ライフサイエンスコーパス: MAR

1 MAR indices ranged from 0.2 to 1.

2 MAR lines had fewer nonexpressing cells than control lin

3 MAR measurement is a promising approach for directly ass

4 MAR measurement predicted drug response using samples as

5 MAR revealed heterogeneity in drug sensitivity not only

6 MAR versus SAR does not correlate with a difference in M

7 MAR was positively correlated and MER was negatively cor

8 MARs comprise one of the few classes of eukaryotic nonco

9 reduced compared to CI by VMI(>=140/100keV), MAR and VMI(MAR>=100keV).

10 was significantly improved in VMI(>=100keV), MAR and VMI(MAR>=100keV).

11 in hypoattenuating artifacts (CI/VMI(200keV)/MAR/VMI(MAR200keV), HU: -77.6 +/- 81.1/-65.1 +/- 103.2/-

12 Moreover, experiments in which apoB 3' MAR sequences were removed from integrated transgenes in

13 The 3' MAR alone may be sufficient to protect against silencing

14 such that constructs bearing both 5' and 3' MARs are passed to their offspring with greater frequenc

15 In those with GFR <30, MAR was not associated with a difference in outcomes.

16 In those with GFR between 30 and 60, MAR was not associated with a difference in MACE [HR 1.0

17 recognition sites for topoisomerase II and a MAR region were observed in the transgene integration ta

18 methyl-muconic acid to 2-methyl-adipic acid, MAR reduced only one double bond in 3-substituted muconi

19 The demonstration of a DMR and an active MAR in the 5' flank of opossum IGF2 mirrors the regulato

20 spectral-detector CT (SDCT) with additional MAR-reconstructions due to artifacts from coils or clips

21 erate either poly(ADPr) (PAR) or mono(ADPr) (MAR).

22 MI) and metal artifact reduction algorithms (MAR) as well as the combination of both approaches (VMI(

23 the safety and immunogenicity of the EBO and MAR vaccines given individually and concomitantly.

24 sing values are due to a mixture of MNAR and MAR.

25 , and is an important priority since PAR and MAR function via distinct mechanisms.

26 The combination of VMI and MAR facilitates a significant reduction of artifacts adj

27 acute cellular rejection (ACR) or mixed AR (MAR).

28 AT islands in fragile sites can function as MARs both in vitro and in vivo.

29 ble (r = 0.909) and 96% of genes attached at MARs are silent (P < 0.001).

30 Because MAR showed variable effects, alternative technologies fo

31 as confirmed to be specific to TRPM1 because MAR serum did not stain these cells in a Trpm1(-/-) mous

32 rotein-conjugated ADP-ribose, including both MAR and PAR.

33 Sera from two well characterized MAR patients, but not from a control subject, stained hu

34 s (MARs): an exceptionally intense computed 'MAR potential' and profound duplex destabilization and f

35 show that HPV18 promoter contains consensus MAR element in the LCR and E6 sequences where SMAR1 bind

36 transgene expression, a question arises: Do MARs increase transgene expression by increasing the per

37 nsport models for the fate of arsenic during MAR, and develop strategies to minimize arsenic release.

38 y and secondary precipitate formation during MAR, and in other systems where interactions between DOM

39 matter (DOM) on arsenic mobilization during MAR, this bench-scale study examined arsenic mobilizatio

40 he mechanisms of arsenic mobilization during MAR.

41 causal mechanisms of arsenic release during MAR via injection in the Orange County Groundwater Basin

42 , geochemical and hydrological shifts during MAR can release toxic, geogenic contaminants from sedime

43 R1-HDAC1 repressor complex at the LCR and E6 MAR sequences, thereby decreasing histone acetylation at

44 ffered significantly (early AMR 79.6%, early MAR 54.7%, late AMR 23.4%, late MAR 21.1%, P < 0.001).

45 he 6 categories--early AMR, early ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

46 ly ACR (P = 0.03), but not late versus early MAR (P = 0.3).

47 postrejection (early AMR 88.3% versus early MAR 77.8% versus late AMR 56.7% versus late MAR 54.9%, P

48 xpression sequences with or without flanking MARs in first-generation adenoviral vectors.

49 Due to concern for MAR, a systemic work-up for melanoma was performed by th

50 maternal autoantibodies as a risk factor for MAR ASD.

51 Alternate mechanisms for MAR function in this system are proposed.

52 wever, differences were only significant for MAR in hypodense and VMI(MAR) in hypo- and hyperdense ar

53 Given our continued clinical suspicion for MAR, the patient's serum was sent for evaluation for TRP

54 nd assumed that the degree of departure from MAR varied according to an individual's self-reported HI

55 st assumed that the degree of departure from MAR was the same for all individuals with missing HIV se

56 sed to assess sensitivity to departures from MAR, both when estimating the prevalence of a partially

57 Four serum samples from MAR patients were identified as TRPM1 immunoreactive by

58 Furthermore, MAR did not confer a benefit in those with severely redu

59 In the future, MAR's substrate promiscuity could be leveraged to produc

60 we show that the majority of PARPs generate MAR, not PAR, and demonstrate that the H-Y-E motif is no

61 Higher MAR was observed for trade-off tasks involving higher le

62 ve deviants" were defined as having a higher MAR and a lower MER than the respective median values.

63 o quartile 4; 95% CI: 11.8, 14.3) and higher MAR (beta: 6.0; 95% CI: 3.5, 8.5) with minimal impact on

64 ated with higher nutritional quality (higher MAR, lower ED), regardless of whether costs were calcula

65 However, MAR did not consistently lower sodium levels.

66 However, MAR exhibits clear efficiency advantages over convention

67 However, MAR sites have encountered arsenic mobilization resultin

68 ify SARs and 2 m NaCl extraction to identify MARs revealed that approximately one-half of the sites w

69 mice, suggesting that the visual deficits in MAR are caused by the uptake of TRPM1 autoantibodies int

70 xpression in expressing cells was greater in MAR lines by 1.9- to 2.9-fold.

71 hould be developed alongside improvements in MAR and evaluated in "real-life" salinity-affected setti

72 I: 7.6, 9.1) and with a 4.1-unit increase in MAR (95% CI: 2.7, 5.5) with a minimal increase in diet c

73 primary target of autoantibodies produced in MAR patients with reduced b-wave is the TRPM1 cation cha

74 Of the 150 patients, 48% had interocular MAR that differed maximally by a factor of less than 2.

75 he IFS algorithm, and a linear interpolation MAR algorithm.

76 on with that of FBP and linear interpolation MAR, noise with IFS was similar close to and far from th

77 red back projection and linear interpolation MAR.

78 Compared to CI, VMI >= 100 keV, MAR and VMI(MAR) between 100-200 keV increased attenuati

79 is several-fold greater than that of a known MAR in the c-myc gene.

80 Anabolic load-induced periosteal lamellar MAR (0.58 +/- 0.14; Pkd1(Dmp1-cKO) vs. 1.68 +/- 0.34 mum

81 79.6%, early MAR 54.7%, late AMR 23.4%, late MAR 21.1%, P < 0.001).

82 ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

83 MAR 77.8% versus late AMR 56.7% versus late MAR 54.9%, P = 0.02).

84 ed to the time before CXL for UCVA (0.01 log MAR; 95% confidence interval -0.14 to 0.15, P = .944), B

85 isual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.005 +/- 0.022 log MAR; 2 eyes lost >/=0.1 log MAR.

86 val -0.14 to 0.15, P = .944), BCVA (0.05 log MAR; 95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.15, P = .310), a

87 rrected visual acuity was 0.04 +/- 0.077 log MAR.

88 05 +/- 0.022 log MAR; 2 eyes lost >/=0.1 log MAR.

89 It was 0.23 +/- 0.20 and 0.291 +/- 0.311 log MAR in FLACS and CPCS groups respectively.

90 The mean final log MAR BCVA was statistically better than the initial BCVA

91 4%, p = 0.047) and total VA improvement (log MAR 0.7 +/- 0.6 vs 1.6 +/- 0.9, p = 0.016) compared to t

92 tion at the base hospital which included log MAR visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry and

93 estrous female were noted in the adult male MAR-ASD animals, as well as reduced vocalizations emitte

94 The ability of FRA16B-mediated MAR sites to rearrange depending on the repeat expansion

95 Proviral genomes with the E micro MAR element had increased chromatin accessibility, which

96 In summary, incorporation of the E micro MAR element in lentivirus vectors resulted in enhanced,

97 we evaluated the expression from the E micro MAR element in mice 2 to 24 weeks posttransplant with tr

98 ceiving vectors with the E micro and E micro MAR elements upstream of the PGK promoter, there was a 2

99 ssociated matrix attachment regions (E micro MAR) into lentivirus vectors.

100 vitro transduced with E micro - and E micro MAR-containing lentivectors.

101 ively in B cells transduced with the E micro MAR-containing vector and not other cells types or vecto

102 illustrated using the regional climate model MAR.

103 st-order multivariate autoregressive models (MAR).

104 The c-myc MAR is also matrix-associated in CEM cells while localiz

105 nt region (MAR) sequence compared with a non-MAR sequence and were similar in size to DNA loops extra

106 8.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR.

107 over the melt season, totaled just 37-75% of MAR, suggesting nontrivial subglacial water storage even

108 retinogram (ERG) phenotype characteristic of MAR resemble the congenital visual disease caused by mut

109 The generation of MAR-ASD-specific epitope autoantibodies in female mice p

110 Intrigued by the substrate promiscuity of MAR, we probed its utility to produce branched chiral di

111 sed PCR MAR assay to investigate the role of MAR-mediated regulation of the beta-globin locus.

112 rovide equivalency of VA defined in terms of MAR and cpd.

113 In patients with GFR >=60, the use of MAR versus SAR was associated with a lower rate of MACE

114 to groundwater, threatening the viability of MAR as a water management strategy.

115 try could greatly simplify the evaluation of MARs or other sequence elements that affect transgene ex

116 The locations of MARs in aortic adventitial fibroblast (AoAF) cells were

117 ere analyzed extensively for the presence of MARs by in vitro matrix-binding assay, and for interacti

118 t genetic evidence that at least a subset of MARs performs an important biological function, possibly

119 tive value, and accuracy, were higher in off MAR condition for both defects.

120 th defects, the Az values were higher in off MAR condition.

121 virus Zaire and Sudan glycoproteins and one (MAR) encoding Marburg virus glycoprotein.

122 ree active vaccine groups: EBO vaccine only, MAR vaccine only, and both vaccines.

123 Finally, we demonstrate that our MAR assay, without the need for extended culture ex vivo

124 thier purchases than did other participants (MAR: +13%; MER: -90%.

125 We have employed an in vivo based PCR MAR assay to investigate the role of MAR-mediated regula

126 ing intravitreal injection of TRPM1-positive MAR IgG into wild-type mouse eyes, and the appearance of

127 of live retinal neurons with TRPM1-positive MAR serum resulted in the selective accumulation of IgG

128 An excess of conserved predicted MARs is seen in intergenic regions preceding 5' ends of

129 , we analyzed the co-occurrence of predicted MARs with highly conserved noncoding DNA regions in huma

130 onserved noncoding DNA consists of predicted MARs.

131 Conversely, more than half of the predicted MARs co-occur with one or more independently identified

132 th unbalanced data due to missing at random (MAR) measurements.

133 e latter is an example of missing at random (MAR).

134 essing sensitivity to the missing-at-random (MAR) assumption.

135 that the single-cell mass accumulation rate (MAR), profiled over many hours with a suspended microcha

136 d on measuring their mass accumulation rate (MAR).

137 gene dose, as were mineral apposition rate (MAR) and expression of Runx2-II, Osteocalcin, Dmp1, and

138 ion rate (BFR), and mineral apposition rate (MAR), improved the trabecular microarchitecture, and dec

139 The highest soot mass accumulation rates (MARs) occurred at the beginning of the Holocene as fuel

140 concentrations and mass accumulation rates (MARs) of soot have mainly occurred since ~1950, the esta

141 below the median, 2) a mean adequacy ratio (MAR) above the median, and 3) a mean excess ratio (MER,

142 dex 2010 (HEI-2010) and mean adequacy ratio (MAR) served as measures of diet quality.

143 Mean adequacy ratio (MAR), mean excess ratio (MER), and energy density (ED) w

144 average, cell lines transformed with the Rb7 MAR-containing vector expressed GFP at levels 2.0- to 3.

145 s to alternatives [managed aquifer recharge (MAR) and rainwater harvesting] that aimed to reduce sodi

146 Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) enhances freshwater security and augments local gro

147 Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a water reuse technique with the potential to me

148 ontaminants during managed aquifer recharge (MAR) poses a challenge to maintaining local groundwater

149 During managed aquifer recharge (MAR), injected water significantly alters water chemistr

150 her develop an algorithm 'merge-and-recover (MAR)' to speed up the calculation.

151 ygenase (CatA) and a muconic acid reductase (MAR) in Escherichia coli.

152 gate the impact of metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) o

153 mixtures: mixture analysis using references (MAR).

154 s VSD leads to multiple Andreev reflections (MAR), which in the limit of weak tunneling probability s

155 rent size regimes-motional averaging regime (MAR), static dephasing regime (SDR), and echo-limiting r

156 were enriched in a matrix attachment region (MAR) sequence compared with a non-MAR sequence and were

157 Matrix attachment region (MAR)-binding proteins have been implicated in the transc

158 DMR and an active Matrix Attachment Region (MAR).

159 prominent nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR).

160 ions from the Modele Atmospherique Regional (MAR) regional climate model (0.056-0.112 km(3)d(-1) vs.

161 Nuclear matrix-associated regions (MARs) organize chromatin into functional domains and at

162 termining phenotype matrix attached regions (MARs) on human chromosomes 14-18 were identified as a fu

163 s have shown that matrix attachment regions (MARs) can increase expression of transgenes in whole org

164 Human matrix attachment regions (MARs) can insulate transgene expression from chromosomal

165 flanking nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) encompassing the protamine domain were created.

166 nd to the nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) of the immunoglobulin heavy chain intronic enhance

167 us is provided by matrix attachment regions (MARs) that define a domain larger than 160 kb.

168 or association at matrix attachment regions (MARs).

169 iption factors at matrix attachment regions (MARs).

170 and its flanking matrix attachment regions (MARs).

171 istics of nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs): an exceptionally intense computed 'MAR potential'

172 might be matrix-scaffold attachment regions, MARs (or S/MARs).

173 arly and late AMR and mixed acute rejection (MAR).

174 s been termed maternal autoantibody related (MAR) ASD.

175 motif called the microneme adhesive repeat (MAR).

176 actor in the multiple adaptational response (MAR) family, regulates expression of the Yersinia type I

177 LcrF, a multiple adaptational response (MAR) transcription factor, regulates virulence in Yersin

178 Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with cutane

179 Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is characterized by night blindness, photopsias, an

180 ibose-protein hydrolase for mono-ADP-ribose (MAR) and poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chain removal (de-MARyla

181 either attached singly as mono(ADP-ribose) (MAR) or in polymeric chains as poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR).

182 r a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely

183 The mean maximum acceptable annual risk (MAR) for each of the SAEs was calculated for various lev

184 ption cassettes CMV- Zif-VP64 and CMV-eGFP-S/MAR transfected a)K562 cells; b)murine beta-YAC bone mar

185 o begin evaluating genome-scale models for S/MAR function.

186 oth NP and uncompacted plasmid VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR can mediate persistent, long-term improvement in an

187 t both plasmid and NP forms of VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR improved the disease phenotypes in an rpe65(-/-) mod

188 and observe that NP or plasmid VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR led to structural and functional improvements in the

189 The iBAC-S/MAR vector is capable of the infectious delivery and ret

190 The iBAC-S/MAR vector was used to deliver and maintain a 135 kb gen

191 Expression studies demonstrated that iBAC-S/MAR-LDLR completely restored LDLR function in CHO ldlr(-

192 lr(-/-) a7 clonal cell lines carrying iBAC-S/MAR-LDLR demonstrated low copy episomal stability of the

193 with a scaffold matrix attachment region (S/MAR) and vitelliform macular dystrophy 2 (VMD2) promoter

194 on the Scaffold/Matrix Attachment Region (S/MAR) for episomal retention and the beta-globin Replicat

195 of the scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR).

196 We show that the S/MAR-containing plasmid exhibited reporter gene expressio

197 S/MARs occur throughout chr4, spaced much more closely tha

198 the use of tiling microarrays to map 1358 S/MARs on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 (chr4).

199 Arabidopsis S/MARs can be divided into five clusters based on their as

200 While some Arabidopsis S/MARs may define structural domains, most occur near the

201 nucleosome formation, and the majority of S/MARs contain at least one nucleosome-depleted region.

202 To define the role of S/MARs in organizing our genome and to resolve the often c

203 scale distribution and sequence content of S/MARs in vivo.

204 ern of distribution and genomic context of S/MARs is thought to be important for processes such as ch

205 This global view of S/MARs provides a framework to begin evaluating genome-sca

206 trix-scaffold attachment regions, MARs (or S/MARs).

207 Scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) and locus control regions (LCRs) that are involved

208 Scaffold or matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) are found in all eukaryotes.

209 using scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) that establish loop domains.

210 fs and 6-mer enrichment patterns show that S/MARs are preferentially enriched in poly(dA:dT) tracts,

211 The varied functions of the S/MARs as revealed by the different extraction methods hig

212 oci-specific studies, we have surveyed the S/MARs in HeLa S3 cells on human chromosomes 14-18 by arra

213 Genes associated with these S/MARs have an increased probability of expression, which

214 al fold higher than plasmid or NPs without S/MARs.

215 In HGY, soot MARs increased by ~7.7 times in the period 1980-2012 rel

216 The increase in soot MARs is also in line with the emission inventory records

217 rchy for graft survival with ACR better than MAR better than AMR, which persisted for both early and

218 at cells preferentially uptook ctMA and that MAR efficiently reduced all muconic isomers to adipic ac

219 We conclude that MAR-mediated overall increases in transgene expression i

220 n sites on seven PARPs, and demonstrate that MAR and PAR generating PARPs modify similar amino acids,

221 The results demonstrate that MAR performs with the same high accuracy as conventional

222 ite-specific recombination demonstrated that MAR sequences were required for the establishment but no

223 We found that MAR-ASD male and female offspring had significant altera

224 We observe that MAR domains exist in tandem repeats, which provide a hig

225 We show that MAR accurately and rapidly defines therapeutic susceptib

226 The MAR algorithm can further speed up the calculation by se

227 The MAR algorithm in CBCT unit may not be helpful in increas

228 The MAR family of transcription factors is well conserved, w

229 The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continenta

230 The MAR met criteria for both ACR and AMR.

231 The MAR quantification protocol as presented here can easily

232 The MAR was similar across the 3 SAEs.

233 The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower b

234 Furthermore, the epitope targeted by the MAR autoantibodies was localized within the amino-termin

235 o test this possibility, we have deleted the MAR from a Chinese hamster ovary variant harboring a sin

236 mine whether the time to at least double the MAR was dependent on age at baseline or starting VA.

237 The hazard for at least doubling the MAR was related to baseline vision and patient age.

238 Finally, the MAR method is compared to one of the most commonly appli

239 ation of segmental reference haplotypes, the MAR algorithm always calculates an exact form of transit

240 This data highlights the MAR assay in both research and clinical applications as

241 15 of 29 (52%, 33-71) participants in the MAR vaccine group had a T-cell response to the Marburg g

242 Nine of 29 (31%, 15-51) participants in the MAR vaccine groups had an antibody response to the Marbu

243 s contains multiple enhancers, including the MAR/intronic (iE(kappa)) and 3' enhancers (3'E(kappa)).

244 ty, the applicability and performance of the MAR analysis utilizing (13)C and (19)F cross-polarizatio

245 l replicon mapping shows that removal of the MAR has no significant effect either on the frequency or

246 lkaline conditions show that deletion of the MAR interferes with local separation of daughter chromat

247 l flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173

248 ot affect DNA binding, or by deletion of the MAR-binding domain.

249 lagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR.

250 Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference s

251 ancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthi

252 This study demonstrates that the MAR-1 antibody to mouse FcepsilonRI unexpectedly binds t

253 polar cells that is presumed to underlie the MAR syndrome.

254 pectation of scale invariance underlying the MAR scale.

255 fference of VA was determined by whether the MAR between the two eyes differed by less than a factor

256 lar to staining for TRPM1, staining with the MAR sera was strong in dendritic tips and somas and was

257 -binding assay, and for interaction with the MAR-binding proteins cut-like protein x/CCAAT-displaceme

258 The MARs of the c-myc domain do not act to prevent the assoc

259 ed at the WT frequency even when Emu and the MARs were absent together.

260 In concert, the MARs bounding this domain likely synergize to regulate t

261 Interestingly, the MARs may convey a selective reproductive advantage, such

262 We show that upon removal of the MARs, the locus becomes subject to position effects.

263 t less than the WT frequency when Emu or the MARs were individually absent.

264 om moderate daily symptoms to remission, the MARs ranged from 0.69% to 0.81% and from 0.39% to 0.55%,

265 Thus, the MARs bounding the PRM1 --> PRM2 --> TNP2 protamine domai

266 M1 gene, and Western blots probed with these MAR sera showed the expected band size ( approximately 1

267 ding 5' ends of genes, suggesting that these MARs are primarily involved in transcriptional control.

268 exhibited enhanced caspase cleavage of this MAR-associating protein.

269 direct lines of evidence suggested that this MAR might be required for origin activation in early S p

270 hen there is a mixture of missingness due to MAR and MNAR.

271 and structural constraints limiting PARPs to MAR synthesis do not limit their ability to modify canon

272 was characterized for conditions relevant to MAR operations.

273 SATB1 binds to MARs within the MMTV provirus to repress transcription.

274 become evident: the enzyme used to transform MAR/PAR into phosphoribose must be purified from the rat

275 n from shallow, aerated sediments underlying MAR infiltration basins.

276 nd-drinking subjects (SAD), marijuana users (MAR), smoking-and-marijuana users (SAM), marijuana-and-d

277 at the potential long-term benefits of using MAR in CABG patients with renal insufficiency may be off

278 del to estimate each subject's unblurred VA (MAR(0) in minutes of arc) and equivalent intrinsic blur

279 n the propensity to have received SAR versus MAR, within groups with preoperative glomerular filtrati

280 ear matrices, which indicates their in vitro MAR function.

281 trix-associated DNA indicating their in vivo MAR function.

282 antly improved in VMI(>=100keV), MAR and VMI(MAR>=100keV).

283 ared to CI by VMI(>=140/100keV), MAR and VMI(MAR>=100keV).

284 CI, VMI, MAR and VMI(MAR) (range: 100-200 keV, 10 keV-increment) were reconst

285 Compared to CI, VMI >= 100 keV, MAR and VMI(MAR) between 100-200 keV increased attenuation in hypoat

286 nly significant for MAR in hypodense and VMI(MAR) in hypo- and hyperdense artifacts (p < 0.05).

287 l as the combination of both approaches (VMI(MAR)) compared to conventional CT images (CI) as standar

288 CI, VMI, MAR and VMI(MAR) (range: 100-200 keV, 10 keV-increment)

289 associated with transcript presence whereas MARs contained within a gene are associated with silence

290 en insufficiently powered to address whether MAR confers long-term benefit over SAR in patients with

291 ts expressing mini-white transgenes in which MAR sequences from the human apoB gene were arranged in

292 e potential of a tag-based pipeline in which MAR/PAR is hydrolyzed down to phosphoribose, leaving a 2

293 nd in pretreated lignin, we found that while MAR fully reduced 2-methyl-muconic acid to 2-methyl-adip

294 at the vision of at least some patients with MAR is compromised due to autoantibody-mediated inactiva

295 sensitivity loss shown by the patients with MAR is consistent with the dysfunction at the level of t

296 Both patients with MAR showed a loss of contrast sensitivity compared to no

297 ntrast sensitivity deficits of patients with MAR under photopic conditions are not specific to the MC

298 Results in patients with MAR were compared with those in 10 visually normal obser

299 Two patients with MAR, ages 57 and 61 years, with normal Snellen visual ac

300 Staining of mouse and primate retina with MAR sera revealed immunoreactivity in all types of ON bi

301 ith CBCT unit in two modes, with and without MAR algorithm.