ライフサイエンスコーパス: Homo

1 Homo erectus is the founding early hominin species of Is

2 Homo floresiensis, a primitive hominin species discovere

3 Homo naledi displays a combination of features across th

4 Homo naledi is a previously-unknown species of extinct h

5 Homo sapiens are genetically diverse, but dramatic demog

6 Homo sapiens harbor two distinct, medically significant

7 Homo sapiens phylogeography begins with the species' ori

8 Homo sapiens' relationship with the tropical rainforests

9 Homo sp. increased the fraction of C4-based resources in

10 Homo species were exposed to a new biogeochemical enviro

11 Homo- and heterospectral correlation analysis are powerf

12 Homo- or heterozygosity at Ars1127354 or Crs7270101 , en

13 Homo-FRET and its consequent energy migration cause the

14 Homo-FRET anisotropy experiments demonstrated that both

15 Homo-oligomerization of proteins is abundant in nature,

16 uctural models of Afar and date the LD 350-1 Homo mandible to 2.80 to 2.75 Ma.

17 to Homo rudolfensis and with the A.L. 666-1 Homo maxilla.

18 r-old footprint assemblages, produced by 20+ Homo erectus individuals.

19 ally attributed to Paranthropus) and Stw 80 (Homo sp.), show similarities to the species, and we disc

20 For example, GTRAC is able to compress a Homo sapiens dataset containing 1092 samples in 1.1 GB (

21 seums Lukenya Hill Hominid 1 (KNM-LH 1) is a Homo sapiens partial calvaria from site GvJm-22 at Luken

22 Our results indicate that East African Homo erectus was more dimorphic than modern Homo sapiens

23 ifications first evolved together in African Homo erectus, or whether H. erectus had a more primitive

24 the sexual dimorphism of presumptive African Homo erectus at 1.5 Ma.

25 oresiensis, Homo luzonensis and perhaps also Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus(12) were found con

26 cessful minimax strategy employed by ancient Homo sapiens subpopulations in a one-player game against

27 antecessor from Atapuerca (Spain)(9,10) and Homo erectus from Dmanisi (Georgia)(1), two key fossil a

28 enorhabditis elegans, Loxodonta africana and Homo sapiens.

29 cimens of Paranthropus, Australopithecus and Homo (n = 97), we find that the H. naledi premolars from

30 hort basicranium, as in Australopithecus and Homo.

31 nium co-existed with Paranthropus boisei and Homo habilis at Olduvai during Bed I times.

32 works, including Saccharomyces cerevisia and Homo sapien PPI networks collected from the Database of

33 % sequence identity to the S. cerevisiae and Homo sapiens orthologs of Usb1, respectively.

34 herichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Homo sapiens sequences reveals how co- and post-translat

35 myces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Homo sapiens, and found that about 2-10% of proteins in

36 nid distinct from Pongo, Gigantopithecus and Homo, and further reveal that Dubois's H. erectus paraty

37 is and perhaps also Homo heidelbergensis and Homo erectus(12) were found contemporaneously.

38 i, Drosophila melanogaster, Mus musculus and Homo sapiens bound G4 structures in BmPOUM2 and other ge

39 , namely, Escherichia coli, Mus musculus and Homo sapiens, and compared using randomized 10-fold cros

40 Drosophila, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens.

41 mbe, Arabidopsis thaliana, Mus musculus, and Homo sapiens.

42 he region during this period-Neandertals and Homo sapiens.

43 tion of the overlap between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens in Eurasia.

44 changed much since the divergence of Pan and Homo from their common ancestor.

45 Comparison of soft tissues between Pan and Homo provides new insights into the function and evoluti

46 c senescence, might be different for Pan and Homo.

47 aditionally associated with Paranthropus and Homo appeared in the fossil record earlier than previous

48 ralopithecus and origins of Paranthropus and Homo in South Africa has been hampered by the perceived

49 resenting Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo(1).

50 d to later hominins such as Paranthropus and Homo, and has implications for key morphological and beh

51 rly evolutionary history of Paranthropus and Homo.

52 8,9), H. heidelbergensis/H. rhodesiensis and Homo naledi(10,11)), similar to Eurasia, where Homo nean

53 Homo (H. habilis and/or H. rudolfensis) and Homo erectus.

54 ia coli RppH, Legionella pneumophila Sde and Homo sapiens NudT16 (HsNudT16).

55 ecus africanus, Australopithecus sediba, and Homo erectus all had zygapophyseal facets that shift fro

56 PPI) networks between Epstein-Barr virus and Homo sapiens.

57 gued to result from the expansion of archaic Homo sapiens out of Africa.

58 Early Pleistocene epoch in Eurasia, such as Homo antecessor, and hominins that appear later in the f

59 during the Middle Pleistocene epoch, such as Homo sapiens, are highly debated(1-5).

60 are (less than 3.5% occurrence) in non-Asian Homo sapiens In contrast, its presence in Asian-derived

61 ers of the Ardipithecus + Australopithecus + Homo clade.

62 tic relationship with the Australopithecus + Homo clade based on nonhoning canine teeth, a foreshorte

63 Besides Homo erectus (sensu lato), the eastern African fossil re

64 is well within the era of speciation between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals/Denisovans and around thre

65 and developmental time information from both Homo sapiens and Mus musculus.

66 get by yeast-two-hybrid screening using both Homo sapiens centrin 2 (Hscen2) and Chlamydomonas reinha

67 acity for ecosystem engineering exhibited by Homo sapiens A crucial outcome of such behaviors has bee

68 icates repeated use of lakeshore habitats by Homo erectus.

69 sorption of local Neanderthal populations by Homo sapiens populations of African origin(1).

70 d model organisms: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis el

71 s to establish that all sediments containing Homo naledi fossils can be allocated to a single stratig

72 where Homo neanderthalensis, the Denisovans, Homo floresiensis, Homo luzonensis and perhaps also Homo

73 Here the authors describe Homo-PROTACS: small molecules that can induce the homo-d

74 We describe Homo-PROTACs as an approach to dimerize an E3 ligase to

75 One AS, designated Homo sapiens keratin 7 (KRT7-AS), was selected due to it

76 Early Homo is remarkable for its wide distribution in delta(44

77 an groups were present at this site-an early Homo sapiens population, followed by a Neanderthal popul

78 ns is shared with Australopithecus and early Homo but not with modern humans suggesting that the mode

79 ry adaptations of archaic hominins and early Homo has been fuelled by contradictory inferences obtain

80 Swartkrans, Homo neanderthalensis, and early Homo sapiens.

81 ental development of australopiths and early Homo was faster than modern humans.

82 elated behavioural differences between early Homo (H. habilis and/or H. rudolfensis) and Homo erectus

83 and consumption of fauna, probably by early Homo erectus sensu lato.

84 n trabecular density first occurred in early Homo erectus, consistent with the shift toward a modern

85 Differences between species of early Homo appear to be characterized more by gnathic diversit

86 5 million years ago, three lineages of early Homo evolved in a context of habitat instability and fra

87 , the eastern African fossil record of early Homo has been interpreted as representing either a singl

88 ell after we see the first evidence of early Homo in the region.

89 ot consistent with a single species of early Homo.

90 overlap in brain size among species of early Homo.

91 OH 7 mandible, and compare it to other early Homo fossils.

92 y from Australopithecus, Paranthropus, early Homo and from KNM-WT 15000 (H. erectus/ergaster) showing

93 solution, and a lack of well-preserved early Homo specimens.

94 hecus africanus, Paranthropus robustus/early Homo from Swartkrans, Homo neanderthalensis, and early H

95 naledi is unique, but most similar to early Homo species including Homo erectus, Homo habilis or Hom

96 pecialization from Australopithecus to early Homo, and increasing dispersion in microwear complexity

97 nger specimen (StW 311) attributed to either Homo sp. or Paranthropus robustus exhibits a pattern mor

98 most likely characteristic of pre-modern era Homo sapiens.

99 o early Homo species including Homo erectus, Homo habilis or Homo rudolfensis.

100 drogenase (Saccharomyces cerevisiae--Erg26p, Homo sapiens--NSDHL (NAD(P) dependent steroid dehydrogen

101 of multiple organisms, including Eukaryota, Homo sapiens, Viridiplantae, Gram-positive Bacteria, Gra

102 ic (Streptomyces coelicolor) and eukaryotic (Homo sapiens) FGEs contain a copper cofactor.

103 uding foci of the essential crossover factor Homo sapiens enhancer of invasion 10 (Hei10), occur at h

104 halensis, the Denisovans, Homo floresiensis, Homo luzonensis and perhaps also Homo heidelbergensis an

105 sil specimens and an eagerly awaited age for Homo naledi raise new questions and open fresh opportuni

106 e microRNAs have been publicly described for Homo sapiens.

107 ignificantly after the earliest evidence for Homo in the eastern African fossil record.

108 entifier conversion and data integration for Homo sapiens (human), Mus musculus (mouse), Rattus norve

109 RNAs, 28 352 targets and 16 833 pathways for Homo sapiens, as well as interactions of 1978 miRNAs, 24

110 is of Homo sapiens (both modern and fossil), Homo neanderthalensis(4) and living apes(5).

111 RNA interaction in PRC2 core complexes from Homo sapiens and Chaetomium thermophilum, for which crys

112 a central subject for human development from Homo erectus to date.

113 deacetylase, using recombinant enzymes from Homo sapiens (human) and Danio rerio (zebrafish).

114 The activities of Dnmt2 enzymes from Homo sapiens, Drosophila melanogaster, Schizosaccharomyc

115 collects data on >6000 bitopic proteins from Homo sapiens, Arabidopsis thaliana, Dictyostelium discoi

116 glycans in more than a dozen cell types from Homo sapiens and Mus musculus.

117 rack record of survival for our entire genus Homo produces even tighter bounds, with an annual probab

118 distinctive longevity is a feature of genus Homo that long antedated the appearance of our species.

119 f primitive stone tools, predating the genus Homo and emphasizing percussive activities, has been rep

120 nd arose early in the evolution of the genus Homo and probably in Homo erectus sensu lato.

121 earliest stone tools were made by the genus Homo and that this technological development was directl

122 The origins of the genus Homo are murky, but by H. erectus, bigger brains and bod

123 ish Late Pleistocene clades within the genus Homo based on ancient protein evidence through the ident

124 of human bipedalism that predates the genus Homo by at least 1.5 million years.

125 omo sapiens as the only species of the genus Homo capable of modifying animal bones into specialised

126 key adaptations that distinguishes the genus Homo from earlier hominins, but recent stable isotopic a

127 Our understanding of the origin of the genus Homo has been hampered by a limited fossil record in eas

128 the adaptive grade shift linked to the genus Homo Recent discoveries from Ledi-Geraru (LG), Ethiopia,

129 Our analyses suggest that the genus Homo underwent a dietary shift (as indicated by delta(13

130 eems to have varied little through the genus Homo, and it should not be used to account for other asp

131 ve a considerably deep ancestry in the genus Homo, and that the cranial morphology of Neanderthals re

132 l and technological development of the genus Homo.

133 study the evolutionary history of the genus Homo.

134 thesized to be a close relative of the genus Homo.

135 within both the hominin clade and the genus Homo.

136 e earliest known representative of the genus Homo.

137 configuration and function within the genus Homo.

138 ve produced the earliest record of the genus Homo.

139 the timing and place of origin of the genus Homo.

140 annot be unequivocally assigned to the genus Homo.

141 g deep-rooted species diversity in the genus Homo.

142 and thus is reasonably assigned to the genus Homo.

143 the origin and early evolution of the genus Homo.

144 in biology across the existence of the genus Homo.

145 to changes in the palaeobiology of the genus Homo.

146 y have developed multiple times in the genus Homo.

147 Extinct hominins, including pre-Holocene Homo sapiens, retain the high levels seen in nonhuman pr

148 te that a morphologically primitive hominin, Homo naledi, survived into the later parts of the Pleist

149 Human (Homo sapiens) glioma tumor-suppressor candidate region g

150 Human (Homo sapiens) micro-RNAs (hsa-miRNAs) regulate virus and

151 bly black bear (Ursus americanus) and human (Homo sapiens sapiens), used in point manufacture.

152 ), worm (Caenorhabditis elegans), and human (Homo sapiens) cells exhibit an enrichment of 5' monophos

153 yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and human (Homo sapiens) mitochondria, Oxidase assembly protein1 (O

154 yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and human (Homo sapiens), intermediate cleavage peptidase55 (ICP55)

155 anded RNA-binding activity of EBP1 in human (Homo sapiens) cells, the overwhelming majority of EBP1 i

156 of retroduplication-derived genes in human (Homo sapiens), fly (Drosophila melanogaster), rice (Oryz

157 In human (Homo sapiens), fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), and

158 icular atlases have been created for humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), and sev

159 rom extinction events, and (iii) how humans (Homo sapiens) affected interactions among non-human spec

160 to-I RNA editing sites identified in humans (Homo sapiens), mice (Mus musculus) and flies (Drosophila

161 ow body shape of anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) evolved via changes in the thorax, pelvis

162 s) in comparison to early and recent humans (Homo sapiens).

163 olog conjecture in two pairs of species: (i) Homo sapiens and Mus musculus and (ii) Saccharomyces cer

164 er limb joints, spring-like plantar arch) in Homo was somewhat mosaic, with the full endurance suite

165 lection pressure for traits and behaviors in Homo such as bipedalism, flexible diets, and complex soc

166 hat it also confers reproductive benefits in Homo sapiens.

167 The development of endurance capabilities in Homo appears to parallel the evolutionary increase in br

168 RHEX is well conserved in Homo sapiens and primates but absent from mouse, rat, an

169 election for smaller masticatory features in Homo would have been initially made possible by the comb

170 ue buccal microwear pattern that is found in Homo antecessor (0.96-0.8 Myr), a well-known cannibal sp

171 Loss of Neu5Gc in Homo likely had complex effects on immunity, providing g

172 e developmental programme of pluripotency in Homo sapiens Here, we confirm that naive PSCs do not res

173 ped for predicting nucleosome positioning in Homo sapiens, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila mela

174 edges and the second is a network of PPI in Homo sapiens (Human) with 20,644 nodes and 241,008 edges

175 evolution of the genus Homo and probably in Homo erectus sensu lato.

176 ulus and interneuron developmental states in Homo sapiens.

177 data set and from a comparison of tissues in Homo sapiens and Mus musculus.

178 s, but the extent of structural variation in Homo sapiens is still unclear.

179 rs, found in all kingdoms of life, including Homo sapiens.

180 most similar to early Homo species including Homo erectus, Homo habilis or Homo rudolfensis.

181 e contemporaneous hominin lineages (that is, Homo sapiens(8,9), H. heidelbergensis/H. rhodesiensis an

182 us with derived morphology observed in later Homo, confirming that dentognathic departures from the a

183 apid pulses in the branches leading to later Homo species.

184 a" model, which posits a dispersal of modern Homo sapiens across Eurasia as a single wave at 60,000 y

185 The postcranial skeleton of modern Homo sapiens is relatively gracile compared with other h

186 s long before the regional arrival of modern Homo sapiens.

187 ns (e.g., violence or food shortage), modern Homo sapiens were equipped with the potential to rapidly

188 Homo erectus was more dimorphic than modern Homo sapiens, although less so than highly dimorphic ape

189 nd around three times longer than the modern Homo sapiens divergence times.

190 tacarpal articular surfaces of Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) in comparison to early and recent

191 s have represented only approximately 10% of Homo sapiens' existence.

192 into the cognitive and hunting abilities of Homo erectus while indicating that their activities at t

193 we have constrained the depositional age of Homo naledi to a period between 236 ka and 335 ka.

194 lution trace-element geochemical analysis of Homo sapiens (both modern and fossil), Homo neanderthale

195 sis than to the derived parabolic arcades of Homo sapiens or H. erectus.

196 howed that the two alpha satellite arrays of Homo sapiens Chromosome 17 (HSA17), D17Z1 and D17Z1-B, b

197 bstantially revises the timing of arrival of Homo into the Americas.

198 mammals was part of the plastic behavior of Homo sapiens that allowed it to rapidly colonize a serie

199 the large, metabolically expensive brains of Homo sapiens can be energetically afforded.

200 Defining the distinctive capacities of Homo sapiens relative to other hominins is a major focus

201 nalysis (XMAn)' database is a compilation of Homo sapiens mutated peptides in FASTA format, that was

202 We provide proof-of-concept of Homo-PROTACs using diverse molecules composed of two ins

203 led to a re-evaluation of the conception of Homo sapiens as the exclusive manufacturer of specialise

204 employer behavior in the northwest corner of Homo economicus, actual online hiring decisions tend to

205 a minimally redundant, canonical database of Homo sapiens proteins.

206 Direct dating of Homo naledi fossils from the Dinaledi Chamber shows that

207 about 2.0 Ma--the emergence and dispersal of Homo erectus (sensu lato).

208 rossroads for understanding the dispersal of Homo sapiens out of Africa and into Asia and Oceania.

209 ests that it appeared after the emergence of Homo sapiens and contributed to the great success of our

210 anges that took place after the emergence of Homo sapiens We show converging evidence from paleoanthr

211 tralopithecus afarensis and the evolution of Homo on the other.

212 cited as a critical step in the evolution of Homo sapiens, language, and human-level cognition.

213 ating of Neu5Gc loss during the evolution of Homo.

214 it has been hypothesized that the exodus of Homo sapiens out of Africa and into Eurasia between ~50-

215 sented here indicate a long-term exposure of Homo to these elements, via fires, fumes and their ashes

216 Here we describe the foot of Homo naledi from Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa, using 1

217 rliest fossil attributed to a modern form of Homo sapiens comes from eastern Africa and is approximat

218 South Africa, which contains the fossils of Homo naledi.

219 rial phytochrome with the effector module of Homo sapiens phosphodiesterase 2A.

220 LG), Ethiopia, place the first occurrence of Homo ~250 thousand years earlier than the Oldowan at Gon

221 ypotheses posit a link between the origin of Homo and climatic and environmental shifts between 3 and

222 that the key to understanding the origin of Homo lies in understanding how environmental changes dis

223 ssil evidence points to an African origin of Homo sapiens from a group called either H. heidelbergens

224 The origin of Homo sapiens remains a matter of debate.

225 s and, for some loci, predates the origin of Homo sapiens.

226 Africa was the birth-place of Homo sapiens and has the earliest evidence for symbolic

227 , Ethiopia, that establishes the presence of Homo at 2.80 to 2.75 Ma.

228 suggesting that it is likely the product of Homo sapiens as they dispersed eastward out of Africa.

229 Testing on Nanopore reads of Homo sapiens (H. sapiens), Escherichia coli (E. coli) an

230 e more open conditions along with remains of Homo.

231 m the presence of an unidentified species of Homo at the CM site during the last interglacial period

232 However, in species of Homo, including modern humans, there is a tight link bet

233 initially designated as the type specimen of Homo rhodesiensis, but recently it has often been includ

234 o-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of Homo sapiens CHD4 engaged with a nucleosome core particl

235 unctions, we solved the crystal structure of Homo sapiens COQ9 at 2.4 A.

236 Homo heidelbergensis, or to a subspecies of Homo erectus A recently discovered cranium (Aroeira 3) f

237 partial skullcap and several loose teeth of Homo erectus have been discovered.

238 how that the terminus of an rRNA tentacle of Homo sapiens contains 10 tandem G-tracts that form highl

239 w into presumed early symbolic traditions of Homo sapiens and how they evolved over a period of more

240 Body odour is a characteristic trait of Homo sapiens, however its role in human behaviour and ev

241 notion that the evolutionary trajectories of Homo caused their divergence [18-21].

242 orgia represent a single regional variant of Homo erectus.

243 r Palaeolithic contexts favoured the view of Homo sapiens as the only species of the genus Homo capab

244 n of either Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL4 or Homo sapien sapien PKR (respectively) to a truncation of

245 cies including Homo erectus, Homo habilis or Homo rudolfensis.

246 sues and Yeast from two different organisms (Homo Sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, respectively)

247 hree years in the seven supported organisms (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Drosophil

248 In contrast to our Homo sapiens-derived genes, the microbiome is much more

249 U-Th age for the oldest flowstone overlying Homo naledi fossils, we have constrained the depositiona

250 t the earliest arrival of Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens in Europe.

251 the Levant shortly before Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens populated the region.

252 ince the first discovery of Pithecanthropus (Homo) erectus by E.

253 few sufficiently complete Early Pleistocene Homo clavicles seem to have relative lengths also well w

254 o a population ancestral to Late Pleistocene Homo floresiensis.

255 met Neandertals, Denisovans, mid-Pleistocene Homo, and possibly H. floresiensis, with some degree of

256 ctions in the two eukaryotic reconstructions Homo sapiens Recon 1 and Yeast 5 are specified as irreve

257 liana, Drosophila melanogaster, Danio rerio, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Oryza sativa, Solanum lycope

258 the striate cortex (V1) of normally sighted Homo sapiens.

259 y, inner-city male and female youth (species Homo sapiens) 9-12 years of age followed by the Columbia

260 a have been assigned to a new human species, Homo naledi, which displays a unique combination of prim

261 ave allowed the definition of a new species, Homo antecessor.

262 graphic and adaptive history of our species, Homo sapiens, including its interbreeding with other hom

263 presenting either a single variable species, Homo habilis, or two species.

264 thropus robustus/early Homo from Swartkrans, Homo neanderthalensis, and early Homo sapiens.

265 ntly it has often been included in the taxon Homo heidelbergensis(2-4).

266 le location, by a hominin species other than Homo sapiens, at an as-yet unknown date.

267 cal evidence now demonstrates, however, that Homo sapiens has actively manipulated tropical forest ec

268 Using only the information that Homo sapiens has existed at least 200,000 years, we conc

269 to Homo erectus These crania also show that Homo, Paranthropus, and Australopithecus were contempora

270 This suggests that Homo either emerged from Australopithecus during this in

271 ica, and indicate a much younger age for the Homo naledi fossils than have previously been hypothesiz

272 e australopith pattern occurred early in the Homo lineage.

273 mate OH 7 partial hand skeleton (part of the Homo habilis holotype).

274 tal to evaluating the early evolution of the Homo lineage, and by priority names one or other of the

275 gene, possibly expediting divergence of the Homo lineage, due to a partial fertility barrier.

276 tion of HYDIN2 early in the evolution of the Homo lineage.

277 The sequence of the Homo sapiens Krr1 GXXGlp is evolutionarily conserved (16

278 assumptions regarding the morphotype of the Homo-Pan last common ancestor (LCA).

279 Here we show that the Homo sapiens NAD(+) synthetase (hsNadE) lacks substrate

280 rrence of a cranium with clear affinities to Homo erectus These crania also show that Homo, Paranthro

281 H 7 is incompatible with fossils assigned to Homo rudolfensis and with the A.L. 666-1 Homo maxilla.

282 ncluding 97 hominin footprints attributed to Homo erectus.

283 e isotopic analyses of fossils attributed to Homo in the Turkana Basin show an increase in the consum

284 ng a minimum of 15 individuals attributed to Homo naledi.

285 al, the bones of this hand are attributed to Homo naledi.

286 ears that can be unequivocally attributed to Homo sapiens are lacking.

287 incipient stage of Neandertal evolution, to Homo heidelbergensis, or to a subspecies of Homo erectus

288 soils might not have posed a major threat to Homo populations.

289 may have provided a selective advantage when Homo transitioned to butchery using stone tools.

290 ty is expected to be highest in Africa where Homo sapiens evolved and has maintained a large populati

291 mo naledi(10,11)), similar to Eurasia, where Homo neanderthalensis, the Denisovans, Homo floresiensis

292 y claimed, or on the island of Flores, where Homo floresiensis fossils have been found.

293 he late Pleistocene in Paranthropus, whereas Homo maintains a flexible diet.

294 additional perspective to the paradox of why Homo sapiens, particularly agriculturalists, appear to b

295 Many features associated with Homo sapiens, including our large linear bodies, elongat

296 high-predicted structural conservation with Homo sapiens.

297 omical dissections and compare the data with Homo sapiens.

298 inum proteins were evolutionary related with Homo sapiens proteins to sort out the non-human homologs

299 he earliest stages of diversification within Homo.

300 of this change in the isotope signal within Homo.