コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 SGLT2 inhibitors also reduced end-stage kidney disease (
2 SGLT2 inhibitors are antihyperglycemic drugs that protec
3 SGLT2 inhibitors are proximal tubule and osmotic diureti
4 SGLT2 inhibitors attenuate the proximal reabsorption of
5 SGLT2 inhibitors improve glomerular hemodynamic function
6 SGLT2 inhibitors lower glomerular capillary hypertension
7 SGLT2 inhibitors may mimic systemic hypoxia and stimulat
8 SGLT2 inhibitors might modulate glucose influx into rena
9 SGLT2 inhibitors protected against the risk of major adv
10 SGLT2 inhibitors provide multiple benefits, including de
11 SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of dialysis, transplan
12 SGLT2 inhibitors reverse this maladaptive signaling by t
13 SGLT2 inhibitors should be used when possible by people
14 SGLT2 inhibitors substantially reduced the risk of dialy
15 ucose with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor could improve insulin-mediated tissue g
16 hypoglycemic sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin and the insulin sensitize
18 gliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, had positive cardiorenal effects in pa
19 iflozin, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on renal hemodynamics and tubular func
21 onse to the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin, which has been shown to
22 nt with the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin reduced albuminuria in pa
23 benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and key lifestyle measures could play
26 g effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are already established, guidance is n
28 Carbasugar sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are highly promising drug candidates f
30 re recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have further improved disease outcomes
31 treated with sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have improved cardiovascular (CV) outc
33 s (ARBs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in adults with CKD (estimated glomerul
34 implicating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in glucagon secretion by pancreatic al
35 gon release, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors induce stimulation of endogenous gluco
38 ts with CKD, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors provide cardiorenal protection, but wh
40 ctiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors vs sulfonylureas-the second most widel
42 cohorts: (1) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, (2) glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) re
43 a) agonists, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonis
45 n the era of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, population-wide screening for chronic
46 ng ERAs with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which have diuretic effects, offers a
47 ering agents-sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-has been reported to decrease the risk
50 117,989) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (n = 258,614), a control group compose
51 ; p < 0.01), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.79; p < 0.001)
52 es recommend sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) rec
53 agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are increasingly used as second-line a
54 2 diabetes, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are known to reduce glucose concentrat
55 istration of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors could lead to ketoacidosis in patients
57 e effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be related primarily to enhanced S
59 own that the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, a newer generation of antihyperglycem
63 use of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin in HFr
65 rofile, the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors empagliflozin and canagliflozin have b
66 ases (e.g., sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes-interaction term f
69 effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on kidney failure, particularly the ne
70 gonists and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce glycaemia and weight, and impro
71 [ARNIs], and sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitors) reduce mortality in patients with hea
72 gonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitors) using routinely available clinical fe
73 his analysis of U.S. data from 2022 to 2023, SGLT2 inhibitor prescription among people with a Class 1
74 P4 inhibitor (aHR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.17-1.58), SGLT2 inhibitor (aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28), or sulfo
75 care [adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.14-2.91]; SGLT2 inhibitors and/or GLP-1RAs: from 12.3% to 60.4% fo
82 the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, with glimepiride in patients with type
83 el glucose lowering agent, empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor which targets the kidney to block glucos
86 2 years after the FDA's first approval of an SGLT2 inhibitor, although the phenomenon had been known
87 usted HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97]) or an SGLT2 inhibitor (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73 to 0.88
88 rate was lower among patients prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor (4.9 events per 1000 person-years) than
89 Adults with type 2 diabetes prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor had a lower rate of gout than those pres
91 ons with type 2 diabetes newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor were 1:1 propensity score matched to pat
92 KD and albuminuria, 21.0% did not receive an SGLT2 inhibitor or an ACEI or an ARB, despite compelling
93 onomic status were less likely to receive an SGLT2 inhibitor, suggesting that interventions to ensure
94 s; 122 096 [95.17%] men), 23 870 received an SGLT2 inhibitor and 104 423 received a sulfonylurea.
95 osis of heart failure, had never received an SGLT2 inhibitor previously, and were newly started on em
96 th metformin alone or in combination with an SGLT2 inhibitor for at least 3 months before screening.
98 2) or higher on metformin with or without an SGLT2 inhibitor were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to once-w
101 ogical therapy (ARNI, beta blocker, MRA, and SGLT2 inhibitor) versus conventional therapy (ACE inhibi
103 with established, cardiovascular disease and SGLT2 inhibitors considered for patients with heart fail
104 n HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction]), and SGLT2 inhibitors (DAPA-HF [Dapagliflozin and Prevention
105 nitiating sulfonylureas, DPP4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors (n = 536,068), and a control group of 1
106 ril 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023, we assessed SGLT2 inhibitor prescription rates, stratified by presen
107 tes mellitus and chronic heart failure), but SGLT2 inhibitors activate SIRT1/PGC-1alpha/FGF21 signali
108 ide decrease in environmental nutrients, but SGLT2 inhibitors may also upregulate SIRT1, PGC-1alpha,
109 scular events without effect modification by SGLT2 inhibitor use (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87 without
110 ketogenic nutrient deprivation signaling by SGLT2 inhibitors may explain their cardioprotective effe
111 ynthetic route towards some novel carbasugar SGLT2 inhibitors, featuring an underexploited, regiosele
112 he way towards the development of carbasugar SGLT2 inhibitors as potential antidiabetic/antitumor age
113 However, the clinical usage of carbasugar SGLT2 inhibitors has been underexplored, due to the leng
114 ealed the unexpected SAR of these carbasugar SGLT2 inhibitors, and enabled the discovery of a highly
116 xamine the safety and efficacy of continuing SGLT2 inhibitors in HF when the estimated glomerular fil
117 inuric CKD with and without type 2 diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors facilitate the use of RAS blockade.
118 ar outcome trials in patients with diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular and renal outcom
120 In patients with chronic kidney disease, SGLT2 inhibitors and endothelin A receptor antagonists (
122 al cohort study with target trial emulation, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk o
127 the crucial role for selecting patients for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy and highlight several crucial qu
128 etes, 6.2% had a Class 1a recommendation for SGLT2 inhibitor therapy, and 3.1% (3.0%-3.2%) of those r
131 summarizes proposed mechanisms of action for SGLT2 inhibitors, integrates these data with results of
132 Changes in hematological parameters for SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs throughout the 3-year fol
133 ndividuals with an incident prescription for SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs were included, with the fi
134 t a concise synthetic approach to gliflozin (SGLT2 inhibitors) aglycones from generating regioselecti
135 ta-analysis of patients hospitalized for HF, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the early risk of cardiovascula
139 ure and diabetic glomerular hyperfiltration, SGLT2 inhibitors may induce protective effects on the ki
141 scontinuation, defined as an interruption in SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 RA prescription for >=90 days,
143 s with acceptable safety profiles, including SGLT2 inhibitors, endothelin receptor blockers, targeted
144 During this period, the use of open-label SGLT2 inhibitors was similar in the two groups (43% in t
149 s may not be limited to diabetes management: SGLT2 inhibitors have also shown therapeutic promise in
152 ucose-dependent and -independent mechanisms: SGLT2 inhibitors prevent both hyper- and hypoglycemia, w
153 synthetic route towards some small-molecule SGLT2 inhibitors by a chemo- and diastereospecific palla
157 ardiovascular or kidney disease, the rate of SGLT2 inhibitor use increased but was lower than that am
159 82-0.85) were associated with lower rates of SGLT2 inhibitor use, whereas higher median household inc
161 artiles of OOP costs for a 1-month supply of SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 RA based on their health plan
162 Alternatively, the established ability of SGLT2 inhibitors to enhance SIRT1 might be the mechanism
163 ipal statistical mediators of the ability of SGLT2 inhibitors to reduce the risk of heart failure and
164 uest to determine the mechanism of action of SGLT2 inhibitors is ongoing, this therapeutic class of d
165 responses can be explained by the action of SGLT2 inhibitors to promote cellular housekeeping by enh
166 tentially indicative of a diuretic action of SGLT2 inhibitors) did not track each other closely in th
167 fraction may be mitigated by the actions of SGLT2 inhibitors to reduce blood pressure, body weight,
168 ute importantly to the consistent benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors to slow the deterioration in glomerular
169 or metabolism cannot explain the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors either experimentally or clinically.
174 ome evidence that the proportional effect of SGLT2 inhibitors might attenuate with declining kidney f
175 y physiology predicts the salutary effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on hard renal outcomes, as shown in lar
178 dy used male SS rats only, and the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on hypertension in females has not been
180 way, sodium-related physiological effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and clinical correlates of natriuresis,
181 hanism underlying the cardiorenal effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and summarizes clinical trial evidence
182 summarize the key pharmacodynamic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and the clinical evidence that support
183 studies that have shown that the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are likely related to actions on the he
184 ociated ketosis and the ketogenic effects of SGLT2 inhibitors occur almost entirely independent of gl
186 large-scale trials assessing the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients
187 w and meta-analysis to assess the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on major kidney outcomes in patients wi
189 a signaling; this can explain the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors to promote ketonemia and erythrocytosis
190 organ-specific anti-inflammatory effects of SGLT2 inhibitors using evidence from animal and human st
191 ach of the beneficial and harmful effects of SGLT2 inhibitors-with the exception of their effect to l
194 f randomized trials evaluating initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients hospitalized for HF was per
195 data suggests that in-hospital initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors may reduce the early risk of cardiovasc
197 r government regulators nor manufacturers of SGLT2 inhibitors evinced an awareness of this extensive
199 estions about the risk-to-benefit profile of SGLT2 inhibitors when used as adjunctive therapy in pati
200 rmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical trials and examine possible
203 1.73 m(2) To clarify and support the role of SGLT2 inhibitors for treatment of T2DM and CKD, the Nati
204 en done to assess the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in combination with insulin therapy in
205 ls designed to demonstrate the CVD safety of SGLT2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), con
207 Preclinical studies and clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors have consistently demonstrated reductio
208 -controlled CV and kidney outcomes trials of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes were i
209 , cardiovascular or kidney outcome trials of SGLT2 inhibitors that reported effects on major kidney o
210 total of 23 870 individuals with new use of SGLT2 inhibitors and 104 423 individuals with new use of
211 ntify significant differences between use of SGLT2 inhibitors and use of other glucose-lowering drugs
212 uing evidence gap for considering the use of SGLT2 inhibitors early following an acute MI to reduce c
213 idence and safety data related to the use of SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular and renal protection
215 rong rationale to expect benefit from use of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes at hig
216 e substantive evidence supporting the use of SGLT2 inhibitors to prevent major kidney outcomes in peo
217 ment of Veterans Affairs compared the use of SGLT2 inhibitors vs sulfonylureas in individuals receivi
218 ed with other glucose-lowering drugs, use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of
219 In per-protocol analyses, continued use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of d
220 ed with other glucose-lowering drugs, use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with decreased risk of c
221 onal per-protocol analyses, continued use of SGLT2 inhibitors with metformin was associated with a re
222 Patients were divided into new users of SGLT2 inhibitors and new users of other glucose-lowering
223 ular mortality and morbidity in new users of SGLT2 inhibitors versus new users of other glucose-lower
227 onsistent with data from clinical studies on SGLT2 inhibitors and provide a rationale for the mode of
228 iven by findings for empagliflozin (the only SGLT2 inhibitor for which data from a dedicated long-ter
229 nd 20% less likely to initiate a GLP-1 RA or SGLT2 inhibitor, respectively, when compared with those
230 ey disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo.
232 t of the five trials of 21 947 participants, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of composite cardiovas
236 discovery of two highly selective and potent SGLT2 inhibitors, thereby paving the way towards the dev
237 kely than White individuals to be prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.39-0.65; p < 0.001)
238 icipants from DELIVER and EMPEROR-Preserved, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced composite cardiovascular death
239 tes and a broad cardiovascular risk profile, SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with reduced cardiova
241 10 038 and 1077 T2D patients newly receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (mean [SD] age, 59.5 [12.1] years; 5689
242 o identify patients with T2D newly receiving SGLT2 inhibitors or glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agon
243 effects in those receiving and not receiving SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.54-1.0
244 55 unique cases of FG in patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors between 1 March 2013 and 31 January 201
245 w-up period of 2.5 years, patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors had lower incidence of composite anemia
248 nately, these benefits are not without risk: SGLT2 inhibitors predispose to euglycemic ketoacidosis i
250 ecursors was synthesized and tested as SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitors using a cell-based fluorescence assay o
256 ge pancreatic and prostate cancers, and that SGLT2 inhibitors, currently in use for treating diabetes
257 tudies in people with T2DM demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce cardiovascular death and hospita
258 e adenocarcinomas, and provide evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors block glucose uptake and reduce tumor g
259 nical practice guidelines now recommend that SGLT2 inhibitors with proven cardiovascular benefit be p
261 herapeutic SGLT2 inhibition, we suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors induce aestivation-like metabolic patte
262 age x treatment interactions suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors were more cardioprotective in older tha
263 clusion, we provide evidence suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors may offer renal protection and did not
264 the GLP-1 receptor agonist exenatide and the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin with exenatide or dapaglif
266 n 58) studied the efficacy and safety of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin versus placebo in 17 160 p
267 blood pressure and glycaemic effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin with placebo in patients w
268 thod is demonstrated by the synthesis of the SGLT2 inhibitor, canagliflozin (1a), from commercially a
271 betic HF rats tested the hypothesis that the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin (EMPA) inhibits proximal t
272 Acutely, indirect NHE3 inhibition using the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin did not affect urinary cal
273 FpEF (NCT03030235), we evaluated whether the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin improves the primary endpo
275 pe 1 diabetes (n = 22) were treated with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin (5 mg daily) or placebo fo
276 e report analyses of renal outcomes with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in the DECLARE-TIMI 58 car
278 ing the GLP1 receptor agonist group with the SGLT2 inhibitor group, the hazard ratio for thyroid canc
279 type 2 diabetes receiving metformin therapy, SGLT2 inhibitor treatment was associated with a reduced
280 met our inclusion criteria, assessing three SGLT2 inhibitors: empagliflozin (EMPA-REG OUTCOME), cana
281 , 0.57-0.98]) also did not vary according to SGLT2 inhibitor use (P-heterogeneity=0.53 and 0.94, resp
287 t of SGLT2 to prevent renal glucose wasting, SGLT2 inhibitors have been developed to treat diabetes a
289 produced, it is important to understand why SGLT2 inhibitors inhibit <50% of the filtered glucose lo
292 bitors; and HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.49-1.24 with SGLT2 inhibitors) (P for interaction = 0.95) and reduced
293 nital tract infections were more common with SGLT2 inhibitors (odds ratios, 1.42 [CI, 1.06 to 1.90] a
294 e on the cardiorenal protective effects with SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients
297 clinical trials, large clinical trials with SGLT2 inhibitors are now investigating the potential use
299 tor use (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68-0.87 without SGLT2 inhibitors; and HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.49-1.24 with S
300 emia due to chronic kidney disease, and yet, SGLT2 inhibitors produce an unattenuated erythrocytic re