ライフサイエンスコーパス: PEF

1 PEF and heating (80 degrees C for 10 min) at pH 4 enhanc

2 PEF and heating at pH 4 enhanced the anti-inflammatory a

3 PEF and spirometry were recorded in 186 cases and 160 co

4 PEF caused a decrease in available free amino groups of

5 PEF could be a novel method to produce healthier reduced

6 PEF efficiently reduced fluorescent AGE formation in bre

7 PEF is a valid measure of health status in older persons

8 PEF processing at approximately 690kJ/kg and pH 4 increa

9 PEF treatment at 25 kV/cm at 50 degrees C denatures Pru

10 PEF treatments above 0.5kV/cm caused tubers to soften, b

11 PEF treatments did not affect the final temperatures of

12 PEF treatments did not affect the pH or total acidity of

13 PEF treatments were applied at 20 or 26 kV cm(-1) for 34

14 PEF used as food ingredient allows obtaining a tasty foo

15 PEF-1 CLE sample showed lower total volatile base conten

16 PEF-treated samples (T(2)) had significantly (p < 0.05)

17 PEFs are postulated to be caused by (i) plus-end-directe

18 PEFs are proposed to facilitate congression by pushing c

19 PEFs contained 40-47% of UA with low DM (24-49.9%), and

20 A PEF treatment of 3.4 kV/cm and 105 mus (35 pulses of 3 m

21 The application of a PEF treatment (2 kV/cm; 11.25 kJ/kg) to the olive paste

22 After PEF treatment at the electric field strength between 0.2

23 elerating uptake beginning immediately after PEF exposure and the other by high-level, accelerating f

24 enaturation was approximately 13% less after PEF treatments compared with the thermal treatments.

25 nifested sometimes hundreds of seconds after PEF exposure.

26 atment increased the extraction yield of all PEFs, but the existence of an additional positive effect

27 120 ml (6.1%), FVC within 150 ml (5.3%), and PEF within 0.80 L (12%).

28 heaosortase B in two of the same archaea and PEF-CTERM/archaeosortase C in four others.

29 , optimization of ion pair concentration and PEF parameters caused a 1.5 or 2-fold increase of magnes

30 second-highest FVC (dFVC), FEV1 (dFEV1), and PEF (dPEF), from prebronchodilator spirometry, and anthr

31 ciation was found between ozone exposure and PEF.

32 force components (K-fibre, spring force and PEF) acting on individual sister kinetochores in vivo.

33 e limits for repeatability of FEV1, FVC, and PEF during spirometry test sessions in adult outpatients

34 microbial safety, the impact of heat, HP and PEF pasteurisation on the volatile profile of orange jui

35 When HP and PEF treated samples were tested by the prick test, the s

36 ntly, pulsed electric technologies (HVED and PEF) show good prospects for enhanced bioaccessibility o

37 Pre-incubation with J. oxycedrus badia PEF for 24h protected neurons from injury in the neurode

38 ant effect on PEF (L/min), weekly home-based PEF, FVC, and FEV1.

39 eNO), clinical and lung function biomarkers (PEF, FVC,FEV(1)), we estimated this loss of adaptive cap

40 's peel into juice was maximally achieved by PEF.

41 treatment differences for HF (overall and by PEF and REF).

42 Furthermore, olive oil obtained by PEF showed total phenolic content, total phytosterols an

43 contents of flavonols in musts pretreated by PEF and TV were significantly higher comparing to the co

44 , kt-MT attachment stability is modulated by PEFs, which can be generated by distinct force-producing

45 (NOD/SCID)/beta2m-/- mice was unperturbed by PEFs.

46 Here, we describe a live-cell PEF assay in which tension was applied to chromosomes by

47 pre-treated with PEF and soaked with 1% CLE (PEF-1 CLE) showed lower melanosis score than that with 1

48 ) TACE procedures resulted in complications [PEF 28 (25.2%), NV 4 (3.6%), abdominal pain 9 (8.1%), in

49 Consequently, PEF processing was very effective for the inactivation o

50 d risk estimates still depend on contentious PEFs and cancer slope factors.

51 Conversely, PEF-treatment and subsequent intermediate incubation in

52 Efficacy was assessed using FEV1, daily PEF, and an asthma control score.

53 detrended fluctuation analysis to once-daily PEF data from 493 participants in the LOCCS (Leukotriene

54 For this purpose, four different PEF treatments were applied using a continuous system ov

55 ients hospitalized for HF with preserved EF (PEF) or reduced EF (REF).

56 n most secondary outcomes, including evening PEF, with a difference of 35.3 liters per minute (P<0.00

57 9.9 +/- 6.7 vs. 34.2 +/- 4.7 L/min), evening PEF (69.9 +/- 5.8 vs. 31.1 +/- 4.5 L/min), the percentag

58 udies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol sulfate use

59 For 257 (7.3%) exacerbations, PEF did not recover within 99 days.

60 higher elastic modulus than non-US-extracted PEFs, being promising as food additives.

61 Potency equivalency factors (PEFs) developed by the California Environmental Protecti

62 el that employs potency equivalency factors (PEFs) for targeted carcinogenic PAHs.

63 -TACE complications: postembolization fever (PEF), nausea and vomiting (NV), abdominal pain, infectio

64 ated the potential of pulsed electric field (PEF) as a sodium-reduction strategy for processed meat.

65 igh pressure (HP) and pulsed electric field (PEF) processing for mild pasteurisation of orange juice.

66 Effects of pulsed electric field (PEF) processing on 28 aroma active compounds, and four p

67 o study the effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) processing on the bioprotective capacity of carrot

68 er being treated with pulsed electric field (PEF) processing.

69 impact of the use of pulsed electric field (PEF) technology on Arroniz olive oil production in terms

70 studies the effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment at moderate and high field strengths (E=0

71 ite shrimp with prior pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment before soaking in Chamuang leaf extract (

72 The influence of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment on the anthocyanin extraction yield (AEY)

73 ere to investigate if pulsed electric field (PEF) treatments caused cellular/structural alterations i

74 igh pressure (HP) and pulsed electric field (PEF) treatments combined or not with heat on denaturatio

75 and whey proteins) in pulsed electric field (PEF)-treated milk were compared with thermally treated m

76 gated the effects of pulsed electric fields (PEF) (1.4-1.7 kV/cm, 653-695 kJ/kg) and heating (60 and

77 rees C for 10min) or pulsed electric fields (PEF) (1.4-1.8kV/cm, 260-690kJ/kg) treatments on the in v

78 es processed by both pulsed electric fields (PEF) and heat pasteurization (HP) was evaluated in the s

79 g of orange juice by pulsed electric fields (PEF) and thermal pasteurisation was carried out to compa

80 Pulsed electric fields (PEF) and ultrasound (US) are promising innovative techno

81 shock combined with pulsed electric fields (PEF) followed by hydraulic pressure.

82 The impact of pulsed electric fields (PEF) for a non-thermal disintegration on the important j

83 nalyze the effect of pulsed electric fields (PEF) in mass transfer as a pre-treatment of the OD using

84 ae were treated with pulsed electric fields (PEF) in order to obtain a maximum accumulation of seleni

85 The effect of pulsed electric fields (PEF) on the carotenoid content of tomato juices was stud

86 study the effect of pulsed electric fields (PEF) on the stilbene content of three grape varieties.

87 ceration times after pulsed electric fields (PEF) using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical

88 mixture processed by pulsed electric fields (PEF), high voltage electrical discharges (HVED) and ultr

89 oietic cells through pulsed electric fields (PEFs) effectively purges myeloma cells without sacrifici

90 eatments techniques: pulsed electric fields (PEFs), enzymes treatment (ET) and thermovinification (TV

91 m exposure to 40 mus pulsed electric fields (PEFs).

92 e reveal a role for the parietal eye fields (PEFs) in directing spatially selective processes relatin

93 sed electric energy (pulsed electric fields, PEF or high voltage electrical discharges, HVED) of nutr

94 tent of total phenolics and total flavonols, PEF and TV were statistically different, but ET was not

95 7 +/- 0.03 L), morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (89.9 +/- 6.7 vs. 34.2 +/- 4.7 L/min), evening PEF

96 The difference in peak expiratory flow (PEF) (DeltaPEF, l/min) after 16 weeks of treatment with

97 ine if fluctuations in peak expiratory flow (PEF) are predictive of subsequent treatment failure and

98 endpoint was change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) as percentage predicted (PEF%p) from baseline to we

99 thors examined whether peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a valid measure of health status in older adults

100 0.57), or twice daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements (mean difference in morning PEF 1.18 L

101 QLQ (primary outcome), peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring, diurnal peak flow variability (dPFV, an

102 set of questions plus peak expiratory flow (PEF) with optimal sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP).

103 d points FEV1, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), and asthma control days (ACDs).

104 ratory-tract symptoms, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and measured personal NO2 exposures every week for

105 spiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow (PEF), and when stable underwent spirometry every 3 month

106 hodilator FVC, FEV(1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced midexpiratory flow (FEF(50)), and skin pric

107 measuring the morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), with a mean difference of 25.8 liters per minute (

108 y endpoint was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

109 ry outcome was morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

110 51.4 L/min lower A.M. peak expiratory flow (PEF; p = 0.005) in B16Arg/Arg subjects(salmeterol, n = 1

111 age) were observed in grape juices following PEF treatment.

112 ly 13.3 kV/cm and approximately 40 kV/cm for PEF and HVED treatments were used, respectively.

113 No effects for PEF were observed on colour, yield (%) and oxidative and

114 R = 3.603) were independent risk factors for PEF.

115 This was also observed for PEF treated samples at an energy input of 256kJ/kg (37.0

116 an increase by 18% and 32% respectively for PEF and TV, and only 3% for ET comparing to the control.

117 d as the principal force-producing agent for PEFs.

118 e kinesin-10-dependent polar ejection force (PEF).

119 s, which combine with polar ejection forces (PEF) and elastic inter-sister chromatin to govern chromo

120 Furthermore, polar ejection forces (PEFs), highest near poles, can stabilize improper attach

121 During mitosis, "polar ejection forces" (PEFs) are hypothesized to direct prometaphase chromosome

122 reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (PEF [>or=50%] or REF [<50%]).

123 irst time, a (poly)phenol-enriched fraction (PEF) from leaves of Corema album, and used in vitro and

124 trachomatis, the population excess fraction (PEF), can be estimated from serological data using finit

125 ne (TEF) and polyphenols enriched fractions (PEF) prepared from tea dust were tested in a model syste

126 ly characterize phenolic-enriched fractions (PEFs) from four wild Juniperus sp. found in Portugal (Ju

127 were upgraded as pectin-enriched fractions (PEFs) useful for functional food formulation due to co-e

128 -group-specific population excess fractions (PEFs) of PID due to C. trachomatis, using routine data,

129 this "predisposition-excitation framework" (PEF) for the etiology of insanity, hereditary or constit

130 e freshly fermented model wine obtained from PEF and TV pretreated musts being the most different wit

131 ynthesis of polyethylene furandicarboxylate (PEF), which is a potential large-scale substitute for pe

132 Forty-six percent of Hispanics had PEF (EF >40%), whereas 54% had REF (EF <40%); 55% and 45

133 40%); 55% and 45% of non-Hispanic whites had PEF and REF, respectively.

134 n echocardiograms: HF-REF if EF was <50%, HF-PEF if EF was consistently >/=50%, and HF-Recovered if E

135 and creatinine were greater in HF-REF and HF-PEF patients.

136 For both HF-REF and HF-PEF, there were few regional differences in rates of all

137 e and event-free survival than HF-REF and HF-PEF.

138 outcomes by level of CKD, separately for HF-PEF and HF with reduced left ventricular EF.

139 Current therapeutic recommendations for HF-PEF are aimed mostly at symptomatic management and treat

140 ied by geographic region, and more so for HF-PEF than for HF-REF.

141 failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) occurs in approximately 50% of patients with heart

142 failure with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF) on patients' lives and the effects of irbesartan.

143 r those with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF).

144 with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF).

145 erved left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-PEF).

146 with HF with preserved ejection fraction [HF-PEF]; mean age, 68 years; deaths per 1000 patient-years,

147 mining other novel therapeutic targets in HF-PEF are keenly awaited.

148 e randomized clinical trials completed in HF-PEF patients did not achieve statistical significance in

149 idence interval, 1.5-2.7; P<0.001) and in HF-PEF patients was 1.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.90-2.0;

150 idence interval, 2.4-6.8; P<0.001) and in HF-PEF patients was 2.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5;

151 ely related to outcomes in HF-REF than in HF-PEF.

152 of all-cause mortality in HF-REF than in HF-PEF.

153 ical record data were used to divide into HF-PEF and reduced left ventricular EF on the basis of quan

154 and ongoing research in the treatment of HF-PEF is reviewed in this article.

155 ensitive measure of the adverse impact of HF-PEF on patients' lives.

156 r more of the definition and diagnosis of HF-PEF, the risk profile of patients enrolled, and the thre

157 Patients with symptomatic HF-PEF were randomly assigned to irbesartan (up to 300 mg d

158 ne MLHFQ scores of 43+/-21 indicated that HF-PEF had a substantial adverse effects.

159 We identified 14 579 patients with HF-PEF and 9762 with HF with reduced left ventricular EF.

160 Rates in patients with HF-PEF were highest in the United States/Canada (HF hospita

161 For example, among patients with HF-PEF, the risk of death was nearly double for eGFR 15 to

162 emonstrated specifically in patients with HF-PEF.

163 strategies specifically for patients with HF-PEF.

164 nd toward improvement among patients with HF-PEF.

165 US-hemicellulase led to the highest PEF yield (27.1%), and extracted almost the whole pectin

166 improved within the study period (Hispanics PEF: 75.2-95.1%; non-Hispanic whites PEF: 79.0-92.7%; Hi

167 singly weak and erratic, but it explains how PEFs can guide chromosome movements without severely def

168 ed the unevenness of the PEF effect, however PEF caused no changes in overall tuber/tissue structure.

169 following intestinal digestion, while HVED, PEF and USN treatments increased total carotenoid bioacc

170 tions in Oxalis tuberosa (oca) tubers and if PEF treatment could reduce tuber oxalate levels.

171 However, it is not known if PEF orders of magnitude shorter than the activation time

172 least 20% difference in the yearly change in PEF%p, measured with hospital-based and weekly home-base

173 ebenone significantly attenuated the fall in PEF%p from baseline to week 52 in the mITT (-3.05%p [95%

174 nopyranoside and veranisatin-C were found in PEF-1 CLE sample and were plausibly involved in keeping

175 The improvement in PEF did not differ between genotypes (difference [Arg/Ar

176 Quantification of the increase in PEF energy to ensure a ten-fold reduction in De (ze, 63.

177 producing bacterial counts were obtained in PEF-1 CLE, compared to the control and other treated sam

178 onsecutive symptom-free days and recovery in PEF as return to preexacerbation levels.

179 syncytial virus [p=0.01]) and a reduction in PEF of more than 12 L/min for picornavirus (p=0.04) for

180 entary aqueous extraction (+SE) that include PEF-assisted extraction as the first step, and +SE at 50

181 signed for exposing cell cultures to intense PEFs while carrying out real-time microscopy.

182 ated by heat treatments or by high-intensity PEF (HIPEF) and stored under refrigeration for 56 days.

183 First, moderate-intensity PEF (MIPEF) was applied to raw tomatoes.

184 Compared to untreated grape juice, PEF pre-treatment on grapes enhanced the release of the

185 Low PEF (<80% of predicted value) was prevalent among person

186 e of health status in older persons, and low PEF is an independent predictor of hospitalization and p

187 models and to examine relations between low PEF values and other clinical factors.

188 tantially higher adjusted odds of having low PEF, on par with those for conditions known to be associ

189 Persons with low PEF in 2006 were more likely to be hospitalized (OR = 1.

190 nd ICS concurrently (n = 8) had a lower A.M. PEF (36.8 L/min difference, p = 0.048) than B16Gly/Gly s

191 ily time-activity-symptom diary and measured PEF (peak expiratory flow) using peak flow meters.

192 gression model for difficulty with mobility, PEF remained an independent factor (odds ratio (OR) = 1.

193 ence intervals, 43, 231; p = 0.019), morning PEF L/m (mean difference, 36.8; 95% confidence intervals

194 08; 95% CI, 2.00-8.31; P < .001) and morning PEF (odds ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.12-4.01; P = 0.021), as

195 tments produced similar increases in morning PEF (7.1 to 8.3 percent; approximately 32 liters per min

196 EF) measurements (mean difference in morning PEF 1.18 L/min; -14.29 to 17.14), and mean difference in

197 The primary endpoint, change in morning PEF at Days 50-56 compared with the last 7 d of the run-

198 We did not observe changes in morning PEF, FEV1, and PD20 in any of the three groups nor betwe

199 After 18 weeks of treatment, mean morning PEF in Arg/Arg participants was 21.4 L/min (95% CI 11.8-

200 almeterol and tiotropium in terms of morning PEF (n = 90 and 78, respectively) and ACDs (n = 49 and 5

201 In Gly/Gly participants, morning PEF was 21.5 L/min (11.0-32.1) higher when participants

202 f clinical studies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albutero

203 significant improvement in morning and night PEF (mean difference, 29.1; CI, 2.3, 56; p = 0.04 and 52

204 Hz or 100 Hz for 1 min) alternately by 12-ns PEF and by conventional pulses.

205 eripheral nerve can be accomplished by 12-ns PEF without electroporation.

206 The PME activity of PEF-processed samples decreased or did not change, while

207 th a dose-response effect, while addition of PEF in bread produced a significant decrease (p<0.05).

208 Application of PEF caused the increase of ions accumulation by 65% for

209 The application of PEF using moderate strengths at different times during c

210 nowledge that demonstrates the capability of PEF technology to produce plant-based foods with better

211 ty associated with aroma active compounds of PEF-treated peach nectar.

212 A significant (p < 0.05) effect of PEF was observed on shear force (N) and toughness (N/mm

213 rum samples in each, from which estimates of PEF were derived.

214 of consistency between adjusted estimates of PEF, but all have wide 95% CrIs.

215 nt, the present study assessed the impact of PEF and US treatments, applied individually and in combi

216 In addition, the influence of PEF on their physicochemical composition was studied.

217 Optimization of PEF parameters led to the further rise in the both ions

218 The allergenicity potential of PEF extracted proteins was compared to osmotic shock ext

219 The presence of PEF and TEF inhibited formation of fluorescent advanced

220 xponent alpha, reflecting self-similarity of PEF, in relation to treatment failure from the run-in pe

221 The use of PEF had no negative effects on general chemical and sens

222 We evaluated the coefficient of variation of PEF (CVpef) and the scaling exponent alpha, reflecting s

223 with a decrease in mean diurnal variation of PEF at Week 8 (p = 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], -

224 nase (AAK) opposes the stabilizing effect of PEFs.

225 However, the exact role of PEFs is unclear, because little is known about their mag

226 Based on PEF data from our previous studies of a similar patient

227 Idebenone also had a significant effect on PEF (L/min), weekly home-based PEF, FVC, and FEV1.

228 At optimal PEF parameters: electric field strength of 3kV/cm and pu

229 ce methodology was used to determine optimal PEF treatment and optimise anthocyanin extraction.

230 , compared to either 60 degrees C heating or PEF processing.

231 extraction of carotenoids from untreated or PEF treated cells that were immediately freeze-dried aft

232 The CAPTURE plus PEF exhibited improved SN and SP for all cases versus al

233 and low serum albumin (p = 0.035) predicted PEF while low serum albumin (p = 0.021) and low platelet

234 ted in 1992), were used to develop predicted PEF regression models and to examine relations between l

235 tes, tumour size and female gender predicted PEF post-TACE.

236 piratory flow (PEF) as percentage predicted (PEF%p) from baseline to week 52, measured with spirometr

237 Results indicated that prior PEF treatment can analogously enhance both antioxidant a

238 sample or those soaked in CLE without prior PEF and the control during storage of 10 days (P < 0.05)

239 The application of two-stage procedure PEF+supplementary aqueous extraction (+SE) that include

240 d motility or tip-tracking activity produced PEFs.

241 In this sense, PEF pre-treatments were done using three different volta

242 Equivalent estimates based on the standard PEF formula from case-control studies were 0% and over 6

243 Despite the retention of starch, PEF treatment reduced tuber oxalate contents by almost 5

244 roughout the metaphase plate, with a steeper PEF potential well towards the periphery and a concomita

245 of these physical methods demonstrated that PEF redistributed a greater proportion of intracellular

246 These results indicate that PEF could be a suitable technology for obtaining musts w

247 It is obvious that PEF treatment affects the temperature stability of endog

248 This study clearly shows that PEF could add value to carrots by maximising bioprotecti

249 Results suggest that PEF treatment improved saltiness by influencing the salt

250 The PEF (males, <350 L/min; females, <250 L/min) SN and SP w

251 The PEF decreases from 53.5% (95% CrI, 15.6%-100%) in women

252 The PEF extracts contained 'superoxide dismutase' (SOD), a k

253 The PEF treatment time of 131 mus on average led consistentl

254 The PEF was far more stable over place and time in the 19th

255 The PEF was often used to explain the diversity of individua

256 The PEF-treated samples had higher sensory scores than the h

257 Additionally, the PEF-determined BaP-equivalent concentrations were compar

258 The PME inactivation level after the PEF (25.26 kV/cm-1206.2 mus) and HP (90 degrees C-20s) t

259 the orange juice samples enhanced after the PEF or thermal pasteurisation.

260 genicity was less than dose-additive and the PEF-method provided higher estimates of BaP-equivalents

261 as generally more than dose-additive and the PEF-method provided lower estimates of BaP-equivalents t

262 rly show that the best time for applying the PEF-treatment through the red fermentation is during the

263 00 g fw) was similar to that obtained in the PEF-treated sample using water (65.8 mg/100 g fw).

264 Interestingly, the PEF promoted the formation of non-toxic alphaSyn species

265 bility tests confirmed the unevenness of the PEF effect, however PEF caused no changes in overall tub

266 essing PME inactivation as a function of the PEF treatment conditions, and this enabled the estimatio

267 y properties were found as a function of the PEF treatment times.

268 Minimum and maximum estimates of the PEF were 28.0% (95% credible interval: 6.9, 50.0) and 46

269 minated much of 20th-century psychiatry, the PEF proposed a flexible, developmental, and pluralistic

270 The PEFs obtained were rich sources of phenolic compounds, e

271 The PEFs of PID due to C. trachomatis decline steeply with a

272 directly measure the speed and force of the PEFs developed on chromosome arms.

273 Therefore, PEF could be an appropriate technology to improve olive

274 Therefore, PEF was possible with water, a more environmental-friend

275 This PEF treatment increased the AEY, the effect being higher

276 Flowing cells through PEFs is a promising technology for rapid tumor cell purg

277 ipheral blood (PB) cells were passed through PEFs at 1.35 kV/cm to 1.4 kV/cm, resulting in 3- to 4-lo

278 of intracellular water migration compared to PEF.

279 15 min exposure of the 20 h grown culture to PEF of 5.0 kV/cm and 20 mus pulse width, accumulation of

280 d 35.9%) of interleukin-8 production, due to PEF treatment and heating (80 degrees C for 10 min), res

281 ion of AAO released after being subjected to PEF treatment.

282 A parietal area close to PEFs appears to be specialized for processing the future

283 t with 1.25% sodium metabisulfite treatment, PEF treated sample or those soaked in CLE without prior

284 dge of the molecular mechanisms underpinning PEF generation is incomplete.

285 erties of the tuber tissues led to an uneven PEF effect with the tuber inner cores softening more tha

286 Various PEF treatments using electric field strength between 0.2

287 When PEF was combined with US at low temperatures the differe

288 inetochore-MT attachments are weakened where PEFs are most likely to strengthen them.

289 spanics PEF: 75.2-95.1%; non-Hispanic whites PEF: 79.0-92.7%; Hispanics REF: 67.7-88.4%; non-Hispanic

290 % (control), 1.2% (T(1)) and 1.2% along with PEF processing (T(2)).

291 CAPTURE with PEF can identify patients with COPD who would benefit fr

292 ality risk was observed among Hispanics with PEF (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.8

293 ative to non-Hispanic whites, Hispanics with PEF or REF were more likely to be younger and to have di

294 Hispanic HF patients with PEF had better in-hospital survival than non-Hispanic wh

295 Sample pre-treated with PEF and soaked with 1% CLE (PEF-1 CLE) showed lower mela

296 Whole oca tubers were treated with PEF at different electric field strengths up to 1.2kV/cm

297 The samples treated with PEF had more stable flavonoids and phenolic acids than t

298 f Saccharomyces cerevisiae were treated with PEF to improve simultaneous accumulation of magnesium an

299 control as well as in the cells treated with PEF.

300 gd.m. for zinc, in the cultures treated with PEF.

301 pital survival than non-Hispanic whites with PEF.