ライフサイエンスコーパス: Social Responsiveness Scale

1 ed using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and Social Responsiveness Scale.

2 with age and autistic traits indexed by the Social Responsiveness Scale.

3 cale, Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised, and Social Responsiveness Scale.

4 dimensions through a factor analysis of the Social Responsiveness Scale.

5 icant association with parent ratings in the social responsiveness scale.

6 th information on ASD-related traits via the Social Responsiveness Scale.

7 ]), the verbal IQ (0.53 [P = .004]), and the Social Responsiveness Scale (0.52 [P = .009]) scores.

8 changes directionally favoring JNJ-42165279: Social Responsiveness Scale 2 (SRS, p = 0.064), Repetiti

9 The Social Responsiveness Scale-2 was administered to assess

10 utism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2, the Social Responsiveness Scale-2, and the Child Symptom Inv

11 , while the Child Behavior Checklist and the Social Responsiveness Scale, administered to the main te

12 The Social Responsiveness Scale-Adult Version (SRS-A) measur

13 tor Function Classification System level and Social Responsiveness Scale and Child Behavior Checklist

14 ve ability (Full-Scale IQ), social behavior (Social Responsiveness Scale), and neuromotor performance

15 This data set also included the Social Responsiveness Scale as a dimensional measure of

16 lf analyses, we define networks that predict Social Responsiveness Scale, Autism Diagnostic Observati

17 The quantitative Social Responsiveness Scale genome scan identified two l

18 neuropsychological assessments including the Social Responsiveness Scale-II (SRS-2) as a measure of a

19 titative genome scan was performed using the Social Responsiveness Scale in a cohort of about 100 fam

20 e parent of each pair of twins completed the Social Responsiveness Scale on each child.

21 utism were significantly correlated with the Social Responsiveness Scale (P = 0.05), verbal IQ (P = 0

22 This study demonstrates the utility of the Social Responsiveness Scale quantitative endophenotype t

23 In correlated analyses differing by Social Responsiveness Scale respondent, genomewide signi

24 ale or Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised and Social Responsiveness Scale; Revised Child Anxiety and D

25 The Social Responsiveness Scale scan with only male affected

26 sures in children, including biparental mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores and proband Repetitiv

27 Further, predicted Social Responsiveness Scale scores for individuals with

28 The sex-differential distributions of Social Responsiveness Scale scores in multiplex autism f

29 Sibling Social Responsiveness Scale scores were continuously dis

30 Social Responsiveness Scale scores were unimodally distr

31 ividually, and combined, in association with Social Responsiveness Scale scores, using crude and adju

32 es and Measures: Distribution of ASD traits (Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition [SRS-2], wit

33 ores (91.4 [20.4] vs 103.4 [17.8]; P = .01), Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition, scores (57.

34 25% or greater reduction in informant-rated Social Responsiveness Scale-Second Edition total scores

35 traits at 6 years were assessed by using the Social Responsiveness Scale short form in 4,624 children

36 Further analysis using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) revealed that the rela

37 had genotyping, sperm methylation data, and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) score data available.

38 The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) significantly differed

39 ere 4 and 5 years old, mothers completed the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of autistic

40 with individual differences measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a quantitative measur

41 Test, and autism severity assessed with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), an instrument establi

42 ians: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global I

43 Using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), in which higher score

44 ported autism-related traits measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)-second edition (n = 39

45 e of the Child Behavior Checklist and/or the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

46 (TD), based on the behavioral domains of the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

47 by the trial's primary outcome measure, the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)].

48 n treatment over time on the caregiver-rated Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) (p = 0.686).

49 Parents completed the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) and Pediatric Eye Qu

50 l behavior was assessed at age 3 years using Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2) T-scores.

51 ve Behavioral Assessment System (ABAS-3) and Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2).

52 behavior phenotypes (p < 0.0002, measured by Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS] score), which contrast

53 Quantitative characterization using the Social Responsiveness Scale supported previously reporte

54 sment System for Children-2 (BASC-2) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(TM)-2 (SRS-2).

55 The authors used the Social Responsiveness Scale to obtain quantitative asses

56 Autistic traits as measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale were continuously distribute

57 Linkage analyses using scores from the Social Responsiveness Scale were performed in 590 famili

58 Autistic traits were measured using the Social Responsiveness Scale when the children were appro

59 r a social endophenotype in autism using the Social Responsiveness Scale, which provides a quantitati