コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 SF-1 ChIP-on-chip was performed in NCI-H295R human adren
2 SF-1 immunoreactivity was also detected in the exocrine
3 SF-1 is a key transcription factor for all steroidogenic
4 SF-1 is a transcription factor that controls the develop
5 SF-1 is an essential factor for sex determination during
6 SF-1 is the target of both phosphorylation and SUMOylati
7 SF-1 neurons were visualized by Tau-green fluorescent pr
8 SF-1 phosphorylation at these sites is therefore not ess
9 SF-1 transcriptional activity was also differentially re
10 SF-1 was recently shown to interact with DAX-1, another
11 SF-1, an orphan member of the nuclear hormone receptor g
12 mily, which includes steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and liver receptor homolog 1 (LRH-1), regulate cru
13 Here, we report that steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and liver receptor homolog 1 are repressed via pos
14 6b1 is maintained by Steroidogenic Factor 1 (SF-1) and Sex-Determining Region Y Box-9 (SOX9), which e
15 cipation of multiple steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) elements with the downstream cAMP response element
16 we first reveal that steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive neurons i
21 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) is essential for adrenal development and steroidog
22 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) is essential for steroidogenic gene transcription.
23 transcription factor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) is exclusively expressed in the brain in the ventr
24 tral nervous system, steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) is required for terminal differentiation of neuron
26 ice lacking FOXO1 in steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) neurons of the VMH are lean due to increased energ
27 han nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) regulates the differentiation and function of endo
28 criptional regulator Steroidogenic Factor 1 (SF-1), and zG-specific Sf-1 deletion prevents lineage co
29 an nuclear receptor, steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1), which can be detected in the hypothalamic primord
33 transcription factor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1; also known as NR5A1) is a crucial mediator of both
34 1 (LRH-1; NR5A2) and steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1; NR5A1) have therapeutic potential for the treatmen
35 vely active receptor steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1; NR5A1), is proposed to repress their transcription
36 anscription factors, steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) and early growth response-1 (Egr-1), play a centra
38 han nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) are occupied in vitro by using nuclear extracts fr
39 heterozygous for the steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) gene suggested that reduced expression of this nuc
40 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) has been implicated as a downstream effector of pe
41 phorylation state of steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) in mediating ACTH/cAMP-dependent transcription of
43 the orphan receptor steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) was found to potently transactivate the SHP promot
44 ses transcription by steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), a factor that regulates expression of multiple st
46 in-alpha, aromatase, steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), cholesterol side chain (SCC), and epiregulin.
47 ft analyses a distal steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1)-binding site that is essential for full promoter a
48 to LC expression of steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1)-dependent genes (StAR, Cyp11a1, Cyp17a1) with over
49 7-OHC each increased steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1)-mediated StAR gene transactivation by approximatel
52 The nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, NR5A1) is a key regulator of adrenal and gonadal b
56 ures of human NR5A1 (steroidogenic factor-1, SF-1) ligand binding domain (LBD) bound to PIP2 and PIP3
57 a repressor of SF-1 activity, reduced Egr-1-SF-1 synergy and diminished GnRH stimulation of the LHbe
58 activity studies led to excellent dual-LRH-1/SF-1 agonists (e.g., RJW100) as well as compounds select
61 hydrogen bonds with the phospholipid abolish SF-1/coactivator interactions and significantly reduce S
67 tivities were similarly lowered by DAX-1, an SF-1 suppressor, and raised by steroid receptor coactiva
68 eir promoter regions, but does not affect an SF-1 dependent LC gene (3beta-HSD) without overlapping s
70 ain-derived neurotrophic factor (bdnf) as an SF-1 target gene, we assessed the colocalization of SF-1
71 oreover, similar effects were observed in an SF-1/thyroid hormone LBD chimera receptor, illustrating
77 conclude that the synergy between Egr-1 and SF-1 is essential for GnRH stimulation of the LHbeta gen
79 sis demonstrated the expression of DAX-1 and SF-1 mRNA in whole human skin and Western analysis also
84 various SF-1 target genes and that ASAH1 and SF-1 colocalize on the same promoter region of the CYP17
86 The NHR-25 homologs Ftz-F1 in Drosophila and SF-1 in mammals are involved in various biological proce
87 activity with JNK/c-Jun phosphorylation and SF-1-dependent Cyp11a1 transcription for steroid synthes
88 promoter in a highly repetitive region, and SF-1-dependent activation was confirmed in luciferase as
92 al capacity of transcription factors such as SF-1 and is leveraged during development to achieve cell
93 chanism by which SUMO conjugation attenuates SF-1 activity was found to be largely histone deacetylas
94 members of this superfamily, such as NGFI-B, SF-1, and ROR, could also recognize unique geometric fea
95 genesis, but until now a direct link between SF-1 and vascular remodeling has not been established.
97 sal gene, Dax-1, antagonizes synergy between SF-1 and WT1, most likely through a direct interaction w
98 -1 produced in vitro indicate F2 and F3 bind SF-1; BLAST searches and Southwestern blotting suggest t
100 ta promoter but only in the presence of both SF-1 and Egr-1, and not in the presence of other Egr pro
102 d that MIP-2A physically interacts with both SF-1 and Ptx1, thereby inhibiting transactivation of the
106 primarily in the ventrolateral VMH coexpress SF-1 and BDNF, and in contrast to other brain regions, b
113 ering affinities, indicating that the distal SF-1 site is bound more avidly than is the proximal SF-1
114 Mutation of the binding sites for either SF-1 or Egr-1 completely abolishes the synergy between t
125 that the SHP promoter contains at least five SF-1 binding sites, and mutagenesis studies demonstrate
129 ike transcription factor, a binding site for SF-1 is present only in the promoter 1b active in the ov
130 Cyp17a1) with overlapping binding sites for SF-1 and COUP-TFII in their promoter regions, but does n
135 for three other NR5A members-mouse and human SF-1 and human LRH-1-which reveal that these receptors b
136 the putative ligand-binding domains of human SF-1 at 2.1-A resolution and human LRH-1 at 2.5-A resolu
137 for this poorly understood cluster of human SF-1 mutations and demonstrates how signaling phosphoino
139 rvation significantly decreased hypothalamic SF-1 levels by promoting ubiquitin-dependent degradation
140 the transcriptional activity of hypothalamic SF-1 was activated by SUMO, but this was attenuated duri
141 t sumoylation at Lys194 would greatly impact SF-1 function, the conformation and coregulator recruitm
145 usly defined proximal activation function in SF-1 showed that the activation function mapped fully to
146 finity is compromised either by mutations in SF-1 or by sequence alterations in its binding site.
150 est that increased insulin responsiveness in SF-1 neurons can overcome leptin hypersensitivity and en
151 GABA from the developing VMH is not seen in SF-1 knockout mice, and cells that are immunoreactive fo
152 everal reported SF-1 target genes, including SF-1 itself, was inhibited by treatment with AC-45594 an
153 and discusses SRY and other genes, including SF-1, WT1, DAX-1, and SOX9, that play key developmental
154 hytoestrogen genistein were able to increase SF-1 transcription, promote Ishikawa cell proliferation,
155 Because 7alpha,27-OHC was unable to increase SF-1-dependent StAR promoter activity, we examined 27-OH
156 ders of adrenal development, while increased SF-1 dosage has been associated with adrenocortical tumo
157 e data suggest that, directly or indirectly, SF-1 plays important roles in determining the distributi
158 ts suggested that MIP-2A expression inhibits SF-1- and Ptx1-mediated transactivation of LHbeta promot
162 c functional assay employing the full-length SF-1 protein and its native response element, yielding I
163 a knockin mouse model to show that SUMO-less SF-1 binds and activates inappropriate targets, causing
164 pressors to DNA-bound nuclear receptors like SF-1, thereby extending the range of corepressor action.
167 ore, we examined whether MIP-2A can modulate SF-1- and Ptx1-mediated transcriptional activation.
174 Strikingly, the VMH is absent in newborn SF-1 knockout mice, suggesting that SF-1 is essential fo
175 elective loss of DNA binding to noncanonical SF-1 targets, such as inhibinalpha; this binding deficit
178 have previously demonstrated the ability of SF-1 to bind to and transactivate the rat LHbeta gene pr
180 pment as evidenced by both the activation of SF-1-dependent transcription in the adrenal cortex by si
181 es reduced the transcriptional activities of SF-1 and LRH-1 in mammalian cell transfection assays wit
182 t alterations in the levels or activities of SF-1 or FTF could modulate SHP expression in appropriate
183 t HIPK3 action to potentiate the activity of SF-1 for Cyp11a1 transcription in mouse adrenocortical Y
184 -1 represses the transcriptional activity of SF-1, and AHC mutants of DAX-1 lose repression function.
186 the StAR promoter indicates that blockade of SF-1 SUMOylation leads to an increase in overall promote
187 rget gene, we assessed the colocalization of SF-1 and BDNF expressing neurons, as well as expression
188 he functional and structural consequences of SF-1 sumoylation at two conserved lysines (Lys119 and Ly
192 ns, demonstrating that normal gene dosage of SF-1 is required for mounting an adequate stress respons
193 alamic development and will be downstream of SF-1, a critical factor for normal VMH differentiation.
196 proximal (P)-box of the first zinc finger of SF-1 (G35E) has been reported to cause complete XY sex r
197 ntially to the SUMOylation-deficient form of SF-1 and that CDK7 inhibition reduces phosphorylation of
198 R) mice failed to phenocopy a simple gain of SF-1 function or show elevated levels of well-establishe
199 hough serine phosphorylation of the hinge of SF-1 (NR5A1), the closest relative of LRH-1, confers a s
201 ed modification model in which inhibition of SF-1-mediated transcription by SUMOylation in adrenocort
202 es not alter the subcellular localization of SF-1, the modification inhibits the ability of SF-1 to a
204 We propose that this single modification of SF-1 and the subsequent recruitment of nuclear receptor
211 n of selective inhibitory chemical probes of SF-1 by a rational ultra-high-throughput screening (uHTS
212 tion play crucial roles in the regulation of SF-1 function and that these effects are dependent on nu
213 However, liver expresses a close relative of SF-1, the orphan fetoprotein transcription factor (FTF),
215 t the nuclear receptor DAX-1, a repressor of SF-1 activity, reduced Egr-1-SF-1 synergy and diminished
216 To delineate the functional significance of SF-1 itself in the brain, we generated pre- and postnata
218 2 as a potentially important novel target of SF-1 in the adrenal gland, indicating that regulation of
221 osphorylation sites (Ser-430 and Ser-203) on SF-1 had no effect on the SF-1-dependent FUER stimulatio
222 ction by directly binding to the receptor on SF-1 target gene promoters and identify a key role for n
224 entified regulatory protein-lipid surface on SF-1 with the phosphoinositide head group at its nexus a
225 be mutually exclusive, suggesting that once SF-1 is bound to DNA, sumoylation may be less important
229 ates, PIASy and PIASxalpha strongly promoted SF-1 sumoylation, and addition of DP103 enhanced both PI
230 site and the previously identified proximal SF-1 site showed that both are necessary for transcripti
232 ork analysis of genes identified as putative SF-1 targets revealed enrichment for angiogenic process
235 addition, we identified the nuclear receptor SF-1 as a direct FOXO1 transcriptional target in the VMH
237 PK) converging on nuclear hormone receptors (SF-1/LRH-1) to modulate their transcriptional output.
239 t that natural variations leading to reduced SF-1 function may underlie some forms of subclinical adr
240 at Wnt-dependent signaling cascades regulate SF-1-dependent transcription of genes required for adren
244 function, the expression of several reported SF-1 target genes, including SF-1 itself, was inhibited
246 a novel coregulatory protein that represses SF-1 function by directly binding to the receptor on SF-
247 ce at 6-weeks were much reduced; however, SC-SF-1(-/-) seminal vesicles weights were comparable sugge
248 cell and germ cell population declined in SC-SF-1(-/-) mice resulting in the disruption of seminifero
249 ated Sertoli cell-specific Nr5a1 KO mice (SC-SF-1(-/-)) at E14.5, which coincides with testis develop
251 oli and germ cells, the testis weights of SC-SF-1(-/-) mice at 6-weeks were much reduced; however, SC
254 T) was used to identify potent and selective SF-1 inverse agonists through the screening of a chemica
259 coregulator recruitment of fully sumoylated SF-1 LBD protein was either unchanged or modestly impair
262 dogenic genes, without affecting synergistic SF-1 and sex-determining region Y (SRY) coactivation of
264 Together, our data provide evidence that SF-1 is required for spleen development in humans via tr
267 Collectively, these results indicate that SF-1 directs transcriptional programs in the hypothalamu
269 inverse agonist lead, was used to show that SF-1 constitutive activity can be pharmacologically modu
271 oximal LHbeta gene promoter and suggest that SF-1 and Egr-1 act synergistically to increase expressio
272 newborn SF-1 knockout mice, suggesting that SF-1 is essential for the development of VMH neurons.
273 structure-function relationships across the SF-1/LRH-1 subfamily indicates that ligand binding is th
274 Ishikawa cell proliferation, and induce the SF-1 target gene aromatase in a GPR30-dependent manner.
275 Further, introduction of a mutation into the SF-1 A-box, which has been proposed to bind to the 5'-fl
276 e the 1.5 angstroms crystal structure of the SF-1 ligand binding domain in complex with an LXXLL moti
277 Mutations designed to reduce the size of the SF-1 pocket or to disrupt hydrogen bonds with the phosph
278 30 and Ser-203) on SF-1 had no effect on the SF-1-dependent FUER stimulation in Y-1 and 10T1/2 cells.
279 ro transfection studies, DAX-1 repressed the SF-1-mediated transactivation of the Cyp19 promoter but
280 an LBD helix assembly assay suggest that the SF-1 LBD adopts an active conformation, with helices 1 a
281 op is topologically distinct relative to the SF-1 enzymes, both loops map to similar tertiary structu
282 ed in undifferentiated ES cells, can bind to SF-1 response elements in the proximal promoter and prox
284 hese modifications interact or contribute to SF-1 regulation of endogenous genes remains poorly defin
285 ult, the K119R mutant, compared to wild-type SF-1, was selectively recruited to a "SUMO-sensitive" si
287 SAH1 is recruited to the promoter of various SF-1 target genes and that ASAH1 and SF-1 colocalize on
288 de transcriptional regulators such as Vgll2, SF-1, Sox14, Satb2, Fezf1, Dax1, Nkx2-2, and COUP-TFII,
289 to the identification of 445 gene loci where SF-1-binding regions were located from 10 kb upstream to
294 T2 cells and are capable of interacting with SF-1, GnRH stimulation of Egr-1 was the most robust.
298 ke induced by the complexation of STAT3 with SF-1-066 or BP-1-102 under physiological conditions enab
299 hift assays and co-transfection studies with SF-1 produced in vitro indicate F2 and F3 bind SF-1; BLA
301 emonstrate that beta-catenin synergizes with SF-1 to activate the alpha-inhibin promoter through form