コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 LVM and relative wall thickness increased, whereas preva
2 LVM determined by micro-CT was higher in HCM than normal
3 LVM indexed to body surface area (LVMI) and MWT were sig
4 LVM regressed in both groups but with no significant dif
5 LVM was calculated on the basis of an echocardiography.
6 LVM was indexed to body surface area, and the LVM-to-vol
7 LVM was measured by echocardiography, and measurements o
8 LVM was obtained by determining myocardial volume.
9 LVM was obtained with 2D M-mode echocardiography in a co
10 LVM was quantified by AS and MP in 126 consecutive patie
11 LVM was similar in individuals predisposed to hypertensi
12 LVM-AI predicted LV mass correlated with CMR-derived LV
13 LVM-AI-predicted LVH was associated with incident atrial
14 0.001) and electrocardiographic (p < 0.001) LVM remained associated with development of depressed LV
15 n LVM (13.1 g; 95% CI, 5.0-21.3 g; P=0.002), LVM index (6.9 g/m(2); 95% CI, 2.4-11.3 g/m(2); P=0.003)
18 terminants of year 25 LVM/m(2.7) were year 5 LVM, year 5 and change in body mass index, year 5 and ch
19 We prove that, despite the challenges above, LVM-based estimators of causal queries are accurate if t
20 Allopurinol significantly reduced absolute LVM (-2.65 +/- 5.91 g vs. placebo group +1.21 +/- 5.10 g
21 st correlation was found between RI and age, LVM, LVMI, and plasma parathormone concentration and was
22 vs. placebo -1.3 +/- 4.48 g; p = 0.007) and LVM index (LVMI) (allopurinol -2.2 +/- 2.78 g/m(2) vs. p
23 cebo group +1.21 +/- 5.10 g [p = 0.012]) and LVM indexed to body surface area (-1.32 +/- 2.84 g/m(2)
24 ]; two studies, 70 patients, I(2) = 88%) and LVM indexed (mean difference, -1 g/m(2) [95% CI: -6, 3];
25 ion existed between sympathetic activity and LVM index in the LVH[-] and LVH[+] groups (at least r=0.
27 e velocity, left ventricular mass (LVM), and LVM index (LVMI) increased in subsequent RI quartile sub
29 rmined LVM was indexed to body surface area (LVM index); in the LVH[-] group, LVM index was 67+/-2.1
30 of 50 patients, MRI was also used to assess LVM regression, and again there was no significant diffe
31 cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess LVM, and positron emission tomography to quantify restin
32 ular wall mass (LVM), measured in grams; (b) LVM indexed to body mass index, measured in grams per me
35 n=28 612), we assessed associations between LVM-AI predicted LVH and incident cardiovascular outcome
36 B, n=1371]), we assessed correlation between LVM-AI predicted and CMR-derived LV mass and compared LV
37 imilar LVH discrimination in the UK Biobank (LVM-AI c-statistic 0.653 [95% CI, 0.608 -0.698] versus a
40 t, and sex has a strong correlation with CMR LVM in large cohort of normal individuals in the United
41 The following measures minimally decreased: LVM (mean difference, -18 g [95% CI: -33, -3]; seven stu
42 LVM was considerably higher than CMR-derived LVM (mean+/-SD of 138.8+/-28.9 g versus 86.3+/-20.9 g).
44 ardiac magnetic resonance imaging-determined LVM was indexed to body surface area (LVM index); in the
49 cardiometabolic biomarkers associations for LVM have not been clarified in physically active young a
55 exercise performance associated with greater LVM was noted only in men, while greater WC was the only
56 rface area (LVM index); in the LVH[-] group, LVM index was 67+/-2.1 g/m2, a value between those of th
58 were on dialysis had greater cIMT and higher LVM index than those with CRI (P < 0.001) and greater ar
59 and dialysis groups had greater cIMT, higher LVM index, and poorer diastolic function than the contro
62 al voxel segmentation, AS(PV) yielded higher LVM (159+/-38 g) than MP (Delta=20+/-10 g) and AS(FV) (D
64 >or=80th percentile), eccentric hypertrophy (LVM >or=80th percentile but RWT <80th percentile), and c
66 mean difference between groups for change in LVM and LVMI was -3.89 g (95% confidence interval: -1.1
68 The primary outcome measure was change in LVM, assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR
71 l partial voxels yields a 14-17% increase in LVM versus full voxel segmentation, with increased diffe
72 lysis resulted in a significant reduction in LVM (13.1 g; 95% CI, 5.0-21.3 g; P=0.002), LVM index (6.
79 ltivariate analysis, the effect of increased LVM on the risk of stroke was significantly decreased by
83 redict cardiovascular events, with increased LVM predictive in male participants, while LVM-to-volume
84 fect was stronger in subjects with increased LVM than among those without increased LVM (p = 0.033).
85 risk of stroke among patients with increased LVM to a level comparable to that of patients without in
93 sively abnormal adjusted mean values of LVM, LVM index, relative wall thickness, and ankle-brachial i
96 nd CV risk factors and trabeculated LV mass (LVM) and (b) establish normal reference ranges in a sele
97 is of sex-specific distributions of LV mass (LVM) and relative wall thickness (RWT): normal (LVM and
98 esonance (CMR) typically quantifies LV mass (LVM) by means of manual planimetry (MP), but this approa
99 between sympathetic activation and LV mass (LVM) has not been clearly defined across a range of arte
100 meter, LV posterior wall thickness, LV mass (LVM), and LV mass index (LVMI), compared to participants
102 relationship between LV structure [LV mass (LVM), relative wall thickness, and LV internal diameter
103 0-year change in left ventricular (LV) mass (LVM) and LV geometry in black and white young adults in
105 ies such as increased left ventricular mass (LVM) and diastolic dysfunction develop at the time of mi
106 s may lead to greater left ventricular mass (LVM) and reduce the effect of cardiometabolic risk facto
107 ied the correlates of left ventricular mass (LVM) in 84 healthy young adults aged 16 to 24 years from
108 quation for predicted left ventricular mass (LVM) in a cohort of normal individuals in the United Kin
109 relationship between left ventricular mass (LVM) in adults and longitudinal measurements of CV risk
110 allopurinol regresses left ventricular mass (LVM) in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
111 causes regression of left ventricular mass (LVM) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
112 ustained reduction in left ventricular mass (LVM) index after 5 years (from 71.4 [SD 22.5] g/m(2.7) t
114 ine whether increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a risk factor for the development of a reduced l
121 ative contribution of left ventricular mass (LVM) regression, change in aortic valve area (AVA), and
122 pulse wave velocity, left ventricular mass (LVM), and LVM index (LVMI) increased in subsequent RI qu
123 resonance to measure left ventricular mass (LVM), and PET to quantify resting and hyperemic (dipyrid
125 parameters: (a) left ventricular wall mass (LVM), measured in grams; (b) LVM indexed to body mass in
126 ventricular hypertrophy (LVH; high LV mass [LVM]) is traditionally classified as concentric or eccen
127 y, 939 hypertensive patients with measurable LVM at baseline were randomized to a mean of 4.8 years o
128 nil at this time, lunar vertical migration (LVM) may facilitate monthly pulses of carbon remineraliz
132 e-varying Cox analyses, compared with normal LVM, those with eccentric dilated and both concentric no
134 ) and relative wall thickness (RWT): normal (LVM and RWT <80th percentile), concentric remodeling (LV
135 baseline a normal LVEF and an assessment of LVM (either by electrocardiogram or echocardiogram), and
136 se To assess the sex-specific association of LVM measured with cardiac MRI with cardiovascular outcom
141 ment (LGE) extent, measured in percentage of LVM; and (e) native T1 mapping, measured in milliseconds
142 ng in childhood is a consistent predictor of LVM in young adults, underscore the importance of obesit
146 c stroke was seen in the highest quartile of LVM (odds ratio [OR]: 6.14 [95% confidence interval [CI]
153 ese data implicate Ogn as a key regulator of LVM in rats, mice and humans, and suggest that Ogn modif
154 therapy was associated with stabilization of LVM, MLVWT, and T1 mapping values, whereas LGE extent mi
156 ogressively abnormal adjusted mean values of LVM, LVM index, relative wall thickness, and ankle-brach
160 The benefit of frequent hemodialysis on LVM may be mediated by salutary effects on blood pressur
161 ronounced effect of frequent hemodialysis on LVM was evident among patients with left ventricular hyp
170 nalyses were performed between the predicted LVM and the LVM obtained from manual contouring of CMR c
172 tic resonance imaging to accurately quantify LVM, in hypertensive patients with and without LVH and i
173 (Ogn) as a major candidate regulator of rat LVM, with increased Ogn protein expression associated wi
174 o placebo, allopurinol significantly reduced LVM (allopurinol -5.2 +/- 5.8 g vs. placebo -1.3 +/- 4.4
176 WT <80th percentile), concentric remodeling (LVM <80th percentile but RWT >or=80th percentile), eccen
178 al hour of sleep was associated with smaller LVM (beta: -3.483, P < 0.0001) and LVMI (beta: -0.815, P
179 analysis of the combined groups showed that LVM correlated closely with body size, particularly lean
180 performed between the predicted LVM and the LVM obtained from manual contouring of CMR cine images.
194 the reference group, the median trabeculated LVM was 6.3 g (IQR, 4.7-8.5 g) for men and 4.6 g (IQR, 3
195 ex-specific reference ranges of trabeculated LVM in a healthy middle-aged White population were estab
196 identified the genetic factors that underlie LVM variation, and the regulatory mechanisms for blood-p
198 V mass and compared LVH discrimination using LVM-AI versus traditional ECG-based rules (ie, Sokolow-L
200 Multivariable regression determined whether LVM was independently associated with the development of
201 d LVM predictive in male participants, while LVM-to-volume ratio is predictive in female participants
202 Methods were independently compared with LVM quantified on echocardiography (echo) and an ex vivo
204 aist circumference (WC) were correlated with LVM index (beta = 0.07, 0.10, - 0.01, 0.01, 0.24 and 0.2
205 omen, SBP, HDL-C and WC were correlated with LVM index in the univariate analysis (beta = 0.07, - 0.0