ライフサイエンスコーパス: EF

1 EF at the time of MI and within 180 days post-MI were de

2 EF modeling showed the field strength to be uniform in t

3 EF treatment with an IrO(2)/air-diffusion cell ensured t

4 EF undergoes a largescale conformational rearrangement w

5 EF-Tu delivers aa-tRNA to the ribosomal A site and parti

6 EF-Tu plays a critical role in mRNA decoding by increasi

7 e cooperativity between EF-4, EF-3 and EF-2, EF-1 and allostery involving the four EF-hands.

8 For crop-specific emissions, the NH(3) EFs averaged 11.13%-13.95% for the three main staple cro

9 Globally, the NH(3) EFs averaged 12.56% and 14.12% for synthetic N fertilize

10 antified the region- and crop-specific NH(3) EFs of N fertilizer by compiling data from 324 worldwide

11 The region- and crop-specific NH(3) EFs of N fertilizer established in this study offer refe

12 ly, south-eastern Asia had the highest NH(3) EFs of synthetic N fertilizer (19.48%) and Europe had th

13 o found positive cooperativity between EF-4, EF-3 and EF-2, EF-1 and allostery involving the four EF-

14 ability estimates up to 0.61, to date only 6 EF-associated loci have been reported.

15 tify genes that interacted with PW to affect EF.

16 end of accommodation corridor passage after EF-Tu release can be reengaged by EF-Tu.GTP from solutio

17 ly coupled electrodes to deliver alternating EFs to cell and tissue cultures.

18 echocardiogram, with 573 (66%) measuring an EF >50%.

19 The crystal structure revealed an EF domain with two Ca(2+)-binding motifs inserted within

20 r cells and their migratory ability under an EF.

21 he surface enhancement factor (EF), until an EF of ~5, after which the sensor performance deteriorate

22 we generated continuous, 200-kHz EMF with an EF amplitude profile spanning 0-6.5 V/cm pk-pk and appli

23 93, P < .001), EDV (r = 0.92, P < .001), and EF (r = 0.73, P < .001).

24 ositive cooperativity between EF-4, EF-3 and EF-2, EF-1 and allostery involving the four EF-hands.

25 tem respiration (RE) in response to T(a) and EF anomalies were compared for different forest types.

26 bryoniae, and L. chinensis based on COI and EF-1a genes, and microsatellite DNA.

27 The application of CSIA and EF allows characterizing the transformation of organic p

28 The ZZ-type zinc finger and EF-hand domain protein 1 (ZZEF1) is a multidomain-contai

29 ng exercise in selected patients with HF and EF >=40%, without compromising systemic perfusion.

30 c PA channels with partially unfolded LF and EF at 4.6 and 3.1- angstrom resolution, respectively.

31 antigen facilitated the diffusion of LF and EF into the blood compartment.

32 first alpha helix and beta strand of LF and EF unfold and dock into a deep amphipathic cleft, called

33 only 7% of mice presented bacteremia, LF and EF were detected in the blood of 100% and 42% of mice, r

34 e association between long-term outcomes and EF recovery among young MI patients has not been investi

35 of neural systems supporting reflection and EF skills to an increased risk for general features of p

36 single-step displacements from ribosome and EF-Tu diffusive trajectories before and after Onc112 tre

37 ular basis for ribosome recycling by RRF and EF-G remains unclear.

38 ediate the release of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu and EF-Tu from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis.

39 ts the duration and amplitude of the applied EFs.

40 ns and determined their responses to applied EFs with a high throughput screen.

41 conductive channel while MICU1 and MICU2 are EF-hand proteins that regulate the channel activity in a

42 splant has become increasingly prevalent, as EF deficits are associated with poor disease-related out

43 endent group of 99 patients, whose automated EF values were compared with reference values obtained b

44 E and GPCR-Bench) and resulted in an average EF of 9.75 and 13.70, respectively, which compare favora

45 Among patients with abnormal baseline EF, information on follow-up EF was available for 216, o

46 %, whereas 1,221 (71%) had a normal baseline EF.

47 There were 1,724 patients with baseline EF data: 503 (29%) had EF <50%, whereas 1,221 (71%) had

48 We also found positive cooperativity between EF-4, EF-3 and EF-2, EF-1 and allostery involving the fo

49 the flexibility of the hinge region between EF-hands 2 and 3 is required for placing GCAP1-regulated

50 expanding the effective surface area beyond EFs of ~5 decreases sensor performance.

51 discovered a characteristic calcium-binding EF-hand-like motif in NS2 and found that the calcium bin

52 This inverse BMI-EF association was due to a significant overlap in genet

53 d EF (LVEF <=40%), 42% in HF with borderline EF (LVEF, 41%-49%), and 31% in HF with preserved EF (LVE

54 sage after EF-Tu release can be reengaged by EF-Tu.GTP from solution, coupled to GTP hydrolysis.

55 ates after the delivery of aminoacyl-tRNA by EF-Tu*GTP.

56 ly unaffected suggesting STAT3 modulation by EFs as one mechanism driving effects.

57 ignificant association with EF (rs6689879*C: EF reduction = 4.2%; P = 2.8 x 10(-8)) in 246 survivors

58 the reintroduction of the mini-otoferlins C2-EF, C2-DEF, or C2-ACEF allowed us to uncover and charact

59 y method suffers from a poorly characterized EF profile and conductive heating that limits the durati

60 ency (100-300 kHz), low-amplitude (1-3 V/cm) EFs, which they called "tumor-treating fields (TTFields)

61 ubfamilies use different folds (coiled-coil, EF-hand, HOOK domain) and different surface contacts to

62 used to measure its three components (common EF, updating, shifting) based on the model proposed by M

63 d on Miyake and Friedman's model: one common EF component process (incorporating inhibition, shifting

64 he results indicated that age-related common EF component differences are mediated by regional gray m

65 d significantly with PW to affect the common EF component.

66 lived CO(2) emissions, would reduce contrail EF by 20.0% [17.4, 23.0%].

67 both interventions could reduce the contrail EF by 91.8% [88.6, 95.8%].

68 1.7% of the fleet could reduce the contrail EF by up to 59.3% [52.4, 65.6%], with only a 0.014% [0.0

69 of flights contribute to 80% of the contrail EF in this region.

70 8.8% [45.2, 82.1%] reduction in the contrail EF.

71 s such as stress, training both hot and cool EF skills, and adding a reflective, metacognitive compon

72 al evidence for a continuum from more "cool" EF skills activated in emotionally neutral contexts to m

73 We propose and test a model of how each core EF (i.e., working memory, inhibition, and flexibility) c

74 he CCA tail of the tRNA, weakens the crucial EF-Tu-tRNA interactions, which lowers tRNA binding affin

75 After successful decoding, EF-Tu hydrolyzes GTP, which triggers a conformational ch

76 study offer references to update the default EF in the IPCC Tier 1 guideline.

77 In contrast, our device delivers EFs with a well-characterized radial profile in a noncon

78 meric fraction [EF] = 0.55-0.77) and dishes (EF = 0.53-0.68).

79 We find that hairpin opening occurs during EF-G-catalyzed translocation and is driven by the forwar

80 rmational changes typically only seen during EF-G-mediated translocation of the mRNA-tRNA pairs.

81 fraction (EF; EF >=50%), HF with reduced EF (EF <50%), and MI.

82 HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF; EF >=50%), HF with reduced EF (EF <50%), and MI.

83 Patients who experienced EF recovery had less severe angiographic disease, lower

84 cells participate in either extrafollicular (EF) or germinal center (GC) responses.

85 evidence that switch I of EF-Tu facilitates EF-Tu's involvement during aa-tRNA selection.

86 urface-exposed translation elongation factor EF-Tu carrying a Lys-5 trimethylation, incorporated by t

87 A that is delivered by the elongation factor EF-Tu(1).

88 o investigate the diffusion of edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF), we use sensitive quantitativ

89 ther its lethal factor (LF) or edema factor (EF) into the host cell.

90 s either lethal factor (LF) or edema factor (EF), respectively, play an important yet incompletely de

91 guanosine triphosphatase elongation factor (EF)-Tu.

92 etermination of the SERS enhancement factor (EF), including suitable Raman reporter/probe molecules,

93 creases with the surface enhancement factor (EF), until an EF of ~5, after which the sensor performan

94 AGELLAN achieved a median enrichment factor (EF) of 14.38, significantly higher than that using indiv

95 The enrichment factors (EF) of the target compounds showed no correlation with t

96 and measurements of their emission factors (EFs) are sparse for regions of sub-Saharan Africa.

97 ization require the use of emission factors (EFs) for cookstoves, which are specific to fuel type and

98 mented the newly available emission factors (EFs) from a recent field campaign, Nepal Ambient Monitor

99 region- and crop-specific emission factors (EFs) of N fertilizer for NH(3) are poorly developed and

100 typically estimated using emission factors (EFs), defined as the proportion of the terrestrial nitro

101 factors and global N(2) O emissions factors (EFs) from urine patches.

102 e extraction, increasing enrichment factors (EFs) by severalfold compared with the use of n-octanol o

103 e catalyst for heterogeneous electro-Fenton (EF) treatment of organic water pollutants is discussed.

104 onors: ferulic acid (FA) and ethyl ferulate (EF).

105 layered nanoparticle (NP)-electrospun fiber (EF) composite to provide sustained-release of GRFT, and

106 g nervous system, endogenous electric field (EF) influence embryonic growth.

107 within programmed stand-off electric fields (EFs) and monitoring cellular responses via AC electrical

108 d exceeding 6.5 V/cm pk-pk) electric fields (EFs) to cell and tissue cultures generated using induced

109 Electrical fields (EFs) have significant effects on cancer cell migration (

110 he coupling effects of electrokinetic flows (EF) such as alternating current electroosmosis (ACEO) an

111 After adjustment for EF, each percent reduction in GLS was associated with a

112 ially transit the accommodation corridor for EF-Tu.GDP to release.

113 ties, radiative forcing, and energy forcing (EF) from individual flights can be 2 orders of magnitude

114 vine MFGM supplemented experimental formula (EF) and compared to infants fed standard formula (SF) an

115 EF-2, EF-1 and allostery involving the four EF-hands.

116 Ejection fraction (EF) and shortening fraction (SF) were recorded after eac

117 ancestry, first based on ejection fraction (EF) as a continuous outcome, followed by clinical histor

118 5006 (60.7%) had pretrial ejection fraction (EF) available, including n=959 with EF <=45%.

119 The preserved LV ejection fraction (EF) group in MIS-C showed diastolic dysfunction.

120 Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) is an indicator of cardiac function, usually assesse

121 Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) recovery is associated with better long-term outcome

122 ients, stratified by both ejection fraction (EF) status (reduced [HFrEF], preserved [HFpEF], not clas

123 failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF), improvements in left ventricular EF (LVEF) are asso

124 cases (60%) had a normal ejection fraction (EF).

125 tation (MR) when using LV ejection fraction (EF).

126 r = 0.97, P < .001), and ejection fraction (EF: r = 0.94, P < .001).

127 all HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF; EF >=50%), HF with reduced EF (EF <50%), and MI.

128 A shift of the enantiomer fraction (EF) (-) from 0.50 to 0.35 in soil at the jointing stage

129 emperature (T(a) ) and evaporative fraction (EF).

130 and systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] <50%), followed for 5.8 +/- 4.7 years (up to 18 year

131 ichment in the cells (enantiomeric fraction [EF] = 0.55-0.77) and dishes (EF = 0.53-0.68).

132 hort wave of plasmablasts (PBs) arising from EF sites, followed by GC producing somatically mutated m

133 nts that mediate the release of aa-tRNA from EF-Tu and EF-Tu from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis.

134 tely results in the release of the tRNA from EF-Tu.

135 Executive function (EF) is vital to human beings.

136 Executive function (EF) refers to a set of cognitive functions that support

137 Executive function (EF) skills are neurocognitive skills that support the re

138 emonstrated low-normal LV systolic function (EF, 53%; SF, 27%), and she subsequently began intensific

139 Examining executive functioning (EF) posttransplant has become increasingly prevalent, as

140 two conserved proteins, elongation factor G (EF-G) and the ribosome recycling factor (RRF).

141 factor (RRF) and GTPase elongation factor G (EF-G), synergistically split 100S ribosomes in a GTP-dep

142 ind to the drug target (Elongation factor G [EF-G]) and promote dissociation of EF-G from FA-stalled

143 he human mitochondrial elongation factor G1 (EF-G1(mt)) in three distinct conformational states, incl

144 Children with higher general EF have lower BMIs, and this association is primarily at

145 atients with baseline EF data: 503 (29%) had EF <50%, whereas 1,221 (71%) had a normal baseline EF.

146 f the 2,447 patients, 118 (4.8%) had ES-HCM (EF 39 +/- 9%; range 12% to 49%) at age 48 +/- 15 years.

147 NA permeation is severely limited for higher EFs.

148 n emotionally neutral contexts to more "hot" EF skills needed for the reversal of motivationally sign

149 The structural mechanism of how EF-Tu is involved in proofreading remains to be fully re

150 Gene-level enrichment analysis identified EF-hand calcium binding domain 14 as a novel susceptibil

151 Here, we identify EF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 9 (EFC

152 methylation of EF-Tu by EftM does not impact EF-Tu's canonical function in translation.

153 cating the BAG3 locus on chromosome 10q26 in EF variation, with the strongest association observed fo

154 ations reveal that conformational changes in EF-Tu coordinate the rate-limiting passage of aa-tRNA th

155 ties that mediate age-related differences in EF components remain unclear.

156 Difficulties in EF are transdiagnostic indicators of atypical developmen

157 r, the mito-specific C-terminal extension in EF-G1(mt) is directly involved in translocation of the a

158 Occurrence of LVSD, trends in EF and SF, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall

159 ines in isolation showed random migration in EFs of physiological strength, whereas cells in monolaye

160 providing access to previously inaccessible EF regimes.

161 effect was found to increase with increasing EF amplitude.

162 daic currents from the MB reporter at larger EFs that require higher square wave voltammetry (SWV) fr

163 rate reduction in cell density (<10%) at low EF amplitudes (<4 V/cm) and a greater reduction in cell

164 Patients with lower EF were more likely to have experienced ST-segment eleva

165 ations by binding this ion through a luminal EF-hand domain.

166 BNP concentrations and left ventricular (LV) EF, LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV end-systo

167 pean ancestry but with attenuated magnitude (EF reduction = 0.4%; P = 0.042).

168 (SD, 9.4) years; 385 (49%) were female; mean EF was 56%; and median N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic

169 Nine EF tasks were used to measure its three components (comm

170 e were determined via ELISA, showing that NP-EF composites achieved high GRFT loading, and provided s

171 imilar to untreated mice, suggesting that NP-EF composites may be a promising and safe sustained-deli

172 The in vitro efficacy of GRFT NP-EFs was assessed using HIV-1 pseudovirus assays, demonst

173 Additionally, sustained-release NP-EFs, administered 24 h prior to infection, prevented aga

174 n interaction is disrupted in the absence of EF-G, resulting in slippage of the translational reading

175 monitoring showed an increase in R(Cell) of EF stimulated and control HUVECs after 54 h and 78 h, re

176 ons, we studied the conformational change of EF-Tu from the guanosine triphosphate to guanine diphosp

177 with PW to affect the updating component of EF, and the GSE43955 pathway interacted significantly wi

178 elated differences in specific components of EF.

179 e switch 1 loop of EF-Tu allows domain D1 of EF-Tu to rotate relative to domains D2 and D3 and leads

180 sensitivity and specificity of detecting of EF <=35% were calculated.

181 y 0.90 and specificity 0.92 for detection of EF <=35%.

182 nd understanding the genetic determinants of EF is important to better understand the pathophysiology

183 factor G [EF-G]) and promote dissociation of EF-G from FA-stalled ribosome complexes.

184 GTP hydrolysis enables the GTPase domain of EF-Tu to extend away, releasing EF-Tu from tRNA.

185 influence on age-related general elements of EF.

186 of La:Dy, which gave an enrichment factor of EF(La:Dy) =297+/-31 for the solid fraction, compared to

187 changes in the conformational flexibility of EF-G in response to FusB binding and show that these cha

188 structure and conformational flexibility of EF-G, but which of these changes drives FA resistance wa

189 um-binding protein belonging to the group of EF-hand calcium-binding proteins.

190 viability data that showed faster growth of EF-stimulated HUVECSs.

191 ed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of EF in 26 638 adults from the Genetic Epidemiology Resear

192 ates during the unfolding of five helices of EF-cleaved bR.

193 Here, we provide evidence that switch I of EF-Tu facilitates EF-Tu's involvement during aa-tRNA sel

194 Switch I of EF-Tu rapidly converts from an alpha-helix into a beta-h

195 cant change in the dynamics of domain III of EF-G(C3) that leads to an increase in a minor, more diso

196 ween the nucleotide and the switch 1 loop of EF-Tu allows domain D1 of EF-Tu to rotate relative to do

197 nt understanding of the functional output of EF and GC responses and the molecular switches promoting

198 he first 24 h, the viability (population) of EF-stimulated cells was smaller than non-stimulated cont

199 tal tasks to test the component processes of EF based on Miyake and Friedman's model: one common EF c

200 l, biophysical, and functional properties of EF-hand-like motifs in plant proteins.

201 within EF-G by which FA prevents release of EF-G from the ribosome.

202 oteins (MRPs) and a mito-specific segment of EF-G1(mt) in mitochondrial tRNA (tRNA(mt)) translocation

203 ncrease in a minor, more disordered state of EF-G domain III.

204 ith eftM and conclude that trimethylation of EF-Tu by EftM does not impact EF-Tu's canonical function

205 TTFields" by better isolating the effects of EFs and providing access to previously inaccessible EF r

206 gration was then surveyed in the presence of EFs in vitro.

207 ts of the lead variants at TMEM40 or BAG3 on EF are largely independent of these conditions.

208 that interacted with parental warmth (PW) on EF.

209 centrations of PFAAs has little influence on EFs and that modeling studies designed to quantify the s

210 ic dysfunction (LVSD) defined as SF < 28% or EF < 55%.

211 Our device can be readily extended to other EF frequency and amplitude regimes.

212 cant standardized mean difference in overall EF skills with transplant recipients demonstrating worse

213 nsplant recipients demonstrate worse overall EF skills and deficits in working memory, processing spe

214 optimized parameters were established as PC/EF molar ratio 1/15, enzyme load 30% (w/w) and incubatio

215 ponses that persist for months to persistent EF responses with dominant suppression of GCs.

216 .8) and a 4.4-fold increase with a preserved EF (hazard ratio: 4.4; 95% confidence interval: 2.4 to 7

217 Even preserved EF patients showed subtle changes in myocardial deformat

218 ither a reduced (12.3 +/- 2.7%) or preserved EF (15.3 +/- 2.0%; p < 0.001).

219 patients with either a reduced or preserved EF.

220 those with reduced EF <=45% versus preserved EF >45% or unknown.

221 ar), but exceeded 10-fold HCM with preserved EF (0.2%/year; p < 0.001).

222 LVEF, 41%-49%), and 31% in HF with preserved EF (LVEF >=50%).

223 ociated with lower risk of HF with preserved EF but not HF with reduced EF.

224 ociated with lower risk of HF with preserved EF but not HF with reduced EF.

225 Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has proposed EFs of 0.25% and 0.75%, though studies have suggested th

226 ormatics screening, we identified a putative EF-hand-like Ca(2+) binding motif in the carboxyl termin

227 crease in MACE among patients with a reduced EF (hazard ratio: 1.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 1

228 resenting with either a preserved or reduced EF.

229 resenting with either a preserved or reduced EF.

230 as not associated with significantly reduced EF.

231 first HHF was similar for those with reduced EF <=45% versus preserved EF >45% or unknown.

232 ion fraction (EF; EF >=50%), HF with reduced EF (EF <50%), and MI.

233 CAD differed by LVEF: 53% in HF with reduced EF (LVEF <=40%), 42% in HF with borderline EF (LVEF, 41%

234 of outpatients with chronic HF with reduced EF, improvements in LVEF were common.

235 HF with preserved EF but not HF with reduced EF.

236 registry of outpatients with HF with reduced EF.

237 HF with preserved EF but not HF with reduced EF.

238 ive heating and enabling thermally regulated EF delivery.

239 se domain of EF-Tu to extend away, releasing EF-Tu from tRNA.

240 quality of life, LV structural remodeling ( EF >5% and ESV 10%) and heart failure event/cardiovascul

241 ar dynamics simulations of the full ribosome-EF-Tu complex.

242 The bacterial RRF/EF-G pair was previously known to target only the post-t

243 We found that although HflX and the RRF/EF-G pair are functionally interchangeable, HflX is expr

244 her enhancement factors of Raman scattering (EFs) for particular enantiomers, and the SERS intensity

245 We have identified the single EF-hand Ca2+-binding protein Ca2+-dependent modulator of

246 cover the IMAC, we have identified the small EF-hand protein calmodulin-like protein 4 (CALML4) as an

247 e-exposed patients had significantly smaller EF and SF declines than unexposed patients across course

248 s was to compare overall and domain-specific EF between healthy youth and those with a kidney, heart,

249 on, shifting, and updating) and two specific EF component processes (shifting and updating).

250 Although family studies indicate that EF has an important genetic component with heritability

251 Research indicates that EF skills can be cultivated through scaffolded training

252 Strikingly, we show for the first time that EFs significantly downregulate T cell activation followi

253 strate-binding groove was formed between the EF domain and the conserved core of the catalytic domain

254 ntly, single amino acid substitutions in the EF-hand domain of SEPN1 identified as clinical variation

255 f a hydrophobic cluster of residues near the EF-hand Ca(2+) binding sites.

256 The proximity of the EF domain to the active site suggests that Ca(2+) bindin

257 , but capture different conformations of the EF loop via specific hydrophobic interactions.

258 ctural changes, suggesting a key role of the EF-hand domain in SEPN1 function.

259 analysis predicted a destabilization of the EF-Ts variants complex with EF-Tu, in agreement with the

260 We reported the EF-directed migration of both rat Schwann cells (SCs) an

261 ns for factors that are likely to affect the EFs and should be included in all future studies, these

262 ow) were significant factors influencing the EFs reviewed.

263 le for 216, of whom 90 (42%) recovered their EF to >=50%.

264 e outcomes between those who recovered their EF versus those who did not.

265 Among them, EF recovery occurred in more than 40% and was independen

266 These EF-induced functional changes were accompanied by a sign

267 A major application of these EFs is as an emerging cancer treatment modality.

268 tors of age-related differences in the three EF components.

269 297+/-31 for the solid fraction, compared to EF(La:Dy) =159+/-22 in the absence of the field, and ach

270 HUVECs were exposed to EF (162 mV/mm at 1.2 Hz) and monitored with standard via

271 Binding of FusB to EF-G causes a significant change in the dynamics of doma

272 and identify moderating variables related to EF differences between these 2 groups.

273 bserves neural processes that are related to EF.

274 of different glial cell types in response to EF stimulation.

275 e translational GTPase elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) delivers a transfer RNA (tRNA) to the ribosome.

276 s a ternary complex of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA), and GTP.

277 of Onc112 on ribosome, elongation factor-Tu (EF-Tu), and DNA spatial distributions and diffusive prop

278 leckstrin homology (PH) domain and first two EF hands (EF1/2) are required for Rap1A activation and i

279 especially main chain conformations, of two EF-lobes in holo-form are quite similar; this is a good

280 ements with other P4Hs while having a unique EF domain.

281 dentified elongation factor thermo-unstable (EF-Tu), l-lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), protein D (PD), a

282 normal baseline EF, information on follow-up EF was available for 216, of whom 90 (42%) recovered the

283 emic settings because of deficits in various EF domains.

284 ction (EF), improvements in left ventricular EF (LVEF) are associated with better outcomes and remain

285 events in patients with EF 35% to 49% versus EF <35% (17% vs. 19%; p = 0.80).

286 <=45% (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30-0.76]) versus EF >45% (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.58-1.29]).

287 ry prevention ICDs should be considered when EF is <50% in HCM.

288 raction (EF) available, including n=959 with EF <=45%.

289 ied 2 loci, TMEM40 and BAG3, associated with EF at a genome-wide significance level.

290 ially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with EF-guided migration of SCs or OPCs alone.

291 t 1p13.2 showed significant association with EF (rs6689879*C: EF reduction = 4.2%; P = 2.8 x 10(-8))

292 ilization of the EF-Ts variants complex with EF-Tu, in agreement with the dramatic steady-state level

293 mus thermophilus 70S ribosome complexed with EF-G, RRF and two transfer RNAs at a resolution of 3.5 a

294 ence in frequency of events in patients with EF 35% to 49% versus EF <35% (17% vs. 19%; p = 0.80).

295 eduction tended to be greater for those with EF <=45% (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30-0.76]) versus EF >45% (

296 based methods, including AutoDock Vina (with EF = 1.48/3.16 in DUD-E and GPCR-Bench), DOCK 6 (2.12/3.

297 effect in both SCs and OPCs stimulated with EFs, while the remaining DEGs responded differently.

298 ransmission of conformational changes within EF-G by which FA prevents release of EF-G from the ribos

299 th transplant recipients demonstrating worse EF (g = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.50) t

300 Over a median follow-up of 11.1 years, EF recovery was associated with an ~8-fold reduction in