ライフサイエンスコーパス: FISH

1 FISH analysis indicated that SOD knockdown moderately in

2 FISH analysis indicated the presence of Rickettsia bacte

3 FISH with break-apart probes identified CCND2 rearrangem

4 histochemistry 3+; 3 immunohistochemistry 2+/FISH amplified), whereas 7 were HER2- (3 immunohistochem

5 reas 7 were HER2- (3 immunohistochemistry 2+/FISH nonamplified; 4 immunohistochemistry 1+).

6 enome structures that are consistent with 3D FISH data and known knowledge about the human chromosome

7 wo chromatin loops that were confirmed by 3D-FISH.

8 Using super-resolution 3D-FISH and chromosome conformation capture, we observe a d

9 patient with childhood-onset melanoma had a FISH aberration compared with 4 patients with adult-onse

10 The development of a FISH-based assay for cccDNA tracking provided the first

11 h a FISH ratio >/= 2.0, 1.3% (n = 35) with a FISH ratio >/= 2.0 despite a HER2 signal < 4.0, and 3.0%

12 verall, 11.8% (n = 339) were positive with a FISH ratio >/= 2.0, 1.3% (n = 35) with a FISH ratio >/=

13 scence staining combined with filter-adapted FISH after filtration enrichment.

14 e how we overcame the challenges of adapting FISH for imaging in plant tissue and provide a step-by-s

15 culating tumor cells (CTC) with aberrant ALK-FISH patterns [ALK-rearrangement, ALK-copy number gain (

16 Aberrant ALK-FISH patterns were examined in CTCs using immunofluoresc

17 coupled with tyramide signal amplification (FISH-TSA), that this gene is located in the distal regio

18 ngly paradoxical relationship between 3C and FISH, both in minimal polymer models with dynamic loopin

19 es with sSMCs were characterized by aCGH and FISH.

20 set of chromosomes, for which both Hi-C and FISH data are available, demonstrate that GEM-FISH can o

21 However, studies comparing Hi-C and FISH data show that in some cases the distance between o

22 ugh systematically integrating both Hi-C and FISH data with the prior biophysical knowledge of a poly

23 s indicate that cross-validation of Hi-C and FISH should be carefully designed, and that jointly cons

24 rate views from 3C, or genome-wide Hi-C, and FISH is far from solved.

25 ns, there was 100% agreement between CMA and FISH for 1p/19q determination.

26 f the combined single-cell (meta)genomic and FISH approach for studies of complicated symbiotic syste

27 present in MED B. tabaci using Hiseq2500 and FISH technologies.

28 6.9% with combined results from both IHC and FISH analyses.

29 atment effect was found for all ER, IHC, and FISH levels, except for the ER-positive/HER2 low FISH ra

30 s were selected for immunohistochemistry and FISH.

31 ed algorithm to faithfully register live and FISH images.

32 for gliomas with discordant neuroimaging and FISH results.

33 eliable alternative to Sanger sequencing and FISH for studying the genetic properties of the Ig loci.

34 respectively, are synthesized and labeled as FISH probes.

35 gh concordance with standard methods such as FISH, and its success in the POLLUX and CASTOR clinical

36 (SABER), which endows oligonucleotide-based FISH probes with long, single-stranded DNA concatemers t

37 Percentage concordance between FISH and CMA among the CMA-tested cases was calculated.

38 d fluorescence in situ hybridization (BONCAT-FISH).

39 rst application, to our knowledge, of BONCAT-FISH and BONCAT-FACS within an environmental context, we

40 arrangements that were cryptic to breakapart FISH.

41 is-free survival (5 years) for monosomy 3 by FISH was 40% to 60%, by MLPA was 30% to 40%, by SNP was

42 u co-examination of chromosome aneuploidy by FISH and immunostaining of multiple biomarkers displayed

43 Conclusion EGFR CNG assessed by FISH appears to identify a subgroup of patients with eso

44 so able to reduce biofilm as demonstrated by FISH and microcalorimetry.

45 ed minor fusions that were not detectable by FISH.

46 > cogain > polysomy > disomy) as detected by FISH, and evaluated on a semiquantitative scale (modifie

47 ell-specific anabolic activity determined by FISH-nanoSIMS.

48 port the original categorizations of HER2 by FISH status in BCIRG/Translational Research in Oncology

49 d by Hi-C, and spatial distance, measured by FISH, are often assumed to quantify the same phenomena a

50 he tumor tissue assessed by qPCR (but not by FISH) have significantly more often a high number of HER

51 The method, which we call FISH-Flow, allows for high-throughput multiparametric me

52 cell sorting, DNA sequencing, qPCR and CARD-FISH assays revealed discrepancies involving the identif

53 ions with bromodeoxyuridine followed by CARD-FISH.

54 ion fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) on >14 500 archaeal and bacterial cells (Methanosa

55 ion fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH), we show that only four novel clonal phylotypes we

56 We designed new CARD-FISH probes that allowed us to distinguish and observe U

57 This assay detected aberrant centromeric CO-FISH patterns consistent with sister chromatid exchange

58 e, superresolution imaging of centromeric CO-FISH using structured illumination microscopy implied th

59 tation fluorescent in situ hybridization (CO-FISH).

60 ation, we developed an assay with dual-color FISH that enables detection of HR between different pair

61 Two-colour FISH confirms that a TAD becomes less compact following

62 s cost and time compared to the conventional FISH protocols and opens up new opportunities to investi

63 We present correlation FISH (corrFISH), a method to resolve dense temporal barc

64 0% (n = 86) with HER2 signal >/= 6.0 despite FISH ratio < 2.0.

65 es), respectively, and generated 26 distinct FISH signals that can be used as a barcode to uniquely l

66 We show that SABER amplified RNA and DNA FISH signals (5- to 450-fold) in fixed cells and tissues

67 g RNA-seq, single-molecule RNA FISH, and DNA FISH, we detected a cancer sample with EML4-ALK fusion R

68 Use of low resolution single cell DNA FISH and population based high resolution chromosome con

69 Here, we describe a multiplexed DNA FISH Oligopaint library that targets the entire Caenorha

70 loci and then uses sequential rounds of DNA FISH to determine the loci identity.

71 ng of an enigma as beyond low-resolution DNA FISH we do not have the appropriate tools to analyze the

72 on strategy that provides flexibility to DNA FISH experiments by coupling a single primary probe synt

73 A multiplexed approach to DNA FISH experiments has been used to visualize the three-di

74 both classes of NADs were confirmed via DNA-FISH, which also detected Type I but not Type II probes

75 EGFR FISH was assessable in 976 patients and 400 patients (41

76 (FISH) using prespecified criteria and EGFR FISH-positive status was defined as high polysomy or amp

77 in patients with advanced NSCLC who are EGFR FISH-positive.

78 .78-1.27; p=0.96; respectively; and for EGFR FISH non-positive 1.00, 0.85-1.17; p=0.97; and 1.03, 0.8

79 ogy regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0.88, 0.68-1.14; p=0.34; and 0.99, 0.78-1.

80 In EGFR FISH-negative tumors, there was no difference in overall

81 linical trials in different settings in EGFR FISH-positive and, in particular, EGFR-amplified esophag

82 In EGFR FISH-positive tumors (20.2%), overall survival was impro

83 th non-squamous histology regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0.88, 0.68-1.14; p=0

84 In the prespecified analysis of EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation with squamous cell histology

85 oup and 198 in the control group in the EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation, progression-free survival d

86 did not differ among patients who were EGFR FISH non-positive with squamous cell histology (HR 1.04,

87 76 patients and 400 patients (41%) were EGFR FISH-positive.

88 gression-free survival in patients with EGFR FISH-positive cancer and overall survival in the entire

89 fied subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR FISH-positive squamous-cell carcinoma cancers are encour

90 tion improves MERFISH performance when fewer FISH probes are used for each RNA species, which should

91 Using fiber FISH and Bionano optical mapping, we assembled LCR22 all

92 g information from optical mapping and fiber-FISH.

93 Here, we use fiber-FISH, 10x Genomics Linked-Read sequencing, and breakpoin

94 Using fiber-FISH, we demonstrate that parents transmitting the de no

95 hose 14 for valid ation by multicolour fibre-FISH.

96 diversity detected by high-resolution fibre-FISH and conclude that extensive molecular analysis is r

97 These fibre-FISH samples provided accurate calibration standards for

98 Herein, we report a flow-FISH cytometry assay that detects cells expressing EBV-e

99 We also employed Flow-FISH for single-tube analysis of IFN-gamma transcript an

100 sed fluorescence in situ hybridization (Flow-FISH) for IFN-gamma to multicolor flow cytometry that al

101 els of other cytokines, indicating that Flow-FISH helps identify the best cytokine producers during T

102 We conclude that Flow-FISH is a rapid, sensitive, and cost-effective method to

103 we developed a sample clearing approach for FISH measurements.

104 Three studies reported survival data for FISH, 1 study reported survival data for CGH, 1 study re

105 associated with the increase in requests for FISH testing.

106 n cases with MYC rearrangement or copy gain, FISH for BCL2 and BCL6 was also performed.

107 Here we propose GEM-FISH, a method for reconstructing the 3D models of chrom

108 ISH data are available, demonstrate that GEM-FISH can outperform previous chromosome structure modeli

109 Among IHC 2+ patients, HER2 FISH positivity was 11.8% (FDA), 9.4% (AC2007), and 24.1

110 HiPR-FISH provides a framework for analysing the spatial ecol

111 HiPR-FISH, in conjunction with custom algorithms for automate

112 We show that 10-bit HiPR-FISH can distinguish between 1,023 isolates of Escherich

113 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (HiPR-FISH), a versatile technology that uses binary encoding,

114 Combined with super-resolution imaging, HiPR-FISH shows the diverse strategies of ribosome organizati

115 However, FISH analysis of the starved stringent response mutant s

116 umber by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) can identify patients most likely to benefit from

117 um using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) to differentiate individual meiotic chromosomes 1

118 tases by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

119 otron or fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH).

120 ning and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses confirmed that L. campestre, L. heterophy

121 IHC and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses when analyzed with Receiver Operative Cha

122 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed two massively large variants of

123 es using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and growth in microfluidic drops demonstrate that,

124 e we used fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immuno-FISH on metaphase chromosomes from kary

125 ecule RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and made several unexpected findings.

126 etaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and PacBio sequencing on the cell-line UPCI:SCC090

127 nterphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and sequencing of purified cell populations from p

128 ction is Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and while highly sensitive and specific, it is als

129 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches allow 3D architectures of genomes to be

130 gical and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches respectively, and shown to be distribut

131 (3C) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are two widely used technologies that provide dist

132 ion via a fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, which can detect those rearrangements to a

133 (SKY) and fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrated coordinate localization and transloca

134 ly by 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments and show that active RNAPII is enriche

135 using 3D fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments.

136 Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, and 18 was used to determine

137 BCL6 and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC were performed.

138 led using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for RNA, and then isolated by fluorescent activate

139 ule mRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) has been established as the standard method for th

140 Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used extensively in animal systems to stu

141 (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) HER2 testing guidelines in 2007 (AC2007) and updat

142 xpansion, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) imaging of RNA can be performed with high yield an

143 on using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in an additional 87 osteosarcomas, with IGF1 recep

144 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful method to visualize the spatial posi

145 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful single-cell technique that harnesses

146 ckground Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a standard method for 1p/19q codeletion testing

147 tablished fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy method.

148 -targeted fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy, we demonstrate that NCLC1 cells form i

149 in-line fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of bacterial cells.

150 specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes designed in our lab or obtained from commer

151 ls using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes.

152 ation, a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol was established to detect different viral

153 nce with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results.

154 ule mRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals that, upon site-specific CTCF disruption o

155 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reveals the abundance and positioning of nucleic a

156 specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique that allows visualization of COs directl

157 pment of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technologies enables the quantification of telomer

158 l (r)RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to be associated with S. strix.

159 We use fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to characterize the endogenous expression of Tacr1

160 rmined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using prespecified criteria and EGFR FISH-positive

161 Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) will be required to identify HGBL-DH and will recl

162 tatus by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), microsat

163 escence, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), micronuclei imaging, and the telomere shortest le

164 ed by RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Northern blots, and RNA sequencing-implicates MRP

165 aint DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-FISH and protein fluorescence, 3D ATAC-PALM c

166 ) MCL by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), whole-genome/exome sequencing, and gene-expressio

167 fluorescence imaging in situ hybridization (FISH)-based assay for the detection of duck hepatitis B

168 A fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based karyotyping cocktail was developed with whic

169 based on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-supplemented immunohistochemistry of biopsied tumo

170 es using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH).

171 tial DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

172 cing, or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

173 through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

174 tus with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

175 IN using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

176 eakapart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

177 sion diagnosis exist, including pan-Trk IHC, FISH, reverse transcription PCR, DNA-based next-generati

178 the nuclear periphery as shown by 3D immuno-FISH.

179 cent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immuno-FISH on metaphase chromosomes from karyotypically normal

180 e/fluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH) assays demonstrate frequent asymmetry in genomic c

181 DNA and RNA immuno-FISH reveal that PML NBs are closely associated with act

182 nt subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-FISH (SE-iFISH), to detect a variety of aneuploid circul

183 Future work could incorporate FISH utilizing A. thaliana mapped BAC clones to allow th

184 ohesin SMC1A, and used four-color-interphase-FISH coupled with BrdU incorporation and analyses of sen

185 Recent technological advances have leveraged FISH to visualize these features in a highly multiplexed

186 xed snapshots as a result of techniques like FISH and Hi-C, little is known about chromatin dynamics

187 ysis of a sample processed using an off-line FISH protocol, the total analysis time was reduced from

188 levels, except for the ER-positive/HER2 low FISH ratio (>/=2 to <5) group (DFS: 3-way ITT Pvalue for

189 he fluorescent in situ hybridization method (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

190 Here, we adapt single molecule FISH techniques to demonstrate the presence and activity

191 intermolecular multi-colour single molecule FISH.

192 We use single-molecule FISH (smFISH) and MATLAB to visualize and quantify nucle

193 Single-molecule FISH (smFISH) has been the gold standard for quantifying

194 cule detection determined by single-molecule FISH (smFISH) or live imaging.

195 Single-molecule FISH data showed that the majority of these mutants accu

196 Highly multiplexed single-molecule FISH has emerged as a promising approach to spatially re

197 plied this approach to image single-molecule FISH in combination with immunofluorescence (smFISH-IF)

198 le by massively multiplexing single-molecule FISH measurements.

199 concept of the usefulness of single-molecule FISH to increase knowledge about the interactions betwee

200 Using single-molecule FISH, we further observed that expression of Smad3 targe

201 Multicolor FISH analysis identified an array of breakpoints respons

202 While newly advanced multiplexed FISH imaging offers possibilities for refined 3D reconst

203 synaptic retrograde tracing, and multiplexed FISH to characterize the cells of the mouse habenula.

204 ealer offers a one-stop shop for multiplexed FISH design needs of the research community.

205 o design probes for a variety of multiplexed FISH techniques and their combinations.

206 methods is the complexity of the multiplexed FISH probe design.

207 Among the 17 neuroradiologist-FISH discordances, there were nine gliomas associated wi

208 Using this new FISH protocol, we can detect >50% of the total target mR

209 ent advances in multiplexed amplification of FISH signals, it remains challenging to achieve high lev

210 wever, background-from off-target binding of FISH probes and cellular autofluorescence-can become lim

211 We identified off-target binding of FISH probes to cellular components other than RNA, such

212 ent has paved the way to the construction of FISH probes entirely from synthetic oligonucleotides (ol

213 An example of FISH-Flow measurements of cytokine mRNA induction by ex

214 Oligo-FISH analyses using these probes in various wild Oryza s

215 Moreover, dual-color oligo-FISH was used to characterize diverse chromosomal abnorm

216 sing probes based on oligonucleotides (oligo-FISH) is a useful tool for chromosome identification and

217 Together, the oligo-FISH probes we established will be a powerful tool for s

218 Here we developed two oligo-FISH probes that allow the identification of each of the

219 el optimization of a method that is based on FISH and proximity ligation techniques to quantify mRNA

220 evaluation have relied on simulation and/or FISH imaging that typically features a handful of low re

221 ma from PN using immunohistochemistry and/or FISH.

222 Our FISH protocol with single-fluorophore sensitivity signif

223 To test the model, we perform FISH experiments and compare with Capture-C data.

224 reening 526 PLUG primer pairs and performing FISH using oligonucleotides as probes.

225 ation using peptide nucleic acid probes (PNA-FISH) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-ti

226 Here, we introduce a new single-probe FISH protocol termed sFISH for budding yeast, Saccharomy

227 e describe an optimized quantitative FISH (Q-FISH) protocol for measuring telomere length that bypass

228 Here we describe an optimized quantitative FISH (Q-FISH) protocol for measuring telomere length tha

229 with observations from single cell resolved FISH-nanoSIMS analyses.

230 Restricting FISH analysis to the 10% of DLBCL patients who have a ge

231 el) to those obtained from ALK, ROS1 and RET FISH on 51 clinical specimens.

232 ich was further validated by RT-qPCR and RNA FISH.

233 and then quantified transcript number by RNA FISH in the same cell.

234 Extensive RNA FISH and fractionation experiments established that NORA

235 ch produces a drastic signal increase in RNA FISH samples without increasing the fluorescent spot siz

236 Single-molecule RNA FISH experiments revealed that the beta-globin enhancer

237 Single-molecule RNA FISH to measure mRNA expression of differentiation marke

238 -cell RNA sequencing and single-molecule RNA FISH to provide a systematic molecular atlas of full-thi

239 y, by combining RNA-seq, single-molecule RNA FISH, and DNA FISH, we detected a cancer sample with EML

240 s (MINA), and sequential single-molecule RNA FISH.

241 ficits were confirmed by single molecule RNA FISH.

242 encing, and at the single-cell level, by RNA-FISH, and is not attributable to differences in repressi

243 uorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RNA-FISH and protein fluorescence, 3D ATAC-PALM connected mi

244 fluorescence in situ RNA hybridization (RNA-FISH) of the intron region of immediate early transcript

245 -cell flow cytometry and single-molecule RNA-FISH assays, we demonstrate that knocking down of CTCF o

246 Using single-molecule RNA-FISH, we demonstrate that de novo formation of the Zfp46

247 ctions using multiplexed single molecule RNA-FISH.

248 ons and confirmed its localization using RNA-FISH.

249 stems such as multiplex RNA imaging with RNA-FISH and multiplex protein imaging with antibody-stainin

250 omatin tracing, RNA multiplexed error-robust FISH (MERFISH), multiplexed imaging of nucleome architec

251 We then used 10-plex SABER-FISH to identify in vivo introduced enhancers with cell-

252 Scalable FISH technologies, which can be applied to whole animals

253 SCE-FISH also measured successful recombination in human pri

254 with fluorescent in situ hybridization (SCE-FISH).

255 These findings demonstrate that SCE-FISH frequency at fragile sites is a sensitive indicator

256 Using SCE-FISH, we find that endogenous and exogenous replication

257 e-cell RNA sequencing, for example, to smart FISH, large-scale calcium imaging from cortex and deep b

258 RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (smRNA FISH), we show that egl-1 is transcribed in the mother o

259 Specific FISH probes may allow the molecular identification and d

260 By specific FISH probes, including the IGK enhancer region, we detec

261 ambiguously identified by haplotype-specific FISH.

262 Split-FISH reduces off-target background fluorescence, decreas

263 We demonstrate the efficacy of split-FISH on various mouse tissues by quantifying the distrib

264 We present split-FISH, a multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization m

265 to colorimetric in situ hybridization, sRNA-FISH signals can be imaged using super-resolution micros

266 Here we report a protocol (sRNA-FISH) for efficient fluorescent detection of sRNAs in pl

267 plant tissue and provide a step-by-step sRNA-FISH protocol for studying sRNAs at the cellular and eve

268 copy can be used to separate the target sRNA-FISH signal from background autofluorescence.

269 n and G4 stabilization causes multi-telomere FISH signals and telomere loss, hallmarks of deficient t

270 Strand-specific telomere FISH indicates preferential loss of C-strand DNA while a

271 cellular compartmental analysis of temporal FISH technique based on the cellular distribution of imm

272 Furthermore, we found that FISH analysis using the Arabidopsis-type telomere repeat

273 These results highlight that FISH fails to identify all HGBL-DH/THs, while revealing

274 matic review is sufficient to recommend that FISH and IGHV be performed as standard clinical tests fo

275 The FISH probes were specific for detection of HMPV positive

276 The FISH-Flow protocol involves cell fixation, permeabilizat

277 The FISH-Hi-C paradox arises because the cell population is

278 s neuroradiologist 1p/19q prediction and the FISH result was 84.8% (95 of 112; 95% confidence interva

279 s neuroradiologist 1p/19q prediction and the FISH result was calculated.

280 the distribution of subpopulations from the FISH data, which quantitatively reproduces the Hi-C data

281 iologist 1p/19q prediction differed from the FISH result and (b) consensus neuroradiologist confidenc

282 We have optimized the FISH protocol so that each round is complete in 1 min, d

283 We also show that the FISH test for the AURKA gene copy number in urine yielde

284 Here, we show that the FISH-Hi-C paradox can be resolved using a theory based o

285 dosimetry via cytogenetic analysis using the FISH method.

286 ted by tREX have higher correlation with the FISH measurements than any of the comparison methods.

287 D structure from tREX is consistent with the FISH measurements, and the corresponding distances predi

288 us as determined with CMA disagreed with the FISH result and agreed with the consensus neuroradiologi

289 ethods may provide a suitable alternative to FISH as they are compatible with multiplexing and diagno

290 er and could provide a robust alternative to FISH testing in the diagnostic setting.

291 Using FISH, we determined the distribution of cccDNA under con

292 Using FISH, Xu et al. here analyze the cellular response to DV

293 mparison methods to a Hi-C dataset for which FISH measurements are available to evaluate estimation a

294 Our data indicate that while FISH tended to over-report aneuploidies, a modified 2-pr

295 The 2 children with FISH-positive PNs are melanoma free after 7 and 4 years.

296 etween these different methods compared with FISH has not been evaluated.

297 and 1p/19q codeletion status determined with FISH that were accrued from January 1, 2010 to October 1

298 ma, we observed a high concordance rate with FISH for del17p, a risk defining CNV event (88% in POLLU

299 misassigned to 1p/19q codeletion status with FISH.

300 The physical maps were validated with FISH and genetic mapping of SNP markers derived from BES