コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 LDHA abundance correlated positively with MYC expression
2 LDHA also promoted GH3 cell proliferation through induct
3 LDHA and LDHB are two main LDH subunits, and both are fr
4 LDHA binds to NADH and promotes reactive oxygen species
5 LDHA catalyzes pyruvate into lactate instead of leading
6 LDHA deficiency crippled cellular redox balance and inhi
7 LDHA deficiency cripples cellular redox control and dimi
8 LDHA is a pharmacologically tractable EWS-FLI1 transcrip
9 LDHA sensing by Al-Py FONPs was found to be highly selec
10 okinase 1 (HK1) and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) - both of which regulate the metabolic switch - an
12 tate via the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and is a metabolic feature of effector T cells.
13 es the detection of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) by exploiting the AIE property of synthesized naph
15 lls (HSCs), whereas lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) deletion significantly inhibits the function of bo
18 actate reduction by lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) inactivation heightens type I IFN production to pr
19 Here, we show that lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) is induced in activated T cells to support aerobic
20 e glycolytic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) is induced in CD8(+) T effector cells through phos
21 enetic depletion of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) or stiripentol, a lactate dehydrogenase A inhibito
23 kinase 2 (HK2), and Lactate Dehydrogenase A (LDHA) were each significantly higher in MYCN-amplified n
24 duced activation of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), an enzyme that catalyses the interconversion of p
25 (UMPS), as well as lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), establishing a mechanism by which AHR regulates l
26 upon inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), our findings hint at a conserved mechanism in whi
27 h as those encoding lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), solute transporter MCT1, and hexokinase 1 (HK1) -
28 ransporter MCT1 and lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), the enzyme catalyzing label exchange between pyru
29 ctate synthesis via lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), traditionally considered to be a 'disallowed' fun
31 ate lactate through lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), which is encoded by a target gene of c-Myc and hy
32 g to and activating lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), which promoted histones lysine lactylation to ind
33 shown to undertake lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)-dependent aerobic glycolysis; however, the specifi
34 es demonstrate that lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA)-directed extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ER
41 c constriction were treated with oxamate (an LDHA [lactate dehydrogenase A] inhibitor) or sodium lact
45 together, these data suggest that HIF1A and LDHA are important targets for hypoxia-driven drug resis
48 onserved canonical E boxes in ENO1, HK2, and LDHA occur in 31- to 111-bp islands with high interspeci
49 roblastoma cells with inhibitors of MCT1 and LDHA, the enzyme responsible for lactate production, res
51 red the expression and activity of PDHA1 and LDHA, as both are involved in regulating the direction o
54 sion of the glycolytic genes GLUT1, PKM2 and LDHA, and of CDC25A; thus, Cdc25A upregulates itself in
56 nduction of LDHA required PI3K signaling and LDHA deficiency impaired PI3K-catalyzed PIP3 generation.
57 was highly synergistic with vincristine and LDHA inhibition under cell culture conditions, but this
58 ation pattern on c-Myc target genes, such as LDHA, consequently reprogram glycolytic metabolism for C
59 , thereby activating transcription of BNIP3, LDHA, PDK1, and SLC2A1, which encode proteins that are r
61 such as 63 exhibit low nM inhibition of both LDHA and LDHB, submicromolar inhibition of lactate produ
62 cally, the LDH isoenzyme spectrum imposed by LDHA and LDHB is necessary to optimize glycolysis to mai
64 in this interval, resulting in the order CEN-LDHA-SAA1-TPH-D11S1310-(D11S1888/KCNC1 )-MYOD1-D11S902D1
65 various heterotetrameric isoforms comprising LDHA and LDHB in tumor cells, not only canonical LDHA.
67 rculosis (TB) patients and myeloid deficient LDHA (Ldha(LysM-/-)) mice, we demonstrate that glycolysi
68 leic acid or expression of phospho-deficient LDHA Y10F sensitized the cancer cells to anoikis inducti
70 ression of the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase (LDHA and LDHB combined), and the ratio of lactate transp
71 hexokinase (HK2) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDHA) expression, together with a switch in pyruvate kin
75 14 key glycolysis proteins (including ENO1, LDHA, LDHB, ACSS2, ALDOA, and PGK1), compared to CsP alo
77 iption factor IRF4 and the glycolytic enzyme LDHA govern the effector differentiation potential of CD
78 oint as well as a ROS promoting function for LDHA and identifies LDHA as a potential therapeutic targ
81 icantly associated with expression of GLUT1, LDHA, PDK1, LOX, LOXL2, and L1CAM mRNA in human breast c
82 ne expression of five reference (B2M, H3F3A, LDHA, PPIA and YWHAZ) and five target (CXCL9, CXCL10, CX
86 t of its promiscuous activity under hypoxia, LDHA produces L-2 hydroxyglutarate (L-2HG), an epigeneti
89 S promoting function for LDHA and identifies LDHA as a potential therapeutic target for OA treatment.
91 )C MRS of pyruvate to monitor alterations in LDHA activity and expression caused by PI3K pathway inhi
95 suggesting that Y10 phosphorylation-mediated LDHA activity promotes cancer cell invasion and anoikis
99 identified proteins (CRMP1, CRMP2, GDA, NSE, LDHA, LDHB, STIP1, and YBOX) that are highly expressed i
101 lation and transcription of Ifng Ablation of LDHA in T cells protects mice from immunopathology trigg
104 that three tetrameric isoenzymes composed of LDHA and LDHB (LDH-3/4/5) comprise the LDH spectrum in T
108 lastoma cells also reduced the expression of LDHA (and lactate), DHODH, and UMPS but did not affect U
114 ple myeloma, and that specific inhibition of LDHA and HIF1A can restore sensitivity to therapeutic ag
116 Accordingly, oxamate-induced inhibition of LDHA suppressed glucose uptake, lactate secretion, invas
118 Genetic and pharmacological inhibition of LDHA-mediated tumor-macrophage symbiosis markedly suppre
119 was confirmed by siRNA-mediated knockdown of LDHA and MCT-4, which decreased lactate secretion and ma
121 and were associated with a drop in levels of LDHA mRNA and LDHA and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha p
122 udy, we showed that the expression levels of LDHA mRNA and protein were significantly elevated in inv
125 breast tumors showed that overexpression of LDHA and the hypoxia marker CAIX was associated with red
127 ells, suggesting that Y10 phosphorylation of LDHA may represent a promising therapeutic target and a
132 udies have focused on the ubiquitous role of LDHA in tumor metabolism and growth, our data reveal tha
133 brane influx in vivo, not glycolytic flux or LDHA activity, driving a reinterpretation of this maturi
138 e show that overexpression of either PDK1 or LDHA in a rat CNS cell line (B12) confers resistance to
139 In contrast, cells expressing either PDK1 or LDHA maintained a lower mitochondrial membrane potential
140 s inhibited in the absence of either PKM2 or LDHA, indicating that the cell-state-specific responses
142 , MDH2 and CS in one cluster and FBP2, PFKL, LDHA, TPI1 and GAPDH/S in the other cluster, suggest glu
143 ciprocally, infiltrating macrophages produce LDHA-containing extracellular vesicles to promote gliobl
144 e found to be an excellent probe for sensing LDHA through an AIE-based "fluorescence off'' mechanism
145 localization signal (NLS), sequence shuttles LDHA into the nucleus, where it enhances transcription o
146 cing the deposition of the mark by targeting LDHA/B leads to the downregulation of NC genes and the i
147 in multiple myeloma, specifically targeting LDHA, can be beneficial to inhibit tumor growth and over
148 mples of glioblastoma patients confirms that LDHA and its downstream signals are potential biomarkers
152 h reduction of LDHA expression indicate that LDHA is involved in tumor initiation, but its role in tu
153 ctor T cell differentiation and suggest that LDHA may be targeted therapeutically in autoinflammatory
156 specifically attenuated activity with their LDHA-expressed subunits that dominate liver parenchyma.
157 F1 induces a metabolic reprogramming through LDHA regulation in human breast tumor cells, modifying t
158 henotype in inducing drug resistance through LDHA and HIF1A in multiple myeloma, and that specific in
160 lified neuroblastoma cells are "addicted" to LDHA enzymatic activity, as its depletion completely inh
162 FONPs gradually got quenched in response to LDHA due to the conversion of fluorescent pyruvate to no
163 PGK1, PGM1, PGAM1, ENO1, ENO2, GAPDH, TPI1, LDHA, and LDHB) in the glycolytic pathway with concomita
164 l lines while gain-of-function studies using LDHA or HIF1A induced resistance in bortezomib-sensitive