janusB, and ocnus) in Drosophila simulans included all three of these features
83 Wolbachia and in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans infected with wMelPop and wAu strain
84  loci that control innate food preference in Drosophila simulans into the genomic background of D. se
85 tle number between Drosophila mauritiana and Drosophila simulans is caused by evolutionary changes in
86                                              Drosophila simulans is hypothesized to have originated i
87 eoporin 160kDa (Nup160) gene of the fruitfly Drosophila simulans is incompatible with one or more fac
88                                              Drosophila simulans is known to harbor three distinct mi
89 ranscript at the 5' end of the R2 element in Drosophila simulans is rapid and utilizes an unexpected
90                                              Drosophila simulans is unusual in having a least three d
91                                              Drosophila simulans isofemale lines from Africa, South A
92          Here we used a panel of 32 isogenic Drosophila simulans lines to test for genetic variation
93 ce data from 255 Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans loci.
94                   In Drosophila mauritiana x Drosophila simulans male hybrids, OdsH from D. mauritian
95                        We utilized available Drosophila simulans molecular population genomic data to
96 increased mRNA and protein expression of the Drosophila simulans nonmuscle myosin II gene zipper.
97  the evolutionary dynamics of infection of a Drosophila simulans population by a maternally inherited
98 element, a highly invasive TE, in replicated Drosophila simulans populations under controlled laborat
99 l the spatio-temporal spread of Wolbachia in Drosophila simulans populations.
100 n was addressed in this study using lines of Drosophila simulans previously shown to have either acti
101 wAu strains from Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, respectively.
102 la melanogaster with that of divergence from Drosophila simulans shows that the A/S ratio of divergen
103 contiguous de novo reference genomes for the Drosophila simulans species complex (D. simulans, D. mau
104                                              Drosophila simulans strains infected with three differen
105      Here, we present data from the fruitfly Drosophila simulans that address these questions.
106 ocused on ~1/3 of embryos from CI crosses in Drosophila simulans that develop apparently normally thr
107 y, a unique domain of expression is found in Drosophila simulans that does occur in the closely relat
108 study has revealed a mobile DNA insertion in Drosophila simulans that is associated with an apparent
109 and single lines of Drosophila sechellia and Drosophila simulans, the latter two differing by approxi
110                      Together with data from Drosophila simulans, these data reveal the following.
111 ces of ESTs from the male accessory gland of Drosophila simulans to their orthologs in its close rela
112 related species, Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, under different environmental condi
113 achia popcorn strain from D. melanogaster to Drosophila simulans, we demonstrated that initial high d
114 y rescue between Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans, we show that this hybridization can
115 m genes in a California population sample of Drosophila simulans were shown to bear several hallmarks
116 sofemale lines obtained from a population of Drosophila simulans were surveyed for recent R2 insertio
117 evolution of the Dox meiotic drive system in Drosophila simulans, which affects male-female balance (
118 on evolution in 10 replicated populations of Drosophila simulans, which were adapted from standing va
119                                 Infection in Drosophila simulans with the endocellular symbiont Wolba

 
Page Top