戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              IVR treatment significantly improved BCVA and CRT, but n
2                                              IVR treatment significantly improved best-corrected visu
3 terone delivery of >28 days with ANLO101, an IVR that may be a self-administered product for infertil
4 were iteratively used to develop ANLO101, an IVR with similar loading capacity but with greater surfa
5        Thirty-four participants completed an IVR driving game including 4 GPS conditions (No GPS; aud
6  Re-carbonyl complex monolayer, we derive an IVR rate of (25+/-8) cm(-1) corresponding to (450+/-150)
7 ered from intravaginal rings, we designed an IVR that contains a drug matrix encapsulated in the core
8 procedural information and distraction in an IVR intervention for pediatric patients undergoing venip
9  These estimates are then used to perform an IVR on each partition.
10  to be mentors delivering support through an IVR system.
11 roved by peer-driven intervention through an IVR system.
12 s in safety outcomes between IVT-AFL 2q8 and IVR 0.5 mg PRN or dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants.
13 nd duration driven by PRO loading amount and IVR design.
14 ferential between PRP and IVR increases, and IVR therapy may exceed the typical accepted limit of cos
15 ot clinically meaningful between the IVB and IVR groups (P-value = 0.568 for PRN, P-value = 0.103 for
16 luate the real-life effectiveness of IVB and IVR in Thailand.
17  comparison of effectiveness between IVB and IVR should be investigated due to the limited sample of
18 versity was not observed for either IVR, and IVR use did not influence Candida spp. prevalence.
19 n the rate of adverse events between LPC and IVR (P > 0.05 for RD, MDR, VH, and cataract).
20 etime, the cost differential between PRP and IVR increases, and IVR therapy may exceed the typical ac
21                       Using vaginal wall and IVR swabs at IVR insertion and removal, the genital micr
22 cated to an intervention (an age-appropriate IVR intervention offering distraction and procedural inf
23          Using vaginal wall and IVR swabs at IVR insertion and removal, the genital microbial composi
24                                     The BACK/IVR domains of ARA3 also are sufficient to modify AHR si
25 nslocator/simple-minded) domain and the BACK/IVR domains of ARA3 mediate the AHR-ARA3 interaction.
26 ant difference in disease regression between IVR and LPC (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence inter
27 edistribution (IVR) and the relation between IVR and molecular structure.
28 his meta-analysis aims to rigorously compare IVR to LPC in the treatment of ROP.
29 TRAL were used to identify studies comparing IVR monotherapy to LPC.
30 nvariant glycine 56 and a strongly conserved IVR, whereas nonaxonemal beta-tubulins vary widely in IV
31 ional mode interference which can counteract IVR-induced relaxation.
32 ed from the human size (54 mm OD; 7.6 mm CS) IVR analogue.
33  buprenorphine administration, 93% for daily IVR calls, and 92% for random call-backs), and 183 of 18
34  AI-CBT-CP group, patient feedback via daily IVR calls was used by the AI engine to make weekly recom
35                                       During IVR therapy, there was an increased probability of Lacto
36                           Conversely, during IVR, flow was initially directed toward the apex and the
37 e 3 apical views, and SR was measured during IVR (SR(IVR)) and early LV filling (SR(E)).
38                              Combined ENG/EE IVR therapy was associated with an increase in Lactobaci
39               However, whether the effective IVR dimensionality can vary with time and whether the me
40 r beta-diversity was not observed for either IVR, and IVR use did not influence Candida spp. prevalen
41                              The elastomeric IVR body (matrix) was produced by hot melt extrusion of
42  system, even above the threshold for facile IVR.
43 y setting were $52 754 for IVB, $128 242 for IVR, and $86 262 for IVA.
44 IVB; $114 095 and $92 653, respectively, for IVR; and $78 935 and $63 270, respectively, for IVA.
45 eas nonaxonemal beta-tubulins vary widely in IVR sequences.
46                Secondary end points included IVR-reported changes in pain, weakness, and tiredness; c
47 vered telephone session or an individualized IVR-delivered therapist message.
48  intramolecular motions and thus inefficient IVR.
49                                      Initial IVR designs demonstrated the ability to release PRO from
50 fects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on metamorphopsia in patients with branch retinal v
51 stical rate theories, assuming instantaneous IVR, predict exponential decay of the population with th
52 otein exocytosis was enhanced by ivermectin (IVR).
53                                hH4v is on LG IVR and the hH2A-hH2B pair is located immediately right
54 en appeared to decrease with TFV and TFV/LNG IVR use (log(10)0.57 and log(10)0.27 decrease respective
55                        Specifically, TFV/LNG IVR use was accompanied by increased abundances of Lacto
56                                  The TFV/LNG IVR was more 'stabilizing': 50% of the participants' mic
57                           A solid PRO-loaded IVR was investigated in vivo to assess safety and pharma
58                           Compared with LPC, IVR was associated with a higher likelihood of requiring
59 rate proof-of-concept of a novel core-matrix IVR for sustained and simultaneous delivery of diverse m
60                                     The mean IVR stiffness score after treatment with mexiletine was
61 , 2-8 messages) and 67.8% received 1 or more IVR messages (median, 3 messages; interquartile range, 1
62               Collectively, the proposed MPT IVR has potential to expand preventative choices for you
63 atory (IL-10, IL-12) cytokines while the MPT IVR was in place or after its removal.
64                                     The MZCL IVR contains four active pharmaceutical ingredients (API
65 ore-matrix intravaginal ring (IVR), the MZCL IVR, which effectively delivered the MZC combination mic
66   At baseline, 18 of 28 animals had negative IVR(SR) (i.e., PSS) in at least one segment.
67            During coronary artery occlusion, IVR(SR) became negative and larger in magnitude than S(S
68 ticipants who contributed at least 7 days of IVR-diary data in either treatment period.
69 text have come from the state space model of IVR, which predicts power law behavior for the rates wit
70 text messages were more likely to opt out of IVR messages (aOR, 4.07; 95% CI, 3.65-4.55), and those o
71  95% CI, 3.65-4.55), and those opting out of IVR messages were more likely to opt out of text message
72  text messages, and 4392 (1.5%) opted out of IVR messages.
73            Deuteration increases the rate of IVR, which decreases the fraction of recrossing and incr
74 be investigated due to the limited sample of IVR patients.
75 ual acuity measures compared with studies of IVR 0.5 mg PRN and dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants based o
76 ed light on the global trends of research on IVR and its clinical development as an intervention for
77 The majority of participants who used IVB or IVR showed improvements in BCVA after treatment.
78 s who had previously not received any IVB or IVR treatment between 2013 and 2014.
79 ers who received 1 or more automated text or IVR message between October 1, 2018, and September 30, 2
80                 Receipt of automated text or IVR messages.
81 d visual acuity (BCVA) with IVT-AFL 2q8 over IVR 0.5 mg PRN by 4.67 letters [95% credible interval (C
82                              A solid placebo IVR was carried forward in vivo using an ovine model to
83 e in vitro release properties of preliminary IVR designs in simulated vaginal fluid.
84 sotropic and anomalous nature of the quantum IVR dynamics and show that multiple power law scalings d
85 IVT-AFL 2q8 versus intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) 0.5 mg as needed (PRN) (10 studies) and IVT-AFL 2q8
86 r edema (DME) with intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) by means of OCTA.
87 as bevacizumab and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) have also been increasingly used.
88 acizumab (IVB) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in actual practice for treating patients with retin
89 bevacizumab (IVB), intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR), and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for the treatme
90 e this certainty, immersive virtual reality (IVR) may lead to a strong feeling of embodiment over an
91 distraction using immersive virtual reality (IVR) may reduce pain and anxiety among children undergoi
92              Furthermore, eyes that received IVR had a lower refractive error, with a WMD of -0.93 di
93 molecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) and the relation between IVR and molecular structur
94 molecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) effects.
95 molecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) is at the heart of chemical reaction dynamics.
96 molecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) is indicated through the extensive local perturbati
97 molecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR).
98 molecular vibrational-energy redistribution (IVR).
99 y intramolecular vibrational redistribution (IVR) from the pumped rotational mode to all others.
100 f intramolecular vibrational redistribution (IVR) in p-benzyne is too slow to prevent this.
101 h" (BACK) domain, and an intervening region (IVR).
102 n the beta-tubulin internal variable region (IVR).
103 effects in instrumental variable regression (IVR).
104 R ratio during the isovolumetric relaxation (IVR) period can be used to estimate LV filling pressures
105 ring systole (S(SR)), isovolumic relaxation (IVR(SR)), and rapid filling (E(SR)) phases in both ische
106 contraction (IVC) and isovolumic relaxation (IVR) might represent a transient feature of myocardial w
107                 Here we describe a reservoir IVR technology that delivers the tenofovir prodrug tenof
108 s recorded on an interactive voice response (IVR) diary (scale of 1 = minimal to 9 = worst ever exper
109 ure was the mean interactive voice response (IVR) diary stiffness score (0-9 scale) over the particip
110 ected through an interactive voice response (IVR) system leads to better patient satisfaction (primar
111 tly calls via an interactive voice response (IVR) system, IVR-generated random call-backs, and iPad-d
112 evention technology (MPT) intravaginal ring (IVR) for prevention of HIV, HSV-2, and unintended pregna
113 polyether urethane (HPEU) intravaginal ring (IVR) for sustained delivery of the anti-HIV agent tenofo
114 tive levels delivered via intravaginal ring (IVR) in a regimen-specific manner.
115 cribe a novel core-matrix intravaginal ring (IVR), the MZCL IVR, which effectively delivered the MZC
116 rgestrel, LNG) were loaded in a macaque size IVR (25 mm outer diameter, OD; 6.0 mm cross-section, CS)
117                                           SR(IVR) had a strong correlation with time constant of LV p
118                                         E/SR(IVR) can predict LV filling pressures with reasonable ac
119 n and echocardiographic imaging, mitral E/SR(IVR) ratio had the best correlation with mean wedge pres
120                                         E/SR(IVR) was most useful in patients with ratio of E to mitr
121                                    Global SR(IVR) by 2-dimensional speckle tracking is strongly depen
122 al views, and SR was measured during IVR (SR(IVR)) and early LV filling (SR(E)).
123  an interactive voice response (IVR) system, IVR-generated random call-backs, and iPad-delivered HIV,
124                                      All TDF IVR-treated macaques (n = 6) remained seronegative and s
125 Cost utility for PRP would be 85% lower than IVR in the facility setting and 90% lower than IVR in th
126 R in the facility setting and 90% lower than IVR in the nonfacility setting.
127      However, there is growing evidence that IVR competes with the reaction timescales, resulting in
128 transition state theory, which suggests that IVR in this reaction can be studied by conventional KIEs
129                                          The IVR(SR)/S(SR) and epsilon(ps) best differentiated ischem
130 ime constant of LV pressure decay during the IVR period (tau) (r=-0.83, P<0.001), whereas SR(E) was s
131 21 [2.49] years), the 75 participants in the IVR group (mean [SD] age, 7.21 [2.43] years) reported si
132  the length of venipuncture procedure in the IVR group (mean [SD] duration, 4.43 [3.47] minutes) was
133 Health care professional satisfaction in the IVR group (mean [SD] score, 34.5 [4.5]) was significantl
134 gnificantly improved pain and anxiety in the IVR group compared with the control group.
135 utical ingredients (APIs) were loaded in the IVR using a single-step drug loading process driven by a
136 ng a measure of the nature and extent of the IVR dynamics.
137                  We explored the role of the IVR on vaginal microbial communities, vaginal short chai
138  drug matrix encapsulated in the core of the IVR whereby the mechanism of drug release is uncoupled f
139 ent-reported severity score stiffness on the IVR diary.
140  was released by diffusion via a pore on the IVR while the MIV-150/LNG diffused from the matrix conti
141                            The fact that the IVR process produces isomerization is deduced through a
142  solid hydrophilic core, embedded within the IVR by compression, contained the small molecule ZA and
143 pH 4.2 for 30 or 90 days, during which times IVR mechanical properties and swelling kinetics were mon
144 .10; P = 0.52); however, eyes that underwent IVR were associated with a higher likelihood of requirin
145 althy volunteers (11 male/8 female) watching IVR renderings of anatomically plausible (full-limb) ver
146                                         When IVR was the primary treatment, the 2-year cost in the fa
147 nergy exchange was overall accelerated, with IVR becoming faster and pseudorotation being slowed down
148 PRP treatment of $14 219 to $24 005 and with IVR of $138 852 to $164 360.
149  increased progressively in association with IVR message volume, with the highest rates among individ
150 ment occurred earlier with LPC compared with IVR (weighted mean difference [WMD], -4.29 weeks; CI, -6
151                 The use of IVB compared with IVR and IVA compared with IVR were cost-saving intervent
152                            PRP compared with IVR as primary treatment for PDR is less expensive over
153  IVB compared with IVR and IVA compared with IVR were cost-saving interventions (ICER, <0) regardless
154 aving a favorable cost utility compared with IVR.

 
Page Top