コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 HBIG and lamivudine combination therapy was administered
2 HBIG mono-therapy was administered to one patient.
3 HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter;
4 observed in 1 (3.6%) patient at 33 mo after HBIG discontinuation, which became negative after a sing
5 , although careful follow-up is needed after HBIG discontinuation, whereas further larger studies are
10 combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver tr
11 n liver transplantation (LT) recipients, but HBIG is costly and inconvenient to administer, prompting
14 who developed recurrent hepatitis B despite HBIG prophylaxis, and to determine if these mutations ca
15 nsplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(
16 The combination of lamivudine and high-dose HBIG can protect against reinfection of the hepatic allo
18 fficacy of a short, fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA followed by long-term NA monoprophylaxis ag
19 patient received a fixed scheme of low-dose HBIG plus NA for 6 mo post-LT and then continued with lo
22 HbsAg- received hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) 10,000 IU i.v. daily for 7 days and monthly for 6
23 combination of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and high-barrier nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) is
24 al and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater
28 ose intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) treatment with continued lamivudine treatment.
31 on and dosage of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) administration, particularly in patients transplan
32 the second case, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) immunoprophylaxis was administered in an attempt t
34 d lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) significantly reduced the reinfection rate (P<0.03
36 ovir, lamivudine+hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), or lamivudine+entecavir on direct sequencing were
38 -positive rate was 15% in HB immunoglobulin (HBIG) recipients (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 15.63; 95% c
41 .796; P=0.020) and combination of lamivudine/HBIG (RR, 0.249; P=0.021) are independently associated w
42 igen (HBeAG)-positive patients required more HBIG to achieve these goals than HBeAG-negative individu
45 rence post-LT but concerns about the cost of HBIG and access to high-barrier NUCs have led to a reduc
47 n high-risk patients, and discontinuation of HBIG in favor of alternative prophylaxis strategies lack
48 which became negative after a single dose of HBIG 1000 IU/L, whereas both serum HBV DNA and HDV RNA r
52 provides an updated analysis of the role of HBIG in preventing HBV recurrence post-LT, alongside a d
55 bined with a short course (in hospital only) HBIG in liver transplant recipients with HBV DNA less th
57 Two control patients who did not receive HBIG had no change in the 'a' determinant in their postt
59 ho did not were more likely to have received HBIG at birth, suggesting that passive antibody may inte
60 V DNA undetectable to 100 IU/mL who received HBIG 5000 IU in anhepatic phase and daily for 5 days tog
66 usion, despite advancements in NUCs therapy, HBIG remains a cornerstone of HBV prophylaxis post-LT, p