ライフサイエンスコーパス: FRAP

1 FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) assays

2 FRAP and DPPH showed a high correlation with ascorbic ac

3 FRAP and ORAC antioxidant activities were correlated to

4 FRAP and photo-conversion experiments demonstrate that t

5 FRAP and TEAC assays showed high correlations with total

6 FRAP experiments in cells treated with the PKCalpha inhi

7 FRAP experiments revealed that removal of either one of

8 FRAP studies revealed that, unlike at nuclear pores, the

9 FRAP, however, is limited in its ability to resolve spat

10 olox) and the reduction of Fe(3+)to Fe(2+) - FRAP (microM Fe(2+)).

11 antioxidant activity (32-79 (DPPH) or 17-27 (FRAP) mg/g).

12 chin eq.100 g(-1); DPPH: 244.7; ABTS: 467.8; FRAP: 762.6 ug TE.g(-1), ORAC: 40.9 mg TE.g(-1)).

13 d losses of 29%, 8%, 12%, 12% (DPPH) and 9% (FRAP), respectively for CHE samples at the end of storag

14 um salt (ABTS(+)), Fe(III) reducing ability (FRAP) and linoleic acid co-oxidation initiated by soybea

15 e radical DPPH and ferric reduction ability (FRAP).

16 ic compounds and antioxidant activity (ABTS, FRAP and ORAC methods)) of 30 grape cultivars of white,

17 S) and antioxidant capacity (PCL(ACW), ABTS, FRAP) were also studied.

18 e than 24, 12 and 53mmol TE/100gdm, by ABTS, FRAP and ORAC, respectively).

19 onoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP) were measured at different phases of simulated gas

20 ant and antimicrobial effects by DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, ORAC and agar disc diffusion methods, respectively

21 ntioxidant activity estimated by DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, ORAC and TBARS assays.

22 gallic acid equiv/g, respectively for ABTS, FRAP and TP).

23 antioxidant capacity according to the ABTS, FRAP and DPPH test methods respectively.

24 ntioxidant capacity was measured using ABTS, FRAP and ORAC assays.

25 ic content (TPC) and antioxidant activities (FRAP, ABTS(+), DPPH) in free and bound phenolics were de

26 acid, polyphenols and antioxidant activity (FRAP and DPPH) of a smoothie were compared to thermal pr

27 Serum antioxidant activity (FRAP, ABTS), as well as lipid peroxidation (TBARS) were

28 osic acid content) and antioxidant activity (FRAP, ABTS).

29 olSA/g and 6.9-92.1mumolSA/g for AuNP, AgNP, FRAP, DPPH and FC methods, respectively.

30 Knockout of TOCA-1 does not alter FRAP kinetics of GFP ZO-1 or occludin, but longer term (

31 tioxidant activities (i.e., ABTS (42.2%) and FRAP (0.81 mM)) and alpha-amylase inhibitory activity (6

32 creased total polyphenols content ( 27%) and FRAP value ( 106%).

33 (i.e., ABTS scavenging activity (53.3%) and FRAP value (3.71 mM)), whereas pH 6.5 with the same extr

34 dant activity (R = 0.69 and 0.52 by ABTS and FRAP assay, respectively) and individual groups of polyp

35 31 mM and 3.05 mM Trolox/100 mL for ABTS and FRAP assay, respectively).

36 DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays showed the highest activity for raw garlic s

37 es, based on a combination of DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays.

38 LC and antioxidant capacity by TEAC ABTS and FRAP methods) properties of plum powders.

39 d vitamin C), antioxidant capacity (ABTS and FRAP), and sensory attributes (e.g. hardness, jujube-ID,

40 ated for antioxidant capacity (AC) (ABTS and FRAP), total soluble phenolics (TP), browning index (BI)

41 The AC (ABTS and FRAP), TPs and HMF ranged between 124-722, 95-802mumoles

42 DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging activity, and FRAP.

43 ABTS radical cation decolorization assay and FRAP as Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma), and other ba

44 observed between total phenolic content and FRAP (R(2) = 0.98) and DPPH (R(2) = 0.66) assays.

45 ical and reducing activities in the DPPH and FRAP assay, although in the liposome model, the guaiacyl

46 apacities were determined using the DPPH and FRAP assay, respectively.

47 The antioxidant DPPH and FRAP assays and chemical profile were determined by colo

48 xidative activity measured with the DPPH and FRAP assays was the highest in the beer with the additio

49 ctivity using conventional methods (DPPH and FRAP assays) and correlated the results with the total p

50 ra components, as measured by ABTS, DPPH and FRAP assays, and upregulation of the genes coding for th

51 and antioxidant activity, using the DPPH and FRAP assays, was obtained for kisra prepared from both c

52 ned the antioxidant capacity (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP methods), total phenolic content and color analysis

53 Baking improves the DPPH and FRAP of the kisra prepared from two cultivars.

54 DPPH and FRAP showed low antioxidant activity for the extract.

55 5326.7 mg/100 g DM) and the highest DPPH and FRAP values (2027.9 and 3539.6 mumol TE/100 g DM, respec

56 ects in antioxidant activity (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP) and Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC).

57 enols and antioxidant activities by DPPH and FRAP) compared to endocarp and manually-produced bran fl

58 ds) andgreater antioxidantactivity (DPPH and FRAP) except for ABTS(.+) values.

59 ificant correlation with results of DPPH and FRAP.

60 nt (TPC) and antioxidant activity (DPPH* and FRAP methods).

61 nt, antioxidant capacity (ABTS(+), DPPH, and FRAP), quality (CIELAB colour parameters), and microbiol

62 hen samples assessed employing the DPPH- and FRAP-based antioxidant assays.

63 /3) binary mixture, presenting TPC, DPPP and FRAP values of 58.44 mg GAE/g, 250.20 mumol TE/g and 720

64 mg ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE)/g DW and FRAP from 2793.95 to 11393.97 mg ferrous sulphate equiva

65 We thus performed simultaneous FCS and FRAP measurements on supported lipid bilayers and live c

66 larger-scale modeling of kinetics, FCS, and FRAP.

67 H-ORAC(FL) and FRAP assays gave values of 872 to 2428 mumol Trolox eq./

68 Bioavailability of phenolics, flavonoids and FRAP activity were increased significantly (p < 0.05) af

69 heterodimerization was confirmed by FRET and FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleach).

70 )/100 g), ABTS (441-1475umol(TE)/100 g), and FRAP (1509-5954umolFe(2+)/100 g) assays.

71 lts of the DPPH (EC50=0.6-1105.3 mug/ml) and FRAP (0.1-8.5 mmol/g) assays.

72 results for DPPH (IC(50) = 0.89 mug/mL) and FRAP (225.53 mumol equivalent ferrous sulphate/g).

73 /mL), TBARS (IC(50) 18.46-20.84 mug/mL), and FRAP (RC(50) 0.203-0.309 mug/mL) assays.

74 ating H/e(-) (IC(50) = 36.4 vs. 39.9 muM and FRAP value = 598 vs. 514 mumol/L, respectively), exerted

75 PF2 with 16 was demonstrated in nanoBRET and FRAP assays.

76 allic acid, and had relatively high ORAC and FRAP activities.

77 aining higher TPC and corresponding ORAC and FRAP results translated to higher reduction in the activ

78 The highest PCLACW and FRAP values were found for Cerise purified extracts (71.

79 was determined by ABTS(+), DPPH radical, and FRAP assays.

80 berries showed much higher TSP, TMA, RSA and FRAP values than V. uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides fru

81 ive plane illumination microscopy (SPIM) and FRAP to create SPIM-FRAP, wherein we use a sheet of ligh

82 ious antioxidant assays (DPPH, ABTS, TAC and FRAP) were performed for all the extracts.

83 ntioxidant capacity was measured by TEAC and FRAP assays.

84 dant capacities were established by TEAC and FRAP methods.

85 The AC was measured by TEAC and FRAP.

86 antly (p<0.05) higher recovery of TP, TF and FRAP antioxidant activity.

87 sented significantly (p<0.05) higher TPC and FRAP (0.083mgGAE/mgdw; 0.101mgTE/mgdw, respectively) tha

88 35 degrees C) determined the highest TPI and FRAP values and the highest temperature (145 degrees C)

89 ed except the ferric reducing ability assay (FRAP) and Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity assay (

90 ferric ion reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and anti-glycation activity by a bovine serum albu

91 In addition, other antioxidant assays (FRAP, ABTS and ORAC) were carried out.

92 ith lipidomics and membrane fluidity assays (FRAP and Laurdan dye staining) we further show that the

93 actin incorporation and partially attenuates FRAP recovery, indicating functional interaction between

94 However, microplate-based FRAP (mFRAP) assays are affected by sample volume and co

95 while Afrostyrax lepidophyllus had the best FRAP.

96 ively) than those observed in the blueberry (FRAP: 10 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 10 +/-

97 By FRAP and imaging we monitored mobility of calsequestrin

98 observed in water media after 27 kJ/cm(3) by FRAP (47 degrees C) and DPPH (86 degrees C) antioxidant

99 tent and antioxidant activity as assessed by FRAP and ABTS methods.

100 ible to measure the diffusion coefficient by FRAP and FCS in the exact same images.

101 extract, at the concentration determined by FRAP method, had higher oxidative stability, evidenced b

102 LC-PDA-MS/MS, while the AC was determined by FRAP, ABTS and DPPH assays.

103 Antioxidant capacity, as determined by FRAP, ABTS and ORAC assays, followed the same pattern as

104 n vitro antioxidant capacity was measured by FRAP and DPPH assays.

105 erent antioxidant capacities, as measured by FRAP and DPPH.

106 PLS, beer's antioxidant capacity measured by FRAP assay could be predicted with acceptable precision

107 y and its in vitro antioxidant properties by FRAP and DPPH tests.

108 noids, ferric reducing antioxidant capacity (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl (DPPH) free radic

109 action with AlCl3) and antioxidant capacity (FRAP, ORAC, DPPH).

110 venging activity, ferric reduction capacity (FRAP) and total phenolic content (TPC).

111 spectrophotometric studies (Folin-Ciocalteu, FRAP, ABTS) to infusions and decoctions of ten plant spe

112 dant activity (evaluated by Folin-Ciocalteu, FRAP, DPPH, ABTS assays).

113 Here, we combine FRAP experiments on both in vitro reconstituted droplets

114 Phenolic content, FRAP/DPPH assays and the colour coordinates were determi

115 Conventional FRAP is noninvasive, has low sample volume requirements,

116 Antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, CUPRAC, FRAP, chelating and phosphomolybdenum assay) and enzyme-

117 860+/-116mg of Trolox as measured by CUPRAC, FRAP, DPPH and ABTS, respectively.

118 elial barrier function, exhibit differential FRAP dynamics, and compete for residency within the TJ.

119 ectable concentration, and the dimensionless FRAP-value.

120 uated through different methods (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP and ORAC).

121 and three in vitro antioxidant assays: DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC.

122 d the antioxidant capacity measured by DPPH, FRAP and ABTS.

123 Pure organosulphur compounds tested by DPPH, FRAP and beta-carotene bleaching assays showed that alli

124 idant determinations were performed by DPPH, FRAP and IC(RED).

125 antioxidant capacities, documented by DPPH, FRAP, and TEAC assays.

126 cant decrease in antioxidant capacity (DPPH, FRAP and ABTS), total phenolic (TP) and ascorbic acid (A

127 ectrophotometry, antioxidant capacity (DPPH, FRAP, ABTS methods), total phenols and HPLC to detect in

128 The results obtained from DPPH, FRAP, and CUPRAC antioxidant assays showed a substantial

129 in-Ciocalteu, Total Polyphenols Index, DPPH, FRAP), HPLC (phloroglucinolysis), voltammetric analysis

130 oxidant activity than R. idaeus in the DPPH, FRAP and TEAC assays.

131 s observed for antioxidant activities (i.e., FRAP and ORAC values) moving from digested to faecal fer

132 our results indicate that myocardial NADH ED-FRAP is a useful optical non-destructive approach for as

133 NADH ED-FRAP parameters were optimized to deliver 23.8 mJ of pho

134 myocardium of perfused hearts using NADH ED-FRAP.

135 uorescence recovery after photobleaching (ED-FRAP) of NADH has been shown to be an effective approach

136 The entire FRAP experiment preparation, data acquisition and analys

137 ferential contributions of the extracellular FRAP/PNPNL loop residue His-624 in HasR and of His-221 i

138 Previous interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data have revealed dwell times of tau on MTs in the

139 assessed by complementary methods (ORAC-Fl, FRAP and DPPH assay), phenolic composition of each extra

140 2 to 26667.45micromol Fe(+2) 100g(-1) DW for FRAP; and 957.72 to 2061.35mg GAE 100g(-1) DW for Folin-

141 pectively R = 0.60, 0.64 and 0.66, while for FRAP method only for anthocyanins R = 0.79).

142 d by the polyphenolic and aqueous fractions, FRAP, ORAC and DPPH, in that order.

143 the resulting stochastic model to data from FRAP measurements and to estimate all unknown model para

144 that model initial conditions extracted from FRAP postbleach intensities prevent underestimation of d

145 icients was close to the value obtained from FRAP in the identical area.

146 The method was tested on data obtained from FRAP measurements on a cultivated biofilm.

147 to extract binding and diffusion rates from FRAP recovery curves, active transport of molecules is t

148 tages, showing greater values in ripe fruit (FRAP: 24 +/- 2 and 28 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 18 +/-

149 Anomalous diffusion was characterized by FT-FRAP through a nonlinear fit to multiple spatial harmoni

150 Additionally, phase analysis in FT-FRAP was shown to inform on flow/sample translation.

151 In FT-FRAP with patterned illumination, the time-dependent flu

152 uorescence recovery after photobleaching (FT-FRAP) with patterned illumination is theorized and demon

153 Furthermore, FRAP analysis provides the possibility of a relatively h

154 Furthermore, FRAP studies demonstrate that phosphorylation at this si

155 activity (ABTS - 2765.3micromol TE/100g FW, FRAP - 1663.67micromol TE/100g FW), with the lowest cont

156 2g/g DPPH; and 3027.31-3216.27mumol Fe2SO4/g FRAP) were found to be exceptionally higher than those o

157 d equivalent antioxidant capacity (AEAC)/g), FRAP (1022.05mumol FeSO4/g), TPC (915.7mg gallic acid eq

158 GCF FRAP level was lower in CsA GO- than in H (P = 0.04).

159 EAC/gDW (DPPH assay), 35.35 mmol Fe(II)/gDW (FRAP assay), and 46.37 mmol TE/gDW (ABTS(+) assay).

160 ics (1251-2115mg GAE kg(-1) FW) and greatest FRAP values (25.9-43.2mM TE kg(-1) FW).

161 DPPH radical scavenging properties but high FRAP (6.6 mMol Trolox/mg).

162 %), whereas aqueous extracts showed a higher FRAP value compared to ethanol extracts (0.98 and 0.61mm

163 lour), while the Monty variety showed higher FRAP values, vitamin C (189.06 mg/100g flour), flavonoid

164 HB showed the highest FRAP activity.

165 e with the observed PCNA recruitment data if FRAP is not used.

166 ree independent measures-calibrated imaging, FRAP, and photoconversion-we find that the Dam1 submodul

167 Combining modelling, an improved FRAP methodology and direct semi-quantitative analysis o

168 r of SRB in the microdomains was assessed in FRAP studies of circular photobleached regions ( approxi

169 35% increase in TFC; and 18-35% increases in FRAP activity.

170 , in particular the high bleach intensity in FRAP, the bleach corrections, and the fitting procedures

171 and fitting introduce large uncertainties in FRAP.

172 ever, the models and assumptions utilized in FRAP analysis of protein condensates are often not caref

173 tionation, immunoprecipitation, and inversal FRAP experiments show that the actin depolymerization pr

174 re, we use polarization-resolved microscopy, FRAP, live cell imaging, and a mutant of Adenomatous pol

175 mg GAE/mL (DPPH* assay) and 0.45 mg GAE/mL (FRAP method).

176 e demonstrate a single-point single-molecule FRAP microscopy technique that enables determination of

177 Moreover, FRAP assay was more sensitive to measure this parameter

178 every pixel in a given 2D slice, thus moving FRAP measurements beyond these previous limitations.

179 The implementation of FRAP and SMT measurements in identical areas provides co

180 tioxidant activities in terms of rankings of FRAP, DPPH activities, TPC, TFC and vitamin C content.

181 evelopment of a novel approach, a variant of FRAP (fluorescent recovery after photo-bleaching) modifi

182 ds by using three different analytical ORAC, FRAP, and ABTS; the effects of treatments were very posi

183 ifferent antioxidant assays, including ORAC, FRAP and DPPH, were monitored on crude jujube extract (C

184 ition (LC-MS) and antioxidant capacity (PCL, FRAP) were measured.

185 e-molecule scale (AFM), bulk solution phase (FRAP), and ex vivo tissue experiments.

186 hemical content while the phosphomolybdenum, FRAP and DPPH assays were used to determine antioxidant

187 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis demonstrated that exposure to bile salts

188 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis of actin filament mobility in intact RBCs

189 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence anisotropy measurements, that for

190 Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), o

191 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking (SMT).

192 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking in human cells, we sh

193 Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) and Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF)

194 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are widely used methods to determine diffusion coe

195 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays revealed that the GFP-MuMx1 nuclear bodies

196 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) assays, we show that the divalent transition metal

197 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) confirmed the active vesicle trafficking in the sh

198 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) dynamics in response to inflammatory cytokines.

199 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments confirmed the differential kinetics of

200 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for determining how many reaction processes partic

201 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) has been one of the most popular tools for studyin

202 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) in transgenic zebrafish with GFP-tagged Ribeye.

203 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a well-established experimental technique to st

204 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is an excellent tool to measure the chemical rate

205 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is widely used to assess condensate fluidity and t

206 Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) measurements assumes bleaching with a circular las

207 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy is used to probe the diffusion properti

208 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy.

209 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) model introduced by Axelrod et al.

210 g fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) monitoring displacement of GFP-BAZ2A from acetylat

211 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of GFP-Galphas.

212 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of labeled protein demonstrated that somatic alpha

213 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of SC junctions in utricles from mice that express

214 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) reporter assay for axonal translation, we see that

215 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) results indicated that NKKY101 mutant cells exhibi

216 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that the population of Gag proteins local

217 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) shows that YscQ exchanges between the injectisome

218 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) static laser microscopy, and determination of intr

219 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies indicate that like H1, binding of HP1BP3 t

220 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to demonstrate that endoglin forms stable homodime

221 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to probe chain mobility in reversible hydrogels as

222 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and mol

223 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and F

224 d fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), quantitative RT-PCR, and whole cell patch clamp r

225 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we demonstrate that adherens junction proteins ar

226 Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP).

227 Plasma FRAP level was higher in H and CsA GO- than in CsA GO+ (

228 ty of ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) of several nectar honey varieties from northern Po

229 y and ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP).

230 ancreatic lipase) and antioxidant potential (FRAP, ORAC), phenolic compounds (UPLC-PDA-FL), basic che

231 l (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2'-azinobis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphon

232 ed by the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) scavenging assays

233 ABTS(+)), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and iron (Fe(2+)) chelating activity.

234 dant upon ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assa

235 ed higher ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) comp

236 pacities [Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)] and

237 ex (TPI), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and total radical trapping antioxidant parameter (

238 The ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was recently adapted to a microplate format.

239 activity, ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC),

240 nging and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays found methanol extract (ME) to be the most

241 (FL)) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays, exhibited significant differences in two b

242 with ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays.

243 DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods, respectively.

244 ) and Ferric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) of hydrolysates and fractions <10kDa and <3kDa wer

245 ORAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) than those generated with plant proteases for all

246 d (AgNP), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Folin-Ci

247 vities in ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical scave

248 DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), after in vitro digestion decreased 51-78% when co

249 ty (RSA), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and a number of anthocyanins, phenolic acids, cou

250 tivities, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and total phenolic content (TPC) than did hot-air

251 ty (RSC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), total

252 ical, the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), the superoxide anion scavenging activity assay (S

253 ctivity, ferrous reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid con

254 ) and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP).

255 e highest reducing ferric antioxidant power (FRAP).

256 (TBARS); ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP); total oxidant status (TOS); and total antioxidant

257 (FL)} and ferric reducing antioxidant power {FRAP}).

258 in 4'-O-glucoside, and antioxidant property (FRAP) were higher in the following order of maturity sta

259 J plugin, and should facilitate quantitative FRAP measurements for users equipped with standard fluor

260 as the highest ability to Fe(3+) reduction (FRAP) (~1.1 mmolFe/g(d.w)).

261 of 0.85-2.81 mg gallic acid equiv./mL, RSC, FRAP and ORAC values were 6.38-20.9, 3.07-17.8 and 4.21-

262 ial was assessed by DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP and beta-carotene bleaching assays.

263 The results of this study show FRAP to be a robust technique which provides the cellula

264 good correlation with the spectrophotometric FRAP (Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma) and DPPH (2,2-D

265 SPIM-FRAP proves to be an order of magnitude faster than fluo

266 on microscopy (SPIM) and FRAP to create SPIM-FRAP, wherein we use a sheet of light to bleach a two-di

267 validating the quantitative accuracy of SPIM-FRAP relative to well-established methods.

268 eveloped a diffusion simulation for our SPIM-FRAP experiments to compare across techniques.

269 rise of accessibility of SPIM systems, SPIM-FRAP is set to provide a straightforward means of quanti

270 en fluorescent protein (GFP)-MxA structures; FRAP revealed a relative stiffness with a mobile fractio

271 antioxidant capacity measured by ABTS test, FRAP assay and photochemiluminescence technique, and the

272 offered smaller diffusion coefficients than FRAP, possibly due to contributions from SRB molecules c

273 d 18+ Unique Manuka Factor; UMF) showed that FRAP values (0.54-0.76 mmol Fe(2+) per 100g honey) were

274 The FRAP and DPPH assays were more suitable than the TEAC as

275 The FRAP data showed anisotropic fluorescence recovery, yiel

276 cts with binding sites to show that both the FRAP and the FCS estimates may be correct and compatible

277 method and the antioxidant properties by the FRAP assay.

278 ghly conserved extreme C-terminus called the FRAP-ATM-TRRAP-C-terminal (FATC) domain.

279 est stoichiometry of Fe(3+) reduction in the FRAP assay and belonged to the most efficient compounds

280 oxyl radicals, and as electron donors in the FRAP assay.

281 regardless of bleaching geometry used in the FRAP experiment.

282 e confirmed from the results obtained in the FRAP, DPPH and ORAC assays.

283 lue is an order of magnitude larger than the FRAP one.

284 Overall, we find that the FRAP bleach intensity does not measurably influence the

285 cal scavenging activities measured under the FRAP, ABTS and ORAC assays in grain extracts of 29 Peruv

286 ivity of these extracts was tested using the FRAP and DPPH assays, and two biological models of lipid

287 n 100 and 1200 mV (LSV(1200mV)) and with the FRAP index.

288 ntire film thickness, as consistent with the FRAP results.

289 ting ability was significantly correlated to FRAP, DPPH, and TPC, while sparse (p<0.05) correlations

290 We used FRAP, super-resolution microscopy, functional tests in m

291 Using FRAP combined with in silico simulations, we find that t

292 By using FRAP at different time points during protein accumulatio

293 vity of the inhibitor was demonstrated using FRAP assays as well as cell viability data.

294 y thus demonstrates the feasibility of using FRAP during protein recruitment and its application in t

295 presented here to estimate parameters using FRAP recovery data is a broadly applicable tool for syst

296 rates, and active transport velocities using FRAP data that captures intracellular dynamics through p

297 Usually FRAP experiments are conducted with the protein concentr

298 this study, we present an approach in which FRAP is used shortly after DNA damage introducing laser

299 While FRAP activity ranged from 8.64-104.21mgTEg(-1)DW (about

300 relation between vitamin C, TPC and TFC with FRAP and DPPH showed their contribution to antioxidant c