ライフサイエンスコーパス: IADL

1 IADL alongside the geriatric G8 scales represent essenti

2 IADL disability occurs frequently among middle-aged and

3 IADL has also been associated with post-autoHCT morbidit

4 At least 1 IADL impairment was reported in 18% of participants, mos

5 re comorbidity (B = -4.90 [-9.70 to -0.10]), IADL restrictions (B = -5.36 [-10.50 to -0.22]), restric

6 model to investigate the item sequence of 11 IADL and ADL combined into a single scale and functional

7 (odds ratio [OR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.02-1.58), IADLs (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71), and heavier tasks (

8 ssed by the mRS (OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 9.6), IADL (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.6), and impairment in spee

9 f ADL difficulty [aOR: 0.63, CI: 0.52-0.76], IADL difficulty [aOR: 0.71, CI: 0.60-0.83], falls [aOR:

10 ; functional limitation: OR 2.77, 2.01-3.81; IADL impairment: OR 3.12, 2.20-4.41; ADL impairment: OR

11 ties of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL (IADL) disability, Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depr

12 of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) scales.

13 of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) were the significant health-related factors associ

14 assessment, including ADL, Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Mini-Mental St

15 of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL).

16 f daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) for which patients needed assistance.

17 daily living (ADLs), and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) self-reported approximately 9 y later in models s

18 f daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) were evaluated through survey instruments.

19 years, and impairment in instrumental ADLs (IADLs), defined similarly.

20 strumental activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognition (Mini-Cog test), history of falls, nut

21 of older adults, VA loss adversely affected IADL levels, which subsequently increased the risk for m

22 The combination of an IADL < 6 and the absence of a caregiver resulted in a si

23 fficient [SD], -0.213 [0.002]; P < .001) and IADL (standard coefficient [SD], -0.209 [0.002]; P < .00

24 QR, 24-38] vs 52 [IQR, 42-56]; P = .001) and IADL scores (7 [IQR, 4-8] vs 8 [IQR, 7-8]; P = .021) com

25 (P = 0.02), POMA gait scores (P < 0.01), and IADL (P < 0.01).

26 in ADL difficulties (r = 0.15, P = 0.05) and IADL difficulties (r = 0.41, P < 0.001).

27 syndrome (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.06-3.22), and IADL disability (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.32-3.60).

28 nce of ADL difficulty (12.26% vs 22.38%) and IADL difficulty (31.13% vs 49.52%) than those who report

29 5-year postoperative mortality was 18.5% and IADL decline was 9.4%.

30 nutrition (B = -6.18 [-11.55 to -0.81]), and IADL restrictions (B = -10.48 [-16.39 to -4.57]) were as

31 ence of ADL by 2.20 (95% CI: 1.25; 3.86) and IADL by 1.54 (95% CI: 1.24; 1.91), respectively.

32 Additionally, ADL and IADL difficulties among men and women contributed to 17.

33 an important prevention strategy for ADL and IADL disability associated with aging.

34 e associated with new or progressive ADL and IADL disability in a dose-dependent manner, particularly

35 ry of the SF-36, and the HAD, IES-R, ADL and IADL scales.

36 The 6-item scales of ADL and IADL were each categorized first as >= 1 limitations, an

37 rumental activities of daily living (ADL and IADL) between 2008 and 2015 among adults of 60-94 years

38 prognostic for functional decline on ADL and IADL, and G8, fTRST (1), and fTRST (2) were prognostic f

39 relation of ECOG PS with ADL (p = 0.51)c and IADL (p = 0.61) was moderate.

40 Peripheral vascular disease and IADL impairment, but not chronological age, may be invol

41 Baseline evaluation of GDS15 and IADL may be proposed to anticipate this event.

42 Geriatric factors (MMSE and IADL) are predictive of severe toxicity or unexpected ho

43 ial factors with postoperative mortality and IADL decline among older adults are understudied.

44 th with 2.5-year postoperative mortality and IADL decline using cox and modified Poisson regression a

45 ession confers greater risk of mortality and IADL decline, higher resilience and perceived control of

46 creased by 0.22 standard deviations (SD) and IADL difficulties increased by 0.28 SD annually.

47 10 and incident ~6-y ADL (and subscales) and IADL disability.

48 er extremity function, frailty syndrome, and IADL disability.

49 o estimate the correlation between TIADL and IADL.

50 inversely associated with impaired ADLs and IADLs [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.60 (0.40, 0.90) and 0.69 (

51 This study aims to evaluate ADLs and IADLs among the TBI population in Vietnam and determine

52 ADLs and IADLs scales were applied.

53 Both ADLs and IADLs were affected strongly by depression and Injury Se

54 to identify factors associated with ADLs and IADLs.

55 impaired lower-extremity function, ADLs, and IADLs [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.67 (0.47, 0.95), 0.52 (0.3

56 impaired lower-extremity function, ADLs, and IADLs approximately 9 y later, particularly in African A

57 entified characteristics associated with any IADL impairment.

58 l, comorbidities, baseline frailty, baseline IADLs and BADLs, hospital type (civilian vs veteran), mo

59 Agreement between IADL impairment and frailty was assessed using the weigh

60 year, the adjusted mean differences between IADL, ADL, CFS, and grip strength in the haloperidol and

61 ly living (Alzheimer Disease Research Center IADLs), pain (geriatric pain measure), and depression sc

62 evel, and then an overlapping of concomitant IADL and ADL, with bathing and dressing being the earlie

63 index, smoking status, ADL dependency count, IADL difficulty count, difficulty walking several blocks

64 , 1.27-2.51]; P < .001) by way of decreasing IADL levels over time.

65 orbidity Index score (P = 0.032), dependence IADLs (P = 0.011), and falls history (P = 0.056).

66 The prevalence of ADL difficulty, IADL difficulty, falls, multiple falls and fall-related

67 We evaluated IADL and ADL data collected at home every 2-3 years over

68 The pattern of findings was similar for IADLs.

69 ct effects of acuity loss were strongest for IADLs where a 1-unit decline in acuity (logMAR) was asso

70 emporal atrophy were associated with greater IADL deficits.

71 -year follow-up, and 27% had ADL and 43% had IADL disability at baseline.

72 greater proportion of frail participants had IADL impairment (52%) compared to non-frail (11%) person

73 The odds of having IADL dependence at 1-yr among survivors was greater in o

74 as part of clinical practice, namely, HRQOL, IADL disability, and depressive symptoms, were significa

75 03), MMSE </= 27/30 (OR, 3.84), and impaired IADL (OR, 4.67); for dose-intensity reduction of > 33%,

76 We observed an association between impaired IADL and lower geriatric G8 scores (p < 0.01), and lower

77 dy, 14.6% had disability in ADL and 47.9% in IADL; 59.7% had vitamin D insufficient levels, and 33.2%

78 10 SD unit increase in the rate of change in IADL difficulties (P < 0.001) per year.

79 There was no substantial change in IADL limitations.

80 A decline in IADL usually precedes ADL limitation, including taking m

81 y exclusively through associated declines in IADL levels.

82 ad twice the proportion of new impairment in IADL as compared to those without POCD (57% vs 27%, P =

83 ) was associated with a 0.067 SD increase in IADL difficulties (P < 0.001) at baseline, and a 1-unit

84 he findings confirmed the earliest losses in IADL (shopping, transporting, finances) at the partial l

85 s (Mean = 7.6, SD = 1.1) performed better in IADLs than male patients (Mean = 7.1, SD = 1.9).

86 visual acuity loss were related to increased IADL difficulties in men and women and increases in ADL

87 on functional limitation, and instrumental (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (ADL).

88 ting may offer useful insights into limiting IADL difficulties in future cohorts.

89 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL<8) and cognitive performance were calculated using

90 in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) (12.21%), and engagement in yoga-related activitie

91 in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 0.97, 6.78).

92 of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and tra

93 by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and gait speed, may be an important pretransplant

94 Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are significant health indicators closely related

95 Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are typically self-reported ability to perform com

96 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability and to assess potential mediation by ha

97 L) or instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) impairment (n = 3109) compared by gender and livin

98 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-living older persons.

99 ody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire.

100 the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sc

101 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales and analyzed with the standardized mean dif

102 ody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score, the Barthel-20 Activities of Daily Living (

103 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 34% of the patients.

104 in instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) was evaluated with the Lawton and Brody scale.

105 ted instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and 4 physically oriented IADL.

106 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), falls, fall injury, and multiple falls.

107 L), Instrumental Activities in Daily Living (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Geriatric Depr

108 ed, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), modified Rankin Scale, and NIH Stroke Score.Compa

109 s in independent activities of daily living (IADL), or mortality were combined.

110 ng, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Timed Up & Go, Mini-Mental State Examination, 15-

111 ith instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

112 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL).

113 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

114 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

115 orm instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) 1 yr following prolonged mechanical ventilation.

116 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) are crucial in measuring the treatment and health

117 /or instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) requiring assistance from baseline.

118 orm instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), depressive symptoms, and cognitive functioning,

119 s), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), discharge destination, and self-reported physica

120 ted instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs).

121 and instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), and chronic conditions.

122 ] + instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), cognition, depression, and nutrition.

123 L] or instrumental activity of daily living [IADL]; higher score indicates better function) and 1-yea

124 2.16; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.30; P = .03) and low IADL scores (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.06 to 7.79; P = .04) we

125 peed ([Formula: see text] = 0.018) and lower IADL score ([Formula: see text]0.002).

126 .28]; P < .01) through their effect on lower IADL levels at baseline.

127 Mild IADL deficits are common in individuals with aMCI and sh

128 fined as an inability to perform one or more IADLs unassisted.

129 Disability in one or more IADLs was present in 18.3% of controls as compared with

130 dence and adjusted relative risk [95% CI] of IADL decline (17% vs. 7%, aRR:1.6[1.2, 2.2]), but lower

131 was associated with a greater likelihood of IADL disability (OR = 1.3).

132 e MD worse than -13.5 dB) had higher odds of IADL disability (OR = 4.2, P = 0.02).

133 g glaucoma and control patients, the odds of IADL disability increased 1.6-fold with every 5 dB of VF

134 Predictors of IADL change after surgery included POCD, presurgical cog

135 ower incidence and adjusted relative risk of IADL decline was identified for those with high resilien

136 The mean score of IADLs was 7.3 (SD = 1.7).

137 Index score, history of falls, dependent on IADL, and abnormal Mini-Cog test results predicted posto

138 o prevent the effect of visual impairment on IADL declines may all reduce mortality risk in aging adu

139 les (95% CI, 0.00-0.19 SDs), and 0.09 SDs on IADL scales (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.17 SDs).

140 whites to need assistance with at least one IADL task (95% confidence interval 1.25-2.13).

141 re likely to need assistance on at least one IADL task (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.

142 (total or sedation-associated) with BADLs or IADLs at either 3- or 12-month follow-up.

143 ily living (IADL), and 4 physically oriented IADL.

144 care and greatest in the physically oriented IADL.

145 to investigate the association of patients' IADL score with other clinical factors, with a particula

146 Self-reported IADL and TIADL were correlated for reading tasks such as

147 TIADL and self-reported IADL are significantly correlated for reading tasks prov

148 correlation between TIADL and self-reported IADL.

149 lculated for relevant Nagi Disability Scale, IADL Scale, and ADL Scale tasks.

150 Older age, male sex, IADL disability, and number of prescription drugs measur

151 The specific IADL disabilities occurring more frequently in both AMD

152 Subjects completed a standard IADL disability questionnaire, with disability defined a

153 Abnormal preadmission performance status, IADL, GDS15, MMSE, GUG, and MNA were associated with inc

154 ome was 1.85 (95% CI, 0.98-3.49) and for the IADL disability, was 2.25 (95% CI, 1.29-3.94).

155 atients on the ADL, 73.0% of patients on the IADL, 24.1% of patients on the GUG, 19.0% of patients on

156 strumental activities of daily living (timed IADL or TIADL) tasks in individuals with irreversible vi

157 bserved as a negatively correlated factor to IADLs.

158 Two IADLs--remembering appointments, family occasions, holid

159 comes, 14 trials used ADL and 13 trials used IADL scales.

160 e independently associated with frailty were IADL disability (PR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.72-6.06), depressiv

161 ve functioning predicted mortality only when IADL disability was excluded from the model.

162 d Injury Severity scores (p < 0.01), whereas IADLs were significantly correlated to caregiver types a

163 Only DASH tended to be associated with IADL (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00).

164 oma (OR = 1.4, P = 0.45) was associated with IADL disability.

165 .04 for 1-yr increase in age) and those with IADL dependence before hospitalization (odds ratio 2.27)

166 ociated with self-reported difficulties with IADLs.

167 ced recurrent falls; 175 (18%) had worsening IADL limitations; 17 (2%) died; and 254 (26%) experience

168 isability and 26% developed new or worsening IADL disability within 2 years.