戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 or and an R3-MYB repressor in monkeyflowers (Mimulus).
2 nct crosses within the flowering plant genus Mimulus.
3 urces currently under development are making Mimulus an excellent system for determining the genetic
4 he genomic resources currently available for Mimulus and discuss future directions for research.
5 oloration as a "superlocus" in a subclade of Mimulus and has contributed to subsequent phenotypic div
6 henotypic and genetic diversity in the genus Mimulus and highlight how direct genetic studies with Mi
7 ingbird-pollinated shrub, Diplacus (formerly Mimulus) aurantiacus, exhibited abundance patterns indic
8 between pairs of three monkeyflower species (Mimulus caespitosa, Mimulus tilingii, and Mimulus guttat
9 nd highlight how direct genetic studies with Mimulus can address a wide spectrum of ecological and ev
10 ids between a hummingbird-pollinated species Mimulus cardinalis and a self-pollinated species Mimulus
11 ndividuals, I investigated the demography of Mimulus cardinalis and Mimulus lewisii across the specie
12 d Mimulus lewisii and hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis are a model system for studying repro
13 pared evolutionary changes in populations of Mimulus cardinalis from historically different climates
14                                              Mimulus cardinalis LMS (McLMS) is weakly expressed and h
15                                              Mimulus cardinalis OS (McOS) is expressed similarly to M
16  Mimulus lewisii with hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis revealed that bees preferred large fl
17 Mimulus) species, the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis, and self-pollinated Mimulus parishii
18 mulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis.
19                                              Mimulus contains a wide array of phenotypic, ecological
20      The recently tetraploid luteus group of Mimulus contains five species native to central Chile, t
21                  Application of GOOGA to the Mimulus data corrects numerous errors (misplaced sequenc
22 unia and rice) than to PPRs elsewhere in the Mimulus genome.
23 d for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimu
24 d for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimu
25 two closely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.
26 shown that male sterility in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interacti
27 two closely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize t
28 species of yellow monkeyflowers, outcrossing Mimulus guttatus and selfing M. nasutus.
29 resulting from hybridisation between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two spec
30 we describe one such barrier between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus.
31 terns of endosperm and embryo development in Mimulus guttatus and the closely related, serpentine end
32               Here, we use the plant species Mimulus guttatus as a case study for understanding genet
33                     Leaf trichome density in Mimulus guttatus can be altered by the parental environm
34 ormance, resistance, and tolerance traits in Mimulus guttatus challenged with a generalist pathogen,
35  by identifying and targeting regions of the Mimulus guttatus genome containing large numbers of cand
36                                              Mimulus guttatus harbors extensive variation in critical
37 ation to copper mine soils in the wildflower Mimulus guttatus identified a locus that appeared to cau
38                                            * Mimulus guttatus in adjacent contrasting plant community
39 acterized in colonized roots of thermal soil Mimulus guttatus in both isolated plants supporting AMF
40               We use an annual population of Mimulus guttatus in which, in nature, seeds germinate in
41 on in 27 traits for 52 annual populations of Mimulus guttatus sampled from 10 altitudinal transects.
42 s of floral adaptation and speciation in the Mimulus guttatus species complex, we constructed a genet
43 populations of annuals and perennials in the Mimulus guttatus species complex.
44 phic microsatellite data for a population of Mimulus guttatus that has an intermediate selfing rate.
45 ing of a wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to precisely locate over 400,000 bounda
46           We grew in- and outbred progeny of Mimulus guttatus under six abiotic stress treatments (co
47 pittlebug (Philaenus spumarius) herbivory in Mimulus guttatus using a diallel cross-grown in a greenh
48  for flowering (MCD) in yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus) accessions from a geothermal soil mosa
49 s (Mimulus caespitosa, Mimulus tilingii, and Mimulus guttatus).
50 e natural population of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).
51 tural population of the yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).
52 flowering time within natural populations of Mimulus guttatus, collecting the early- and late-floweri
53  from a population of yellow monkey flowers, Mimulus guttatus, in Copperopolis, California, which rec
54    Applying this method to two datasets from Mimulus guttatus, we infer a strong signal of adaptive d
55 lly adapted populations of the monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.
56  estimate t and F in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus.
57 age map between two divergent populations of Mimulus guttatus.
58 lopment time, and male fitness components of Mimulus guttatus.
59 tness characters of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.
60 ion in a primarily outcrossing population of Mimulus guttatus.
61 rimarily outcrossing population of the plant Mimulus guttatus.
62 pes at three nested ecological scales within Mimulus guttatus: annual vs perennial life history races
63 s 699 References 699 SUMMARY: Monkeyflowers (Mimulus) have long been recognized as a classic ecologic
64 role for imprinted genes in the evolution of Mimulus hybrid seed lethality.
65 ) of cytoplasm-dependent anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids by identifying and targeting regions of
66 ar male sterility and other floral traits in Mimulus hybrids.
67               In interspecific monkeyflower (Mimulus) hybrids, a driving M. guttatus allele (D) exhib
68 have proven the experimental tractability of Mimulus in laboratory and field studies.
69 s developed here, these results suggest that Mimulus is an excellent platform for studying the geneti
70                              The plant genus Mimulus is rapidly emerging as a model system for studie
71 g patterns of gene flow of the annual plant, Mimulus laciniatus, at its warm range limit.
72 ted the demography of Mimulus cardinalis and Mimulus lewisii across the species' elevation ranges.
73                     The bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardi
74 rids between the bee-pollinated monkeyflower Mimulus lewisii and the closely related selfer Mimulus p
75                     The bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated M. cardin
76 es of monkeyflower: the bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus c
77 line' floral anthocyanin regulation model in Mimulus lewisii and to examine the different ways of tin
78                                              Mimulus lewisii flowers are visited primarily by bumbleb
79                                              Mimulus lewisii LMS (MlLMS) and OS (MlOS) are expressed
80  By analyzing a chemically induced mutant of Mimulus lewisii through bulk segregant analysis and tran
81 nalyze a chemically induced floral mutant of Mimulus lewisii through bulk segregant analysis and tran
82  hybrids produced by crossing bee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii with hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus card
83 noid pigments in the petals of pink-flowered Mimulus lewisii, which is pollinated by bumblebees, and
84 -dominant mutant in the monkeyflower species Mimulus lewisii, with a substantial decrease in corolla
85 rs, in the regulation of style elongation in Mimulus lewisii.
86 nd petals of an allotetraploid monkeyflower (Mimulus luteus).
87 ween diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two species that were introduced into th
88 ween diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus.
89 t recombination initiation described here in Mimulus may reflect ancient and conserved eukaryotic mec
90 nteny within the model flowering plant genus Mimulus (monkeyflowers).
91  guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasutus (selfer, spring flowering).
92  guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasutus (selfer, spring flowering).
93 lity in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interactions between a mitocho
94  and the closely related, serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus, and compare them to those of reciprocal
95                  These examples suggest that Mimulus offers ample opportunities to make exciting disc
96 between naturally hybridizing monkeyflowers, Mimulus parishii (self-pollinated) and M. cardinalis (hu
97 lus cardinalis and a self-pollinated species Mimulus parishii attract bumblebees (Bombus impatiens),
98 confocal imaging in the monkeyflower species Mimulus parishii to capture the spatiotemporal dynamics
99 mulus lewisii and the closely related selfer Mimulus parishii to determine the genetic basis of diver
100 ated Mimulus cardinalis, and self-pollinated Mimulus parishii.
101 n in a natural, <140-year-old allopolyploid (Mimulus peregrinus), a resynthesized interspecies triplo
102                               We surveyed 40 Mimulus populations from localities across the UK to exa
103 hat nearly complete hybrid male sterility in Mimulus results from a simple genetic incompatibility be
104  number in four replicate (cloned) arrays of Mimulus ringens (Scrophulariaceae), each consisting of g
105                    Within the monkeyflowers (Mimulus sect.
106   We isolated three allelic mutants from two Mimulus species displaying altered floral symmetry and i
107  between reciprocal hybrid seeds formed from Mimulus species that differ in effective ploidy.
108  be important in bee interactions with other Mimulus species, also played an important role in this n
109 ceptionally strong isolating barrier between Mimulus species, with reciprocal crosses producing < 1%
110 ulated rapidly between these closely related Mimulus species.
111 sity of floral anthocyanin patterns in other Mimulus species.
112 lian segregation distortion within and among Mimulus species.
113 enetic divergence has occurred between these Mimulus species.
114 ween a pair of closely related monkeyflower (Mimulus) species, the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus car
115  in related sympetalous species, Linaria and Mimulus, suggesting that changes in boundary gene activi
116 ee monkeyflower species (Mimulus caespitosa, Mimulus tilingii, and Mimulus guttatus).
117 pecies of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize the mechanisms and str
118 evolved recently in the monkeyflower species Mimulus verbenaceus.
119                                 This hybrid, Mimulus x robertsii, is largely sterile but capable of p
120 rt that a speciation locus in monkeyflowers (Mimulus), YELLOW UPPER (YUP), contains an inverted repea

 
Page Top