ライフサイエンスコーパス: MDCT

1 MDCT angiography is a highly informative method to study

2 MDCT angiography of the coronaries is a good and rapid m

3 MDCT data sets were evaluated for the presence and volum

4 MDCT data were integrated with high-density 3-dimensiona

5 MDCT enterography (MDCTE) is a non-invasive, simple to p

6 MDCT images were analyzed to define infarct size/extent

7 MDCT infarct volume compared well with triphenyltetrazol

8 MDCT is an indispensable tool in quantitative and qualit

9 MDCT of the abdomen was done which revealed atrophic pan

10 MDCT offers the additive value of a very short image acq

11 MDCT parameters were 120 kV, 120 mA/s, collimation 12x0.

12 MDCT prior to ablation demonstrates the anatomy of the l

13 MDCT protocols integrating CTA and stress-rest perfusion

14 MDCT proved to be an important modality for decision-mak

15 MDCT scans were evaluated for hypoattenuated leaflet thi

16 MDCT stress-rest perfusion methods were recently describ

17 MDCT studies for suspected bowel obstruction should focu

18 MDCT substantially underestimated plaque volume per segm

19 MDCT verified THV thrombosis in 28 of 405 (7%) patients.

20 MDCT was able to determine the cause of obstruction with

21 MDCT was performed in 140 patients within 1 to 3 months

22 MDCT was performed in 89 patients with AF, analyzing the

23 MDCT was performed in the prone position, using a custom

24 MDCT was positive for sarcoidosis in 6 additional patien

25 MDCT with good reformatting techniques has excellent acc

26 MDCT with reformatting techniques was very accurate in p

27 MDCT yielded a slightly larger lumen area, anteroposteri

28 MDCT, interpreted by an expert radiologist, is reliable

29 MDCT-based MTT and PBF measurements demonstrate globally

30 MDCT-based sizing produced the same valve size for n=34

31 MDCT-derived 3-dimensional aortic annular measurements a

32 MDCT-derived regions of microvascular obstruction were a

33 MDCT-IP may provide the best diagnostic accuracy for fun

34 ed to 36 patients (group 2) acquired in a 16-MDCT (120 kV and filtered back-projection).

35 ed to 36 patients (group 2) acquired in a 16-MDCT (120kV and filtered back-projection).

36 or rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated.

37 m, 0.46 +/- 0.4 and 1.31 +/- 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

38 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

39 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

40 the 32-MDCT and 1.25 +/- 0.30 mSv for the 16-MDCT.

41 or the 32-MDCT and 1.25+/-0.30mSv for the 16-MDCT.

42 n and cochlea in the 32-MDCT, compared to 16-MDCT, with statistically significant differences.

43 were acquired with an ultra-low dose CT (32-MDCT, 130 kV, tin filter and iterative reconstruction).

44 deviation) was 0.16 +/- 0.04 mSv for the 32-MDCT and 1.25 +/- 0.30 mSv for the 16-MDCT.

45 ard deviation) was 0.16+/-0.04mSv for the 32-MDCT and 1.25+/-0.30mSv for the 16-MDCT.

46 of the ossicular chain and cochlea in the 32-MDCT, compared to 16-MDCT, with statistically significan

47 sis could be achieved in 37 patients with 39 MDCT masses (22 thrombus and 17 pannus).

48 in neck scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

49 in head scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

50 e an increasing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations

51 ent numbers of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigat

52 s of detector rows including one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated.

53 scan was 3.4, 4.6, 4.7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

54 scan was 2.4, 3.3, 4.4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

55 lysis from routine CT chest examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed in 202

56 ra) during routine chest CT examinations (64 MDCT TK LIGHT SPEED GE Medical System) performed using t

57 ng one 4-MDCT, a 6-MDCT, a 16-MDCT, and a 64-MDCT were investigated.

58 4 and 5.6 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

59 7 and 6.0 for 4-MDCT, 6-MDCT, 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

60 0.4 and 1.31 +/- 0.33 mSv for 16-MDCT and 64-MDCT, respectively.

61 ise of images taken and/or fewer doses in 64-MDCT.

62 sing trend in the Q-factor from 4-MDCT to 64-MDCT units in both head and neck examinations.

63 viduals with normal PFT results and abnormal MDCT findings.

64 angiography was performed 1 to 14 days after MDCT.

65 ients who underwent TAVR with the algorithm (MDCT group) were compared with consecutive patients with

66 Ischemic demarcation was detected in all MDCT images of affected patients by both readers, irresp

67 The implementation of an MDCT annulus area sizing algorithm for TAVR reduces PAR.

68 pandable THV size selection were based on an MDCT sizing algorithm with an optimal goal of modest ann

69 as a significant correlation between 3DA and MDCT for prediction of perpendicular valve projections (

70 Conventional angiographic and MDCT studies were analyzed by independent core laborator

71 f quantitative Doppler echocardiographic and MDCT assessment of AS shows that measuring AVC load prov

72 llow-up transesophageal echocardiography and MDCT.

73 MRI detected 489 liver metastases and MDCT 384.

74 threshold algorithms were applied to MRI and MDCT datasets reconstructed at various slice thicknesses

75 2 liver metastases) underwent Gd-EOB MRI and MDCT imaging.

76 In the control group, MRI and MDCT showed similar per-patient specificity (100% vs. 98

77 invasive examinations such as angio-MRI and MDCT, or invasive examinations such as DSA and IVUS.

78 With serially obtained MRI and MDCT, we demonstrate in vivo reappearance of myocardial

79 dimensional angiographic reconstructions and MDCT are safe, practical, and accurate imaging modalitie

80 The difference between THV size and MDCT annular size was predictive of PAR (mean diameter:

81 een transcatheter heart valve (THV) size and MDCT measures of annular size (mean diameter, area, and

82 In this prospective study, spirometric and MDCT evaluation was done in 52 consecutive patients diag

83 Three-dimensional TEE and MDCT cross-sectional perimeter and area measurements wer

84 0.30 mm for cadaveric scans between WBCT and MDCT.

85 ve predictive value, 69.2%) were detected at MDCT.

86 mors, and only one (0.1%) was not visible at MDCT.

87 Adenosine-augmented MDCT myocardial perfusion imaging provides semiquantitat

88 and positioning difficulty in a gantry-based MDCT who underwent three-dimensional elbow imaging with

89 Agreement between MDCT, MRI, and pathologic results (when available) was e

90 er operating characteristic analysis between MDCT and 3D-TEE perimeter and area cover indexes were no

91 There was a good correlation between MDCT and QCA percent stenosis (r = 0.75, p < 0.01, SEE =

92 Both MDCT and MRI were performed on the same day approximatel

93 paravalvular regurgitation was good for both MDCT (area under the curve for perimeter and area cover

94 erosclerotic lesions in patients with ACS by MDCT.

95 ntified by QCA, 754 (95%) were analyzable by MDCT.

96 Calculated rPCI assessed by MDCT was compared with the sPCI using the Concordance Co

97 Thus, measurement of AVC by MDCT should be considered for not only diagnostic but al

98 O), and myocardial mass values calculated by MDCT, MRI, and 2DE were compared with each other.

99 Periprosthetic masses were detected by MDCT in 46 patients, and their attenuation values were m

100 us urethra and the scrotum was discovered by MDCT.

101 ive assessment of coronary artery disease by MDCT has good performance characteristics for ruling out

102 onal myocardial wall thinning (WT) imaged by MDCT and arrhythmogenic substrate in postinfarction vent

103 lerotic rabbits underwent in vivo imaging by MDCT and 1.5-T MRI.

104 Myocardial perfusion imaging by MDCT may have significant implications in the diagnosis

105 Acute and chronic infarcts by MDCT were characterized by hyperenhancement, whereas reg

106 The AVC-load by MDCT, strongly associated with AS severity, allows diagn

107 sel areas and Remodeling Indices measured by MDCT correlated closely to IVUS (r(2) = 0.77 and r(2) =

108 pler echocardiography and AVC measurement by MDCT.

109 the clinical yield of AVC quantification by MDCT to diagnose and manage these complex patients.

110 cipients with elevated resting heart rate by MDCT is feasible using multicycle reconstruction.

111 e performed easily and reliably with cardiac MDCT used for coronary artery evaluation and it also giv

112 14.9 years who had been scanned with cardiac MDCT were evaluated with cardiac MRI and 2DE.

113 s of image quality for non-enhanced cerebral MDCT.

114 rwent breast MRI and contrast-enhanced chest MDCT for staging between September 2019 and September 20

115 On chest MDCT, the SVC was noted on the left side.

116 ers at similar imaging doses; and a clinical MDCT.

117 omatic aortic stenosis who had both contrast MDCT and 3D-TEE for annulus assessment before balloon-ex

118 Coronary MDCT angiography was performed in eight pediatric heart

119 To correlate MDCT findings with histopathology/surgical findings/Endo

120 Background Multidetector CT (MDCT) enables rapid and accurate diagnosis of head and n

121 tween (18)F-FDG PET/CT and multidetector CT (MDCT) findings, to compare (18)F-FDG PET/CT results with

122 Multidetector CT (MDCT) has become an essential imaging tool for evaluatin

123 since the introduction of multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners.

124 Advances in multidetector CT (MDCT) technology with submillimeter slice collimation an

125 ced CT ((18)F-FDG PET/CT), multidetector CT (MDCT), and MR imaging in differentiating malignant from

126 ow scans over gantry-based multidetector CT (MDCT), but studies analyzing their clinical value remain

127 Multidetector CT (MDCT), together with reformatted images, can provide val

128 Multimodal CT (MDCT) is essential in patient selection and detection of

129 d in the gold standard multidetector-row CT (MDCT) images.

130 st the hypothesis, via multidetector row CT (MDCT) perfusion imaging, that smokers showing early sign

131 arenchyma at triphasic Multidetector-row CT (MDCT).

132 r contrast-enhanced multidetector spiral CT (MDCT) permits assessment of remodeling in coronary ather

133 rwent a protocol including (18)F-FDG PET/CT, MDCT, and MR imaging combined with MR cholangiopancreato

134 A DE-MDCT provides a more detailed assessment of the PIZ in c

135 The PIZ volume/mass by DE-MDCT increased with decreasing slice thickness because o

136 The DE-MDCT and -MRI were able to detect a PIZ in all animals,

137 The DE-MDCT reconstructed at 8-mm slice thickness showed excell

138 ns were performed on two 128 multi-detector (MDCT) CT scanners: - iCT (Philips Healthcare with iDose(

139 Following a low-dose MDCT scan to evaluate coronary artery calcium, 187 patie

140 ificant coronary stenoses, contrast-enhanced MDCT (0.75-mm collimation, 420-ms rotation) and intravas

141 l assessment of tumours on contrast-enhanced MDCT and FSE T2-weighted MRI.

142 d with a LAD stenosis, and contrast-enhanced MDCT imaging was performed 5 min into adenosine infusion

143 OB) enhanced liver MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT in the detection of liver metastasis from colorecta

144 Electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced MDCT scans (16 x 0.75-mm detectors, 420 ms rotation, 100

145 is study demonstrates that contrast-enhanced MDCT, when performed with a dedicated breast protocol, o

146 quantified accurately with contrast-enhanced MDCT.

147 of less than 600 underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT.

148 short diameter/long diameter) and expansion (MDCT measured THV area/nominal THV area).

149 atherosclerotic plaques were 89% and 77% for MDCT and 97% and 94% for MRI.

150 )F-FDG PET/CT, compared with 77% and 87% for MDCT (P < 0.05) and MR imaging, respectively.

151 .6 degrees for 3DA and 7.9+/-4.9 degrees for MDCT (P=0.01).

152 Gd-EOB MRI and substantial to excellent for MDCT (k range, 0.75-0.8).

153 nical grounds may not have been referred for MDCT for evaluation of suspected appendicitis.

154 The angles from 3DA, from MDCT, the implant angle, and the postdeployment perpendi

155 analysis of 3-mm axial reconstructions from MDCT and the carefully matched MRI images (182 sections)

156 Dynamic ECG-gated MDCT perfusion scans with a central bolus injection of c

157 ECG-gated MDCT seems to be currently a method of choice for pre-ab

158 during first-pass, contrast-enhanced helical MDCT.

159 However, MDCT is overused, and appropriate selection of patients

160 Integration of CTP and CTA improves MDCT performance for the detection of relevant CAD in in

161 Recent advancements in MDCT allow for noninvasive assessment of the coronary ve

162 CBCT images was within 12-31% of the CNR in MDCT images.

163 Four-level MDCT data demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 59% and

164 rast-enhanced (Visipaque, 150 mL, 325 mg/mL) MDCT (0.5 mm x 32 slice) was performed before occlusion

165 determining the number of metastatic nodes (MDCT ICC, 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.81 vs MRI ICC, 0.56; 95%

166 Noninvasive MDCT angiography is promising but requires further techn

167 ents]; 95% CI: 59.0, 62.0; P < .001) but not MDCT angiography of the HN (9.7% [480 of 4969 patients];

168 Novel MDCT imaging acquisition protocols, postprocessing tools

169 We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT in a segment-based and a patient-based model and de

170 The diagnostic accuracy of MDCT-IP (AUC = 0.91) was superior to TAG320 + CTA or CTP

171 To identify the advantages of MDCT with respect to other imaging modalities.

172 With the advent of MDCT and MRI, accurate preoperative diagnosis of this co

173 On the basis of MDCT measurements, 41% of valves implanted were undersiz

174 We compared the capabilities of MDCT and MRI for the assessment of noncalcified, atheros

175 The integration of MDCT WT with 3-dimensional electroanatomic maps can help

176 In a patient-based model, the NPV of MDCT for significant CAD was limited to 75%.

177 test assessment of diagnostic performance of MDCT for acute appendicitis, according to the reference

178 The results indicate the potential of MDCT to detect coronary atherosclerotic plaque in patien

179 Objective; To find out the role of MDCT in the evaluation of obstructive jaundice with resp

180 g 3D-TEE images closely approximate those of MDCT.

181 The use of MDCT in AS patients may be beneficial for the evaluation

182 lant recipients might be mitigated by use of MDCT.

183 To assess the diagnostic value of MDCT coronary angiography for evaluation of acute chest

184 We sought to determine the value of MDCT for the diagnosis of THV thrombosis and the frequen

185 d positive and negative predictive values of MDCT compared with QCA for the detection of segments wit

186 d negative and positive predictive values of MDCT were 98.5% (95% CI, 97.3% to 99.2%) (665 of 675 pat

187 On MDCT, CF explanted lungs showed an increased median (int

188 dings of coronary artery disease detected on MDCT coronary angiography that were not mirrored by conv

189 Of the 1629 segments, 71% were evaluable on MDCT.

190 d in 26 cases with true-negative findings on MDCT.

191 anges of the visualized coronary segments on MDCT images were compared with catheter angiographic fin

192 In 48 coronary segments visualized on MDCT images, 33, 7, and 4 segments each had normal, lumi

193 ts of myocardial perfusion during first-pass MDCT imaging in a canine model of LAD stenosis.

194 In a subset of 13 patients, MDCT measurements were verified by IVUS.

195 In 50 patients, MDCT was repeated after TAVR to assess THV eccentricity

196 r the detection of segments with any plaque, MDCT had a sensitivity of 82% (41 of 50) and specificity

197 preimplant 3DA and 68% underwent preimplant MDCT.

198 Preoperative MDCT measurements differ substantially from direct intra

199 Preoperative MDCT measurements of the aortic annulus served as basis

200 r TAVR in 4 centers underwent pre-procedural MDCT.

201 tor computed tomography-integrated protocol [MDCT-IP]) assessment in predicting significant fractiona

202 y angiography, 44 patients with high-quality MDCT data sets showing atherosclerotic plaque in a proxi

203 With sufficient image quality, MDCT permits noninvasive visualization of the coronary a

204 ture, combined with existing high-resolution MDCT coronary angiography, may have important implicatio

205 tivity and negative predictive value, 16-row MDCT may be useful in excluding coronary disease in sele

206 TAG320 were assessed using 320-detector row MDCT.

207 or stable angina underwent coronary 16-slice MDCT and invasive selective angiography.

208 sitive stress test result underwent 16-slice MDCT and selective coronary angiography for the detectio

209 For all coronary segments included, 16-slice MDCT has moderate diagnostic value for the detection of

210 (Siemens, 1.5 T) and CCT (Toshiba, 16-slice MDCT) images were obtained on the same day without beta-

211 Contrast-enhanced 64-slice MDCT coronary angiography was performed immediately befo

212 Sixty-four slice MDCT is helpful in identifying masses amenable to thromb

213 Subsequently, MDCT was performed before any treatment was started.

214 Post-TAVI MDCT identified THV thrombosis in 5 patients (4%).

215 Post-TAVI MDCT is a valuable tool for the diagnosis of THV thrombo

216 cantly better in the detection of mCRC, than MDCT, particularly in patients treated with chemotherapy

217 MR imaging showed a higher performance than MDCT in per-patient detection sensitivity (100% vs. 74.2

218 The results of this study indicate that MDCT coronary angiography performed with 16-row scanners

219 ddition, several studies have indicated that MDCT also can detect calcified and noncalcified coronary

220 The MDCT correctly identified 15 of the 16 (94%) transplant

221 lations for EF values were found between the MDCT and CMR tools (r=0.702 p<0.001), and between the MR

222 The correlation coefficient between the MDCT and CMR tools is close to the correlation coefficie

223 and CMR tools) and the results from both the MDCT and the 2DE with the CMR tools results.

224 tients underwent TAVR (SAPIEN XT THV) in the MDCT group and 133 consecutive patients were in the cont

225 On a patient-based model, the MDCT-IP had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and neg

226 Accuracy of the MDCT data was confirmed by correlation with echocardiogr

227 endpoint occurred in 3.8% (5 of 133) of the MDCT group and in 11.3% (15 of 133) of the control group

228 ld PAR was present in 5.3% (7 of 133) of the MDCT group and in 12.8% (17 of 133) in the control group

229 al specimens, to confirm the findings of the MDCT imaging, and the size of cardiomyocytes was measure

230 An expert panel, blinded to the MDCT data, determined the presence or absence of ACS on

231 102) of THVs were undersized relative to the MDCT mean diameter and area, respectively.

232 However, only a few studies compared these MDCT-IP with other clinically validated perfusion techni

233 in cerebral blood vessels diagnosed through MDCT angiography and the level of total cardiovascular r

234 All providers were blinded to MDCT results.

235 replacement valves were smaller relative to MDCT-based sizing in 41% of patients, and the potential

236 of multi-detector row computed tomographic (MDCT) imaging for evaluating coronary arteries in pediat

237 mate multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) measurements for the assessment of aortic annulus

238 hase multidetector computerized tomographic (MDCT) imaging.

239 o analyze multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) 3-dimensional aortic annular dimensions for the pr

240 -enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) after TAVR.

241 tion with Multidetector Computed tomography (MDCT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) demonstrated

242 Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and micro-CT were applied to 11 air-inflated CF ex

243 anced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) magnetic reso

244 tion of a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) annular area sizing algorithm on transcatheter aor

245 mpare the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) arthrography (CTa) and magnetic resonance (MR) art

246 -enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can depict myocardial wall thickness with submilli

247 in using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) enterography in the evaluation of localized malign

248 enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) examination of the abdomen.

249 the chest multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of 41 patients with ankylosing spondyliti

250 -enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for quantifying myocardial necrosis, microvascular

251 value of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for the diagnosis of THV thrombosis.

252 nt years, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has also gained importance in diagnosing gastroint

253 Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has been proposed as a noninvasive method to evalu

254 MRI) and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) imaging in MSC-treated pigs (n = 10) and control s

255 d whether multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) improves the ability to define peri-infarct zone (

256 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in distinguishing between pannus and thrombus, the

257 ance of a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) integrated protocol (IP) including coronary angiog

258 Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) is increasingly taking a central role in identifyi

259 Although multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the first tool used for staging and patient's s

260 e whether multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may be able to detect occlusive coronary disease i

261 coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may improve early and accurate triage of patients

262 raphy and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measuring aortic valve calcification (AVC) load, t

263 abdominal multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) revealed a tubular foreign body density, compatibl

264 from multi-detector row computed tomography (MDCT) studies with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE

265 of multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) to detect atherosclerotic plaque in nonstenotic co

266 7) using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to determine the percentage of visible airways obs

267 curacy of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to measure differences in regional myocardial perf

268 lice, multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) was recently introduced into the field of cardiac

269 ound and multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) we can further evaluate undiagnosed cases of silen

270 underwent multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) within the same episode of care.

271 lti-row detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT), and electron beam tomography (EBT).

272 including multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), have been proposed for prediction of the optimal

273 rances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), the most frequently used radiological imaging met

274 ations of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)-based noninvasive detection of significant obstruc

275 ng chest multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).

276 esions by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

277 g multidetector helical computed tomography (MDCT).

278 osed with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).

279 Triphasic MDCT scans of 38 consecutive patients who underwent surg

280 vity for detection of small PDA at triphasic MDCT.

281 nsecutive postinfarction patients undergoing MDCT before ablation.

282 Irvine, California) THV, 405 (88%) underwent MDCT in addition to transthoracic and transesophageal ec

283 They also underwent MDCT and measurement of serum ACE level.

284 roup versus the prealgorithm group underwent MDCT of the head (55.8% [2774 of 4969 patients]; 95% CI:

285 total of 109 consecutive patients underwent MDCT pre-TAVR with a balloon expandable aortic valve.

286 rmediate/high pre-test probability underwent MDCT, CMR and invasive coronary angiography.

287 into its forms, patterns, and severity using MDCT.

288 DCT (ICC, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.70), whereas MDCT was more reliable for determining the number of met

289 Out of 102 patients in whom MDCT (16-slice scanner, intravenous contrast, 0.75-mm co

290 ICC, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59, 0.84) compared with MDCT (ICC, 0.53; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.70), whereas MDCT was m

291 Furthermore, when compared with MDCT and MR imaging, respectively, (18)F-FDG PET/CT alte

292 ensitivity and 65% specificity compared with MDCT-IP, which showed 88% sensitivity and 83% specificit

293 endocardial rim of tissue, demonstrated with MDCT, was assessed for regional contraction with MRI tag

294 al review shares our initial experience with MDCT fistulography in evaluating fistula-in-ano, demonst

295 performing periradicular infiltrations with MDCT using model-based iterative image reconstruction is

296 ptimal deployment angle and compared it with MDCT.

297 oth methods in 31 participants and only with MDCT in one participant (agreement, 99%; kappa = 0.98; 9

298 use of commercially available software with MDCT measurements and assesses their ability to predict

299 nostic sensitivity with Gd-EOB MRI than with MDCT (95.5% vs. 72% reader 1; 90% vs. 72% reader 2; 96%

300 The number of airways visible with MDCT was not different between rejected and control lung