ライフサイエンスコーパス: SRP

1 SRP fosters interweaving multiple knowledge resources to

2 SRP has had many successes: discovery of arsenic's toxic

3 SRP is also known to contact the ribosome at this site.

4 SRP is coordinated by the National Institute of Environm

5 SRP must continue to address the legacy of hazardous was

6 SRP of inflamed moderate pockets during 6-month PMT, wit

7 SRP plus different adjunctive therapies could provide be

8 SRP scans the nascent chains of translating ribosomes, p

9 SRP together with medical treatment results in a greater

10 re categorized into two treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1% MF and 2) SRP plus placebo.

11 re categorized into two treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1.2% ATV and 2) SRP plus placebo.

12 omly allocated to three treatment groups: 1) SRP with placebo gel (group 1); 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel

13 rized into two treatment groups: 1) group 1: SRP + placebo gel and 2) group 2: SRP + 0.5% AZM.

14 sequence, we computationally identified 152 SRP RNAs throughout the phylum Basidiomycota.

15 roups: 1) SRP with placebo gel (group 1); 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel (group 2); and 3) SRP with 1.2% AT

16 o treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1% MF and 2) SRP plus placebo.

17 reatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1.2% ATV and 2) SRP plus placebo.

18 oups: 1) NT group (n = 30), no treatment; 2) SRP group (n = 30), scaling and root planing (SRP) and l

19 with: 1) at least 6 months of follow-up; 2) SRP, in combination with local antimicrobials; and 3) pa

20 ) group 1: SRP + placebo gel and 2) group 2: SRP + 0.5% AZM.

21 ; 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel (group 2); and 3) SRP with 1.2% ATV gel (group 3).

22 ion with physiologic saline solution; and 3) SRP/SA group (n = 30), SRP and local irrigation with SA

23 FDIS + metronidazole; 2) FDIS + placebo; 3) SRP + metronidazole; and 4) SRP + placebo.

24 ent groups: 1) FDIS+MET; 2) FDIS+placebo; 3) SRP+MET; and 4) SRP+placebo.

25 line solution; and 3) SRP/SA group (n = 30), SRP and local irrigation with SA (10(-5) M).

26 IS + placebo; 3) SRP + metronidazole; and 4) SRP + placebo.

27 DIS+MET; 2) FDIS+placebo; 3) SRP+MET; and 4) SRP+placebo.

28 shes the ability of the ribosome to activate SRP-SR assembly and impairs cotranslational protein targ

29 on to allow repositioning of the 'activated' SRP-SR complex on the ribosome.

30 rtion of the signal sequence severely affect SRP binding.

31 rkers in the gingival crevicular fluid after SRP.

32 ed in the control group 3 and 6 months after SRP, matrix metalloproteinase-8 level decreased in the t

33 improved in both groups 3 and 6 months after SRP.

34 l decreased in the test group 3 months after SRP.

35 between both groups at 3 and 6 months after SRP.

36 , before SRP as well as 3 and 6 months after SRP.

37 ial complexes did not differ between MTZ+AMX+SRP and SRP-only groups at 5 years post-treatment (P > 0

38 membrane via a Dynamic mode, followed by an SRP-induced conformational transition to a Stable mode t

39 Sites treated with SRP + L and SRP alone resulted in statistically significant reductio

40 In the absence of NAC, MetAP and SRP antagonize each other, indicating a novel role for N

41 or NAC in regulating the access of MetAP and SRP to the ribosome.

42 retention exceeding 60% and 80% of NO3-N and SRP inputs, respectively.

43 closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound.

44 We show that mammalian SRP and SRP receptors (SR) are insufficient to generate the biol

45 lexes did not differ between MTZ+AMX+SRP and SRP-only groups at 5 years post-treatment (P > 0.05).

46 milar groups, SRP + MM (aged 66.8 years) and SRP alone (aged 67 years), to treat a >/=5 mm posterior

47 In the presence of anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR Abs, mechanisms involved in muscle reg

48 In vitro, anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR Abs induced muscle fiber atrophy and

49 We investigated whether anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR Abs could be involved in muscle damag

50 In muscle biopsies of patients with anti-SRP(+) and anti-HMGCR(+) Abs, a large number of small fi

51 ith generalized AgP were treated with aPDT + SRP (test group) or SRP only (control group).

52 c analyses and comparison with the bacterial SRP further suggest that the SR MoRF functionally replac

53 The precise mechanism by which the bacterial SRP receptor, FtsY, interacts with and is regulated at t

54 he essential GNRA tetraloop in the bacterial SRP RNA, providing an example for the replacement of RNA

55 nisms and two biomarkers at baseline, before SRP as well as 3 and 6 months after SRP.

56 group at the appointment immediately before SRP.

57 Patients treated by both SRP and FMD showed improvement in all periodontal clinic

58 ns are still known to be independent of both SRP and GET, so there seems to be a critical need for an

59 pecific semantic predictions were indexed by SRP sources within the motor system-in dorsolateral hand

60 the canonical cotranslational recognition by SRP, SRP was found to bind to YohP posttranslationally.

61 eceiving non-surgical periodontal therapy by SRP with (test) and without (control) two appointments o

62 Canonical SRP RNA genes have not been identified for some Thermopr

63 plast of green plants, where the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) post-translationally targets light-harvestin

64 Furthermore, combining SRP and sample rotation, we demonstrate the SRP tomograp

65 masked, randomized clinical trial comparing SRP with placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP co

66 uggest coevolution of the two most conserved SRP features-SRP RNA helix 8 and Srp54-in basidiomycetes

67 a test (SRP + probiotic, n = 14) or control (SRP + placebo, n = 14) group.

68 Amongst controls, SRP with adjunct PT was more effective in reducing PI (P

69 tial RNA is bypassed in the chloroplast (cp) SRP of green plants.

70 In contrast to cytosolic SRP, which contacts the ribosome close to the peptide tu

71 kg/day NH4-N, 1097 kg/day NO3-N, 656 kg/day SRP).

72 the proper biogenesis of function-essential SRP RNA.

73 ution of the two most conserved SRP features-SRP RNA helix 8 and Srp54-in basidiomycetes.

74 Following SRP, the cytokine-bacterial edges demonstrated a 2-fold

75 recorded at baseline, 4 to 6 weeks following SRP, and 6 months following surgical therapy.

76 Eight weeks following SRP, modified Widman flap (MWF) surgery was performed in

77 tivity over existing approaches allowing for SRP measurements of unprecedented frequency (8 min), whi

78 eins, which we name Snd1, Snd2 and Snd3 (for SRP-independent targeting), can synthetically compensate

79 Our findings reveal unexpected fungal SRP diversity and suggest coevolution of the two most co

80 tudy) into two statistically similar groups, SRP + MM (aged 66.8 years) and SRP alone (aged 67 years)

81 iven to 90 patients divided into two groups: SRP (n = 45) and FMD (n = 45).

82 utational approaches have failed to identify SRP components from genomes of many lower eukaryotes, ra

83 3 mm) were measured at 6 months illustrating SRP efficacy.

84 % (down to 38% of patients) and 95% (26%) in SRP + MM and 82% (42%) and 82% (41%) in SRP at 6 and 12

85 ) in SRP + MM and 82% (42%) and 82% (41%) in SRP at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

86 Facial weakness was more common in SRP-IgG-positive patients.

87 ates key interactions between two GTPases in SRP and its receptor, thus enabling rapid delivery of ca

88 (0.9 +/- 0.8 mm) and 13% (0.7 +/- 0.9 mm) in SRP + MM and 11% (0.7 +/- 1.1 mm) and 21% (1.2 +/- 0.9 m

89 (0.7 +/- 1.1 mm) and 21% (1.2 +/- 0.9 mm) in SRP at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

90 reased a significant 61% (P = 0.009) only in SRP + MM at 6 months.

91 metic drug ketamine, play a critical role in SRP, but not in the induction or expression of adult OD

92 arge, eutrophic lake experiencing increasing SRP loads.

93 n dynamics that are reduced upon binding its SRP binding partner, cpSRP54.

94 tionally important loop present in all known SRP RNAs.

95 as not strongly related to lake TP, and lake SRP concentrations were positively but weakly related to

96 e, we present structures of native mammalian SRP-ribosome complexes in the scanning and engaged state

97 We show that mammalian SRP and SRP receptors (SR) are insufficient to generate

98 ribosome-induced activation of the mammalian SRP pathway.

99 e native fold for RNase P to bind and mature SRP RNA co-transcriptionally.

100 e of locally delivered statins to mechanical SRP is beneficial to increasing bone fill percentage.

101 The C. neoformans SRP RNA displays a predicted structure in which the univ

102 locker, is sufficient to trigger RRP but not SRP exocytosis.

103 hat if disease-associated mutations obstruct SRP interaction, they lead to silencing of the mutated p

104 retained on average 37% of NO3-N and 45% of SRP inputs, with maximum retention exceeding 60% and 80%

105 tion of 33-99% of NO3-N inputs and 45-99% of SRP inputs.

106 ence analyses showed that, in the absence of SRP RNA, the M-domain of cpSRP54 both accelerates and st

107 We report purification and analysis of SRP in the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, provi

108 Comparison of SRP in collocate PM2.5 aerosol filter sampling with the

109 RNA is a universally conserved component of SRP that mediates key interactions between two GTPases i

110 These complexes consist of SRP proteins and a single, highly structured SRP RNA.

111 Depletion of SRP, the SRP receptor or the Sec61 translocon in cells l

112 oformans, providing the first description of SRP in basidiomycetous yeast.

113 Detection of SRP is based on molybdenum blue chemistry with Sn(II) ch

114 trolled trial was to compare the efficacy of SRP with and without adjunct probiotic therapy (PT) in t

115 V1 play a critical role in the expression of SRP and its behavioral correlate of familiarity recognit

116 real time the co-transcriptional folding of SRP RNA.

117 understanding of the sources and impacts of SRP in atmospheric chemistry.

118 l sequence and correlates with inhibition of SRP interaction.

119 and remodels the conformational landscape of SRP on the ribosome to regulate its interaction kinetics

120 d their evolution coincides with the loss of SRP RNA in green plants.

121 Our data indicate a novel mechanism of SRP-dependent membrane protein transport with the cpSRP5

122 bitual shamma use compromises the outcome of SRP in patients with CP.

123 nstrates that the NAC-induced regulations of SRP activity are essential for the fidelity of cotransla

124 c sachet commenced after the last session of SRP.

125 ith placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP combined with a 6-month regimen of 400 mg oral propo

126 were treated with aPDT + SRP (test group) or SRP only (control group).

127 koid membrane and lumen by the SEC1, TAT, or SRP/ALB3 translocases.

128 cture of the closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound.

129 Our SRP microscope enables fast quantitation of chemicals in

130 We explore the potential of our SRP technology by mapping polymer particles in 3D volume

131 did not result in an additional benefit over SRP alone.

132 ions of total P (TP) and soluble reactive P (SRP) with no discernable annual or seasonal patterns.

133 ion of DFT (the specific reaction parameter (SRP) approach to DFT).

134 al targeting by signal recognition particle (SRP) and posttranslational targeting by SecA and SecB.

135 The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to signal sequences emerging from the ribosom

136 targeting, the signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to the translating ribosome displaying the si

137 sally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) co-translationally delivers newly synthesized membr

138 The signal recognition particle (SRP) cotranslationally recognizes signal sequences of se

139 The signal recognition particle (SRP) delivers 30% of the proteome to the eukaryotic endo

140 ervation of the signal recognition particle (SRP) from bacteria to man, computational approaches have

141 The signal recognition particle (SRP) is an essential ribonucleoprotein particle that med

142 sally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) is essential for the biogenesis of most integral me

143 tionally by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway or post-translationally by the mammalian tr

144 f the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor and conserved among eukaryotes, plays an e

145 Signal recognition particle (SRP) recognizes signal sequences of secretory proteins a

146 omponent of the signal recognition particle (SRP) required for ER-targeted translation.

147 cognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP)(3,4) and then moved co-translationally through the

148 te selection by signal recognition particle (SRP), a universally conserved protein targeting machine.

149 cognized by the signal recognition particle (SRP), as indicated by in vivo and in vitro site-directed

150 The signal recognition particle (SRP), responsible for co-translational protein targeting

151 equired for the signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP receptors, the translocon, the signal peptidas

152 MetAP), and the signal recognition particle (SRP), which targets secretory and membrane proteins to t

153 The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is essential for correct targetin

154 FlhF, a signal recognition particle (SRP)-like GTPase, has been found to regulate the flagell

155 Signal recognition particles (SRPs) are universal ribonucleoprotein complexes found in

156 In periodontal maintenance patients, SRP + L did not enhance clinical outcomes compared to SR

157 In 4- to 6-mm PD, SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in 8.4%, 6.5%, and 5.22% CAL g

158 ts in Thermoproteus tenax created a permuted SRP RNA gene.

159 rements of water-soluble reactive phosphate (SRP) ions in atmospheric particles.

160 s (NH4-N, NO3-N, soluble reactive phosphorus-SRP) along a approximately 300-km arid-land river (Rio G

161 trial comparing SRP with placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP combined with a 6-month regime

162 RP group (n = 30), scaling and root planing (SRP) and local irrigation with physiologic saline soluti

163 p was treated with scaling and root planing (SRP) and myo-inositol (MI).

164 use to mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) and placebo in each group, with minimum 10 particip

165 est group received scaling and root planing (SRP) and probiotic-containing lozenges.

166 ) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treating chronic periodontitis in patients with

167 system adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treatment of Class II furcation defects.

168 prophylaxis before scaling and root planing (SRP) has an effect on the outcome of non-surgical period

169 PDT) adjunctive to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with AgP.

170 , as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic pe

171 l as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of moderate and severe chronic per

172 d as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes m

173 MX) as adjuncts to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of periodontitis in type 2 diabeti

174 ate the effects of scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical parameters and circulating levels of le

175 effect of MMs plus scaling and root planing (SRP) on these sites.

176 with conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) over weeks or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDI

177 riodontal therapy, scaling and root planing (SRP) per quadrant and one-stage full-mouth disinfection

178 e effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) plus the adjunctive use of diode laser therapy to S

179 s as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) provide additional benefits in the treatment of per

180 ndomized following scaling and root planing (SRP) to receive ERL monotherapy (n = 27) or MIST (n = 26

181 out antibiotics by scaling and root planing (SRP) to remove dental biofilm.

182 er study evaluated scaling and root planing (SRP) with and without EMD in 51 patients presenting with

183 Effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) with/without adjunct probiotic (Lactobacillus reute

184 therapy, including scaling and root planing (SRP), and were assigned randomly to a test (SRP + probio

185 ms, in addition to scaling and root planing (SRP), for the treatment of intrabony defects (IBDs) in p

186 In 1- to 3-mm PD, scaling and root planing (SRP), modified Widman flap (MWF), and osseous surgery (O

187 ) over traditional scaling and root planing (SRP), with or without adjunctive metronidazole, when tre

188 were treated with scaling and root planing (SRP).

189 s (DMt2) receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).

190 dontitis underwent scaling and root planing (SRP).

191 SPT in the form of scaling and root planing [SRP]) (n = 35).

192 riodontal therapy (scaling and root planing [SRP]) on gingival interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-10, seru

193 patients received scaling and root planning (SRP), per quadrant at a 1-week-interval, performed with

194 Ps) coated with stimuli-responsive polymers (SRPs) exhibit tunable optical properties responding to e

195 efore call the semantic readiness potential (SRP).

196 nd stimulus-selective response potentiation (SRP) resulting from enriched visual experience.

197 ents that do not use any form of ST product, SRP is an effective treatment modality for the treatment

198 ssel-beam-based stimulated Raman projection (SRP) microscopy and tomography for label-free volumetric

199 400 mg oral propolis once daily (propolis + SRP group, n = 24) was performed in patients with long-s

200 with either anti-signal recognition protein (SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (H

201 Q-SRP was performed by hand instruments per quadrant at 1-

202 ng order: FMD (n = 20), FMUD (n = 20), and Q-SRP (n = 20).

203 ntly decreased in FMD compared to FMUD and Q-SRP at 6 months (P < 0.05).

204 l quadrant-wise scaling and root planning (Q-SRP) in severe chronic periodontitis.

205 Patients with periodontitis received SRP and surgery, and HVs received prophylaxis.

206 ing SRP and vitamins and the group receiving SRP alone.

207 lar bone levels between the groups receiving SRP and vitamins and the group receiving SRP alone.

208 emerging from the 60S tunnel, which recruit SRP/Sec61 to the shared binding site, displace Ebp1.

209 EGTA, are essentially involved in recruiting SRP vesicles.

210 .4%, 6.5%, and 5.22% CAL gain, respectively; SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in 18.7%, 25.4%, and 30.8% PD

211 %, 39.4%, and 61.39% CAL loss, respectively; SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in increased mean PD of 2.5%,

212 d for the signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP receptors, the translocon, the signal peptidase comp

213 anonical cotranslational recognition by SRP, SRP was found to bind to YohP posttranslationally.

214 SRP proteins and a single, highly structured SRP RNA.

215 sed site-specific photocrosslinking to study SRP-signal sequence interactions.

216 tory and requiring antibiotics to supplement SRP were associated with low biofilm lysine contents.

217 Surprisingly, SRP RNA folding is robust to transcription rate changes

218 (SRP), and were assigned randomly to a test (SRP + probiotic, n = 14) or control (SRP + placebo, n =

219 MWF had significantly more PD reduction than SRP, and there was significantly less CAL gain with surg

220 S had significantly higher PD reduction than SRP.

221 and proteoliposome studies demonstrated that SRP and its receptor FtsY are essential for the posttran

222 The SRP precedes critical words if a previous sentence conte

223 The SRP RNA is a universally conserved component of SRP that

224 The SRP-FtsY GTPases are detached from the RNA tetraloop and

225 ndent binding of the SRP-FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop.

226 Professional tooth cleaning before the SRP does not improve the clinical results of the SRP.

227 cant differences were identified between the SRP and FMD groups in regard to OHQoL and OIDP scores wh

228 etically compensate for the loss of both the SRP and GET pathways, and act as a backup targeting syst

229 less hydrophobic signal sequences bypass the SRP and are moved through the channel post-translational

230 In Escherichia coli, the SRP and its receptor FtsY bind to ribosome-nascent chain

231 r plant chloroplasts from cyanobacteria, the SRP pathway underwent striking adaptations that enable t

232 SRP and sample rotation, we demonstrate the SRP tomography that can reconstruct the 3D distribution

233 chanism of signal sequence transfer from the SRP to the translocon.

234 Compared with the other groups, the SRP/SA group showed less local inflammation and better t

235 Loss of the MoRF in the SRP receptor (SR) largely abolishes the ability of the r

236 er RANKL immunolabeling were observed in the SRP/SA group at 15 and 30 days.

237 There were fewer TRAP-positive cells in the SRP/SA group than in the NT group at all of the time poi

238 There was more PBF in the SRP/SA group than in the other groups at days 7 and 15.

239 beyond its hydrophobic binding groove of the SRP M domain towards the translocon.

240 polypeptide selection by SecA instead of the SRP machinery.

241 Initial recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP-RNC complex results in GTP-

242 ing machinery permits the permutation of the SRP RNA and creates highly stable and functional circula

243 tidomain chloroplast-specific subunit of the SRP, cpSRP43, is proposed to take on the role of coordin

244 ex results in GTP-independent binding of the SRP-FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop.

245 does not improve the clinical results of the SRP.

246 ature protein have only a mild effect on the SRP-signal sequence association.

247 e translating Escherichia coli ribosome, the SRP-SR in the 'activated' state and the translocon.

248 Depletion of SRP, the SRP receptor or the Sec61 translocon in cells leads to r

249 ions in the RNA-binding domain of Srp54, the SRP protein subunit that directly interacts with helix 8

250 by biochemical experiments, reveals that the SRP RNA adopts a kinked and untwisted conformation to al

251 oluble ribosome footprints revealed that the SRP-dependent membrane targeting of PsbA is already init

252 ing the signal sequence to deliver it to the SRP receptor (SR) on the membrane, where the signal pept

253 gets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the SRP receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, init

254 ribosome-nascent-chain complex (RNC) to the SRP receptor, termed FtsY in bacteria.

255 recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP-RNC complex results in GTP-independent binding of th

256 e reactions with chemical accuracy using the SRP-DFT approach, as has been shown for H2 + Cu(111) and

257 teract efficiently by themselves without the SRP RNA.

258 eated with SRP and adjunctive laser therapy (SRP + L).

259 Strikingly, these SRP RNA features in Basidiomycota are accompanied by phy

260 The 5'- and 3'-termini of this SRP RNA are located close to a functionally important lo

261 Thus, SRP protects secretory protein mRNAs from degradation.

262 use of local antimicrobials as an adjunct to SRP may result in additional benefits compared with SRP

263 nce daily is a potentially viable adjunct to SRP that significantly reduces levels of HbA1c, FPG, and

264 cts of local antimicrobials as an adjunct to SRP, compared with SRP alone, on periodontal clinical pa

265 Class II furcation defects as an adjunct to SRP.

266 tion of four sessions of aPDT, adjunctive to SRP, promotes additional clinical, microbiologic, and im

267 ded that topical use of SA as an adjuvant to SRP is effective in the treatment of experimental period

268 id not enhance clinical outcomes compared to SRP alone in the treatment of inflamed sites with >/= 5

269 Cross-links to SRP were also observed for a second small membrane prote

270 ations were positively but weakly related to SRP loads.

271 ts without obesity with CP were submitted to SRP.

272 the adjunctive use of diode laser therapy to SRP alone on changes in the clinical parameters of disea

273 Here we show that SR switches translocons to SRP-dependent translocation by displacing Sec62.

274 tress on non-surgical periodontal treatment (SRP) outcomes in patients with severe chronic periodonti

275 All patients underwent SRP.

276 ; and 4) group 4: Non-chewers that underwent SRP + PT.

277 e; 2) group 2: Shamma-chewers that underwent SRP + PT; 3) group 3: Non-chewers that underwent SRP alo

278 s: 1) group 1: Shamma chewers that underwent SRP alone; 2) group 2: Shamma-chewers that underwent SRP

279 + PT; 3) group 3: Non-chewers that underwent SRP alone; and 4) group 4: Non-chewers that underwent SR

280 -month follow-ups in patients that underwent SRP with and without adjunct PT.

281 ur data revealed that YohP engages an unique SRP-dependent posttranslational insertion pathway that i

282 ns and a slowly releasable pool of vesicles (SRP) at farther distance from them.

283 One in 4 patients was SRP-IgG positive, and 1 in 3 was HMGCR-IgG positive.

284 res of PI, BOP, PD, clinical AL and MBL when SRP was performed with/without adjunct PT.

285 tivated systems like H2 + Pd(111), for which SRP DFs are not yet available.

286 However, chemical accuracy with SRP-DFT has yet to be demonstrated for weakly activated

287 result in additional benefits compared with SRP alone in PD reduction and CAL gain, especially in we

288 crobials as an adjunct to SRP, compared with SRP alone, on periodontal clinical parameters of patient

289 similar clinical improvements compared with SRP alone.

290 The adjunct use of EMD with SRP resulted in significantly greater improvements in ov

291 onstrate that they function in parallel with SRP and GET to target a broad range of substrates to the

292 d analysis, patients in group 2 treated with SRP + 0.5% AZM showed enhanced reductions in PI, GI, mSB

293 Sites treated with SRP + L and SRP alone resulted in statistically signific

294 Fifty-eight sites were treated with SRP alone.

295 Fifty-six sites were treated with SRP and adjunctive laser therapy (SRP + L).

296 a period of 5 years than those treated with SRP only.

297 nt IBD depth reduction at sites treated with SRP plus locally delivered MF in patients with CP in bot

298 BDs was randomly allocated to treatment with SRP followed by LDD of 1.2% RSV, 1.2% ATV, or placebo ge

299 ative coping strategies demonstrate worsened SRP outcomes.

300 DASS-stress score was associated to worsened SRP outcomes in terms of bleeding on probing (BOP) (OR =

301 trategies were also associated with worsened SRP outcomes.