ライフサイエンスコーパス: EAR

1 EAR increases expression of exopolysaccharide genes and

2 EAR prioritization identified multiple sites, biological

3 EAR was significantly reduced after 4 weeks (DeltaFEV1 2

4 EAR-motif-containing effector candidates were identified

5 person-years; SIR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.86-2.08]; EAR, 85.3 [95% CI, 76.2-94.8] per 100,000 person-years),

6 SK2190915 vs. placebo for the minimum FEV(1) EAR was 0.408 L (0.205, 0.611).

7 binds strongly, in addition to HNF-4, ARP-1, EAR-2, and EAR-3, heterodimers of RXRalpha with RARalpha

8 t four orphan/nuclear receptors, ERRalpha-1, EAR-2, COUP-TFI (EAR-3), and RARgamma, bind to the silen

9 person-years (SIR, 2.10 [95% CI, 2.06-2.14]; EAR, 719.3 [95% CI, 693.3-745.6] per 100,000 person-year

10 -1, and other positive clones include EAR-2, EAR-3 (COUP-TF1), RAR gamma, and p120E4F.

11 son-years; SIR, 11.56 [95% CI, 10.83-12.33]; EAR, 109.6 [95% CI, 102.0-117.6] per 100,000 person-year

12 an expected (SIR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.35; EAR 30.56).

13 nhancer of aerial rosette (on chromosome 4): EAR has been tentatively identified as a new allele of t

14 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7; observed, 473; EAR, 18.2) for advanced- and early-stage cHL, respective

15 as highest for hypopharyngeal SCC (SIR, 3.5; EAR, 307.1 per 10,000 PYR) and lowest for laryngeal SCC

16 a diagnosis (SIR 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.51; EAR 34.89).

17 2.4-fold (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.6; observed, 559; EAR, 61.6) and 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7; observed, 4

18 first year (SIR 2.07; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.79; EAR 150.37) and 1-5 years following lymphoma diagnosis (

19 PYR) and lowest for laryngeal SCC (SIR, 1.9; EAR, 147.8 per 10,000 PYR).

20 person-years; SIR, 7.54 [95% CI, 7.17-7.93]; EAR, 168.3 [95% CI, 158.6-178.4] per 100,000 person-year

21 person-years; SIR, 4.65 [95% CI, 4.32-4.99]; EAR, 76.1 [95% CI, 69.3-83.3] per 100,000 person-years).

22 axin-1 (CCL11) secreted enzymatically active EARs (EC(50) 5 nM) by piecemeal degranulation.

23 ved in the secretion of enzymatically active EARs following chemokine stimulation.

24 4, and the secretion of enzymatically active EARs was detected using an RNase activity assay.

25 An EAR (>=20% reduction from baseline in forced expiratory

26 he other containing LAZY1, which contains an EAR motif, and promotes vertical shoot growth in Oryza s

27 d 85 after dosing, with most experiencing an EAR within 1 hour.

28 rotein accretion was 2.7 and 5.7 g/d, for an EAR of 8.2 and 18.9 g/d in the second and the third trim

29 r median time to EAR; 44% of subjects had an EAR on days 1 and 28.

30 Most REGN1908/1909 patients did not have an EAR by 4 hours (the last time point tested).

31 dations for dietary reference values, ie, an EAR (median) and RDA (97.5th percentile) for healthy adu

32 Based on an EAR of 100 mg/d of vitamin C, the RDA is proposed to be

33 of thyroidal iodine stores would produce an EAR of 72 mug and a recommended dietary allowance of 80

34 omen [725 nmol (320 microg)/d] to provide an EAR of 1178 nmol (520 microg)/d.

35 n data, we suggest that 36 g/d represents an EAR for adequate glucose to support placental metabolism

36 Jsi1 likely activates the ERF branch via an EAR (ET-responsive element binding-factor-associated amp

37 which was shown previously to bind ARP-1 and EAR-3 but not HNF-4, binds strongly heterodimers of RXRa

38 to bind HNF-4, also binds strongly ARP-1 and EAR-3, as well as RXRalpha/RARalpha heterodimers and les

39 gly, in addition to HNF-4, ARP-1, EAR-2, and EAR-3, heterodimers of RXRalpha with RARalpha, and less

40 NDII (beta, -1.7; 95% CI, -6.7 to 3.4), and EAR (beta, -0.9; 95% CI -7.7 to 5.8).

41 T, aerial rosette gene (on chromosome 5) and EAR, enhancer of aerial rosette (on chromosome 4): EAR h

42 mineral intake, but contributions to AI and EAR for iron, zinc and calcium were very low (5-20%, 10-

43 rifies that the F(L) estimation equation and EAR to EAR(c) conversion methods are appropriate.

44 erapy was associated with worse MDASI-HN and EAR scores.

45 with significantly worse MDASI-HN, NDII, and EAR scores, while concurrent chemotherapy with radiother

46 estimated inadequate intakes between PA and EAR cut-point methods.

47 which is required for nuclear retention, and EAR-like domain, which participates in nuclear export, a

48 s at the 3-5 mm bud stages, with the SAD and EAR gene products detected in 4-7 mm buds.

49 and the corresponding gene products SAD and EAR were detected by Western blotting in 3-4 mm buds, co

50 mechanisms of mouse eosinophil secretion and EAR release, we combined an RNase assay of mouse EARs wi

51 SMRs and EARs differed substantially by cause of death and cHL st

52 d by a TOPLESS co-repressor 4 (TPL4)-binding EAR repression motif.

53 e element since ERRalpha-1 is expressed, but EAR-2 and RARgamma are only present in a small number of

54 novel Bacillus subtilis riboregulator called EAR that shares structural complexity with riboswitches

55 e risks (EARs) were seen with breast cancer (EAR, 2.2) and cancers of the oral cavity (EAR, 1.5) and

56 r (EAR, 2.2) and cancers of the oral cavity (EAR, 1.5) and skin (EAR, 1.5) per 1000 person-years.

57 rical EAR can be transformed into a circular EAR(c) that is convenient to use in two-dimensional enco

58 d by a novel cis-acting RNA element, coined 'EAR', located between the second and third gene of the e

59 o 1 of 3 dietary vitamin D targets (control; EAR: 400 IU/d; or RDA: 600 IU/d) for 12 wk (January to A

60 octogenarian women suggest that the current EAR and RDA for elderly women may be underestimated.

61 ue, although the 95% CI includes the current EAR.

62 These studies evaluated current EARs for children 4-8 y and women 19-30 y old.

63 es to maintain stores were below the current EARs of 275 (children) and 500 (women) ug RAE/d despite

64 [median (IQR): control, 227 (184-305) IU/d; EAR, 410 (363-516) IU/d; and RDA, 554 (493-653) IU/d; P

65 Excess absolute risks of death (EAR) and cured fraction (CF) indicates lifetime area und

66 e carbonate budgets of the reefs and derived EAR varied considerably across this ~58 km long fringing

67 This receptor, HaPiT2 (formerly designated EAR), in contrast to the human form of the A-MuLV recept

68 6 on CsDFR and CsANS, due to their different EAR and TLLLFR domains and interactions with CsTT8/CsGL3

69 auses of death were those for heart disease (EAR, 15.1; SMR, 2.1), infections (EAR, 10.6; SMR, 3.9),

70 after advanced-stage cHL and heart disease (EAR, 6.6; SMR, 1.7), ILD (EAR, 3.7; SMR, 13.1), and infe

71 osely related to JAZ8 and includes divergent EAR, TIFY/ZIM, and Jas motifs.

72 The discovery of a large number of divergent EARs suggests the intriguing possibility that these prot

73 e events (AEs) related to medications/drugs (EAR, 7.4; SMR, 5.0) after advanced-stage cHL and heart d

74 s to determine the time course of the early (EAR) and late allergic reaction (LAR).

75 O1 target genes, DAZ1 and DAZ2, which encode EAR motif-containing C2H2-type zinc finger proteins.

76 By contrast, expression of ERF6-EAR, in which ERF6 was fused to the ERF-associated amphi

77 , leading to hypersusceptibility of the ERF6-EAR transgenic plants to B. cinerea.

78 PAR encodes a K2-2 zinc finger, EAR-domain protein.

79 There is also a third group with a low flat EAR time course (91 of 355 [25.5%]; 95% CI, 21%-30%).

80 Following EAR, imaging studies are used to identify leaks since pa

81 are identified as late as 7 years following EAR.

82 beta2 integrins were found to be crucial for EAR secretion, and we suggest a mechanism in which sprea

83 chanism in which spreading is obligatory for EAR secretion.

84 t model, single i.p. injections of g-E and g-EAR delayed bioluminescence from metastasizing ES-2-luc

85 espectively, despite fast drug release for g-EAR in vivo versus in vitro.

86 After i.p. injection in mice, g-EAR showed gelation in the peritoneum and sustained, loc

87 ng of 17-AAG (Hsp90) and rapamycin (mTOR) (g-EAR).

88 ation results of hearing function from the G-EAR consortium and TwinsUK were used for meta-analysis.

89 Among the highest EARs for noncancer causes of death were those for heart

90 in transgenic plants by different Cys2/His2 EAR-containing proteins, is mediated by the EAR-domain.

91 and heart disease (EAR, 6.6; SMR, 1.7), ILD (EAR, 3.7; SMR, 13.1), and infections (EAR, 3.1; SMR, 2.2

92 ; SMR, 3.9), interstitial lung disease (ILD; EAR, 9.7; SMR, 22.1), and adverse events (AEs) related t

93 opharyngeal SCC (annual percentage change in EAR, -4.6%; P = .03).

94 In EARs, FEV1 and Feno value decreases reached 36.8% and 22

95 R alpha-1, and other positive clones include EAR-2, EAR-3 (COUP-TF1), RAR gamma, and p120E4F.

96 d secreted their granule proteins, including EAR and eosinophil peroxidase in response to CCL11.

97 t disease (EAR, 15.1; SMR, 2.1), infections (EAR, 10.6; SMR, 3.9), interstitial lung disease (ILD; EA

98 , ILD (EAR, 3.7; SMR, 13.1), and infections (EAR, 3.1; SMR, 2.2) after early-stage cHL.

99 In contrast, adaptive Inner EAR mean scores were significantly higher for those with

100 er of the association between standard Inner EAR scale scores and audiometry, with a positive associa

101 ; 210 [53.2%] female), standard static Inner EAR mean scores were appropriately higher in patients wi

102 no association between standard static Inner EAR scores and WRS.

103 The association between subjective Inner EAR results and audiometry was evaluated.

104 ncentrations (control: 55.8 +/- 12.3 nmol/L; EAR: 64.1 +/- 10.0 nmol/L; and RDA: 63.7 +/- 12.4 nmol/L

105 Changes in mean intake as %<EAR/>AI were determined.

106 males, there were significant increases in %<EAR for thiamin, riboflavin, vitamin C, iron, copper, an

107 males, there were significant increases in %<EAR for vitamin C and zinc for intakes from FB and from

108 kes from FB; and a significant decrease in %<EAR for vitamins A and E from FB+DSs.

109 and from FB+DSs; significant decreases in %<EAR for vitamins D and E, and magnesium for intakes from

110 e below the estimated average requirement (%<EAR) or above the adequate intake (%>AI)].

111 the N terminus, which is known to bind LxLxL EAR motifs.

112 The median EAR was estimated as the median of this distribution, 10

113 he UL for added sugars and >95% did not meet EAR for fiber.

114 in children's nutrient intakes and most met EARs although few had intakes above the ULs.

115 We found that secretion of mouse EARs in response to CCL11 and CCL24 was Galphai -depende

116 release, we combined an RNase assay of mouse EARs with ultrastructural studies.

117 A potential new EAR of 171 g/d accounts for maternal (100 g) and fetal (

118 te that Arabidopsis CDF proteins contain non-EAR motif-like conserved domains required for interactio

119 how that in yeast two-hybrid assays, the non-EAR protein, Related to ABI3/VP1-1 (RAV1), binds a novel

120 at a time, very low calcium intake (<60% of EAR), very low 25(OH)D (<12 ng/mL), and elevated PTH (>6

121 emales, receive more than the 70% and 90% of EAR value of vitamin C, respectively.

122 Endoleak is a common complication of EAR that can lead to aneurysm enlargement and even ruptu

123 the curve (AUC; 0-2 hours) and incidence of EAR (FEV(1) reduction >=20%).

124 However, time to EAR and incidence of EAR are less reproducible and are highly correlated with

125 Average FEV1, rather than incidence of EAR or time to EAR, could be considered as an endpoint f

126 In this study, the interaction of EAR-2, COUP-TFI, and RARgamma with S1 was confirmed by D

127 cation, terminal phenotype, and reduction of EAR protein levels.

128 demonstrate chemokine-dependent secretion of EARs from both intact mouse eosinophils and their cell-f

129 Importantly, the uniform size of EARs among chromosomes contributes to disproportionately

130 cationic protein, and their murine ortholog EARs, which have been shown to be involved in host defen

131 promoted rapid diversification of paralogous EAR genes in both primates and rodents.

132 at the antipathogen functions of the primate EARs are conserved after they are established and that t

133 The additional protein EAR, calculated for a GWG of 12 kg, was 9.1 and 21.2 g/d

134 (WBKC), to measure their additional protein EAR.

135 The effective attraction radius (EAR) of an attractive pheromone-baited trap was defined

136 ets and resultant estimated accretion rates (EAR) of the shallow reef zone of leeward Bonaire - betwe

137 used to calculate exposure-activity ratios (EARs) as a prioritization tool.

138 nts wore electronically activated recorders (EAR), an app that captured 30-second snippets of ambient

139 bottom-moored Ecological Acoustic Recorders (EARs) to investigate the temporal patterns in acoustic p

140 we identify privileged end-adjacent regions (EARs) spanning roughly 100 kb near all telomeres that es

141 ever, the signal transduction that regulates EARs secretion in response to physiological stimuli, suc

142 er Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) scale, alongside validated measures of their mental

143 he Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) scale.

144 ifferent areas (endemics-area relationships, EARs) should be used instead of SARs, and that SAR-based

145 dovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EAR) requires long-term surveillance for endoleak or inc

146 ng factor-associated Amphiphilic Repression (EAR) domain that triggers both HISTONE DEACETYLASE COMPL

147 ng factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) domain-dependent transcriptional repressors: NO abo

148 erved ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif at the carboxy terminus abolishes BZR1's abil

149 se factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif in the coding region of the apple ETHYLENE RE

150 se factor-associated Amphiphilic Repression (EAR) motif is known to facilitate interaction by binding

151 ng factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif is required for this transcriptional repressi

152 o the ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif, strongly suppresses B. cinerea-induced defen

153 ns an ERF-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif.

154 TOR (ERF)-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif.

155 ng factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motifs.

156 ng factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR-like) domain.

157 PL/TPR co-repressors, whereas the repressive EAR domain is dispensable and the acidic domain seems on

158 nd women, the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for protein

159 The Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for vitamin

160 n the current Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for adults of 0.66 g . kg(-)(1) . d(-)(1) based on

161 ood below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for calcium (49% and 44%, respectively), magnesium

162 potential new estimated average requirement (EAR) for carbohydrate intake to account for placental gl

163 at least the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for folate from foods alone.

164 ing below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) for folate or above the Tolerable Upper Intake Leve

165 an 10% of the estimated average requirement (EAR) for iron and zinc is provided by consumption of sto

166 an 10% of the estimated average requirement (EAR) for micronutrients.

167 pment, but no estimated average requirement (EAR) is available for this age group.

168 The estimated average requirement (EAR) is the amount of nutrient estimated to meet the req

169 not meet the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) of 400 IU/d.

170 ation for the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) of additional protein during pregnancy for a gestat

171 The median estimated average requirement (EAR) of nitrogen from these data was 105 mg N x kg(-1) x

172 on to use the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) rather than the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA)

173 y to meet the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) than were nonusers.

174 ake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), and only 21% had a vitamin D intake that met or ex

175 e values -the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), RDA, Adequate Intake (AI), and a tolerable Upper L

176 women, or the estimated average requirement (EAR).

177 resenting the estimated average requirement (EAR).

178 ly 30% of the estimated average requirement (EAR).

179 take (AI) and estimated average requirement (EAR).

180 [<60% of the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR)] or insufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (<20

181 meeting the estimated average requirements (EAR) and 2) exceeding the tolerable upper intake level (

182 from estimated average protein requirements (EAR) weighted by population age structure.

183 re below the Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) for 10-15% of the women.

184 w respective estimated average requirements (EARs) or exceeded 99th percentiles of usual intakes of t

185 phiphilic repression) motif, which resembles EAR motifs from plant ERF transcription factors, that in

186 ent inhibition of the early airway response (EAR) to antigen.

187 associated with the early allergic response (EAR).

188 attenuation of the early asthmatic response (EAR) by GSK2190915; treatment difference of GSK2190915 v

189 n the development of early airway responses (EAR), LAR and AHR in allergic sheep undergoing airway ch

190 (VI) on early and late asthmatic responses (EAR/LAR) and airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR).

191 were measured during early airway responses (EARs) and late airway responses after challenge with hou

192 mmalian eosinophil-associated ribonucleases (EARs), which are members of the ribonuclease A superfami

193 cidence ratios (SIRs), excess absolute risk (EAR) per 10,000 person-years at risk (PYR), and number n

194 ence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risks (EAR) compared to a SEER reference population with simila

195 nce ratios (SIRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) assessing relative and absolute cancer risk in tra

196 The highest excess absolute risks (EARs) were seen with breast cancer (EAR, 2.2) and cancer

197 ulation and estimated excess absolute risks (EARs; per 10,000 patient-years) to quantify disease-spec

198 udogenes of the eosinophil-associated RNase (EAR) family from 5 rodent species.

199 d secretion of eosinophil-associated RNases (EARs), such as the human eosinophilic cationic protein (

200 oteins are the eosinophil-associated RNases (EARs): the human eosinophil-derived neurotoxin and eosin

201 primary physiological function of the rodent EARs.

202 The SEER EAR, with sexes and races pooled, can be modeled as a su

203 Since EAR-2, COUP-TFI, and RARgamma are expressed at high leve

204 cers of the oral cavity (EAR, 1.5) and skin (EAR, 1.5) per 1000 person-years.

205 e EAR and F(L) were used to obtain a smaller EAR(c) for use in a two-dimensional model that caught an

206 Under the same conditions, a spherical EAR was placed at the center of the 10-m layer and inter

207 The spherical EAR can be transformed into a circular EAR(c) that is co

208 63 restores filament growth in pTCP15::TCP15-EAR plants, whereas overexpression of TCP15 rescues the

209 f TCP15 to a repressor domain (pTCP15::TCP15-EAR) had shorter stamens, indicating that class-I TCPs s

210 presses transcription through its C-terminal EAR motif.

211 A conserved C-terminal EAR-like motif found in IGT genes was required for these

212 lear receptors, ERRalpha-1, EAR-2, COUP-TFI (EAR-3), and RARgamma, bind to the silencer (S1) region o

213 These findings show that EAR repression domains in a subgroup of JAZ proteins rep

214 rt chromosomes in pachynema, suggesting that EARs partially underlie the curiously high recombination

215 The EAR and F(L) were used to obtain a smaller EAR(c) for us

216 The EAR for a particular attractant and insect species in na

217 The EAR motif in BZR1 mediates recruitment of TPL to BZR1-re

218 The EAR mutation in ERF4 results in reduced repression of ER

219 The EAR repression domain was required for MYBH-regulated le

220 The EAR was derived by adding the DFE of this quantity [454

221 The EAR(c) equation requires an estimate of the effective th

222 Eight hours after the EAR, FEV1 was still decreased (P < .001), whereas Feno v

223 tumor was 2.2 (95% CI, 2.1 to 2.2), and the EAR was 167.7 cancers per 10,000 PYR.

224 ntified putative interactors of Zat7 and the EAR-domain, including WRKY70 and HASTY, a protein involv

225 y blocked the LAR and AHR and attenuated the EAR phase.

226 in a lower proportion with intake below the EAR and a higher proportion with intake above the UL.

227 -65 y) women had intakes from food below the EAR for calcium (48% and 74%, respectively), magnesium (

228 ions included: 1) >10% of children below the EAR for vitamins A and E, pantothenate, calcium, and fib

229 y), and most had intakes that were below the EAR for vitamins E (82%) and D (74%).

230 childbearing age still have intake below the EAR, whereas up to 12% of younger children have intake a

231 ated for pulmonary functions during both the EAR and late allergic response, and airway hyperresponsi

232 EAR-containing proteins, is mediated by the EAR-domain.

233 type zinc finger proteins, which contain the EAR transcriptional repressor domain, are thought to pla

234 ent intake for individuals; in contrast, the EAR has only a 50% probability of adequacy.

235 In contrast, the EAR-motif appears not to be involved in suppressing the

236 Prioritized bioactivities from the EAR analysis were linked to discrete adverse outcome pat

237 FF/VI provides additive protection from the EAR relative to its components, significant protection o

238 We also identify the EAR element in other species within the order Bacillales

239 If the EAR cannot be determined, an adequate intake (AI) amount

240 Ninety-six percent of children in the EAR and RDA groups and 67% of the control group had 25(O

241 try analysis showed that the mutation in the EAR motif causes a reduction in the interaction with TPL

242 No changes were observed in the EAR, BAL fluid IL-4 levels, or serum total and Ag-specif

243 ales is not symmetric, which invalidates the EAR cut-point approach for assessing the prevalence of i

244 kes of most US children aged 1-13 y meet the EAR.

245 microg) DFE/d was derived by multiplying the EAR by 1.2 to account for an estimated 10% CV.

246 ts showed once more the unsuitability of the EAR cut-point method to calculate the prevalence of iron

247 The presence of the EAR element within the eps operon is required for readth

248 nt discovery that the gene repertoire of the EAR family is much larger in rodents than in primates ha

249 For example, 1 to 56% of the EAR for I and up to 10% for Se or 37% for Zn could be co

250 T1 + FER1 plants could provide 40-50% of the EAR for iron and 60-70% of the EAR for zinc in 1- to 6-y

251 40-50% of the EAR for iron and 60-70% of the EAR for zinc in 1- to 6-year-old children and nonlactati

252 ity between the evolutionary patterns of the EAR genes and those of the major histocompatibility comp

253 Our study demonstrates key roles of the EAR motif and TPL in BR regulation of gene expression an

254 with DU1-29 also reduced the severity of the EAR to antigen.

255 The inhibition of the EAR with one of the inhibitors, TBC-1269, was associated

256 A deletion or a mutation of the EAR-motif of Zat7 abolishes salinity tolerance without a

257 This study assessed the effect of age on the EAR and RDA for protein.

258 od Safety Authority (EFSA) only provided the EAR (50th percentile), 90th, 95th (population reference

259 preference for using the RDA rather than the EAR for the DVs: 1) consumers are likely to expect that

260 tandard for nutrient intake, rather than the EAR, has a potential benefit (a higher prevalence of ade

261 e of adults with usual intakes less than the EAR.

262 40% of females has an intake higher than the EAR.

263 research studies available suggest that the EAR and RDA might be greater than the assumed 0.66 and 0

264 Sensitivity analysis showed that the EAR cut-point method could also result in large overesti

265 these observations, we hypothesize that the EAR element associates with RNA polymerase to promote pr

266 We also find that the EAR element promotes readthrough of heterologous termina

267 Our findings demonstrate that the EAR-domain of Cys2/His2-type zinc finger proteins plays

268 These results demonstrate that the EAR-motif of Zat7 is directly involved in enhancing the

269 r JAZ proteins, recruits TOPLESS through the EAR motif-containing adaptor protein NINJA.

270 The canola MYB80 was fused to the EAR (ERF-associated amphiphilic repression) repressor an

271 served when employing the PA compared to the EAR cut-point method, using EFSA's reference values.

272 is quantity [454 nmol (200 microg)/d] to the EAR for nonpregnant women [725 nmol (320 microg)/d] to p

273 ese defects are rescued by TPL fusion to the EAR motif-mutated BZR1.

274 to provide a DNA-binding module fused to the EAR-repression domain (SRDX) to generate a chimeric repr

275 ction (CF) indicates lifetime area under the EAR curve.

276 abiotic stress, it is not clear whether the EAR-motif of these proteins is involved in this function

277 A were compared to results obtained with the EAR cut-point method.

278 hether vitamin D intakes consistent with the EAR or Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA), through fort

279 At 12 wk, the EAR and RDA groups had significantly higher vitamin D in

280 y of the women had dietary intakes below the EARs for iron (97%), vitamin D (96%), and folate (70%).

281 RAE/d despite the TLRs being higher than the EARs were formulated to maintain (i.e., 0.07 umol VA/g l

282 contributed to the diversification of these EAR genes.

283 Interventions based on these EARs may need to be scaled back.

284 This EAR is based on measurements of potassium accretion in h

285 that the F(L) estimation equation and EAR to EAR(c) conversion methods are appropriate.

286 CR3-mediated signaling pathway that leads to EAR secretion in both mouse and human eosinophils.

287 However, time to EAR and incidence of EAR are less reproducible and are h

288 EV1, rather than incidence of EAR or time to EAR, could be considered as an endpoint for intervention

289 e, respectively, with similar median time to EAR; 44% of subjects had an EAR on days 1 and 28.

290 ining nonspecific DNA-binding domain and two EAR motifs typically found in repressors of stress-induc

291 ent sequences of 2417 nucleotides at the two EAR loci, the eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN, RNase

292 We demonstrate that the two EAR motifs in DAZ1/DAZ2 mediate their function in the ma

293 mediated repression depends on an LxLxL-type EAR (for ERF-associated amphiphilic repression) motif at

294 Data on 220 patients undergoing EAR were retrospectively reviewed.

295 A total of 52 patients (24%) who underwent EAR had endoleak detected during postoperative follow-up

296 USCHEL directly interacts with EXPORTINS via EAR-like domain which is also required for destabilizing

297 While it is unclear whether EAR senses a biofilm-inducing signal, the results sugges

298 of eosinophil-associated diseases, in which EARs are key factors.

299 eat, encodes a C2H2 zinc finger protein with EAR motifs which putatively functions as a transcription

300 an equivalent number of insects as that with EAR in three dimensions.