ライフサイエンスコーパス: SRS

1 SRS followed by EGFR-TKI resulted in the longest OS and

2 SRS is a nonlinear technique that probes the same vibrat

3 SRS is typically administered in a single session but ca

4 SRS microscopy offers an imaging speed that is faster th

5 SRS microscopy was used to image D2O, PG-d8/DMSO-d6, and

6 SRS relies on the precisely guided delivery of high-dose

7 SRS revealed interactions between the gel and the stratu

8 SRS was applied to image label-free ponatinib with high

9 C-H frequency (2850 cm(-1)) SRS imaging revealed a substantial difference in lipogen

10 randomized participants (SRS alone, n = 111; SRS plus WBRT, n = 102) with a mean age of 60.6 years (S

11 ) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(TM)-2 (SRS-2).

12 6 years (adjusted B=0.23, 95% CI=0.03-0.37); SRS results were similar.

13 pattern of more than 450 000 CpG sites in 44 SRS patients.

14 .88-0.92; P-POSSUM = 0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.91; SRS = 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.87).

15 After SRS, 18 patients (7%) had new transient or permanent sym

16 ce of cognitive deterioration was less after SRS alone at 3 months (5/11 [45.5%] vs 16/17 [94.1%]; di

17 ss cognitive deterioration at 3 months after SRS alone (40/63 patients [63.5%]) than when combined wi

18 -up, performed between 4 and 15 months after SRS, all 3 patients demonstrated a reduction in uveal tu

19 ration and detection strategies have allowed SRS to probe increasingly smaller volumes and shorter ti

20 disease progression (of which 47% were also SRS-positive) were deceased, and 87% of patients with a

21 On multivariable analysis, SRS versus EGFR-TKI, WBRT versus EGFR-TKI, age, performa

22 Initial scores for ABC and SRS were closely matched for participants assigned to pl

23 hyll fluorescence and absorption in CARS and SRS microscopy.

24 er-adjusted associations between 52 EDCs and SRS scores using a two-stage hierarchical analysis to ac

25 tic child by a PDP score>98th percentile and SRS score in the top 5% of the sample (n=81, 2.0%).

26 gene expression profiling was performed and SRS endotype was determined by a previously established

27 assignment to hydrocortisone or placebo, and SRS endotype (P = 0.02).

28 t applications of both spontaneous Raman and SRS as novel imaging platforms to facilitate the drug di

29 romised in the Drosophila nervous system and SRS patient cells.

30 nce supports the use of SRS alone, WBRT, and SRS with WBRT.

31 the unique legacy of plutonium production at SRS.

32 f collected foot borne debris, were taken at SRS over an eleven year period, from 2003 to 2014.

33 ation of spermine does not appear to benefit SRS patients or mouse models.

34 There was no significant interaction between SRS group and vasopressor assignment (P = 0.50).

35 polarization ratios measured using broadband SRS agree with the limited number of previously reported

36 water, benzene, and toluene using broadband SRS with femtosecond and picosecond Raman pump pulses at

37 owed by EGFR-TKI versus EGFR-TKI followed by SRS at intracranial progression is urgently needed.

38 ollowed by EGFR-TKI, or EGFR-TKI followed by SRS or WBRT at intracranial progression.

39 zes the rich chemical information offered by SRS imaging, and an improved diagnosis can be achieved i

40 sm resulting in a non-functional SMS causing SRS.

41 ly mild symptoms from brainstem compression, SRS can be recommended as the primary therapy with the a

42 In the following decades, SRS emerged as a unique discipline involving a collegial

43 g patient outcomes following cavity-directed SRS.

44 tegration within (local efficiency) the DMS, SRS, and FPS, and between (participation coefficient) th

45 Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition [SRS-2], with T scores of >/=75 associated with a categor

46 ed (1:1) with a block size of four to either SRS of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery)

47 dren whose parents had concordantly elevated SRS scores (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.16) an

48 This has enabled SRS research to move from its original domain, of probin

49 with the standard SRS, the clearing-enhanced SRS achieves greater than 10-times depth increase.

50 In this early experience, SRS was found to be an effective management option for u

51 l-focusing stimulated Raman scattering (FMSF-SRS) microscopy: a technical improvement over traditiona

52 P < 0.001, comparing treatments) and 17% for SRS scores (P = 0.017).

53 Because there is no cure for SRS, treatment plans focus on alleviating symptoms rathe

54 the SRS plus WBRT group and 20 to 24 Gy for SRS alone.

55 Median overall survival was 10.4 months for SRS alone and 7.4 months for SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio

56 10.4 months for SRS alone and 7.4 months for SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75-1.38; P

57 of a 5-week continuous monitoring period for SRS, quantitative immunohistochemistry using neuronal (n

58 is with MRI to aid in treatment planning for SRS.

59 (mean change from baseline, -1.5 points for SRS alone vs -4.2 points for SRS plus WBRT; mean differe

60 -1.5 points for SRS alone vs -4.2 points for SRS plus WBRT; mean difference, 2.7 points; 95% CI, -2.0

61 ndings from our study may have relevance for SRS and highlight a potentially underreported aspect of

62 ranial failure was significantly shorter for SRS alone compared with SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 3.6

63 However, label-free SRS detection of single biomolecules having extremely sm

64 Moreover, coupled with label-free SRS imaging of the total proteome, our method can readil

65 that both lymphoblasts and fibroblasts from SRS patients can accumulate Me(2)SPM, resulting in signi

66 n improved diagnosis can be achieved if full SRS information is used.

67 apeutic effect in viable cells in functional SRS is also suggested.

68 The bioorthogonal hyperspectral SRS microscopy imaging reveals that TPP can maintain sta

69 Current hyperspectral SRS data analysis methods are based on either linear unm

70 We then utilize hyperspectral-SRS imaging of intracellular lipid droplets to identify

71 ncluding the Social Responsiveness Scale-II (SRS-2) as a measure of autistic traits and social impair

72 in brain tissue, the organ most affected in SRS, and was associated with changes in polyamine metabo

73 ated with negligible absolute differences in SRS scores (</= 1.5).

74 estimated covariate-adjusted differences in SRS-2 T-scores with a doubling in phthalate concentratio

75 of SRS microscopy and review innovations in SRS microscopes and imaging probes.

76 hat radiocesium will likewise be retained in SRS soils.

77 omponent explaining 30.9% of the variance in SRS-2 scores, and a strong association with ADHD symptom

78 for patients with MBM from melanoma includes SRS, WBRT, or a combination of both.

79 ing any optical imaging technique, including SRS, there is an additional problem of optical aberratio

80 INTERPRETATION: SRS of the surgical cavity in patients who have had comp

81 cans from patients who underwent gamma knife SRS from January 2011 to August 2018 were analyzed.

82 f patients likely to benefit from first-line SRS, close CNS observation, and treatment of emergent CN

83 After resection of a brain metastasis, SRS radiosurgery should be considered one of the standar

84 er, in patients not suited for microsurgery, SRS might also be an alternative to balance tumor contro

85 Further, on the basis of the multiplexed SRS images concurrently highlighting the cellular protei

86 volumetric phasor analysis of multispectral SRS images for chemically specific clustering and segmen

87 positive SRS than the group with a negative SRS (P = 0.0002).

88 providing an ablative effect noninvasively, SRS has altered the treatment paradigms for benign and m

89 This previously unreported application of SRS has permitted, therefore, direct visualization and s

90 oteins and lipids by linear decomposition of SRS images at three optimally selected Raman shifts.

91 We aimed to establish the effect of SRS on survival and cognitive outcomes compared with WBR

92 sible for the patients having a mild form of SRS and reveal yet another molecular mechanism resulting

93 We introduce the fundamentals of SRS microscopy and review innovations in SRS microscopes

94 ates the pathological polyamine imbalance of SRS and causes survival defects and synaptic degeneratio

95 ackground and experimental implementation of SRS microscopy are discussed and recent developments in

96 affecting males, the main manifestations of SRS include osteoporosis, hypotonic stature, seizures, c

97 The label-free nature of SRS imaging combined with its chemical specificity allow

98 reduce the intracellular spermidine pools of SRS patient-derived cells.

99 Finally, we demonstrate the potential of SRS for a range of in planta applications by presenting

100 g-cell interaction, showing the potential of SRS in drug development.

101 We defined gene sets predictive of SRS group, and serial sampling demonstrated that subgrou

102 The imaging sensitivity of SRS microscopy is limited to ~10 mM for endogenous biomo

103 was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SRS for VS with regard to different Koos grades.

104 ll hearing preservation rate and toxicity of SRS was influenced by age and cannot be predicted by tum

105 ive, multi-institutional randomized trial of SRS followed by EGFR-TKI versus EGFR-TKI followed by SRS

106 Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection could be an alterna

107 nts with 1 to 3 brain metastases, the use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulte

108 Level 1 evidence supports the use of SRS alone, WBRT, and SRS with WBRT.

109 chemical information can maximize the use of SRS during intraoperative pathologic consultation with i

110 le length scales to underline the utility of SRS to the molecular sciences.

111 We aimed to categorize patients based on SRS endotypes to determine if these profiles influenced

112 for the detection of primary NETs occult on SRS, especially tumors with a well-differentiated patter

113 assigned to the observation group (n=68) or SRS group (n=64), with 128 patients available for analys

114 tion was observed due to vector injection or SRS.

115 metastases were randomized to receive SRS or SRS plus WBRT between February 2002 and December 2013.

116 There were 213 randomized participants (SRS alone, n = 111; SRS plus WBRT, n = 102) with a mean

117 ing algorithm, we obtain robust single-pixel SRS spectra exhibiting single-molecule events, verified

118 nococcus torques at 1 year related to poorer SRS-2 performance.

119 BPA concentration was associated with poorer SRS-2 scores [beta=0.3 ( 95% CI: 0, 0.7)]; this associat

120 A positive SRS does not eliminate the need for performing (18)F-FDG

121 er for the patient group that had a positive SRS than the group with a negative SRS (P = 0.0002).

122 group with a low-grade GEPNET and a positive SRS, PFS and OS were also significantly lower for patien

123 For patients with a positive SRS, PFS and OS were significantly shorter when the (18)

124 domly assigned (1:1) to either postoperative SRS (12-20 Gy single fraction with dose determined by su

125 roduct and remove three of the six potential SRS, negatively impacting delphinidin synthesis.

126 therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered only to the radiographically visible tumo

127 se of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for this common problem.

128 Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as widely accepted treatment option for

129 Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven an effective tool for the treatment of b

130 y to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved time to local recur

131 However, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity is widely used in an attempt

132 identified during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment planning, which is time consuming and pot

133 The concept of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was first described by Lars Leksell in 1951.

134 rgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT).

135 Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and epidermal gro

136 n the brain after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), yet because of its association with cognitive decl

137 apy to the brain (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] or whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]), and 86 of 90 r

138 3 brain metastases amenable to radiosurgery, SRS alone may be a preferred strategy.

139 -rearranged NSCLC treated with radiotherapy (SRS and/or WBRT) and TKIs have prolonged survival, sugge

140 Some rare SRS patients carry maternally inherited microduplication

141 brain metastases were randomized to receive SRS or SRS plus WBRT between February 2002 and December

142 All patients with untreated VS who received SRS at our center were included.

143 s was less frequent in patients who received SRS than those who received WBRT (28 [52%] of 54 evaluab

144 our findings show that pseudo-H&E recolored SRS images in combination with lipid and protein chemica

145 arch for a molecular cause for the remaining SRS cases, and to find a possible common epigenetic chan

146 Electronic pre-resonant SRS allows detection of sub-micromolar chromophores.

147 r status epilepticus (SE) greatly restrained SRS and alleviated cognitive, memory, and mood dysfuncti

148 e participants, 2144 nurses (67.8%) returned SRS forms for a child and at least 1 parent and were inc

149 to the default mode (DMS), salience/reward (SRS), and frontoparietal (FPS) subnetworks in rMDD patie

150 ere identified using simple random sampling (SRS) in Nayapara and multistage cluster sampling in MSs

151 lysis using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) revealed that the relationship between EQ-C and mat

152 s completed the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of autistic behaviors.

153 measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a quantitative measure of autism traits.

154 hecklist (ABC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (

155 list and/or the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

156 me measure, the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)].

157 e 3 years using Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) T-scores.

158 f Mortality (P-POSSUM), Surgical Risk Scale (SRS), and Surgical Outcome Risk Tool (SORT).

159 02, measured by Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS] score), which contrasts with families where the phe

160 rospectroscopy, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and laser scanning confocal imaging, and microtome

161 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) describes a family of techniques first discovered a

162 Hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging has rapidly become an emerging tool for hig

163 ous two-channel stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging technique and a new pseudo-hematoxylin and

164 al of employing stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging to probe for metabolic differences between

165 Broadband stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) is often observed in applications that use nonlinea

166 (PhDY-Chol) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscope.

167 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy allows for high-speed label-free chemica

168 this method to stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy and systematically identify 57 Caenorhab

169 py, followed by stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy and transcriptomics analysis, we identif

170 f hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy associated with a Raman tag synthesized

171 emonstrate that stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy can be used to provide sensitive and qua

172 emonstrate that stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy could be used to sensitively monitor per

173 fast multicolor stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy for cellular phenotyping.

174 ing method with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy for visualization of the cell nuclei in

175 n a decade ago, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy has become a powerful modality for imagi

176 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is a powerful label-free chemical imagin

177 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is one popular experimental tool used to

178 tical technique stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy promises a solution, as it can rapidly m

179 ring (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy provide label-free chemically specific i

180 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy represents a powerful method for imaging

181 roliferation or stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy to assess lipid quality.

182 ombination with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, define a role for BMP signaling in lipi

183 ticles based on stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy.

184 acterized using stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy.

185 e-clearing with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy.

186 ring (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) spectroscopies.

187 application of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) uses the benefit of a label-free molecular fingerpr

188 development of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), and covers the use of bioorthogonal tags to enhanc

189 CT scan, (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SRS), and (18)F-FDG PET.

190 onal and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) results were studied.

191 with the somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), in each clinically suspicious case.

192 ogenesis and spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) an impairment of the endogenous anti-inflammatory p

193 the onset of spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) in the animals.

194 alleviating spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) or cognitive, memory, and mood impairments has neve

195 thout affecting the strain rate sensitivity (SRS) significantly.

196 Analysis of SAG1-related sequence (SRS) antigenic repertoire reveals a highly heterogeneous

197 atients with spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SRS) is a matter of concern especially in case of large

198 We identified two sepsis response signature (SRS) subgroups in fecal peritonitis associated with earl

199 ubstitution in a substrate recognition site (SRS).

200 plutonium (Pu) study at Savannah River Site (SRS) conducted between 2003 and 2013.

201 al basin located on the Savannah River Site (SRS) has concentrated in a wetland 600 m downstream.

202 The F-Area of the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina (USA) is an example.

203 soil collected from the Savannah River Site (SRS) or unamended vadose zone soil and exposed to 3 year

204 for high U retention by Savannah River Site (SRS) wetland sediments under varying redox and acidic (p

205 cility in F-Area of the Savannah River Site (SRS), USA, were approximately 2.5 times greater than tho

206 in upland soils of the Savannah River Site (SRS).

207 MS), and stimulated Raman spectromicroscopy (SRS) were combined.

208 (TG-MS) and statistical Raman spectroscopy (SRS) and microscopy (SRM).

209 ly evidenced by scanning Raman spectroscopy (SRS) and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energ

210 ombination of stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS) and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) using

211 ave employed statistical Raman spectroscopy (SRS), and a forefront characterization tool using thermo

212 t scores, and summed difference scores (SSS, SRS, and SDS [respectively] = SSS-SRS) were evaluated us

213 ores (SSS, SRS, and SDS [respectively] = SSS-SRS) were evaluated using 17-segment visual interpretati

214 Compared with the standard SRS, the clearing-enhanced SRS achieves greater than 10-

215 Patients with Snyder-Robinson Syndrome (SRS) exhibit deficient Spermidine Synthase (SMS) gene ex

216 Snyder-Robinson syndrome (SRS) is an X-linked intellectual disability syndrome cau

217 esis enzyme, cause Snyder-Robinson syndrome (SRS), an X-linked intellectual disability syndrome; howe

218 Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is a growth retardation syndrome in which loss of m

219 Silver Russell Syndrome (SRS) syndrome is an imprinting disorder involving low bi

220 syndrome (BWS) and Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS).

221 strengthening the specimen-referral system (SRS).

222 enes belonging to the MYB, HD-ZIP, ERF, TCP, SRS, WRKY and DOF families may be involved in the regula

223 es belonging to HD-ZIP, ERF, WRKY, MYB, TCP, SRS and DOF families may be the major players in the reg

224 Raman scattering is an incoherent technique, SRS is a coherent process, and this fact provides severa

225 showed more metastatic anatomic regions than SRS in 17 patients.

226 ur approach exhibits higher sensitivity than SRS imaging of DNA in the fingerprint spectral region.

227 We recently demonstrated that SRS patient-derived lymphoblastoid cells are capable of

228 Our study demonstrates that SRS imaging is a sensitive and quantitative means of mea

229 We found that SRS is the major predictor of transcriptomic variation;

230 Given that SRS children also have very low body mass index, underst

231 erging data exist to support the notion that SRS in combination with targeted therapies or immune the

232 d the favorable benefit-to-risk profile that SRS affords for appropriately selected patients.

233 The SRS cross sections reported here can be used with confid

234 The SRS scores of the children were examined in association

235 The SRS scores, as reported by nurse mothers and their spous

236 Although the SRS and EGFR-TKI cohorts shared similar prognostic featu

237 d surface complexation modeling (SCM) at the SRS F-Area and other similar aquifers.

238 irritated, had less connections between the SRS and other subnetworks and higher local efficiency co

239 scores of autistic traits as measured by the SRS-2 in boys, but not girls; these small size effects w

240 erences in autism traits, as measured by the SRS.

241 Results The median OS for the SRS (n = 100), WBRT (n = 120), and EGFR-TKI (n = 131) co

242 dose schedule was 30 Gy in 12 fractions; the SRS dose was 18 to 22 Gy in the SRS plus WBRT group and

243 our patients were ineligible (three from the SRS group and one from the observation group).

244 ant roots can highly immobilize U(VI) in the SRS acidic sediments, which has significant implication

245 assessment committee identified gaps in the SRS for prioritization and intervention and piloted the

246 the observation group and 72% (60-87) in the SRS group (hazard ratio 0.46 [95% CI 0.24-0.88]; p=0.015

247 impairment (three [3%] of 93 patients in the SRS group vs eight [9%] of 92 patients in the WBRT group

248 actions; the SRS dose was 18 to 22 Gy in the SRS plus WBRT group and 20 to 24 Gy for SRS alone.

249 c characteristics still persist today in the SRS terrestrial environment.

250 Uranium in the SRS wetland sediments existed primarily as U(VI) bonded

251 genes unique to probands, especially in the SRS-discordant group (p = 0.0035).

252 strategy enables detailed monitoring of the SRS environment, revealing plutonium isotopic compositio

253 nterferences, and a linear dependence of the SRS signal on the TPP concentration, we successfully est

254 This innovative use of the SRS spectroscopy may find applications in agrochemical r

255 eated participants showed improvement on the SRS.

256 In microcosms simulating the SRS wetland processes, U immobilization on roots was 2 o

257 We demonstrate that the SRS virtually eliminates the background interference com

258 ne of more of these genes contributes to the SRS phenotype.

259 Whether the SRS response is measured intentionally or unintentionall

260 e distal domains and clear homology with the SRS-domain containing proteins of Toxoplasma gondii.

261 on (127)I and (129)I are similar within the SRS aquifer/wetland system.

262 Common to all three SRS subgroups, we found a hypomethylated region at the p

263 ecifically, the technology enables real-time SRS-image-based sorting of single live cells with a thro

264 This strategy represents an alternative to SRS and WBRT.

265 ients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SRS (98 patients) or WBRT (96 patients).

266 survival was longer in patients assigned to SRS (median 3.7 months [95% CI 3.45-5.06], 93 events) th

267 8 [52%] of 54 evaluable patients assigned to SRS vs 41 [85%] of 48 evaluable patients assigned to WBR

268 Pu/(239+240)Pu activity ratios attributed to SRS are substantially different than fallout due to past

269 mited cerebral metastasis were randomised to SRS versus SRS+WBRT.

270 nse to sepsis, including effects specific to SRS group.

271 Although the addition of WBRT to SRS improves the overall brain relapse rate, WBRT has no

272 rations exhibited significantly higher total SRS T-scores, indicating greater overall social impairme

273 1.0) and 0.5 (95% CI: 0.1, 0.8) higher total SRS T-scores.

274 Mean total SRS T-score was 45.3 (SD = 6.1).

275 py: a technical improvement over traditional SRS microscopy that effectively removes imaging backgrou

276 e potential therapeutic targets for treating SRS and other polyamine-associated neurological disorder

277 e a stabilizing effect on Pu migration under SRS vadose zone field conditions.

278 e the molecular mechanisms that may underlie SRS.

279 argeting the molecular mechanisms underlying SRS pathology.

280 Two patients also underwent SRS for additional intracranial metastases.

281 at operated at the Savannah River Site, USA (SRS) decades ago, trace quantities of plutonium with hig

282 We then use SRS to image the mixing of aqueous glucose and salt solu

283 As a proof of principle, we used SRS microscopy to analyze the cuticles from a variety of

284 Using SRS-based isotope tracing assay to quantitatively track

285 ral metastasis were randomised to SRS versus SRS+WBRT.

286 show that single cell metabolic imaging via SRS microscopy can be used for rapid detection of antimi

287 tion, failure to receive EGFR-TKI after WBRT/SRS, or insufficient follow-up.

288 xa at 1, 2, and 3 years were associated with SRS-2 performance, including many in the Lachnospiraceae

289 iome structure at 1 year was associated with SRS-2 total T-scores (p = 0.01).

290 e children were examined in association with SRS scores of the parents using crude and adjusted linea

291 astases, the use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulted in less cognitive deter

292 ficantly shorter for SRS alone compared with SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-5.9; P < .

293 tumors has not yet been fully evaluated with SRS imaging.

294 pments in the field of cellular imaging with SRS are highlighted and summarized.

295 Biochemically, the cells of individuals with SRS accumulate excess spermidine, whereas spermine level

296 Quality of life was higher at 3 months with SRS alone, including overall quality of life (mean chang

297 Combining STXM with SRS precisely dissected the penetration enhancing effect

298 nction was more frequent with WBRT than with SRS and there was no difference in overall survival betw

299 Patients were treated with SRS followed by EGFR-TKI, WBRT followed by EGFR-TKI, or

300 e brain metastasis or initial treatment with SRS versus WBRT were not (P = .633 and .666, respectivel