戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 th a hierarchical structure derived from the Gene Ontology.
2 ubset of genes enriched for the inflammation gene ontology.
3 d by depth of proteins within hierarchies of gene ontologies.
4 were extracted from the transcriptomes using Gene Ontology, adult-brain gene lists generated by Trans
5                In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichmen
6                                              Gene ontology analyses of EGM and AGM samples revealed d
7                                              Gene ontology analyses of genes coexpressed between extr
8                                  Pathway and gene ontology analyses of these differentially expressed
9                                              Gene ontology analyses of transcripts displaying APA in
10                                              Gene ontology analyses revealed activation of metabolic
11                                   MapMan and Gene Ontology analyses revealed global transcriptional c
12                                  Pathway and gene ontology analyses revealed that Tnt1-inserted genes
13 multiscale modeling, ribosome profiling, and gene ontology analyses.
14                                              Gene ontology analysis associated spurious bivalent prom
15                                 Furthermore, gene ontology analysis demonstrated that DMRs associated
16                                              Gene ontology analysis demonstrates that a large portion
17                                              Gene Ontology analysis demonstrates that HA-CS NPs were
18                                              Gene ontology analysis highlighted several new targets a
19                                              Gene ontology analysis identified a novel role for Matri
20                                              Gene ontology analysis identified a set of genes related
21 ctional overlap revealed through comparative gene ontology analysis in both species.
22                                              Gene ontology analysis indicated that their main molecul
23                                              Gene ontology analysis indicates reduced metabolic proce
24                                              Gene ontology analysis of genes with DMCs at TSSs reveal
25 e the function of mitochondria, according to gene ontology analysis of proteins that are down-regulat
26                                              Gene ontology analysis of SR1-regulated genes confirmed
27                                              Gene ontology analysis of the budesonide-modulated trans
28                                              Gene ontology analysis of the gene panel identified mult
29                                              Gene ontology analysis of the secretory proteins reveale
30                                              Gene Ontology analysis of this cluster revealed enrichme
31                                              Gene ontology analysis of three independent clinical GC
32                                              Gene ontology analysis of TOPBP1- and ETAA1-dependent ph
33                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed decreased synaptic signa
34                                  Pathway and gene ontology analysis revealed differential expression
35                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment in processes
36                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment of cell migra
37                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed enrichment of signaling
38                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed multicellular organism d
39                                              Gene ontology analysis revealed that a number of genetic
40                                              Gene Ontology analysis revealed that nuclear lumen, nucl
41                                              Gene Ontology analysis revealed that S-(+)-fipronil caus
42                                            A gene ontology analysis reveals that stress response proc
43                                              Gene ontology analysis showed a similar pattern, with mo
44                                              Gene ontology analysis showed that expression of PIEZO1
45                                              Gene ontology analysis showed that genes affected by TRA
46 ance and stress fiber formation by TGF-beta, gene ontology analysis showed that genes encoding extrac
47                                              Gene ontology analysis suggested that Nrf2 KO-changed pr
48 ghted gene coexpression network analysis and gene ontology analysis to identify biological processes
49                                              Gene ontology analysis using WebGestalt indicates the en
50             Gene set enrichment analysis and gene ontology analysis was used to examine transcriptomi
51 proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins id
52 sion analysis, principal component analysis, gene ontology analysis, and network analysis) or multipl
53                                              Gene ontology analysis, focusing on genes with low, inte
54 ical in glioma development using pathway and gene ontology analysis.
55 y relevant genes which are well justified by gene ontology analysis.
56                    We cross-linked EPIC with gene ontology and anatomy ontology terms, employing FDA
57                    We cross-linked EPIC with gene ontology and anatomy ontology terms, employing Fish
58 ch display potential biological functions in Gene Ontology and circRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks that are n
59 rends in biological process annotations from Gene Ontology and disease annotations from DisGeNET are
60 five popular classification algorithms using gene ontology and gene expression datasets as features t
61 bility to predict biological functions using Gene Ontology and gene-disease associations using Human
62 o enrichment analyses for pathways, tissues, gene ontology and genetic pleiotropy.
63                                              Gene Ontology and KEGG pathway analyses shed light on th
64 ts well-known classification systems such as Gene Ontology and KEGG, but also offers additional, new
65 ene annotation and pathway databases such as Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genom
66                                              Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome
67  involved in the regulation of miR-124-3p by Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome
68  these DMPs displayed enrichment of 58 and 6 Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome
69                                              Gene ontology and network analyses showed enrichment of
70                                        Using gene ontology and network analysis, eight clusters of ge
71                                              Gene ontology and network pathway analysis were performe
72 in murine whole blood using RNAseq analysis, gene ontology and network topology-based key driver anal
73                                              Gene ontology and pathway analyses linked TNF-alpha and
74                                              Gene ontology and pathway analysis identified endoplasmi
75                               Alternatively, gene ontology and pathway analysis in tissues indicated
76 lso applied NetPAS in gene sets derived from gene ontology and pathway annotations and showed that Ne
77 t into the function of the DEGs, we examined gene ontology and phenotype enrichment and found signifi
78                                              Gene ontology and phenotype-genotype analysis suggested
79                                              Gene Ontology and PubMatrix analyses of differentially e
80               Our database also incorporated Gene Ontology and several pathway databases to enhance f
81 a reference-transcriptome-guided approach on gene ontology and tox-pathways, we confirmed the novel a
82 d integrated genotype-phenotype annotations, gene ontologies, and interaction networks to determine t
83 fferentially expressed transcripts, enriched gene ontology, and altered functions and canonical pathw
84 re performed using modular repertoires, IPA, Gene Ontology, and NetworkAnalyst 3.0.
85 nt p-value < 0.05), hierarchical clustering, gene ontology, and pathway representation.
86  analyses with differential gene expression, gene ontology, and weighted gene correlation network ana
87 odelling and protein catabolism according to Gene Ontology; and highlight the opportunities for provi
88                                              Gene ontology annotation and network analysis showed tha
89 ctable in the circulation, we also created a gene ontology annotation for circulating miRNAs using th
90          Biological knowledge, and therefore Gene Ontology annotation sets, for human genes is incomp
91  using classification systems, such as Pfam, Gene Ontology annotation, mpstruc or the Transporter Cla
92                   To increase the utility of Gene Ontology annotations for interpretation of genome-w
93 ta matrix and gene-term data matrix (storing Gene Ontology annotations of genes) into low-rank matric
94              Next, IsoFun uses the available Gene Ontology annotations of genes, gene-gene interactio
95 functional pairs (negative pair), we use the Gene Ontology annotations tagged with "NOT" qualifier.
96 typic information of individual samples with gene ontology annotations to derive a ranking of genes a
97  positive and negative class labels, updated Gene Ontology annotations, and by literature evidence.
98 oding genes, and support for more expressive Gene Ontology annotations.
99 alyses were performed in silico according to Gene Ontology annotations.
100              In this study, we used MS and a Gene Ontology approach to identify differentially sumoyl
101 t revealed extracellular matrix organization Gene Ontology as the most significant.
102 ons of individual genomes to pangenomes with gene ontology based navigation of gene groups.
103 pression network, hierarchal clustering, and gene-ontology based approaches identified a putative rol
104                                   Integrated Gene Ontology-based analysis further revealed that ASD g
105 e, and extract non-redundant associations of Gene Ontology-based functions.
106 his protein-metabolite network, we conduct a gene ontology-based semantic similarity ranking to find
107                   Furthermore, the result of Gene Ontology-based term classification (GO), EuKaryotic
108                                          Our Gene Ontology-based term classification and KEGG-based p
109 enes; 31 of these genes were enriched in the gene ontology biologic process 'receptor-mediated endocy
110                           Among the enriched Gene Ontology Biological Process (GO BP) terms, actin cy
111  we use single isoform genes co-annotated to Gene Ontology biological process annotations, Kyoto Ency
112                                              Gene ontology biological process term analysis revealed
113     With the generated signaling network and gene ontology biological process term grouping, we ident
114 ially expressed genes; the top five enriched gene ontology biological processes included (i) immune r
115                                         Four gene ontology biological processes were enriched among g
116 henotype ontology and transfer learning with gene ontology can improve the predictions.
117 s were enriched in the biological process of gene ontology categories and at later treatment stages.
118 or brain development, enrichment in the same Gene Ontology categories as genes with mutations de novo
119 se populations in genes enriched for several gene ontology categories related to muscle adaptation, c
120 are present, though most significantly, that gene ontology categories relating to transcription are o
121                   We found that reproductive gene ontology categories were significantly enriched in
122 identified subnetworks that were enriched in gene ontology categories, revealing directional regulato
123 found in select transcripts within these key gene ontology categories, underscoring the vulnerability
124 ions are statistically enriched for specific gene ontology categories.
125 ng neuronal functions including postsynaptic gene ontology categories.
126 se assembly, cell proliferation, and related Gene Ontology categories.
127          These genes mapped to the following gene ontology categories: fatty acid degradation, peroxi
128          Alterations due to MCS impact every gene ontology category queried, including GABAergic neur
129 r-representation of L1 insertions within the gene ontologies 'cell projection' and 'postsynaptic memb
130                                              Gene Ontology classification and protein-protein interac
131 ication, intron/exon structural patterns and gene ontology classification as well as profile expressi
132  for proteomic analysis (>=9.0 mL urine) and gene ontology classification identified 75% of the prote
133                                              Gene ontology classification of the resensitizing loci r
134  are only present or more abundant in cas-c1 Gene ontology classification of these proteins identifie
135 standards' derived from proteomic studies or Gene Ontology classifications.
136 le in their degradation by XRN4 and VCS, and Gene Ontology clustering revealed novel actors of seed d
137  six model organism databases (MODs) and the Gene Ontology Consortium (GO).
138 ntegrative analysis of target prediction and Gene Ontology data.
139 multiple ontology categories (like pathways, gene ontology, disease categories) and therefore expedit
140      In addition, we identify nodes in these gene ontology-enriched subnetworks that are coordinately
141 ntial expression, functional annotation, and gene ontology enrichment analyses were performed.
142  of the detected proteins was assessed using Gene Ontology enrichment analysis and Ingenuity Pathway
143                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis and protein-protein in
144                                  Comparative gene ontology enrichment analysis evidenced that most st
145                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis found that DEGs contri
146                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis from gene-expression d
147 th a high similarity to Arabidopsis APETALA1 Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially expr
148                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis of gene sets associate
149                                              Gene Ontology enrichment analysis provides an effective
150                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed immune-stimul
151 th immunochemical confirmation combined with gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that ERp57 ta
152                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that OsHOX24
153                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that the data
154                                              Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed the promotion
155 clic transcriptome in B. distachyon, we used Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, and found several ter
156 time course expression profiles, clustering, gene ontology enrichment analysis, differential expressi
157 erenhancer signal profile, associated genes, gene ontology enrichment analysis, motifs of transcripti
158  for consideration of biological context via gene ontology enrichment analysis.
159 hod to identify regions (DMRs) and conducted gene ontology enrichment analysis.
160         Differential expression analysis and Gene ontology enrichment revealed that the number of tra
161 idation tests (Edge Set Enrichment Analysis, Gene Ontology Enrichment, Disease-Gene Subnetwork Compac
162 ved in the wound-healing process, as well as Gene Ontology enrichments in fundamental wound-healing p
163                                              Gene ontology enrichments revealed a large spectrum of A
164 controlled Ikaros over-expression to recover gene ontology enrichments, identify motifs in genomic re
165 atabase with avian immune gene evidence from Gene Ontology, Ensembl, UniProt and the B10K consortium
166 ee categories of protein functions including gene ontology, enzyme commission and ligand-binding site
167 from other sources such as InterProScan, the Gene Ontology, ENZYME, UniPathway, and others.
168 e ontologies, with the interferon-associated gene ontology exhibiting the highest percentage of upreg
169                              Gene family and gene ontology functional enrichment analysis of the diff
170 lation profiles, a total of 339,158 putative gene ontology functions associated with 1446 human m(6)A
171 unigenes, differentially expressed unigenes, gene ontology functions, and the family of peroxidase ge
172 patterns of response, representing different gene ontology functions.
173        Systems biology approaches relying on gene ontologies, gene coexpression, and protein-protein
174 ion data with external sources of orthology, gene ontology, gene interaction and pathway information.
175 ific targeting for >5000 mRNAs we determined gene ontologies (GO).
176 chemokine ligand 4 (CCL4), while exploratory gene ontology (GO) analyses revealed lower expression of
177                                              Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Ge
178  The David database was then used to perform Gene ontology (GO) analysis and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Ge
179                                              Gene ontology (GO) analysis highlighted genes relating t
180                                          The gene ontology (GO) analysis implicated candidate genes u
181                                              Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of DEG that were higher or l
182                                              Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of FIR up-regulated genes in
183                                              Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the co-expression modules
184                                            A Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of the enrichment of biologi
185                                      Through Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, the target genes were mappe
186                                              Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and G
187                                              Gene Ontology (GO) and MapMan pathway analyses underline
188 r pathways and functional categories such as gene ontology (GO) and other databases.
189 new approach to detect potentially incorrect Gene Ontology (GO) annotations by comparing the ratio of
190 ailable research about synapse biology using Gene Ontology (GO) annotations to novel ontology terms:
191 structed protein sequence, a set of inferred Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, and a 'proxy gene' for e
192 icals/drugs, genes/proteins, diseases, taxa, Gene Ontology (GO) annotations, pathways, and gene inter
193 rward deep neural networks, as a solution to Gene Ontology (GO) based protein function prediction.
194 utlier genes were significantly enriched for Gene Ontology (GO) categories mainly related to social b
195  method displaying a similar distribution of gene ontology (GO) cellular component assignments compar
196 ntegrating the hierarchical structure of the Gene Ontology (GO) data dramatically improves prediction
197                               Clustering and gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses of radish dataset
198  genes were characterized using the MetaCore Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis algorithm.
199                                              Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of nod+ specific
200                                    Moreover, gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of salt responsiv
201                                              Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showed relatively
202 howed same effect directions in stage-2, the gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis showed several si
203               In both studies, we found that Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment results had more overlappi
204                                              Gene ontology (GO) functional annotations analysis using
205 al enrichment of genes and pathways based on Gene Ontology (GO) has been widely used to describe the
206                 Additional evaluations using gene ontology (GO) indicate that significant enrichment
207                                          The Gene Ontology (GO) is a central resource for functional-
208                                              Gene ontology (GO) is a widely used resource to describe
209                                              Gene ontology (GO) is an eminent knowledge base frequent
210                                     Although Gene Ontology (GO) is available for Caenorhabditis elega
211  well-defined structure and manual curation, Gene Ontology (GO) is the most frequently used vocabular
212                                          The Gene Ontology (GO) is the unifying biological vocabulary
213 ndothelial cells uncovered the activation of Gene Ontology (GO) pathways relevant to the human diseas
214 s of treated and untreated C. albicans using Gene Ontology (GO) revealed a large cluster of down regu
215                                 Based on the gene ontology (GO) term analysis, six promising candidat
216                                    Moreover, Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment enabled identificatio
217 toprotective (CyTP) genes categorized in the Gene Ontology (GO) term of "Xenobiotic Detoxification Pr
218 We report a number of significantly enriched gene ontology (GO) terms that are related to the cytoske
219  performing predictors proposed recently use gene ontology (GO) terms to construct feature vectors fo
220 the non-redundant (nr) protein database, and Gene Ontology (GO) terms were assigned based on the top
221                Among the DEGs, 48, 47 and 36 gene ontology (GO) terms were enriched in response to wa
222  Currently, the tool provides annotations to Gene Ontology (GO) terms, and PANTHER family and subfami
223  families and subfamilies are annotated with Gene Ontology (GO) terms, and sequences are assigned to
224  detecting genomic features, here defined by gene ontology (GO) terms, enriched for causal variants a
225                                              Gene ontology (GO) terms, GO:0010200 (response to chitin
226 ere significantly (p < 0.05) enriched in 279 gene ontology (GO) terms, including those related to pho
227 ojection to cluster heterogeneous samples by Gene Ontology (GO) terms.
228 be expression and we assessed enrichment for gene ontology (GO) terms.
229 ns with non-enzymatic functions annotated by Gene Ontology (GO) terms.
230  were associated with chondrogenesis-related gene ontology (GO) terms.
231 nction propagation, and the structure of the Gene Ontology (GO) to best utilize sparse input labels a
232 nd proteomic resources like gene expression, Gene Ontology (GO), and protein-protein interaction netw
233 entially expressed genes (DEGs), followed by gene ontology (GO), Hallmark pathway enrichment and prot
234 LP) to incorporate functional annotations in Gene Ontology (GO).
235  Differential gene expression (fold-change), gene ontology (GO; biological process) and pathway analy
236 hese statistically significant deviations in gene ontology groups can occur in seemingly high-quality
237 ere 19 nearby genes which could be linked to gene ontology information.
238                 We also carried out detailed gene ontology, KEGG, disease association, pathway common
239 gh-density microarrays and pathway analyses (Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes,
240 urately classify HRGPs leads to inconsistent gene ontologies limiting the identification of HRGP clas
241  and colon organoids, along with RNA-Seq and gene ontology methods, to characterize the effects of IL
242 d a genome-wide significant association of a Gene Ontology morphogenesis term (including assigned rol
243 nrichr and YeastEnrichr are created from the Gene Ontology, mRNA expression profiles, GeneRIF, pathwa
244                                              Gene ontology of predicted target genes for COMs showed
245 ta that has a hierarchical component such as gene ontology or geographic location data.
246 y expressed genes (DEGs) were categorized by gene ontology or Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
247                                              Gene ontology overrepresentation analysis in P7SCI gene-
248                                              Gene Ontology, pathway enrichment and network analysis c
249                                              Gene ontology pathways mapped from altered proteins over
250 , immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways were over-represented among the h
251 on and 5hmC profiles that mapped to specific gene ontology pathways.
252 ave more than doubled due to progress of the Gene Ontology Phylogenetic Annotation Project.
253 nrichment analysis revealed common pathways, gene ontology, protein domains, and cell type-specific e
254 hree important resources of biological data (gene ontology, protein interaction data, protein sequenc
255                                  Comparative Gene Ontology proteome analysis revealed that SUM52 cell
256 ilarly, the congruence on functional levels (Gene Ontology, Reactome) is low.
257 xpressed gene targets were also enriched for gene ontologies related to microtubule binding processes
258                                  Analysis of gene ontologies revealed that exosomes mirrored whole hu
259            In vitro transfection studies and gene ontology revealed involvement of these altered miRN
260 n addition, it leverages the PPI network and Gene Ontology structure to further coordinate the matrix
261 ion of COI1 and enrichment of genes with the Gene Ontology term 'cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase complex
262                                              Gene ontology term enrichment analysis of 416 genes from
263                                              Gene ontology term enrichment analysis was used to explo
264 ncyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway and Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis.
265  annotation for circulating miRNAs using the gene ontology term extracellular space as part of blood
266 onitrogens was detected as the most enriched gene ontology term for the host D. scoparium, for those
267 y all of them are enriched with at least one gene ontology term.
268                                        Using Gene Ontology terms and genome databases, 1805 genes wer
269 chanisms (defined by the gene sets), such as Gene Ontology terms and molecular pathways.
270 n, visualization and enrichment analysis for gene ontology terms and pathways.
271 functional information, we are disseminating Gene Ontology terms annotated against miRBase sequences.
272 re a protein can be associated with multiple gene ontology terms as its labels.
273  GO-slim, containing over four times as many Gene Ontology terms as our previous GO-slim, as well as
274                                          The Gene Ontology terms cellular response to chemical stimul
275                    An enrichment analysis of gene ontology terms from each life stage or sex highligh
276 regulated genes, several were categorized in gene ontology terms oxidation-reduction processes, ATP b
277 eral defense-related genes and enrichment of gene ontology terms related to immunity and salicylic ac
278 tion has identified a large number of unique gene ontology terms related to metabolic activities, a r
279          These genes are highly enriched for Gene Ontology terms related to the extracellular matrix,
280 d with invasion (P = 0.03), was enriched for gene ontology terms relating to cell adhesion and migrat
281                    The web server identifies Gene Ontology terms that are statistically overrepresent
282 annotations to derive a ranking of genes and gene ontology terms using a supervised learning approach
283 tegorized into 27 functional groups based on Gene Ontology terms, including 14 groups in biological p
284 tively dosage balance-sensitive gene groups (Gene Ontology terms, metabolic networks, gene families,
285        By automatically associating relevant Gene Ontology terms, PALMER facilitates biological inter
286                             Over-represented gene ontology terms, pathways and molecular functions, a
287  associations between gene descriptors (e.g. Gene Ontology terms, protein-protein interaction data an
288           Employing a clustering analysis of Gene Ontology terms, we newly identify ~600 putative mul
289  is also present when function is defined by Gene Ontology terms.
290 sion distributions associated with different gene ontology terms.
291 eing-related genes, where the predictors are Gene Ontology terms.
292 nes were highly enriched for defense-related Gene Ontology terms.
293 re first collapsed at the gene level then by Gene Ontology terms.
294 nt analysis was used to generate and cluster Gene Ontology terms.
295 ncyclopedia of Genes and Genome pathways and gene ontology terms.
296         As predicted, metabolic pathways and gene ontologies that are putatively dosage-sensitive bas
297 ings mechanistically link the two functional gene ontologies that have been implicated in human CHD:
298                                           By gene ontology, the mouse and human ZGA genes with de nov
299 y leading biological resources including the Gene Ontology, UniProt and several model organism databa
300 the upregulation of multiple proinflammatory gene ontologies, with the interferon-associated gene ont

 
Page Top