戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              FAZ area and CST did not differ significantly between gr
2                                              FAZ area and major axis and minor axis length were stron
3                                              FAZ area and temporal peripapillary VD are predictors of
4                                              FAZ area remained stable throughout the cycle.
5                                              FAZ area was enlarged at the DCP (P = .001).
6                                              FAZ area was significantly correlated with foveal pit ar
7                                              FAZ area, point thickness of central fovea, central 1-mm
8                                              FAZ area, vessel area density (VAD), vessel length densi
9                                              FAZ CI also differed between groups (0.47 +/- 0.08 vs. 0
10                                              FAZ diameters measured by UHR-AO-OCT and entoptic imagin
11                                              FAZ enlargement rates were higher in the more advanced i
12                                              FAZ enlargement was associated with higher lactate dehyd
13                                              FAZ from maize tortillas is positively related to the ex
14                                              FAZ measurements were performed in a full retina slab ba
15                                              FAZ of fatigue group was significantly enlarged compared
16                                              FAZ of non-ICU patients was significantly enlarged compa
17                                              FAZ was determined with a dual-isotope tracer ratio tech
18                                              FAZ was measured on days 2-3 and 51-52; meal-specific AZ
19                                              FAZ was measured using a triple stable isotope tracer ra
20                                              FAZ-based analysis revealed statistically significant di
21 tly associated were age (r = 0.33, P = .03), FAZ area (r = 0.45, P = .02), and central retinal thickn
22 veal Avascular Zone) area (P-value = 0.309), FAZ perimeter (P-value = 0.504), FD-300 (Foveal density,
23 omparison were testing for the presence of a FAZ, noting distinct features in the capillary pattern,
24 ng foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (FAZ-A), FAZ contour irregularity (FAZ-CI), average vessel calibe
25                          Further study about FAZ area and VA correlations during the natural course o
26  that TbSAS-4 associates with six additional FAZ tip proteins, and depletion of TbSAS-4 disrupts the
27                      The presence of altered FAZ topography in patients with retinal or systemic dise
28 ntercapillary area (PICA) to determine if an FAZ was fragmented.
29 FAZ area ranging from 0.05 to 1.05 mm(2) and FAZ diameter ranging from 0.20 to 1.08 mm.
30 334 to 0.246], p = 0.775, I(2) = 73.3%), and FAZ area (Hedges' g = 0.248, 95% CI=[- 0.207 to 0.703],
31 Eyes with DME had larger AVC, VT, FAZ-A, and FAZ-CI and lower VD than those in the control group (P <
32 n was found between logMAR visual acuity and FAZ area in both the superficial (rho = 0.29; P < 0.01)
33 erfusion vessel density (PVD), FAZ area, and FAZ perimeter.
34 PLK), which is essential for centrin arm and FAZ duplication.
35                             Vessel-based and FAZ-based metrics applied to OCTA images may serve as ef
36  retinal vasculatures using vessel-based and FAZ-based metrics.
37 ose in the other groups, and temporal CT and FAZ diameter were significantly lower (P < .05).
38 ith subfoveal CT, temporal and nasal CT, and FAZ diameter (P < .05).
39               Moreover, vascular density and FAZ area appear to correlate with visual function.
40 proves the correlation of vessel density and FAZ-specific parameters to DR severity and BCVA.
41 re not interchangeable regarding VD, FD, and FAZ for both the superficial and deep capillary plexus.
42                             Mean VD, FD, and FAZ values between the instruments were compared.
43 the best model included DCP VD, SCP GPD, and FAZ enlargement (AUC: 0.82, QIC: 184.7).
44 s were change in macular ischemia grades and FAZ enlargement rate (mm(2)/year).
45 ed between the peripheral ischemia index and FAZ area (r = 0.49, P = .0001).
46 ved between the peripheral leakage index and FAZ area, but only in eyes that were laser naive (r = 0.
47 sted of FAZ area, FAZ circularity index, and FAZ acircularity index.
48 cally labeled with zinc stable isotopes, and FAZ was determined with a dual-isotope-tracer ratio tech
49  However, retinal thickness measurements and FAZ size did not differ between either HbSS or HbS varia
50 luated, the changes in NFLP_CD, mSVC_VD, and FAZ area were more pronounced.
51             Results show that foveal pit and FAZ metrics were not related to age, axial length, or re
52  6 mm(2) SCP scans, the DCP (all scans), and FAZ metrics showed no significant differences.
53 e of central GA also impacted retinal VD and FAZ morphology.
54 eal temporal/superior/nasal/inferior VD, and FAZ area.
55 n central macular thickness (and volume) and FAZ metrics was performed.
56 ular whole image vessel density (m-wiVD) and FAZ, in addition to alterations of ONH and RPC whole ima
57 - 3.98%, P = .034) at the innermost annulus (FAZ margin to 200 mum out).
58  including foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (FAZ-A), FAZ contour irregularity (FAZ-CI), average vesse
59 sel density, and foveal avascular zone area (FAZ) values were measured and recorded for macular vascu
60 tion size of the foveal avascular zone area (FAZ-A) in both groups, it found that the mean +/- SD of
61 (FAZ)-related metrics consisted of FAZ area, FAZ circularity index, and FAZ acircularity index.
62 ty (FD-300; vessel density in 300 mum around FAZ) were analyzed.
63 ne (FAZ) is valuable for retinal imaging, as FAZ alterations are key biomarkers for diabetic retinopa
64                                    Assessing FAZ alterations in the deep vascular network may be subj
65                                  The average FAZ area was 0.323 mm(2), with an average effective diam
66 r more letters at 12 months and any baseline FAZ parameters.
67 Z enlargement ranges from 5%-10% of baseline FAZ area per year in eyes with established ischemia.
68                         Correlations between FAZ area and VA were explored using regression models.
69 ative relation (P < 0.001) was found between FAZ and both dietary phytate and the phytate:zinc molar
70                     The relationship between FAZ area and VA varied with age (P = 0.026) such that fo
71 f exogenous phytase to SQ-LNS increased both FAZ and TAZ.
72 ith age (P = 0.026) such that for a constant FAZ area, an increase in patient age was associated with
73 scans with poor quality, the aFAZ, corrected FAZ (cFAZ), whole image superficial vessel density (wiSV
74 P and DCP were significantly lower; and CRT, FAZ area and perimeter in ICP and DCP, and presence of c
75 nty-four participants with a clearly defined FAZ were recruited for comparison.
76 ever, artifacts and automatically delineated FAZ measurements may influence the results.
77 area, superficial and deep vessel densities, FAZ perimeter, acircularity index of FAZ (AI; the ratio
78                    Macular vascular density, FAZ area, and foveal thickness were measured in all eyes
79                                     Enlarged FAZ area and decreased VD-DCP were significantly associa
80 h of eight diabetic patients had an enlarged FAZ area, larger than 0.22 mm(2).
81  between these vascular metrics and enlarged FAZ areas, suggesting a potential association between pe
82 icating nucleation on the FAZ-associated ER (FAZ:ER).
83 erse magnification, all OCT-A indices except FAZ area were linearly related to induced refractive ame
84                                    Extracted FAZ geometries were used to calculate area and effective
85 ineation of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), FAZ area, perimeter, and acircularity index were determi
86 greement between the right and left eyes for FAZ (intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.97), SVC VLD (ICC,
87           Differences in the mean values for FAZ perimeter, AI, and FD-300 were statistically signifi
88                 The presence of a fragmented FAZ did not affect visual acuity.
89                 The presence of a fragmented FAZ seems not to be a rare phenotype in individuals with
90                The frequency of a fragmented FAZ was 4.8% of individuals (12 of 250) or 3.6% of eyes
91 und to have at least 1 eye with a fragmented FAZ.
92 weighing, the total absorbed zinc (TAZ) from FAZ x diet zinc, and the exchangeable zinc pool size (EZ
93                                   Functional FAZ area was not a significant predictor of BCVA or LLVA
94 e, dyslipidemia, DR severity, and functional FAZ area correlated with BCVA on univariate analysis.
95  smoking status, DR severity, and functional FAZ area correlated with LLVA on univariate analysis.
96 A scans identified structural and functional FAZ areas, respectively.
97 nd OCTA to measure structural and functional FAZ, vessel density (VD) and geometric perfusion deficit
98 LVA) and performs better than the functional FAZ as a marker of vision loss.
99 rgement performed better than the functional FAZ providing an improved imaging metric of the influenc
100 ar zone area measured by OCTA-the functional FAZ-identifies the perfused capillaries around the fovea
101 ll top-performing models, whereas functional FAZ was not required.
102 tion correlated positively with decreases in FAZ area and perimeter at one month (p = 0.011, p = 0.02
103 s no statistically significant difference in FAZ (Foveal Avascular Zone) area (P-value = 0.309), FAZ
104                 There were no differences in FAZ area, perimeter, or circularity between the 2 groups
105                               Differences in FAZ metrics between the NoDR and control groups did not
106 ferences between diabetic and normal eyes in FAZ area (superficial and deep layers), perimeter (super
107 as associated with a significant increase in FAZ major axis length in the superficial plexus and a si
108  increases in various FAZ metrics, including FAZ area and minor axis length, were noted.
109 ture, including reduced VD-DCP, an increased FAZ area, and a decreased of FAZ CI.
110               Knockdown of cAMP-BP1 inhibits FAZ elongation and disrupts flagellar connection by impa
111 FAZ) area (FAZ-A), FAZ contour irregularity (FAZ-CI), average vessel caliber (AVC), vessel tortuosity
112 0.011) and the parafovea (p = 0.033), larger FAZ area (p = 0.006) and perimeter (p = 0.014), and a hi
113        Eyes with peripheral SCR had a larger FAZ at presentation compared with eyes without periphera
114        In 58 eyes with pseudoholes, a larger FAZ was associated with a smaller average vessel diamete
115  0,026 and p = 0,02 respectively) and larger FAZ in both plexuses (p = 0,048 in the SCP and p = 0,012
116             At pretreatment baseline, larger FAZ area, presence of IRMA, and reduced peripapillary VD
117           But it seems that VD in SCP layer, FAZ Area and Flow Area are similar in both groups.
118                                         Mean FAZ area was greater in diabetic eyes compared with cont
119                                         Mean FAZ area, perimeter, and FD-300 were 0.31 (+/- 0.11 mm(2
120                                         Mean FAZ increased from 8.6% +/- 1.3% to 16.0% +/- 1.3% when
121                                     The mean FAZ area in BRVO eyes was significantly lower only at th
122                 The objective was to measure FAZ and AZ from diets fortified with different amounts o
123                                   The median FAZ areas in mild, moderate, and severe ischemia grades
124 acer ratio; AZ was calculated by multiplying FAZ by dose.
125 gote form disrupts the elongation of the new FAZ filament, generating cells with a shorter FAZ associ
126     TbPLK localization to the tip of the new FAZ is also blocked.
127 n vivo and co-localizes with CIF1 at the new FAZ tip during early cell cycle stages.
128 ora B kinase that acts in concert at the new FAZ tip to regulate cytokinesis initiation.
129        At the flagella connector and the new FAZ tip, cAMP-BP1 associates with FLAM3, a regulator of
130 ichment of these FAZ tip proteins at the new FAZ tip, suggesting a role of TbSAS-4 in maintaining the
131 o-like kinase and aurora B kinase to the new FAZ tip, thus revealing the mechanistic role of CIF2 in
132 RT (OR, 1.015; P < 0.001), increased area of FAZ in DCP (OR, 6.625; P = 0.02), and increased perimete
133 scular density, and morphological changes of FAZ were assessed using OCTA.
134 ular zone (FAZ)-related metrics consisted of FAZ area, FAZ circularity index, and FAZ acircularity in
135 P, an increased FAZ area, and a decreased of FAZ CI.
136 apillary plexus preceding the enlargement of FAZ; therefore, these new parameters might be sensitive
137 ted by two observers to extract estimates of FAZ diameter and area.
138 ysis of variance indicated that inclusion of FAZ enlargement improved the prediction of BCVA (chi-squ
139 sities, FAZ perimeter, acircularity index of FAZ (AI; the ratio of the perimeter of FAZ and the perim
140                        Manual measurement of FAZ dimensions using OCTA is a noninvasive and reliable
141 Two masked graders performed measurements of FAZ dimensions including area, perimeter, and maximum ho
142 ex of FAZ (AI; the ratio of the perimeter of FAZ and the perimeter of a circle with equal area), and
143 6.625; P = 0.02), and increased perimeter of FAZ in DCP (OR, 1.775; P < 0.04); there was also a signi
144 ecific AZs were calculated as the product of FAZ and zinc intake.
145                                  The rate of FAZ enlargement ranges from 5%-10% of baseline FAZ area
146 oth groups, it found that the mean +/- SD of FAZ-A was 0.297 +/- 0.038 mm in good responder patients
147 significant difference (P < .05) in terms of FAZ perimeter, surface, and major axis and a not statist
148                   Statistically worsening of FAZ OCTA metrics was only seen between tertiles 2 and 3,
149 y and sensitivity of biomarkers dependent on FAZ identification.
150 ngth (AL), and central subfield thickness on FAZ and vessel density.
151 and 54.0+/-1.8%, respectively; P = 0.93), or FAZ area (0.26+/-0.13 mm(2) and 0.23+/-0.09 mm(2), respe
152 erence was found in the NFLP_CD, mSVC_VD, or FAZ area between eyes with melanoma and normal fellow ey
153                                      Overall FAZ values were examined in relation to dietary phytate
154 L); and OCT angiography measurement of pfVD, FAZ perimeter and multispectral fractal dimensions (MSFD
155 nsity (LVD), perfusion vessel density (PVD), FAZ area, and FAZ perimeter.
156 d automated algorithms were used to quantify FAZ area and macular vascular density.
157 acquired in a subset of children to quantify FAZ metrics and cone densities at 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 mm e
158 invasive and reliable method for quantifying FAZ at the superficial vascular network.
159 nsumption of zinc-fortified foods may reduce FAZ, zinc fortification at the levels studied positively
160 2 [9.3] mum vs 92.3 [8.5] mum) and mean (SD) FAZ (0.36 [0.16] mm2 vs 0.26 [0.12] mm2) differed betwee
161                             The mean (+/-SD) FAZ values from tortillas prepared from ND-LP, lpa1-1-LP
162 the initial absorption studies; mean (+/-SD) FAZ values were 0.341 +/- 0.111, 0.237 +/- 0.052, and 0.
163                                 Mean (+/-SD) FAZ was 0.35 +/- 0.11, TDZ was 6.0 +/- 3.2 mg/d, TAZ was
164                    Geometric mean (-SD, +SD) FAZ was 7-fold higher from fortified water (65.9%; 42.2,
165  using the deep learning-generated segmented FAZ images as input, the data was split into 70% trainin
166 AZ filament, generating cells with a shorter FAZ associated with a longer unattached flagellum and re
167  cells with long free flagella and a shorter FAZ, accompanied by repositioning of the basal body, the
168 hinopathy, premature birth) having a similar FAZ phenotype.
169 omparable to healthy controls, but a smaller FAZ.
170 hite patients showed a significantly smaller FAZ than black patients (mean difference, 0.11 mm(2); P
171 difference between functional and structural FAZ.
172 ess of their perfusion status-the structural FAZ.
173                        These results suggest FAZ and foveal pit metrics do not systematically differ
174 erver agreement was high for all superficial FAZ measurements (ICC >/=0.90) but did not meet the lowe
175   In this study, we test the hypothesis that FAZ enlargement is associated with decreased best-correc
176                                          The FAZ acts as a 'cellular ruler' of morphology by regulati
177                                          The FAZ area (0.26+/-0.11 mm(2)) increased in treated eyes a
178                                          The FAZ area was not significantly different from normal (al
179                                          The FAZ area was the only metric that demonstrated a signifi
180                                          The FAZ did not vary with age, gender, or AL (P > 0.05).
181                                          The FAZ in the SCP area remained unchanged after injection (
182                                          The FAZ is a complex cytoskeletal structure that connects th
183                                          The FAZ varied significantly with race; white patients showe
184                                          The FAZ was larger compared with that in control eyes in the
185 No correlation was found between age and the FAZ area as well as vascular density.
186 ace of capillary non perfusion areas and the FAZ area in both plexuses.
187 orrelation was found between the SII and the FAZ or VD.
188 ntral macular thickness (and volume) and the FAZ surface.
189 y density in a 300 um wide region around the FAZ (FD-300) (p = 0.001).
190 aged were assessed for agreement between the FAZ and vessel densities of the left and right eyes.
191                      The area containing the FAZ zone was first extracted from the original image and
192 22 of 70 of the capillary loops defining the FAZ were visible in the optimal frame of the capillary p
193                                  In DMI, the FAZ metrics are best evaluated on the 3 x 3 scan due to
194 ep layers), both including and excluding the FAZ area.
195  drawn at increasing eccentricities from the FAZ margin.
196 c perfusion deficit metric that included the FAZ performed better than GPD in detecting referable DR
197 izing contour was manually placed inside the FAZ of the smoothed image and iteratively moved by the s
198                                Moreover, the FAZ areas demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.
199 s no variation in capillary density near the FAZ in different directions.
200          Average capillary diameter near the FAZ rim is 5.1 (4.6) +/- 1.4 mum, with the value in pare
201 e developmental link between the size of the FAZ and the degree of foveal pit excavation.
202  pvOCT provides accurate measurements of the FAZ area and its morphology and a volumetric perfusion m
203 , particularly increasing the clarity of the FAZ borders, and therefore improves the correlation of v
204  bilobe, which is located at the base of the FAZ filament near the mouth of the flagellar pocket.
205 n of TbSAS-4 in regulating the length of the FAZ filament to control basal body positioning and life
206 S-4 is concentrated at the distal tip of the FAZ filament, and depletion of TbSAS-4 in the trypomasti
207 and pvOCT, the measured average areas of the FAZ from two healthy subjects were below 0.22 mm(2), and
208                     However, the role of the FAZ in adhesion and its relationship with the kinetoplas
209             Here, to examine the role of the FAZ in adhesion, we generated FAZ2, FAZ5, and FAZ34 dele
210                              The area of the FAZ is significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO an
211            However, manual correction of the FAZ margin is needed.
212                Despite the complexity of the FAZ only two transmembrane proteins, FLA1 and FLA1BP, ar
213 s then quantified after the exclusion of the FAZ pixels.
214  technique for automated segmentation of the FAZ using images from fundus fluorescein angiography (FF
215                              The size of the FAZ was also highly variable between persons, with FAZ a
216 ression analysis showed that the area of the FAZ was significantly correlated with VA in DR and RVO (
217                                Images of the FAZ were obtained using either a modified fundus camera
218  density within a 300 mum wide region of the FAZ) (P-value = 0.541), superficial vascular density (P-
219 vertical collateral vessels, the area of the FAZ, and order of vessel branching in greater detail tha
220 e composition, assembly, and function of the FAZ.
221 rams using the capillaries at the rim of the FAZ.
222 llary pattern, and measuring the size of the FAZ.
223 ment zone (FAZ) indicating nucleation on the FAZ-associated ER (FAZ:ER).
224              These ERES are nucleated on the FAZ-associated ER.
225 he bilobe, rather assembly of the EGJ on the FAZ:ER, which is coupled to the flagellar cytoskeleton,
226 ensities in the zone immediately outside the FAZ were calculated and the variation in density as a fu
227 id Pooling (ASPP) was trained to segment the FAZ from superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep cap
228 r zone (FAZ) and vasculature surrounding the FAZ were performed on the automatically generated en fac
229 n of many of the capillaries proximal to the FAZ, including those of average size based on published
230 moved by the segmentation program toward the FAZ boundary.
231 ted from retinal thickness data, whereas the FAZ was manually segmented by two observers to extract e
232 ing results obtained by the program with the FAZ boundaries manually delineated by medical retina spe
233 cts where able to quantify the size of their FAZ.
234                     Deletion of any of these FAZ proteins impaired parasite adhesion in vitro.
235  of TbSAS-4 disrupts the enrichment of these FAZ tip proteins at the new FAZ tip, suggesting a role o
236 TbSAS-4 in maintaining the integrity of this FAZ tip protein complex.
237 ured on FA, significant increases in various FAZ metrics, including FAZ area and minor axis length, w
238            Eyes with DME had larger AVC, VT, FAZ-A, and FAZ-CI and lower VD than those in the control
239 nt predictor of BCVA or LLVA in models where FAZ enlargement was also included as a predictor.
240 ippocampal volume negatively correlated with FAZ area and positively correlated with perfusion densit
241  or below AMND could differentiate eyes with FAZ >=0.5 mm(2), whole image superficial vessel density
242 s also highly variable between persons, with FAZ area ranging from 0.05 to 1.05 mm(2) and FAZ diamete
243 arger and more variable for subjects without FAZ.
244  in fractional and total absorption of zinc (FAZ and TAZ, respectively) from a millet-based porridge
245 needed on the fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) and absorbed zinc (AZ) during prolonged exposure to
246 n between the fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) and the phytate content and phytate:zinc molar rati
247 o measure the fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) and to estimate the total quantity of absorbed zinc
248 o measure the fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) in human milk and CF by dual-isotope ratios in urin
249               Fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) was determined by dual-isotope-tracer ratio; AZ was
250 th the postnuclear flagellar adherence zone (FAZ), and closely juxtaposed to corresponding Golgi clus
251 the length of the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ) filament, a specialized cytoskeletal structure requ
252  aligned with the flagellar attachment zone (FAZ) indicating nucleation on the FAZ-associated ER (FAZ
253 or tip of the new flagellum attachment zone (FAZ) toward the posterior end of the cell.
254 nd nucleating the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ), which adheres the flagellum to the cell surface.
255 , mediated by the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ).
256 agellum along the flagellar attachment zone (FAZ).
257 e bilobe, and the flagellar attachment zone (FAZ).
258 ucture called the flagellum attachment zone (FAZ).
259       Analyses of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and vasculature surrounding the FAZ were performed
260                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and vessel density (VD) were collected.
261 biomarkers, including foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area (FAZ-A), FAZ contour irregularity (FAZ-CI), av
262           To quantify foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and macular vascular density objectively using
263 er (RNFL), C/D ratio, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, foveal density and superficial
264 ple metrics including foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and perimeter, nonperfusion area, vessel densi
265 VC) were analyzed for foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and superficial and deep vessel density.
266                   The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and the vessel density of the superficial capi
267 s analysis showed the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area deteriorated over 12 months, with a mean incre
268 ll quadrants, and the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was manually delineated by two independent gra
269                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area was measured manually; vessel density was then
270 ensity (mSVC_VD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area were calculated.
271                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, central subfield thickness (CST), macular gan
272                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, nonflow area, superficial and deep vessel den
273 l macular regions and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, perimeter, and circularity.
274 ractive ametropia and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, perimeter, circularity, and vessel density an
275 uantified include the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, peripheral ischemic index, peripheral leakage
276                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel densities, and perfusion densities of
277  used to quantify the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area.
278 ) and the area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA)
279 emporal and nasal CT, foveal avascular zone (FAZ) diameter, and vessel densities of superficial (SCP-
280 ntitative data on the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) features and the total vascular and avascular surfa
281 ify the size of their foveal avascular zone (FAZ) from the entoptic view, whereas only 22 of 70 of th
282 on density and in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in eyes with idiopathic vitreomacular traction (VMT
283 e segmentation of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is valuable for retinal imaging, as FAZ alterations
284        Changes in the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) metrics over time are key outcome measures for clin
285 l dimension (FD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) of superficial and deep capillary plexus in healthy
286 ion density (PD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) parameters were measured on averaged versus single
287 foveal pit shape, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) size in children.
288 sel density (VD), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) size were measured and compared between HbSS and Hb
289                   The foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was more clearly delineated using the RFI and was s
290 capillary network and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were extracted using video and image analysis algor
291 ular edema (DME), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) were not affected by CT and CV.
292 illary non perfusion, foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and capillary vascular density (CVD) were analyzed
293 sels, the size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), and degree of vessel branching were compared betwe
294 al delineation of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ), FAZ area, perimeter, and acircularity index were d
295                       Foveal avascular zone (FAZ)-related metrics consisted of FAZ area, FAZ circular
296 sion network with the foveal avascular zone (FAZ).
297 e preselected with no foveal avascular zone (FAZ).
298 quantification of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ).
299 essels, excluding the foveal avascular zone (FAZ).
300 eter index (VDI), and foveal avascular zone (FAZ).

 
Page Top