戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              MRCP + analysis of 11 scans showed significant differenc
2                                              MRCP and ERCP images were read centrally by 3 radiologis
3                                              MRCP by using the respiratory-triggered isotropic 3D fas
4                                              MRCP findings were considered useful in all those cases.
5                                              MRCP findings were correlated with those at direct chola
6                                              MRCP has a high sensitivity in detecting choledocholithi
7                                              MRCP has high sensitivity and very high specificity for
8                                              MRCP image quality was also evaluated.
9                                              MRCP image quality was not interpretable in two cases du
10                                              MRCP image was typical in 4 out of 9 malignant cases.
11                                              MRCP images were separated into 3-T (n = 361) and 1.5-T
12                                              MRCP is a reliable non-invasive imaging method for demon
13                                              MRCP is often used for patients with abnormal LFTs, pote
14                                              MRCP is the method of choice in diagnosing pathologies o
15                                              MRCP may obviate ERCP, particularly in patients who cann
16                                              MRCP obviated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogr
17                                              MRCP revealed pancreatic duct strictures in two and scle
18                                              MRCP scans were subsequently analysed using MRCP + softw
19                                              MRCP successfully detected hepatobiliary and pancreatic
20                                              MRCP technique utilizes T2-weighted sequences, in which
21                                              MRCP was performed at 1.5 T in 53 consecutive patients (
22                                              MRCP was performed in a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Philips) with
23                                              MRCP yielded an accuracy of 100% in determining the pres
24                                              MRCP-based two-dimensional brain maps were created to il
25                                              MRCPs produced by finger taps were markedly reduced in P
26                                              MRCPs were derived from back-averaging the electroenceph
27                                              MRCPs were performed with a 3-Tesla system using respira
28                                           19 MRCP + metrics correlated significantly with liver funct
29 258 patients were enrolled in the study; 251 MRCP image sets were assessed, and 236 patients had eval
30                             Additionally, 37 MRCP images obtained with a 3-T MRI scanner from a diffe
31 0%, 87%, and 76% (CT) and 70%, 92%, and 80% (MRCP), respectively.
32 nts were reported in 38.0% of patients after MRCP and 68.1% after ERCP.
33 Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR ima
34 ancreas MR imaging protocol that included an MRCP sequence.
35 anch pancreatic duct (BPD) IPMNs with CT and MRCP, respectively.
36 ion of malignancy were calculated for CT and MRCP.
37       Very good correlation between ERCP and MRCP findings was demonstrated.
38 nd biliary ducts as depicted on the ERCP and MRCP images.
39                                      GGT and MRCP + metrics were significantly higher in ASC compared
40 enhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR images, and MRCP images with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dyn
41                               An appropriate MRCP protocol and knowledge of the different findings th
42                                           At MRCP, segments not detected or mischaracterized were eit
43 t are almost equivalent to those provided at MRCP.
44 f 196 segments analyzed, 17 were not seen at MRCP (sensitivity, 91%).
45                Of the segments visualized at MRCP, 14 were incorrectly characterized (accuracy, 92%).
46                Patients underwent a baseline MRCP that was immediately followed by administration of
47 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatigraphy (MRCP) is the imaging modality of choice.
48 R) imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), four patients; endoscopic ultrasonography (US), 2
49 tic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), because of an enlargement of the pancreatic duct
50 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, a
51 Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the best test to evaluate the intrahepatic and
52 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) studies.
53 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), a non-invasive imaging tool offering effective du
54 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), and T-tube cholangiogram.
55 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
56 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
57 ed immunodeficiency syndrome cholangiopathy, MRCP depicted the biliary tract as clearly as did ERCP (
58 liary dilatation, apart from cholelithiasis, MRCP picture is often atypical and therefore, the final
59 identified duct abnormalities in RG1068-cine MRCP image sets with significantly higher levels of sens
60 ructive jaundice (46.5%) was the most common MRCP indication, with imaging abnormalities observed in
61                                   Diagnostic MRCP examinations were obtained in 299 (99.7%) subjects.
62 retrospective study included two-dimensional MRCP datasets of 342 patients (45 years +/- 14 [SD]; 207
63 compatible findings based on two-dimensional MRCP was achievable and demonstrated high accuracy on in
64                                       Direct MRCP may be a feasible and potentially cost-effective di
65 domized into two diagnostic pathways, direct MRCP and standard care.
66 st and mean cost to diagnosis for the direct MRCP and standard of care group was 2.53 days, pound 449
67 4, and pound 647 respectively for the direct MRCP group and 4.18 days costing pound 742.06 and pound
68 s were enrolled over 12 months, 15 to direct MRCP and 11 to standard care.
69 contrast abdominal MRI and 3D fast spin-echo MRCP).
70                              RG1068-enhanced MRCP might also better identify patients in need of ther
71 nally, the indications for secretin-enhanced MRCP will be discussed to define which patients will ben
72 s review, the technique of secretin-enhanced MRCP, which has the aim to depict the whole pancreatic d
73 k-slab approach, while permitting the entire MRCP examination to be performed in a single breath hold
74                           After failed ERCP, MRCP delineated the pancreaticobiliary tract and helped
75 ications of E or PD had ductal anatomy (ERCP/MRCP) which predicted failure because of significant dis
76 vel of interobserver agreement in evaluating MRCP.
77 A(z)) was significantly (P < .05) larger for MRCP images interpreted with T1 - and T2-weighted images
78  included 224 patients who were referred for MRCP.
79  for reader 1, 0.8404 for reader 2) than for MRCP images alone (0.8144 for reader 1, 0.8122 for reade
80 atomy, tortuous anatomy) were evaluated from MRCP scans.
81                    Compared with images from MRCP, those from RG1068-stimulated MRCP are improved in
82  sensitivity (P < .0001) than in images from MRCP, with minimal loss of specificity.
83               A total of 37 patients who had MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) we
84                  The possible way to improve MRCP is using it with intravenous injection of hepatobil
85     Despite high inter-reader variability in MRCP interpretation, new AI technologies may automate an
86 cal check-up program that routinely includes MRCP studies.
87 MPH, FACC; Sanjay Sharma, BSc (Hons), MBChB, MRCP (UK), MD; Tamanna K.
88                            MATERIAL/METHODS: MRCP examinations of 148 patients (48 men and 100 women;
89  during eccentric than concentric movements, MRCP-indicated cortical activation was greater both in a
90 y tree was modelled using quantitative MRCP (MRCP +).
91 nt pain and jaundice.Detailed imaging by MRI/MRCP should be done.
92 etic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP), are helpful in the diagnosis of hydatid disease.
93 s were 94% and 13% for positive and negative MRCP results, respectively.
94 tic resonance imaging (MRI) machine obtained MRCPs following standard protocols, and key findings (e.
95                              The accuracy of MRCP and MR imaging in determining the presence and leve
96                              The accuracy of MRCP was evaluated using ERCP as the standard.
97 tation was determined mainly on the basis of MRCP and ECPW examinations, and, in individual cases, du
98 onhealthy control subjects), (c) blinding of MRCP image readers to reference-standard results, (d) pr
99                     Automated measurement of MRCP parameters shows promise in detecting obstruction.
100  abdominal 64-detector CT within 2 months of MRCP and/or ERCP.
101     Furthermore, the frequency and number of MRCP images necessary to achieve a temporal resolution a
102        For two observers, the sensitivity of MRCP was 93%, whereas the specificity was 75% for the fi
103               Sensitivity and specificity of MRCP for PSC detection across all studies were 0.86 and
104 ation and the sensitivity and specificity of MRCP obtained with 3T scanners in cases of bile duct obs
105 e administration of secretin, as depicted on MRCP images, will be illustrated.
106 res following confirmation of a stricture on MRCP.
107 D (>10-mm diameter), or thick septa at CT or MRCP may be used as independent predictors of malignancy
108  results, (d) prospective study with ERCP or MRCP performed after subject recruitment into the study,
109 ts underwent surveillance imaging via EUS or MRCP and seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria.
110 agnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) and their prevalence in our population.
111 agnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) evaluation and the sensitivity and specificity of
112 ges taken at different rotational angles per MRCP examination.
113 A, FACC; Sabiha Gati, BSc (Hons), MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FESC; Belinda Gray, BSc (Med), MBBS, PhD; Martin H
114 derived movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) is greater and occurs earlier for controlling huma
115         Movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) was derived by trigger-averaging 40 EEG epochs in
116 asured movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in these patients to determine whether cortical f
117 In patients with high pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled confirmation of PSC; in patients with low p
118  in patients with low pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled exclusion of PSC.
119              In many cases of suspected PSC, MRCP is sufficient for diagnosis, and, thus, the risks a
120                                 Quantitative MRCP metrics are a good discriminator of ASC from AIH.
121 biliary tree was modelled using quantitative MRCP (MRCP +).
122                            Half-Fourier RARE MRCP enables accurate evaluation of pancreaticobiliary d
123 -hold, heavily T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE MRCP was performed in 265 patients with suspected pancre
124                        By means of a regular MRCP protocol it was impossible to reveal any disorders
125 ameters signalled abnormalities, reinforcing MRCP's diagnostic significance.
126 lowed by administration of RG1068 and repeat MRCP and then underwent ERCP within 30 days; they were f
127                    Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and
128            This retrospective study reviewed MRCP images and records of patients with suspected bilia
129 med in a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Philips) with SSH MRCP 3DHR and SSHMRCP rad protocol.
130 to reveal disorders undetected by a standard MRCP.
131 synthetic human secretin (RG1068)-stimulated MRCP detects pancreatic duct abnormalities with higher l
132 ages from MRCP, those from RG1068-stimulated MRCP are improved in many aspects and could aid in diagn
133 ities with higher levels of sensitivity than MRCP.
134                                          The MRCP negative potential (NP) related to motor task prepa
135        Two independent readers evaluated the MRCP images for strictures, dilatation, and intraductal
136  the large pyramidal cells that generate the MRCP.
137                              The loss of the MRCP may serve as a useful marker of upper motor neuron
138 te spatial and temporal distributions of the MRCP signals.
139 e of this study was to determine whether the MRCP signals differ between the two types of maximal-eff
140  of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images to MRCP images with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images
141                 Sixty-one patients underwent MRCP and 54 patients underwent ERCP (21 patients underwe
142 age, 51 years; range, 15-91 years) underwent MRCP by using the respiratory-triggered isotropic 3D fas
143  MRCP scans were subsequently analysed using MRCP + software (Perspectum Ltd).
144  in which the diagnosis was identified using MRCP, whereas in the remaining 12 cases ECPW examination
145 anced dynamic images and heavily T2-weighted MRCP images.
146                                  T2-weighted MRCP included thick- and thin-slab single-shot fast spin
147 DTPA in combination with regular T2-weighted MRCP may be helpful in detecting anomalies of the biliar
148 ses to identify prospective studies in which MRCP was evaluated and compared with endoscopic retrogra
149 re reported to be temporally associated with MRCP and ERCP, respectively.
150 T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images with MRCP images significantly improved the diagnostic accura
151 Positive and negative likelihood ratios with MRCP were 15.3 and 0.15, respectively.

 
Page Top