ライフサイエンスコーパス: MR imaging

1 s separately for CE spectral mammography and MR imaging.

2 mammography surveillance in addition to DCE MR imaging.

3 s a screening tool in patients scheduled for MR imaging.

4 amination results, and biopsy results before MR imaging.

5 136 (84%) were correctly identified with MP MR imaging.

6 atio should routinely be reported at cardiac MR imaging.

7 MR imaging and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging.

8 in 9 patients were diagnosed TART on US and MR imaging.

9 Informed consent was obtained for MR imaging.

10 ues were calculated for both mammography and MR imaging.

11 ional MR image and evaluated it in brain PET/MR imaging.

12 with that at gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging.

13 computed tomography (CT) followed by TOF PET/MR imaging.

14 ay affect attenuation correction (AC) in PET/MR imaging.

15 s findings was performed between ZTE and SOC MR imaging.

16 myeloma with precision comparable to that of MR imaging.

17 g and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging.

18 phs with a higher accuracy than conventional MR imaging.

19 our algorithm using cine compared to tagged MR imaging.

20 ty of this miRNA in conjunction with in vivo MR imaging.

21 agreement for interpretation of biparametric MR imaging.

22 n in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

23 ogression at posttherapy magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

24 th a tin filter) and 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

25 at multiparametric (MP) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

26 were undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

27 nts referred for cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

28 neurologic findings, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

29 em cell transplants with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

30 in patients examined with MR imaging (before MR imaging: 0.13 foci per cell +/- 0.02; 5 minutes after

31 phocytes increased after CT exposure (before MR imaging: 0.14 foci per cell +/- 0.05; 5 minutes after

32 ubjects with DCIS who underwent preoperative MR imaging, 14 experienced recurrence and 11 had an iden

33 ntermediately suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (31 mutations per sample +/- 15), and high-gr

34 - 19), mildly suspicious via multiparametric MR imaging (37 mutations per sample +/- 21), intermediat

35 nts with IPH at baseline magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (53 carotids with IPH) were randomly selecte

36 nterval: 83.4%, 86.5%) and was high for both MR imaging (97.1%; 95% confidence interval: 96.7%, 97.5%

37 Results Patients underwent MR imaging a mean 12.6 days +/- 5.6 (standard deviation)

38 Materials and Methods A PET/MR imaging AC pipeline was built by using a deep learnin

39 Seventy-seven patients underwent unenhanced MR imaging after equivocal US findings, yielding an over

40 an activatable molecular magnetic resonance (MR) imaging agent specific for myeloperoxidase (MPO) act

41 Conclusion Biparametric MR imaging allows detection of clinically significant pr

42 Results MR imaging alone showed true-positive lesions in five pa

43 ere performed for DCIS components visible at MR imaging alone.

44 in mice and could be observed by both (13) C-MR imaging and (13) C-NMR spectroscopy in vivo.

45 s in situ) were diagnosed, 43 were seen with MR imaging and 14 with both mammography and MR imaging.

46 E levels between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging and among readers was substantial (kappa = 0.

47 Here we report the use of advances in MR imaging and analysis to accurately measure global, lo

48 sions classified as PI-RADS category 3 at DW MR imaging and as positive at DCE imaging in the PZ show

49 etrospectively reviewed cancers missed at MP MR imaging and assigned a Prostate Imaging Reporting and

50 ersus full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging and between-reader agreement for interpretati

51 s performed by using software at T2-weighted MR imaging and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted MR

52 Significant variance was observed for MR imaging and direct MR arthrography (P < .001) studies

53 T(1rho) MR imaging and Dixon water-fat MR imaging of the affecte

54 DCE MR imaging and FFD mammography combined yielded the high

55 irect MR arthrography compared with those of MR imaging and indirect MR arthrography.

56 were quantified by using water-fat separated MR imaging and manual segmentations.

57 cts underwent a 3-T resting-state functional MR imaging and static posturography.

58 00 consecutive patients who had undergone MP MR imaging and subsequent radical prostatectomy.

59 T in the residual lesion identified at brain MR imaging and survival time in 56 patients with gliobla

60 mapping between preoperative multiparametric MR imaging and the gland.

61 fants with CHD (n = 49) using phase contrast MR imaging and the relationship between CDO(2) and voxel

62 nclusion Multiregion spatial multiparametric MR imaging and whole-exome radiogenomic analysis of pros

63 Results Radiogenomic multiparametric MR imaging and whole-exome spatial characterization in s

64 LS174T-xenografts using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and fluorescence whole body imaging, which r

65 ined approach of ex vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and histopathological analysis, we observed

66 ze claustrophobia during magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to explore the potential of the 26-item

67 Screening examinations (magnetic resonance [MR] imaging and mammography) for women at increased brea

68 and myocardial function were assessed by 1H MRS imaging and MRI at 3 T.

69 utes 45 seconds (referred to as biparametric MR imaging), and established a diagnosis according to th

70 rmed on the two main concepts of MR imaging (MR imaging, and direct and indirect MR arthrography) and

71 ean sensitivities of direct MR arthrography, MR imaging, and indirect MR arthrography for SLAP tear d

72 morphology, mass margins at mammography and MR imaging, and nonmass enhancement at MR imaging have t

73 ast agent-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and biannual automated breast (AB) ultrason

74 uted tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and the potential effect of reader demograp

75 y and accuracy of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as a supplemental screening tool in women at

76 entricle followed by ex vivo high-resolution MR imaging at 17.6 T with an image voxel volume two orde

77 -art, full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0-T including high-spatial-resolution st

78 2)-18.9] ms; p = 0.001) was found on carotid MR imaging at 48 hrs following the ferumoxytol infusion.

79 tid artery disease) had ferumoxytol-enhanced MR imaging at the optimal imaging window.

80 c glucose-enhanced (DGE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7.0 T.

81 Conclusion The most accurate MR imaging-based diagnostic criteria for PCOS were OV, F

82 onography (US) and other magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based parameters.

83 therapy and radiation therapy, who underwent MR imaging before final surgery between June 2011 and Ju

84 with 85 breast cancers who underwent breast MR imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy between April

85 ions were observed in patients examined with MR imaging (before MR imaging: 0.13 foci per cell +/- 0.

86 ive dynamic contrast material-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging between 2004 and 2014 with ipsilateral recurr

87 use of radiologic deterioration at follow-up MR imaging between 2006 and 2015.

88 the low versus high BPE groups at diagnostic MR imaging, biopsy recommendation rate was 325 of 1443 v

89 Cardiac MR imaging can evaluate with accuracy a variety of progn

90 sy strategies were further evaluated in each MR imaging category: (a) biopsy with cognitive guidance,

91 resting-state functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, cerebellar dentate nuclei (DNs) functional

92 icantly higher for irregular mass margins at MR imaging compared with spiculated mass margins (24.0 v

93 s such as T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted MR imaging could reveal imaging biomarkers associated wi

94 We used diffusion MR imaging data and the Tract-Based Spatial Statistics a

95 t squares algorithm from multiecho spin-echo MR imaging data.

96 y acquired, 3-dimensional spatially resolved MRS imaging data, were compared.

97 mor, whereas gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging demonstrated peripheral contrast enhancement.

98 ed 11 of the 11 secondary cancers (100%) and MR imaging depicted 10 (91%).

99 Screening MR imaging depicted 146 cancers, and 35 interval cancers

100 On a per-patient basis, MP MR imaging depicted clinically important prostate cancer

101 forcement of any a priori assumptions on the MR imaging-derived measurements and with a multivariate

102 second near-infrared (NIR) window and T(1) -MR imaging due to the released Mn(2+) , and inhibited or

103 Longitudinal T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic MR spectroscopy of hyperpolarized py

104 uantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging, even at 1.5 T, to offset significant systemi

105 ver biopsy samples underwent MPO-Gd-enhanced MR imaging ex vivo and subsequent histologic evaluation.

106 glumine (plus a final additional nonenhanced MR imaging examination) were evaluated.

107 e, as well as 5 minutes and 30 minutes after MR imaging examination.

108 ltiparametric diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination followed by MR imaging-guided bi

109 4 volunteers underwent a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination in which images were acquired be

110 thods A total of 121 consecutive whole-spine MR imaging examinations (63 men; mean age +/- standard d

111 ely recruited and underwent two separate 3-T MR imaging examinations 6 months apart.

112 ntification with cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging feature tracking is associated with the seve

113 We thus conducted a detailed analysis of the MR imaging findings in 45 HIV- and 11 HIV+ patients to i

114 -up; 1, US follow-up; 2, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging follow-up; and 3, surgical evaluation.

115 medical centers who were undergoing cardiac MR imaging for assessment of LV dysfunction with EF less

116 appears to be more accurate than nonenhanced MR imaging for diagnosis of SLAP tears, whereas 3-T MR i

117 of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR Imaging for evaluation of arteriovenous shunting and

118 elop evidence-based algorithms for use of CT/MR imaging for eye complaints that can help balance bene

119 s carried out for utilizing simultaneous PET/MR imaging for five subjects by using the proposed appro

120 sion A staged algorithm of US and unenhanced MR imaging for pediatric appendicitis appears to be effe

121 sk who underwent CE spectral mammography and MR imaging for screening or staging from 2010 through 20

122 ose To assess the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for diagnosis of malignancy in lesions that

123 nctional lung (SENCEFUL) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for quantitative ventilation (QV) imaging in

124 y conditional unenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the imaging work-up of pediatric appendi

125 targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-MR imaging fusion biopsy systems.

126 Cardiac MR imaging guided the initiation and withdrawal of antic

127 sonance (MR) imaging examination followed by MR imaging-guided biopsy strategies in the detection of

128 The following three MR imaging-guided biopsy strategies were further evaluat

129 maging/US fusion guidance, and (c) in-gantry MR imaging-guided biopsy.

130 tate free-precession sequences were used for MR imaging-guided catheterization, balloon dilation, and

131 A modified clinical MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound brain system was us

132 se features are evidence of the potential of MR imaging-guided HIFU to be part of a routine strategy

133 The durable clinical efficacy and safety of MR imaging-guided HIFU were demonstrated.

134 -five of the 50 recruited patients underwent MR imaging-guided HIFU.

135 Standard and micro MR imaging guidewires were most suitable for the iliac c

136 MR imaging has the potential to provide essential inform

137 y and MR imaging, and nonmass enhancement at MR imaging have the potential to serve as imaging biomar

138 Biparametric MR imaging helped detect clinically significant prostate

139 Conclusion Breast MR imaging improves depiction of DCIS components of inva

140 healthy volunteers underwent phase-contrast MR imaging in a fasting state and again after a standard

141 trong signals were detected in vivo with PET/MR imaging in atherosclerotic plaques of the abdominal a

142 The validity of DW MR imaging in diagnosing APN was assessed by deriving se

143 To assess the role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differentiation between Graves' disease an

144 ntilation by using dynamic (19)F gas washout MR imaging in free breathing is feasible at 1.5 T even i

145 Conclusion T1rho-weighted DGE MR imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with newly

146 ssels were estimated by using phase-contrast MR imaging in healthy volunteers to allow hemodynamic as

147 rametric contrast material-enhanced prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antige

148 provides complementary information to CT and MR imaging in the characterization of nodules in high-ri

149 The validity report of DW MR imaging in the detection of APN showed a very high se

150 ization and segmentation of rectal cancer in MR imaging in the majority of patients.

151 should be preferred over diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the staging of liver fibrosis.

152 ssess the validity of DW magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with contrast-enhanced compute

153 ed biparametric prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with full multiparametric cont

154 was recorded from brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with fCCM.

155 l mammography and breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of index and secondary canc

156 63 years) who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, including high-b-value DWI and DTI at 3.0 T

157 Diffusion-weighted MR imaging indicated differences in the underlying muscl

158 Between-reader agreement of biparametric MR imaging interpretation was substantial (kappa = 0.81)

159 ancement (BPE) on breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging interpretive performance in a large multi-in

160 l MAPSE measured during routine cine cardiac MR imaging is a significant independent predictor of mor

161 Increased ADC(L) on diffusion MR imaging is associated with high DCN expression as wel

162 Conclusion SENCEFUL MR imaging is feasible for QV assessment.

163 MR imaging is the gold standard for diagnosis.

164 In addition, MR imaging is useful to rule out other causes of acute c

165 Cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is one of the most rigorous form of imaging

166 Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the best modality to diagnose both the de

167 Conclusion Serial multiparametric MR imaging mapping can be used to evaluate cartilage bey

168 rmine if multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging mapping can be used to quantify the response

169 sociated with volumetric and microstructural MR imaging markers of subclinical brain damage.

170 Targeted prostate biopsy by using MR imaging may thus help to reduce false-negative result

171 ross-sectional area, echogenicity) and 3.0-T MR imaging measurements (thickness, width, cross-section

172 Voxel-wise R2 and R2* magnetic resonance (MR) imaging measurements were obtained before, immediate

173 MR imaging measures of brain perfusion and metabolism we

174 otherapy doses correlated significantly with MR imaging measures of left ventricular ejection fractio

175 ether combining multiple magnetic resonance (MR) imaging modalities such as T1-weighted and diffusion

176 ch was performed on the two main concepts of MR imaging (MR imaging, and direct and indirect MR arthr

177 Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MRI) is an effective modality for classifyi

178 observer dependence.(C) RSNA, 2020Keywords: MR-Imaging, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance, Out

179 400 mm(2)/sec, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, obtained without endorectal coil within 34 m

180 ore target specific information to molecular MR imaging of atherosclerosis.

181 rst example of using metal ion redox for the MR imaging of pathologic change in vivo.

182 T(1rho) MR imaging and Dixon water-fat MR imaging of the affected upper arms were performed bef

183 Based on the generated hypothesis, DW MR imaging of the kidneys seems to be highly sensitive a

184 They underwent diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the orbit.

185 ively accrued study population who underwent MR imaging of the prostate including transverse T1-weigh

186 Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the thyroid gland was performed in patient

187 tid artery disease underwent high-resolution MR imaging of their carotid arteries on a 1.5 T MR syste

188 Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of donor-matched and mismatched stem cell tr

189 Pharma, Berlin, Germany) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the abdomen and pelvis was performed at 8

190 rwent dual-energy CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the axial skeleton.

191 Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain and the right ankle had been pe

192 Multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the prostate is more reliably able to loc

193 and zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the shoulder.

194 rodeoxyglucose (FDG) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the upper abdomen.

195 material-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of transient bone marrow edema syndrome (TBM

196 ponding centers of mass in (18)F-FET PET and MRS imaging of Cho/NAA, determined by simultaneously acq

197 sine ((18)F-FET) and proton MR spectroscopy (MRS) imaging of cell turnover measured by the ratio of c

198 here each of the first 13 subjects underwent MR imaging on three separate occasions to determine long

199 evels with neonates who underwent unenhanced MR imaging or CT.

200 Frequent MR imaging over 2 days of 38 untreated LVO patients reve

201 of cartilage changes at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging over 48 months in overweight and obese parti

202 valuate whether publication year, functional MR imaging paradigm, magnetic field strength, statistica

203 to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the MR imaging parameters for discriminating between acute a

204 Whole-lung and lobar (129)Xe MR imaging parameters were obtained by using automated s

205 ial infarction and are superior to all other MR imaging parameters.

206 n level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging parameters in normal pregnancies and those c

207 umor subtype and various magnetic resonance (MR) imaging parameters in the assessment of tumor respon

208 distinguished more objectively from a normal MR imaging pattern by adding quantitative diffusion-weig

209 A diffuse MR imaging pattern can be distinguished more objectively

210 ) for the diagnosis of a diffuse (vs normal) MR imaging pattern, whereas an ADC greater than 0.597 x

211 For hepatic MR imaging PDFF, intra- and interexamination intraclass

212 not associated with sarcopenia.Keywords: CT, MR-Imaging, Pediatrics(C) RSNA, 2020.

213 l axial 3-T DCE breast MRI.Keywords: Breast, MR-Imaging, Phantom Studies(C) RSNA, 2020.

214 erged field of radiogenomics allows specific MR imaging phenotypes to be linked with gene expression

215 ization and measure the concentration of the MR imaging probe Gadofluorine P in plaque tissue ex vivo

216 ions for modification of treatment.Keywords: MR-Imaging, Prostate, Radiation Therapy(C) RSNA, 2020See

217 Conclusion The modified MR imaging protocol allowed for identification of the ep

218 d in the diagnostic performance of the short MR imaging protocol consisting of only transverse T2-wei

219 ng were tasked to develop a 20-30-minute PET/MR imaging protocol for detection of chemotherapy-induce

220 The standard MR imaging protocol image set contained images from all

221 quency coils, and an optimized gradient-echo MR imaging protocol was used to achieve signal sensitivi

222 uded in the dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging protocol with a 1.5-T MR imaging system.

223 0.64, 0.89), and for readers of the standard MR imaging protocol, areas under the curve were 0.71-0.7

224 o 0.5 mL for any of the readers of the short MR imaging protocol, with areas under the curve in the r

225 ared with that of a standard multiparametric MR imaging protocol.

226 ance with an alternative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol (sagittal spin-echo Dixon T2-weight

227 mission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol for evaluation of the brain, heart,

228 e if a modified clinical magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol provides information on the origin

229 lidation of more predictive and translatable MR imaging protocols that can be used as critical diagno

230 ional full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocols.

231 y role and should be included in the routine MR imaging protocols.

232 ative diffusion-weighted imaging to standard MR imaging protocols.

233 % CI: 0.42, 0.68) for the short and standard MR imaging protocols.

234 Medical images such as magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provide valuable information for cancer dete

235 Conclusion ZTE MR imaging provides "CT-like" contrast for bone.

236 MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Population-based CT/MR imaging rates and independent factors associated with

237 wer cartilage degeneration, as assessed with MR imaging; rates of progression were lower with greater

238 Positive predictive value for MR imaging recalls was 9.3% (95% CI: 6.83%, 12.36%) and

239 in volumes determined by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, reduced dentate neurogenesis moderately cor

240 Conclusion MR imaging repeatability is better for global texture pa

241 ension underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, right-sided heart catheterization, and 6-mi

242 omography (CT) scans; 26 magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scans).

243 In women at average risk for breast cancer, MR imaging screening improves early diagnosis of prognos

244 nvestigate the types of cancer detected with MR imaging screening.

245 e language task (P = .02), longer functional MR imaging session times (P < .01), visual presentation

246 sitivity for studies with shorter functional MR imaging session times (P = .03) and relaxed statistic

247 MR imaging showed a higher performance than MDCT in per-

248 ated volume and average ADC at lobar (129)Xe MR imaging showed correlation with percentage emphysema

249 In our patient cohort, MR imaging showed signs of cortical dysgenesis leading t

250 No detectable neural tissue deposition or MR imaging signal was observed in control rats (n = 6).

251 Of 2044 MR imaging studies in the diagnostic group, 1443 were cl

252 Meta-analyses were performed that compared MR imaging studies to direct MR arthrography studies and

253 , 3-T studies to 1.5-T studies, and low-bias MR imaging studies to low-bias direct MR arthrography st

254 69 carotid MR imaging studies were completed.

255 were recruited and underwent 3861 screening MR imaging studies, covering an observation period of 70

256 38-40 unique studies (equal number of CT and MR imaging studies, uniformly distributed LI-RADS catego

257 usly been implicated in autism in functional MR imaging studies.

258 Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies have demonstrated reduced global and

259 Differentiated analysis of MR imaging subgroups again revealed no significant chang

260 dded value to yearly FFD mammography and DCE MR imaging surveillance of carriers of the BRCA mutation

261 By using a 3-T MR imaging system, intermediate-weighted turbo spin-echo

262 nced breast MR imaging protocol with a 1.5-T MR imaging system.

263 time-of-flight (TOF) PET/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging system.

264 Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (T1-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging)

265 Biparametric prostate MR imaging takes less than 9 minutes examination time, w

266 argeted prostate biopsy, including in-gantry MR imaging-targeted biopsy and real-time transrectal US-

267 Here we show by in vivo fluorescence and MR imaging, that LN paracortical zones are profoundly ac

268 Between CE spectral mammography and MR imaging, the intrareader agreement ranged from modera

269 The optimum MR imaging time for carotid atheroma is 48 hrs after its

270 th histological assessment); and the optimum MR imaging time to detect maximum quantitative signal ch

271 haracterization by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to discriminate allergic bronchopulmonary as

272 Keywords: Abdomen/GI, Liver, MR-Imaging, Treatment Effects, Tumor Response (C) RSNA,

273 eks and were imaged with a 7.0-T preclinical MR imaging unit at baseline and 1 week after the last CC

274 fter the procedure by using a 1.5-T clinical MR imaging unit.

275 ons, and, finally, the field strength of the MR imaging unit.

276 inary results is required.Keywords: Adrenal, MR-Imaging, UrinarySupplemental material is available fo

277 psy with cognitive guidance, (b) biopsy with MR imaging/US fusion guidance, and (c) in-gantry MR imag

278 aT(2)) between baseline and post-Ferumoxytol MR imaging using 3D DANTE MEFGRE qT(2)*w and iMSDE black

279 Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR imaging using quantitative 3D MR pulse sequences allo

280 MR imaging visibility and mechanical properties were ass

281 Fifty-five vessel wall MR imaging (VWI) exams were included in this retrospecti

282 The cancer detection rate for MR imaging was 21.8 cancers per 1000 examinations (95% C

283 ed sensitivity and specificity of functional MR imaging was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14%, 7

284 ostic accuracy of perfusion CT and perfusion MR imaging was 63% (58 of 92) and 75% (69 of 92), respec

285 MR imaging was performed before and after administration

286 Breast MR imaging was performed before and after treatment.

287 MR imaging was performed before and at 24, 48, 72 and 96

288 Using simultaneous PET/MR imaging, we show that methylphenidate-induced changes

289 Sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging were 96% and 78% respectively, and those of m

290 imaging algorithm in which US and unenhanced MR imaging were performed in pediatric patients suspecte

291 Ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were performed.

292 In the interpretation of SRU guidelines with MR imaging when it was an option, proportions of any neo

293 the initial modality followed by unenhanced MR imaging when US findings were equivocal.

294 hted; and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging with a 3-T imager at a single institution wer

295 r patients undergoing standard-of-care (SOC) MR imaging with concomitant CT were enrolled in this ins

296 ing for diagnosis of SLAP tears, whereas 3-T MR imaging with or without intra-articular contrast mate

297 rove diagnostic accuracy compared with 1.5-T MR imaging with or without intra-articular contrast mate

298 not) who underwent brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with a mixed fast spin-echo pulse sequence w

299 an brain tissue by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with inhaled hyperpolarized xenon 129 ((129)

300 auma who underwent 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging within 90 days of knee trauma.