戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  blood culture samples positive for fungi by Gram staining.
2 ent infections without organisms detected by Gram staining.
3  exhibiting Gram-positive cocci upon initial Gram staining.
4 microbiological methods, such as culture and gram staining.
5  urease, catalase, and oxidase reactions and Gram staining.
6 onial morphology on CCFA, or morphology upon Gram staining.
7 acity could be observed visually, only after Gram staining.
8              MRSA on TSA II was confirmed by Gram staining, a coagulase test, and a cefoxitin disk te
9                 When the LFA was paired with Gram staining, a sensitivity of 100% was achieved after
10                                              Gram staining, acid-fast staining, and lactic acid, cryp
11                                          CSF Gram staining, acid-fast staining, cryptococcal antigen,
12 nitiation and 90 days thereafter for vaginal Gram staining and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
13 m direct and extracted culture methods using Gram staining and a GAS-specific latex agglutination tes
14                                              Gram staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization ide
15 lection of two corneal scrapes, one used for Gram staining and the other transported in BHI followed
16 al isolation and confirmation was done using Gram-staining and biochemical tests.
17 r all processes, including specimen receipt, Gram staining, and culture reporting.
18                                              Gram staining, bright-field microscopy, hematoxylin and
19 eria (never seen before) to rapidly generate Gram staining, bypassing several chemical steps involved
20                                     Based on gram staining, colony characteristics, biochemical react
21       Application of Evolink on flagella and gram-staining datasets revealed findings that are consis
22                                              Gram staining followed by Nugent scoring based on bacter
23 ed for gram-negative bacilli and examined by Gram staining for both sputum adequacy (using the qualit
24 when only one of two cultures is positive by Gram staining for staphylococci.
25                                              Gram staining has been a frequently used staining protoc
26 lture bottles in which yeast was observed by Gram staining (herein referred to as yeast-positive bloo
27 ues for bacteria including quantitative PCR, Gram staining, immunofluorescence and in situ hybridizat
28                    No organisms were seen by Gram staining in 225 (62%) of the ETAs.
29 th comprehensive bacteriology is superior to Gram staining in identifying pathogens in CF sputum.
30 erent bacteria in each case was performed by Gram staining, in situ hybridization using fluorescence-
31 of our findings, the absence of organisms on Gram staining is a useful criterion for rejecting ETAs f
32       After a one-time training, the virtual Gram staining model processes an axial stack of dark-fie
33                               The results of Gram staining of a vaginal smear were consistent with BV
34             These organisms can be seen upon Gram staining of clinical specimens or can be isolated a
35          The phenotype-based scheme included Gram staining of growth on BEAA and subculture of cocci
36                   Here, we introduce virtual Gram staining of label-free bacteria using a trained neu
37 of a composite reference standard comprising Gram staining of sputum samples and sputum/blood culture
38 hotypes per high-power field, as detected by Gram staining of vaginal swab specimens.
39                                              Gram staining offered rapid validation of enhanced bindi
40       We demonstrated the success of virtual Gram staining on label-free bacteria samples containing
41 es as the structure of the cell envelope and Gram-staining pattern.
42  staining framework bypasses the traditional Gram staining protocol and its challenges, including sta
43                                              Gram staining quickly eliminated gram-positive bacilli f
44 electron microscopy, LIVE/DEAD staining, and Gram staining revealed a difference in the distributions
45                                 Accordingly, Gram staining revealed bacteria within peritoneal fluids
46           Sequencing of 16S PCR products and Gram staining showed that the majority of bacteria in th
47 tified by conventional methods that included Gram staining, tests for colonial morphology, tests for
48  culture bottles newly positive for yeast by Gram staining was performed at five hospitals.
49 ontained Gram-negative bacilli identified by Gram staining, we isolated bacterial DNA using spin colu
50 tles) with Gram-positive cocci observed with Gram staining were analyzed using the BC-GP assay.
51 aginosis and had a Nugent score of 4-10 from Gram staining were eligible.
52 lture bottles with GPC seen in clusters with Gram staining were tested using the BNSA test and a dire