戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 tion and obligate anaerobe enrichment (e.g., Firmicutes).
2 sociated with body mass index (Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes).
3  lineage within the order Bacillales (phylum Firmicutes).
4 ia, and finally Bacteroidetes/Proteobacteria/Firmicutes.
5 mercially important members of the low G + C Firmicutes.
6 plicated in interbacterial competition among Firmicutes.
7 iome, a polymicrobial community dominated by Firmicutes.
8  be produced by a thermophilic member of the Firmicutes.
9  canonical type domains are widespread among Firmicutes.
10 ed by the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.
11 eral families belonging to Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes.
12 report on comprehensive analysis of P450s in Firmicutes.
13 se mechanisms control spore formation in the Firmicutes.
14  a large number of cell wall proteins in the Firmicutes.
15  was reduced in women with low Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes.
16 re peptide pheromone receptors ubiquitous in Firmicutes.
17 ile vancomycin promoted the expansion of the Firmicutes.
18 d associated with CD-specific alterations in Firmicutes.
19 and belongs to the Ruminococcaceae family of Firmicutes.
20 tive set of active microorganisms, primarily Firmicutes.
21 hly conserved from the Proteobacteria to the Firmicutes.
22  is a major regulator of stress responses in Firmicutes.
23  in particular, the selection for the phylum Firmicutes.
24 and syntrophic, acetogenic, and fermentative Firmicutes.
25 ric bacteria and a few species in the phylum Firmicutes.
26 quences belonged to Bacteroidetes and 41% to Firmicutes.
27 t bacterial species differed, especially the Firmicutes.
28 tinal enrichment of bacteria from the phylum Firmicutes.
29 ad characteristic disturbances of the phylum Firmicutes.
30 ation in B. subtilis and other spore-forming Firmicutes.
31 he bacterial species belonging to the phylum Firmicutes.
32 pronounced in L. monocytogenes than in other Firmicutes.
33 R family members in other Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.
34 as enriched in Bacteroidetes but depleted of Firmicutes.
35 ndance of Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes.
36 uitous in Bacilli, a major monoderm class of Firmicutes.
37 lly transferred to the Korarchaeota from the Firmicutes.
38  followed by Bactroidetes (13.99% +/- 0.29), Firmicutes (11.45% +/- 0.51), Actinobacteria (10.21% +/-
39 ting 74.8% of the 16S sequences, followed by Firmicutes (12.0%), Proteobacteria (10.4%), Verrucomicro
40 rs of the phyla Proteobacteria (14% to 68%), Firmicutes (26% to 41%), Actinobacteria (6 to 23%) and B
41 rial phyla, led by Bacteroidetes (51.2%) and Firmicutes (27.1%), and 94 genera were represented prima
42  carious lesions, Actinobacteria (35.8%) and Firmicutes (31.2%) were the most prevalent phyla, follow
43 eas in digesta both Proteobacteria (47%) and Firmicutes (38%) showed high abundance.
44 7) was associated with higher proportions of Firmicutes (43.8% x 38.5%, P = 0.05).
45                                 In contrast, Firmicutes (47% vs 63%, P = .17) and Actinobacteria (10%
46 t microbiotas were dominated by three phyla: Firmicutes (62.9%), Proteobacteria (29.9%) and Fusobacte
47 nt phyla present in bushmeat samples include Firmicutes (67.8%), Proteobacteria (18.4%), Cyanobacteri
48 d the predominance in swine facility dust of Firmicutes (70%) at the phylum level, Clostridia (44%) a
49 units (OTUs, 97% similarity), primarily from Firmicutes (92.6%) and Proteobacteria (6.9%), via 16S rR
50                                              Firmicutes abundance declined from HDC to MAH to SAH (63
51 ncultivated clades related to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi were ubiquito
52 epresentatives from the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria.
53 ltered abundances in the phyla Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria.
54 p-GMK interaction is conserved in members of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Deinococcus-Thermus, but
55  was comprised mostly of the bacterial phyla Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria.
56 dance of Proteobacteria, higher abundance of Firmicutes, along with enriched bacterial genus diversit
57                           Many Gram-positive Firmicutes also have N-acylated lipoproteins, but the en
58 lysis suggests that this may be common among Firmicutes and 30% of all bacteria.
59 to an increase in abundance of Gram-positive Firmicutes and a concurrent decrease in Gram-negative Ba
60                      However, examination of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria reveals that PspA ortholog
61                                 In addition, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were also the abundant phy
62 milk in phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria with an inclusion of 68.04
63 as associated with a significant increase of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and a decrease of Bactero
64 thogens and opportunistic pathogens from the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, which exhibit a Gram-posi
65 g Deltaproteobacteria, as well as uncultured Firmicutes and Actinobacteria.
66 ear, especially reduced exposure to specific Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes, was associated with atopy
67 t Gram-positive bacteria affiliated with the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated in the post-reduc
68 l model for polysaccharide hydrolysis by the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the thermophilic cellulo
69 f strict anaerobic bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla.
70 s are dominated by bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla.
71  obligate anaerobic bacteria, with ratios of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes similar to those observed i
72 nera were identified from all fecal samples; Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the most dominant phyl
73                       In the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, xanthine phosphoribosyltra
74 al communities in kogiid whales dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.
75 d changes occurred at the level of phylum in Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.
76 in the microbiome, with a marked decrease of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.
77 lesterol, intestinal and plasma LPC18:1, and Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria with plasma LPC 18:1.
78 , we identify AcrIIA1(NTD) homologs in other Firmicutes and demonstrate that they have been co-opted
79                                              Firmicutes and Enterobacteriaceae abundances were associ
80 e Romanian adolescents had more sequences in Firmicutes and fewer in Actinobacteria phyla and more se
81 ous in genomes from the Gram-positive phylum Firmicutes and in some Gram-negative bacteria.
82 rkably, we observed a decreased abundance of Firmicutes and increased abundance of Proteobacteria - a
83 vel diversity comparisons revealed decreased Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria in ulcerated sit
84                      FXR KO also had reduced Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria, which could be
85 ic Proteobacteria and decreases in anaerobic Firmicutes and Melainabacteria in the murine foregut and
86 teria were the dominant Hg-methylators while Firmicutes and methanogenic Archaea were typically ~50%
87 filiated with Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (especially Roseobacter of
88 ith a reduction in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria after treatment.
89        On day 4 the proportion of the phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in stool was significantly
90 used marked dysbiosis, with expansion of the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla, near elimination of
91 Abundances of dominant phyla (Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) were similar.
92 CHX significantly increased the abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, and reduced the content o
93 ated with either enrichment or reductions of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively, at a false
94 24-7 and Bacteroidaceae was reduced, whereas Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae,
95 hree phyla common in the gut--Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria--as well as one aerobic pa
96 tes and Fusobacteria, and AMH showing higher Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.
97 onging to the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.
98 ated with the dust was low, but dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.
99 oth gastrointestinal sites were dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.
100 striction in the progression phase increased Firmicutes and reduced Bacteroidetes compared to a high-
101                                           In Firmicutes and related bacteria, ribosomal large subunit
102 ponents and their homologs in homoacetogenic Firmicutes and Spirochaetes suggests that the deltaprote
103                                We found that Firmicutes and Spirochaetes were the most abundant phyla
104 owed a positive relationship with percent of Firmicutes and Streptococcus and a negative association
105                                Diet-enriched Firmicutes and their products were sufficient to increas
106 and Proteobacteria, but fewer Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Verrumicrobia.
107 the low-G+C group of Gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes) and requires signature sporulation genes tha
108 Gs were mostly found in Clostridia, Bacilli (Firmicutes), and in alpha and beta Proteobacteria.
109 , Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Chlamydiae, Firmicutes, and Acidobacteria.
110 s, with phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria being most abundant.
111      At school age, many new Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes bacterial taxa emerged.
112  characterized fusobacteria, proteobacteria, firmicutes, and bacteroidetes.
113 the phyla of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Cyanobacteria in bacteria and the phylum
114 vels of total bacterial load, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Enterobacteriaceae were mostly similar,
115 d by inversely correlated Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, and exhibited discrete compositional pattern
116 ng diverse clades, including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Methanomicrobia, with Deltaproteobacteri
117 sals from the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria phyla, we found that pote
118 in phyla in all samples were Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria.
119 lope that was present in the ancestor of the Firmicutes, and that the monoderm phenotype in this phyl
120  Spx-family proteins are highly conserved in Firmicutes, and the L. monocytogenes genome contains two
121 mouth, including members of the Bacteroides, Firmicutes, and TM7 phyla, while airway microbiota were
122  a profile characterized by the expansion of Firmicutes (appearance of Erysipelotrichi), Proteobacter
123                                          The Firmicutes are a phylum of bacteria that dominate numero
124                                              Firmicutes are reduced in the intestinal microbiota of p
125 nserved in other amidases from Gram-positive Firmicutes, are pivotal for enzymatic activity.
126  where GlgC and GlgD proteins found in other Firmicutes arrange in distinctive clusters.
127 decreased Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes as well as a reduced diversity in microbiome.
128 a, a reduced ratio between Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, as well as a dramatic increase of Gram-negat
129 iety of Gram-positive bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes, as well as Escherichia coli with a compromis
130 RISPRi in gammaproteobacteria and Bacillales Firmicutes at the individual gene scale, by examining dr
131 e classes of low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes), Bacilli, Clostridia and Negativicutes, incl
132 tance against antimicrobial peptides in many Firmicutes bacteria is mediated by detoxification system
133                                              Firmicutes bacteria produce metabolites that maintain th
134 rium acetylicum, a representative intestinal Firmicutes bacterium that is intractable to molecular ge
135 d significant differences in beta diversity, Firmicutes/Bacteroides (F/B) ratio, and increase of Verr
136     Persistent bacterial groups belonging to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were presen
137 icrobiomes were dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria bacteria, whi
138 tation selected for three dominant taxa--the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Thermus.
139  from NHB and NHW women (n = 64), with fewer Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria.
140  revealed that the dominant phyla related to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria accelerate
141 lm material produced by members of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria.
142 heless, both shared a dominance of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria.
143   Results showed that relative abundances of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Enterococcus, Enterobacteriac
144               Here we show that the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B ratio) and intestinal proi
145 and E2 treatment did not affect the ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B).
146                           The gut microbiome Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio decreased with exercise a
147 ction (CDI) are both related to an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the intestinal microbi
148 howed 35.4, 89.2, and 60.0% reduction in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio than the S-raised pigs at
149                                          The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was increased by LPS in S
150  community of LCR rats, resulting in a lower Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio.
151 ld for syntrophic propionate oxidation, with Firmicutes being replaced by Bacteroidetes.
152                                         Some Firmicutes (belonging to the genus Bacillus and Sporosar
153  oral bacteria (e.g., Bacteroides, Bacillus, Firmicutes, beta-proteobacteria, and Spirochetes) were s
154 ur predominantly in bifidobacteria and a few Firmicutes but lack in other HGMs.
155 ulosiruptorand among other biomass-degrading Firmicutes but missing from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii
156  correlated with increased Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes but reduced Clostridium.
157 d for pulcherriminic acid synthesis in other Firmicutes but the patchwork presence both within and ac
158 6% of bacterial colonizers after 1 week were Firmicutes, but by 7 weeks Actinobacteria and Bacteroide
159  depleted of all phyla with the exception of Firmicutes, but doxycycline treatment had minimal effect
160 erobiales belong to the classically monoderm Firmicutes, but possess outer membranes with lipopolysac
161 nserved within certain bacterial phyla, e.g. Firmicutes, but show different patterns in other phyloge
162 EP class inhibit the growth of Gram-positive firmicutes by activating ClpP and causing unregulated pr
163  and the relative abundances were higher for Firmicutes, Chloroflexi and Crenarchaeota, but lower for
164 d IL-17/IL-22-related declines in the phylum Firmicutes, class Clostridia, and order Clostridiales Th
165 ial profile was dominated by two main phyla, Firmicutes, closely followed by Bacteroidetes.
166 e halotolerant bacterial genus in the phylum Firmicutes, commonly found in various habitats in Antarc
167         Bacterial taxa within Clostridia and Firmicutes could be studied as probiotic candidates for
168 erial taxa in ileal effluents and especially Firmicutes, could be used to discriminate between nonrej
169 m 1% to 46% with monensin, but gram-positive Firmicutes decreased from 93% to 46%.
170                                           In Firmicutes, degradative capacity is largely restricted t
171 inant gut bacterial phyla, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, did not differ between participants with gre
172                      We propose that in some Firmicutes DMB is activated to alpha-RP via alpha-R usin
173  of the stool microbiota, transitioning from Firmicutes dominant to Bacteroidetes dominant.
174 control mucosally associated microbiota were Firmicutes-dominant, whereas WT TPN mice were Proteobact
175 obacteria dominated in immature stages while Firmicutes dominated in adult stages.
176 iated with increased mortality compared with Firmicutes-dominated or balanced microbiome profiles (ha
177  analyses identify 12 taxa, 11 in the phylum Firmicutes, eight of which are positively associated wit
178                             In bacteria, the Firmicutes encode conserved Spx-family transcriptional r
179 ipation were highest in individuals with the Firmicutes-enriched enterotype.
180 ate producers), together with a reduction in Firmicutes (especially due to lower Lachnospiraceae popu
181  age, body mass index, and diet; genera from Firmicutes (Faecalibacterium, Lactococcus, and Roseburia
182 e of facultative anaerobic taxa of the phyla Firmicutes (families Ruminococcaceae and Turicibacterace
183 re, by screening 1,639 genomes of uncultured Firmicutes for signatures of an OM, we highlight a third
184           The class Clostridia in the phylum Firmicutes (formerly low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria) inc
185 eviously known, with examples throughout the Firmicutes, Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria.
186 ative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla (Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Bacteriodetes, and Actinobacte
187 ase are reflected by the gammaProteobacteria:Firmicutes (gammaP:F) ratio.
188 w-onset patients had different levels of the Firmicutes genera Lactobacillus and Staphylococcus compa
189 her 3',5'-cAMP is universally present in the Firmicutes group of bacteria.
190 mmunity skewed towards a higher abundance of Firmicutes (> 59.2%) and Bacteroidetes (4.2-31.4%) withi
191 gativicutes, within the classically monoderm Firmicutes has blurred the monoderm/diderm divide and sp
192 ism of interbacterial antagonism utilized by Firmicutes has not been elucidated.
193                                     However, Firmicutes have a fundamentally different set of ribonuc
194  Herein, we show that the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes (high-GC and low-GC Gram-positive bacteria) a
195 acteria in healthy piglets, were replaced by Firmicutes in asymptomatic and diarrheal piglets.
196 the presence of oral Actinobacteria and oral Firmicutes in stool was positively correlated with subse
197 ture, decreased Bacteroidetes, and increased Firmicutes in the feces.
198 P = .047), with enrichment of Clostridia and Firmicutes in the infant gut microbiome of subjects whos
199 higher abundance of Bacteroidetes, and lower Firmicutes in the large intestine, along with lower leve
200 gher proportion of Bacteroidetes relative to Firmicutes in the soil group.
201                                Spore-forming firmicutes include many environmentally important organi
202 F) sigma factor that is found exclusively in Firmicutes including Bacillus subtilis and the opportuni
203                                  Lineages of Firmicutes, including Clostridiales, have been frequentl
204 c-di-AMP controls the uptake of osmolytes in Firmicutes, including the human pathogen Listeria monocy
205 the presence of sporulation genes in various firmicutes, including those with smaller genomes than B.
206                                              Firmicutes increased sharply, whereas Proteobacteria, Ac
207 s in bacterial abundance including decreased Firmicutes, increased Bacteroidetes, and decreased Bifid
208 m in Lake Miers, and two distinct classes of Firmicutes inhabited East and West Lobe Bonney at depths
209  that L27 in Staphylococcus aureus and other Firmicutes is encoded with an N-terminal extension that
210  sensitive target for ADEP-activated ClpP in firmicutes, is not degraded in mycobacteria.
211 ex, composed of Clostridial taxa and several Firmicutes known to be protective in EAE.
212 l coabundance groups; the first dominated by Firmicutes (Lachnospiraceae/Clostridiales), the second b
213                                         Some Firmicutes lack CobT-type enzymes but have a two-protein
214                 The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes [mean relative abundance (SD), 42.1% (10.1%)]
215 he diol dehydratase gene cluster (pduCDE) in Firmicutes metagenomes predicted from the 16S rRNA gene.
216                                              Firmicutes multidrug resistance inc18 plasmids encode pa
217 GOS and lactose were significant increase in Firmicutes, numerical in Actinobacteria, and numerical d
218 h different faecal inocula, while nine other Firmicutes OTUs showed > 5-fold enrichment in at least o
219 odes of rejection, the proportions of phylum Firmicutes (p < 0.001) and the order Lactobacillales (p
220                                              Firmicutes (P < 0.001) was the dominant phylum in MF pup
221  21 there was an increase in HOMIM scores of firmicutes (P </=0.001), fusobacteria (P = 0.003), prote
222 uminococcus (p-for-interaction = 0.007), and Firmicutes (p-for-interaction = 0.04) and effects on inf
223 er 176,000 protein families constituting the Firmicutes pan-proteome identify those that strongly cor
224                           Proteobacteria and Firmicutes penetrated small intestinal villi, and flagel
225 ormal DNA pairs, while the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla were depleted in tumors.
226 e in the abundance of both Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes phyla, with a proportional increase in the gr
227 es belonging mainly to the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla.
228 TMF(-/-) mice leading to predominance of the Firmicutes phylum and a significantly higher abundance o
229              Taxonomy reveals an increase of Firmicutes phylum and Corynebacteriaceae family in MCT s
230                               Members of the Firmicutes phylum comprised 39% of total sequences and w
231 rial sequences and showed an increase in the Firmicutes phylum in GOLD 4 patients versus all other gr
232 ks after birth, whereas many bacteria of the Firmicutes phylum were acquired at later times in infanc
233 rved microbial developmental strategy in the Firmicutes phylum wherein a progenitor cell that faces s
234 ition revealed a significant increase in the Firmicutes phylum with asthma that was associated with a
235  Bacillus subtilis and most species from the Firmicutes phylum, ThiI lacks the rhodanese domain that
236 o membranes on multiple occasions within the Firmicutes phylum.
237 marily by a paucity of phylotypes within the Firmicutes phylum.
238 lycan is absent, especially for the dominant Firmicutes phylum.
239 Samples were classified as Proteobacteria or Firmicutes (phylum level) and Haemophilus or Streptococc
240 m samples contained 5 major bacterial phyla: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteriu
241 d predominance of Bacteroidetes, followed by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria phyla.
242 cterial phylotypes across the Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, the four
243 five dominant bacterial phyla (Spirochaetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fibrobacteres and Bacteroide
244                            In the IBD group, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Fusobac
245  the major low-molecular-weight thiol in the Firmicutes raises the possibility that BSH is involved i
246 sitive correlation between the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio and total dietary fiber intake but not
247  fiber consumption shifted the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio, increasing the relative abundance of B
248  with turf algae had higher Bacteroidetes-to-Firmicutes ratios and an elevated abundance of genes inv
249 corresponding to uncultured Lachnospiraceae (Firmicutes) related to Eubacterium xylanophilum and Buty
250 munity toward lower Bacteriodetes and higher Firmicutes, resembling changes in microbiota composition
251 piring microbes of the phyla Chloroflexi and Firmicutes, respectively.
252 undant in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, respectively.
253                                Taxa from the Firmicutes responded positively to AMF, while taxa from
254                                              Firmicutes scores were higher for infants born by C-sect
255 zebrafish larvae, elevating the abundance of Firmicutes sequences and reducing the abundance of Actin
256  groups XZ and JD than in group SPF, whereas Firmicutes showed the inverse pattern.
257 of putative GusR orthologs from GUS-encoding Firmicutes species also reveal functionally unique featu
258         Genome-wide analysis of P450s in 972 Firmicutes species belonging to 158 genera revealed that
259 lowed by 14% of Clostridia and 2.7% of other Firmicutes species, have P450s.
260  efficacy of SER-287, an oral formulation of Firmicutes spores, and the effects of vancomycin precond
261 bulk pH in the media allowed us to isolate a Firmicutes strain (Paenibacillus sp.).
262 ione is absent from the low-GC Gram-positive Firmicutes, such as Bacillus subtilis.
263 ia, particularly among facultative anaerobic Firmicutes, such as streptococci.
264  of Bacteroidetes and decreased abundance of Firmicutes, Tenericutes, Deferribacteres, and Spirochaet
265 and Bacteroides) and decreased the levels of Firmicutes that metabolize dietary plant polysaccharides
266 Gram-positive bacteria, and particularly the Firmicutes, the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) comp
267                                    Among the Firmicutes, the interactions were all competitive.
268 icted proteins is most similar to those from Firmicutes, the presence of key genes suggests a diderm
269 cteroides, and potentially Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes-the predominant BXD gut phyla.
270 ved in Rex orthologs identified in the phyla Firmicutes, Thermotogales, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi,
271         Since scfCDE is conserved throughout Firmicutes, this work may contribute to the development
272 ent demonstrated a community transition from Firmicutes to a novel Bacteroidetes population that clus
273 ht loss, there is a decrease in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes phyla.
274 r, aged mice had a significant change in the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio with vancomycin treatm
275 ased gut dysbiosis, measured by the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, and increased the prevalenc
276  muciniphila and decreased the proportion of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, consistent with prior repor
277 ition, characterized by a decreased ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, reduced Allobaculum bacteri
278  the gut microbiota by shifting the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes.
279 t and a putative diversity maximum along the Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes axis.
280 ts fed the same high-fat diet, with a higher Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and significant genera
281  gut dysbiosis-as indicated by the decreased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratios and endotoxin-bearing
282 om a predominance of Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes towards Bacteroidetes.
283 ds and other conjugative elements present in Firmicutes using the Listeria acrIIA1 gene as a marker.
284                                              Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum, and Corynebacte
285                      Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes were consistently enriched from lab electroch
286                                     Overall, Firmicutes were found to account for 96% of amplified gu
287 iversity index and the relative abundance of Firmicutes were markedly reduced, whereas Proteobacteria
288               In contrast, several taxa from Firmicutes were more abundant in homes of individuals wi
289                 The phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were more abundant in the rhizosphere of newe
290  Women with a high ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes were more likely to be treated with UDCA (Fis
291 ypes belonging to the Ruminococcaceae in the Firmicutes were predominant in the methanogenic cultures
292                                              Firmicutes were the dominant phylum, and Staphylococcus
293              Based on microbiome sequencing, Firmicutes were the predominant bacterial group at the p
294 obacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes were the top five phyla identified from all s
295 and can be used in all related gram positive firmicutes which employ drastically different DNA replic
296 opmental phenotypes (including virulence) in Firmicutes, which includes common human pathogens, e.g.,
297 f steady state communities was enriched with Firmicutes, while the other was enriched with Bacteroide
298 unity was relatively simple and dominated by Firmicutes with 79% and 65% relative abundance for Meish
299 oromusa branch, which unifies members of the Firmicutes with Gram-negative-type cell envelopes, was r
300 of ABR genes and increased Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes with reduced Proteobacteria.

 
Page Top