戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              MDDC from rs7282490 GG risk-carriers had reduced ICOSL e
2                                              MDDC-mediated HIV-1 transmission to CD4(+) T cells invol
3                                              MDDCs clustered most closely to CD14(+) DDCs; furthermor
4                                              MDDCs loaded with S. aureus or zymosan induced the proli
5 ability of CT, LT, and Forskolin to activate MDDC.
6 h2 cells than immature or TNF/IL-1-activated MDDCs when cultured with naive CD4+ T cells.
7                  Furthermore, PNAg-activated MDDCs induced 2- to 3-fold more IL-4- and IL-13-secretin
8                In this regard, PMT activates MDDC to mature in a dose-dependent manner through the ac
9 nt integrated HIV-DNA, as demonstrated by an MDDC-based viral outgrowth assay.
10                                Both Mphi and MDDC synthesized PAF; however, MDDC accumulated signific
11 he IgG2 Ab response is dependent on PAF, and MDDC selectively induce IgG2 production, we predicted th
12 sion was observed in both CD4(+) T-cells and MDDCs in the presence of Vpr.
13 plication-competent HIV-1 infected PBMCs and MDDCs revealed similar levels of reverse transcription p
14 ngle-cycle HIV-1 infection of both PBMCs and MDDCs was significantly enhanced in the presence of Vpr
15 emonstrate that gp120 binding to DC-SIGN and MDDCs is largely if not wholly carbohydrate dependent.
16               Analysis of conjugates between MDDCs and T cells revealed that, in the absence of antig
17  markedly stimulated CCR5 expression on both MDDCs and LCs.
18                            Uptake of HMPV by MDDC was found to be primarily by macropinocytosis.
19 y labeled blebs and BPI were internalized by MDDC under these conditions.
20 ce the ability of HMPV to be internalized by MDDC, resulting in a reduced ability of the HMPV-stimula
21 nd tumor necrosis factor alpha production by MDDC in the presence of saturating concentrations of lip
22 s fimbriae in the uptake of P. gingivalis by MDDCs and in induction of immunostimulatory Th1 response
23 LDH activity in MDDCs, especially in CD16(+) MDDCs, and subsequently imprint CD4(+) T cells with gut-
24 ulate human monocyte-derived dendritic cell (MDDC) differentiation.
25    We used monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) and CD4 T cells and measured [(3)H]thymidine incor
26 (Mphi) and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) come from a common precursor, they are distinct ce
27 d in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) from rs7282490 ICOSLG GG risk carriers.
28  (MDM) and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) in virus-like particles, dramatically enhancing th
29 mary human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) in vitro and on subsequent MDDC maturation and act
30 T on human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) in vitro and show a novel activity for PMT.
31 V-8 enters monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) through DC-SIGN, resulting in nonproductive infect
32 f immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC) were observed.
33 a than did monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC), despite similar NOD1 expression, similar cytokine
34 ophages or monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC).
35 n, named Modified Detecting Deviating Cells (MDDC).
36 n immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) and peripheral blood myeloid DCs.
37 ates human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) and triggers a specific genetic program that up-r
38  activated monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) as measured by MHC/costimulatory molecule up-regu
39            Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) can efficiently bind and transfer HIV infectivity
40      Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) infected with Toxoplasma gondii induce T-lymphocy
41 onkey (Rh) monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) modified by gene transfer to over-express active
42 f HIV from monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) to permissive T cells.
43 ecifically monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) understudied.
44 d by human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs) was performed with quantitative polymerase chain
45 lecules in monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), enabling effective Ag presentation to T cells.
46      Human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), myeloid dendritic cells, and plasmacytoid dendri
47 fection of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), one of the first cell types to encounter virus i
48 to that of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs), which are less susceptible to HIV-1 infection.
49 ture human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs).
50 ture human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs).
51 ocesses of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDCs).
52 s, monocyte-derived/myeloid dendritic cells (MDDCs/mDCs), and by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs)
53 hanced gene transfer to monocyte derived DC (MDDC) by retargeting adenoviral (Ad) vectors to a marker
54 the maturation of human monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) in vitro.
55 ly impair primary human monocyte-derived DC (MDDC) responses upon stimulation induced through the RIG
56 ith HIV-1 and HSV-2 on monocyte-derived DCs (MDDC).
57 so compared these with monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) and MUTZ3 Langerhans cells (LCs) to investigate t
58 how that HIV fusion to monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) both decreases and kinetically slows when DCs are
59 ess this, we generated monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) in vitro which phenotypically and functionally re
60 f HIV-1 replication in monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) is associated with an increased expression of p21
61 al maturation in human monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) similar to but distinct from the activity of the
62 uration state in human monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) similar to that induced by lipopolysaccharide (LP
63      Exposure of total monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) to S. aureus lysates as well as TLR2 (zymosan and
64 vered to primary human monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) using a lentivirus-based expression system.
65        THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) were investigated as a model for testing the func
66  MDCs and inflammatory monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs) with TLR ligands, resulting in maturation.
67 uctive infection using monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs), blood myeloid DCs, and B-cell lines expressing D
68 C-SIGN is expressed in monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs), macrophage subsets, activated B lymphocytes, and
69 erogenous DC subsets, (monocyte-derived DCs [MDDCs], CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cell [HSC])-derived L
70  use as model skin DCs, the in vitro-derived MDDC and MUTZ3 LC populations grouped within the skin DC
71 ranslated TNF mRNA more efficiently than did MDDC.
72 nfections of dividing PBMCs and non-dividing MDDCs were carried out with single-cycle and replication
73 -SIGN on iDDC, as we previously reported for MDDC.
74  HIV-1 was more efficiently transmitted from MDDC to T cells.
75  also showed that transmission of HIV-1 from MDDCs to autologous T cells was significantly reduced in
76 tworks involved in phenotypic and functional MDDC differentiation.
77                           On the other hand, MDDCs acquiring nonviable T. gondii antigens directly, o
78                                     However, MDDC stimulated with DeltaSHG induced increased prolifer
79 Both Mphi and MDDC synthesized PAF; however, MDDC accumulated significantly more of this lipid.
80               To test this hypothesis, human MDDC were prepared by treating adherent monocytes with I
81 activating effects of cholera toxin on human MDDC and mouse bone marrow-derived dendritic cells, we f
82                                        Human MDDCs rapidly internalized Ag in a calcium- and glycan-d
83                     In THP-1 cells and human MDDCs, BG60-DC-SIGN interaction led to the activation of
84                               Immature human MDDCs exposed to galectin-1 up-regulated cell surface ma
85 -translational modifications (PTMs) in human MDDCs due to chronic alcohol exposure.
86 n-1 is a novel endogenous activator of human MDDCs that up-regulates a significant subset of genes di
87 er in vitro acute alcohol treatment of human MDDCs.
88  compared with LPS, galectin-1-treated human MDDCs exhibited significantly better chemotactic migrati
89 Within 4 days the prevalence of the immature MDDC was approximately twofold higher in LJP cultures th
90  slowly than 81A in both mature and immature MDDCs.
91 ([(125)I]AB-MECA) to membranes from immature MDDCs yielded B(max) of 298 fmol/mg of protein and K(D)
92 lly identical to that obtained from immature MDDCs.
93 ignaling and unequivocally identify immature MDDCs as native expressers of the human A3 receptor.
94 aboratory-adapted 81A over NL4-3 in immature MDDCs and in ex vivo Langerhans cells, indicating that t
95  was elevated more than 100-fold in immature MDDCs compared with monocyte precursors.
96                    Binding of E2 to immature MDDCs was dependent on DC-SIGN interactions, while bindi
97 th CXCR4 tropism mediated fusion to immature MDDCs with efficiencies similar to those of primary CCR5
98 s was delayed in mature compared to immature MDDCs, and NL4-3 fused more slowly than 81A in both matu
99 ermore, MNK controlled TNF mRNA abundance in MDDC and MDM upon NOD1 triggering.
100 red the possibility that PAF accumulation in MDDC might result from reduced turnover due to lower lev
101 aling by the blebs as measured by changes in MDDC morphology, surface expression of CD80, CD83, CD86,
102 s produced Vpx and replicated efficiently in MDDC and MDM.
103  lower levels of expression of the enzyme in MDDC and allowed these cells to produce PGE(2) in respon
104 predicted that PAF levels would be higher in MDDC than in Mphi.
105 g cooperative involvement of these miRNAs in MDDC differentiation.
106               The reduced levels of PAFAH in MDDC could be attributed to lower levels of expression o
107 duced a potent type I interferon response in MDDC.
108 in MDDCs alone and in cell-to-cell spread in MDDC-CD4(+) T cell cocultures.
109 thogens in the gut promote RALDH activity in MDDCs, especially in CD16(+) MDDCs, and subsequently imp
110 tion, as measured by HIV-1-DNA and p24 Ag in MDDCs.
111 powerful in reducing HIV-1 infection both in MDDCs and T cells.
112 IV was recruited to sites of cell contact in MDDCs.
113  virus-induced production of the cytokine in MDDCs.
114        The reduction in the pool of dNTPs in MDDCs appears rather mostly due to a p21-mediated suppre
115 ce tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression in MDDCs via, in part, Raf-1 signaling pathways.
116 onal and DNA-binding activities increased in MDDCs upon exposure to the MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126.
117 ced replication-competent HIV-1 infection in MDDCs, while it modestly promoted viral infection in act
118                          Induction of p21 in MDDCs decreases the pool of dNTPs and increases the anti
119 ively suppressed dengue virus replication in MDDCs and macrophages.
120 egration restriction of HIV-1 replication in MDDCs and show that the interaction of Vpr with the DCAF
121 at are able to restrict HIV-1 replication in MDDCs by inducing hypermutations in the viral genome.
122     This restriction of HIV-1 replication in MDDCs was observed in a single round of virus replicatio
123 y proteins and restrict HIV-1 replication in MDDCs while keeping an immature nonmigratory phenotype,
124 are able to restrict HIV-1BaL replication in MDDCs without significant induction of A3G, A3A, or A3F.
125 pression and restricted viral replication in MDDCs.
126 pr-deficient virus replication and spread in MDDCs alone and in cell-to-cell spread in MDDC-CD4(+) T
127 e downstream effectors of galectin-1-induced MDDC activation and migration.
128 ired for the histamine effect on LPS-induced MDDC responses.
129 sferable with supernatants from RSV-infected MDDC and was not due to transfer of live virus or RSV F
130               Supernatants from RSV-infected MDDC, but not MDDC exposed to UV-killed RSV or mock cond
131 ort processes in single-cycle HIV-1 infected MDDCs, but not in CD4(+) T-cells.
132 nt of proviral integration in HIV-1-infected MDDCs was unaffected by the absence of Vpr, the transcri
133               Furthermore, in HIV-1-infected MDDCs, significant downregulation of CD4 by Nef expressi
134 ions in the env genes from HIV-1BaL-infected MDDCs treated with low quantities of IFN-alpha2b.
135 us-stripped supernatants from HSV-2-infected MDDCs were shown to enhance HIV-1 infection, as measured
136 e supernatant and also within HSV-2-infected MDDCs.
137 , we now demonstrate that T. gondii-infected MDDCs are poor at activating T lymphocytes and are unabl
138            T lymphocytes exposed to infected MDDCs are significantly impaired in upregulation of CD69
139                               Interestingly, MDDCs but not MDCs were protected against IAV infection
140 ects have a propensity to differentiate into MDDC and that this differentiation may be related to the
141 nsity of LJP monocytes to differentiate into MDDC may have important implications for both the host r
142 ropensity of monocytes to differentiate into MDDC.
143  of 81A, was low in both immature and mature MDDCs.
144 defect in HIV replication observed in mature MDDCs stems at least in part from a decline in viral fus
145 results suggest that nonhuman primate mature MDDCs can be genetically engineered to function as alloa
146 sed with markedly lower efficiency to mature MDDCs than immature DCs.
147 C-SIGN interactions, while binding to mature MDDCs was partly independent of DC-SIGN, suggesting that
148 d endocytic capacity, similar to LPS-matured MDDCs.
149 of MDDCs was also induced; moreover, matured MDDCs induced proliferation of autologous CD4(+) T cells
150      Dendritic cells derived from monocytes (MDDCs) in the presence of IL-10 render the MDDCs less re
151                                    Moreover, MDDCs pulsed with 381 also stimulated a higher autologou
152 Supernatants from RSV-infected MDDC, but not MDDC exposed to UV-killed RSV or mock conditions, contai
153 on with TLR7/8 ligand protected MDCs but not MDDCs from IAV infection.
154 sion of 20 miRNAs during days 1, 3, and 5 of MDDC differentiation.
155 onse by regulating the accessory activity of MDDC.
156              Like LJP monocytes, cultures of MDDC generated with interleukin-4 and granulocyte-macrop
157 )-induced upregulation of surface markers of MDDC maturation and did not prevent LPS-triggered alloge
158 r both CT and LT to induce the maturation of MDDC and that this activation is strictly cyclic AMP (cA
159 5'-AMP and Forskolin mimic the maturation of MDDC induced by CT and LT.
160  these toxins failed to induce maturation of MDDC, whereas dibutyryl-cyclic-3',5'-AMP and Forskolin m
161                           This activation of MDDCs is often accompanied by upregulation of apolipopro
162 t time, in vitro chronic alcohol exposure of MDDCs modulates H3 and H4 and induces a significant incr
163  found to be sufficient for the induction of MDDCs that prime Th2-skewed T cell responses.
164                      The HTLV-1 infection of MDDCs also was achieved in blood myeloid DCs following t
165 was shown to play a role in the infection of MDDCs as well as model B-cell lines.
166 d not affect single-cycle viral infection of MDDCs, suggesting that newly synthesized Vpr plays a sig
167                 Interestingly, infections of MDDCs with viruses that encode Vpr mutants unable to int
168 P. gingivalis (10 micro g/ml), maturation of MDDCs was also induced; moreover, matured MDDCs induced
169 ntially affects the ET-induced maturation of MDDCs while not inhibiting ET-induced migration.
170 creased, by lipopolysaccharide maturation of MDDCs.
171 d Ara h 1 induced Erk 1/2 phosphorylation of MDDCs, consistent with previous reports on the effect of
172  to the maintenance of the immature state of MDDCs and myeloid DCs is partly dependent on the activit
173 lammatory responses following stimulation of MDDCs with activators of RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) signa
174 oinflammatory responses after stimulation of MDDCs with RIG-I activators.
175 creased infectivity but had little effect on MDDC maturation.
176 ans and was substantially more infectious on MDDC and MDM than the wild-type virus.
177 esults show that the effects of CT and LT on MDDC are mediated by cAMP.
178 lectin-1 binding to surface CD43 and CD45 on MDDCs induced an unusual unipolar co-clustering of these
179 lated Syk to the CD43 and CD45 co-cluster on MDDCs.
180 ulatory molecule ICOS and the ICOS ligand on MDDCs amplified nucleotide-binding oligomerization domai
181 nsmission was observed when CD4 molecules on MDDCs and DC-SIGN-CD4-expressing cell lines were blocked
182 Ab to TNF-alpha and its receptor, TNF-R1, on MDDCs markedly inhibited the CCR5-stimulating effect of
183 ere, we identify the galectin-1 receptors on MDDCs and immediate downstream effectors of galectin-1-i
184 and JAG1 expression was important for proper MDDC differentiation.
185                                           Rh MDDC transduction with Ad vectors using conventional met
186 immune responses induced by control AdGFP Rh MDDC in an antigen-specific manner.
187                      Notably, AdTGF-beta1 Rh MDDC abrogated alloimmune responses induced by control A
188 overexpress active TGF-beta1 (AdTGF-beta1 Rh MDDC) significantly suppressed alloimmune responses in [
189 sduction of Rh MDDCs by retargeting Ad to Rh MDDC CD40.
190                                           Rh MDDCs were modified by recombinant adenovirus (Ad) trans
191 method that allogeneic mature AdTGF-beta1 Rh MDDCs inhibited proliferation of CD4 and CD8 responder T
192                                    Mature Rh MDDCs that were transduced to overexpress active TGF-bet
193 permitted high-efficiency transduction of Rh MDDCs by retargeting Ad to Rh MDDC CD40.
194 nhibition of both miR-21 and miR-34a stalled MDDC differentiation, as quantified by DC-SIGN/CD14 expr
195 nously added Wnt-1 and Jagged-1 also stalled MDDC differentiation, suggesting that miRNA-mediated inh
196  in a reduced ability of the HMPV-stimulated MDDC to activate CD4(+) T cells.
197 ependent on contact between virus-stimulated MDDC and CD4(+) T cells.
198 n memory CD4(+) T cells and virus-stimulated MDDC.
199 itic cells (MDDC) in vitro and on subsequent MDDC maturation and activation of autologous T cells.
200                         Histamine suppressed MDDC chemokine and proinflammatory cytokine secretion, n
201  to modulate the immunological status of the MDDC.
202 ions, consistent with differentiation to the MDDC phenotype.
203  (MDDCs) in the presence of IL-10 render the MDDCs less responsive to maturation stimuli, such as lip
204 ll were recruited to the interface while the MDDCs concentrated HIV to the same region.
205        BPI-enhanced delivery of the blebs to MDDC did not increase cell activation but permitted CD14
206 -fold) in delivery of (14)C-labeled blebs to MDDC, but not to monocyte-derived macrophages in the pre
207 DC-SIGN expressing cell lines, as well as to MDDCs.
208 levels of inflammatory cytokines compared to MDDCs.
209  gingivalis DPG3, efficiently gains entry to MDDCs in a manner dependent on active cell metabolism an
210 , unlike LPS-matured DCs, galectin-1-treated MDDCs did not produce the Th1-polarizing cytokine IL-12.
211 ocytes differentiated into either cell type, MDDC contained significantly less PAFAH than did Mphi an
212                                         When MDDCs were pulsed with recombinant fimbrillin of P. ging
213 d not increase association of the blebs with MDDC.

 
Page Top