コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 IRV delivery efficiency (3.2+/-1%) trended lower than IM
2 IRV significantly increased central venous pressure meas
3 IRV significantly increased SVCP and FIVP (p < .002).
5 o more acidic endosomes, but does not affect IRV targeting, stability, and insulin responsiveness of
11 the existence of a short-lived inhibitor of IRV translocation thus supporting the "static" model.
13 e, and reader variability in tumor volume on IRV was studied by using intraclass correlation coeffici
15 uscle cells, insulin-responsive vesicles, or IRVs, deliver glucose transporter Glut4 and several asso
20 , however, that the cytoplasmic tails of the IRV component proteins carry targeting information to th
21 on, this reporter protein does not enter the IRVs; moreover, it loses its perinuclear localization an
22 owever, whether the presence of Glut4 in the IRVs is essential for their ability to respond to insuli
23 Thus, the intracellular retention of the IRVs in adipocytes requires continuous RNA and protein b
27 lin increased targeting of myc7-Glut4 to the IRVs, and its insulin responsiveness rose to the maximal
30 ctors contributing to interreader variation (IRV) in parameters measured at dynamic contrast material
36 ammatory syndrome (immune recovery vitritis, IRV), which causes vision loss in AIDS patients with cyt