ライフサイエンスコーパス: X-ray absorptiometry

1 ls and a body fat assessment via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

2 d assays and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

3 asurement of tHcy and whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

4 fat, lean mass) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

5 ody composition were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

6 fspring was assessed at birth by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

7 of the child were assessed with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

8 women at 3 WHI clinics by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

9 wer body fat (LBF) was imaged by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

10 nd fat-free mass and fat mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

11 y composition was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

12 bar spine (LS), as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

13 12 years using anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

14 ercentage fat (TBPF) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

15 quality that is not provided by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

16 omposition was assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

17 All subjects underwent standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

18 nd osteoporosis, measured by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

19 mass from baseline, assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

20 omposition was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

21 he lumbar spine and total hip by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

22 were determined using whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

23 density was determined by using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

24 d fat-free mass were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

25 ne (L2-L4) was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

26 ntage body fat (%BF) measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

27 (MPB), and muscle mass by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

28 nsity measurements obtained from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

29 al density (BMD) was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

30 mass and waist circumference on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

31 sured by a whole-body scan using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

32 y fat percentage was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

33 -body BMD were measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

34 femoral neck and/or lumbar spine) using dual x-ray absorptiometry.

35 free mass (FFM) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

36 BMD was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

37 y Eating Index (HEI) values, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

38 F and FFM were measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

39 and body composition was quantified by dual x-ray absorptiometry.

40 omposition was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

41 radius, and hip were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

42 ntation on BMD at the hip, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

43 at baseline and 3 and 6 mo with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

44 and BMD Z score was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

45 s, BMC, and body composition via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

46 ensity, typically assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

47 MI) and fat-free mass index with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

48 neral density, was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

49 nd lean mass were measured using dual-energy-x-ray absorptiometry.

50 index (FFMI) were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

51 y) were measured with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

52 lean mass were measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

53 osition changes were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

54 ssessed at birth with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

55 BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, and ot

56 (FFM), and appendicular mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; activity-related energy expenditur

57 Body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), ad libitum energy intake (EI; buf

58 Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and abdominal computed tomographic

59 Participants were evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and abdominal magnetic resonance im

60 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric data were used t

61 7 years, and body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and BP at 9 years, were analysed (n

62 inal magnetic resonance imaging, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and carotid ultrasound.

63 osition and abdominal adiposity (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scan, respe

64 ges relate to regional fat gain (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography) and baseli

65 y composition (measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography), insulin s

66 Body fat was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography.

67 ubjects with fat measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography.

68 at distribution were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography.

69 s assessed with a combination of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography.

70 Lean mass was estimated by dual X-ray absorptiometry and examined as leg lean mass (LLM)

71 assessment (VFA) performed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and if VFs identified by CNNs confe

72 Safety data, including clinical, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and laboratory data, are also repor

73 and fractures have lower aBMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and lower vBMD, thinner cortices, a

74 we measured body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI

75 were fat mass, fat distribution (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging), an

76 and 2) body fat distribution by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging.

77 gynoid fat ratio with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and measured the preperitoneal abdo

78 e quality was analyzed using peripheral dual x-ray absorptiometry and micro-computed tomography.

79 the Dallas Heart Study underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and MRI assessment of fat distribut

80 Percent body fat (BF) was assessed via dual X-ray absorptiometry and PA was determined via a multi-s

81 tion was evaluated by means of dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry and skinfold thickness.

82 lyzed infant body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and used untargeted liquid chromato

83 after bed rest, lean body mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and quadriceps cross-sectional are

84 cardiography), body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry), and blood parameters.

85 lerance test), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and ectopic fat (MRI) were assess

86 raction force, body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), and muscle cross-sectional area (

87 assessment (echocardiography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry); and histology and molecular evalu

88 ravenous-glucose-tolerance test, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and computed tomography, respectiv

89 ty (aBMD) were assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and fasting blood was collected fo

90 dy composition was quantified by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and insulin resistance was assesse

91 age body fat was determined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and intraabdominal adipose tissue

92 mass index and fat mass index by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and organ fat including subcutaneo

93 score, total fat mass index from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and overweight or obesity, defined

94 beled water, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and physical activity by accelerom

95 ndroid:gynoid fat ratio by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and preperitoneal abdominal fat by

96 body composition with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and questionnaire-derived percepti

97 body weight, body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and resting energy expenditure by

98 -hour urine calcium measurement, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and supplementation for vitamin D

99 t mass by physical examinations, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and ultrasound, respectively.

100 ion [VO2]), percent body fat via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and visceral fat via magnetic reso

101 d fat mass (FM) were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry annually over a mean (+/-SD) of 4.9

102 mic clamp), body composition (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), as well as hepatic fat content an

103 Dual x-ray absorptiometry-assessed body composition (includin

104 en were aged 4 and 6 y were BMI, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-assessed fat mass, overweight, or o

105 irth and at 4 and 6 y of age for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of lean and fat mass.

106 In a subgroup (n = 766), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of total abdominal fat w

107 al neck) were evaluated by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 5 and 20 wk postpartum.

108 02494) who had been scanned with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 52 wk of lactation (L52; n = 79)

109 onatal body composition was assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry at age 2 weeks.

110 and the offspring had undergone dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at age 9-10 years.

111 bone mineral density was measured with dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and again an average of

112 ty (SBMD) were assessed by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at baseline and at 2 annual follow-

113 LBM was measured by total-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at study baseline and at 12, 24, an

114 GV) was measured with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at Tanner stage 4.

115 sing anthropometric measures and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the baseline visit.

116 Patients underwent dual x-ray absorptiometry at the hip and spine and hand radio

117 , and bone area were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the median age of 6 y.

118 od total body bone mass by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the median age of 6.0 y.

119 ntent (BMC) Z-scores measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at the one-third distal radius, in

120 l bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the spine, hip, and radius, and

121 ge from baseline in areal BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the total hip through month 12 (

122 ediction than that achieved with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-based BMD.

123 e relation of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based measures of adiposity with IS

124 Body composition was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry biweekly, resting energy expenditur

125 ineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, blood samples, diet, physical acti

126 body composition with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, blood volume with the use of a car

127 as evaluated in association with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body composition measures among 15,

128 Using yearly dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, body composition was assessed in t

129 d thicknesses, and waist girth), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, body density, bioelectrical impeda

130 l density (aBMD) measurements by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry cannot assess bone microstructural

131 composition (skinfold thickness, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), comprehensive echocardiography, a

132 organ fat, and adipocyte size by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, CT scan, and adipose tissue biopsy

133 Mouse Genome Project focusing on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry data for the analysis of mouse knoc

134 Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data obtained from the 1999-2004 NH

135 on the basis of NHANES 1999-2004 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data, provide a reference in the US

136 Measures of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass included the limb-

137 thwest England aged 21-60 y with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass indexes </=11 kg/m

138 h West England aged 21-60 y with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived fat mass indexes of >/=13 k

139 avioral assessment, body weight, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for body composition, echoca

140 mass was assessed using repeated dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans.

141 beneficiaries with HIV underwent dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) screening in 2001-2.

142 Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was used to determine bone m

143 tic resonance imaging (MRI), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

144 ks, mice underwent live imaging (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry [DEXA] scanning, two-dimensional ec

145 Lumbar spine dual X-ray absorptiometry does not consistently distinguish c

146 hese measures compare with FM by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) 2 wk postpartum.

147 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis was performed in chi

148 with measures obtained by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and anthropometric measures.

149 sure total body protein by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bioimpedance analysis (BI

150 ge for subsequent development of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tom

151 uits, and bone mineral density (BMD) by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and repeated after 12 weeks o

152 x (BMI), waist circumference and Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessed fat mass), and logis

153 TBV measure with the use of only dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) attenuation values for use in

154 dy cohort members with age 15 yr dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone outcomes (whole body, lu

155 20 years old in 1976 underwent a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone scan.

156 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can be used to determine abdo

157 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) can provide accurate measurem

158 BMI-independent association with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived body-fat distribution

159 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) derived measures of lean mass

160 for >=10 years and had undergone dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) during the previous 12 months

161 I z score, skinfold thicknesses, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fat mass, DXA lean mass, heig

162 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for visceral adipose tissue (

163 1 and 5 (mean 8.3 years apart) and hip dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) had been performed (2 years a

164 en biomechanical CT analysis and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 136 women (age range, 43-9

165 l bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in midchildhood.

166 equences for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the diagnosis and treatmen

167 ral density (BMD) measurement by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an internationally accepte

168 ography (CT) in combination with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is cost-effective as a screen

169 neral density (aBMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the clinical standard for

170 an, 7.7 years) using anthropometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements.

171 Recently, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) modeling of organ-tissue mass

172 jective food intake measures and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan for body composition wil

173 bar vertebrae were imaged with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner, a clinical energy-in

174 t (A(1)R-knockout) mice was analyzed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning, and the trabecular

175 water (DLW) along with multiple dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans to measure changes in b

176 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed before s

177 density at week 48, assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans.

178 size that is easily derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans.

179 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used for an assessment of

180 eight, height and breast composition by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were measured in daughters at

181 osition changes were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) which were combined with ener

182 h abdominal multidetector CT and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 6 months of each other

183 essed within 2 weeks of birth by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), analysed in all randomly ass

184 s, bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and BMD by quantitative comp

185 g adults aged 8 to 20 years with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), anthropometric, demographic,

186 Participants had dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), entered a clinical BMD regis

187 competence, and remodeling with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), high-resolution peripheral q

188 We used dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), high-resolution peripheral q

189 Assessment Tool (FRAX), without dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), in all HIV-infected men aged

190 fect of Pb on bone quality using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), micro-computed tomography, R

191 of body composition, measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), to increased serum alanine a

192 al-body fat and muscle depots on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), whole-body MRI, and cardiac

193 an alternate measure of obesity, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived visceral-fat-volume m

194 and body composition was measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

195 Fat mass was measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

196 ody composition were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

197 e areal BMD were determined with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

198 e (L2-L4) were measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

199 d at age 20 y through the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

200 A) levels; (3) total body fat by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA); (4) liver and muscle insulin

201 ody energy stores [measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)] and energy expenditure [meas

202 cy on offspring fatness (BMI and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [DXA] determined fat mass index [FM

203 ee imaging methods (radiography, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], and quantitative computed to

204 ed of alternative tests (central dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA], calcaneal quantitative ultra

205 body fat percentage (measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) among girls (percentage of es

206 Leg lean mass (via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; DXA) and strength were determined.

207 han or equal to 2 posttransplant dual energy X-ray absorptiometry examinations.

208 calorimetry), body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), fasting appetite ratings (visual

209 alyses of dynamic knee loads as well as dual x-ray absorptiometry for determination of bone mineral d

210 t mass and bone mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for each study year.

211 omography, and less precisely by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for osteodensitometry.

212 ody-composition data measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry from NHANES.

213 muscle mass were measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; grip strength and information on l

214 eir mean TBS was calculated from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images at the L1 to L4 lumbar spine

215 is, mean (SD) whole-body BMD z score by dual x-ray absorptiometry improved by 0.25 (0.78) in the inte

216 d skeletal muscle mass using whole-body dual X-ray absorptiometry in 142 adult lung transplant candid

217 ged 8-19 y was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 1999-2004 as part of a health ex

218 omposition was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 294 adult women at risk of weigh

219 omposition was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 50 female, adult patients with A

220 dy LM and FM were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 78 CD subjects at diagnosis, 6,

221 ith body composition measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 984 Hispanic children and adoles

222 body composition as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a large sample of twins from the

223 BF% was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a population-based cross-section

224 f hip and spine were detected by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in both groups.

225 place) and adiposity measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in US children.

226 percentage body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) in adults in a large nationally re

227 dy mass and whole-body fat mass (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) increased over 12 weeks in Control

228 g overfeeding through the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, indirect calorimetry, and ELISA.

229 ith lower radiation emissions by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry instruments now permit the safe mea

230 rd assessments of body composition (via dual X-ray absorptiometry), insulin sensitivity (via hyperins

231 Dual x-ray absorptiometry is currently the state-of-the-art t

232 fractures, but correlation with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is low.

233 ineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is used to assess bone health in ki

234 nd lean mass were collected from Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machine.

235 he basis of the relation between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-measured fat mass and BMI (in kg/m(

236 ated equations and compared with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements in a subgroup.

237 l and neonatal anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of neonatal lean mass

238 rage of 8.2 years (766 follow-up dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements).

239 ion, insulin resistance, MRI and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measures of body composition and fa

240 iponectin ratio (HMWr), 24-hr ABPM, and dual x-ray absorptiometry measures of fat mass were obtained.

241 s and remodeling were evaluated by dual beam X-ray absorptiometry, micro-computed tomography, and his

242 d from implant sites were assessed with dual x-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and hist

243 ntage of body fat (adiposity) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, moderate-to-vigorous physical acti

244 e examined body composition with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, muscle strength with a handgrip dy

245 s performed for patients evaluated with dual x-ray absorptiometry (n = 2106).

246 AEs), and body fat distribution (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) of rilpivirine (RPV) and EFV plus

247 mass (n = 28,330) measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry or bioelectrical impedance analysis

248 Scanning modalities, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or quantitative CT, have been devel

249 ry outcome was lean body mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry over the 12 week treatment period i

250 dy composition was measured annually by dual X-ray absorptiometry, physical activity by accelerometry

251 Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry predicts fractures similarly for me

252 ding fasting blood samples and a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (subset of 650) from which met

253 ted with the use of a total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan at 20 y of age.

254 Canada, referred for a baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan from January 1, 1996, to March

255 ent anthropometric measurements, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, as well as dietary and activi

256 By dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, body composition was unaltere

257 c-euglycemic clamp, VO2max test, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan, underwater weighing, and musc

258 Whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning revealed that bone-mass ac

259 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning was done at baseline and w

260 ody composition assessment using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning with energy expenditure me

261 udiometry (hearing loss, 22.6%), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans (low bone mineral density [BM

262 sis treatment with 2 consecutive dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans (mean interval, 4.5 years).

263 BMD (total and subregions) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry scans and complete information on c

264 bone measures were derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans at a mean age of 9.9 y.

265 studied a subset with whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans at baseline and during follow

266 BMD between the first and second dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans categorized as stable, detect

267 n 1993 and 1998 who had received dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans for estimation of total body

268 ured by specific software on the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of lumbar spine in 39 KTR and

269 ginning of the trial, and serial dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans of the lumbar spine were perf

270 ients in which serial whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans were performed.

271 Total body fat, measured from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scans, was the primary outcome.

272 Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry studies revealed increased central

273 , the percentage of fat by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, symptoms of depression and anxiety

274 ce fragility fractures at better dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry T-scores than those with postmenopa

275 For the subset with dual x-ray absorptiometry T-scores, 2-year AUC was 0.74 for b

276 There are limitations of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry technology in this population, incl

277 easured the aBMD with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the distal radius and tibia bone m

278 nfants' anthropometrics and used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to assess body composition at 1, 4,

279 40.9 years]) were evaluated with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to determine lumbar spine BMD and t

280 skeletal muscle phenotypes using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, ultrasound and isokinetic dynamome

281 ) were estimated with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, underwater weighing (UWW), and TBW

282 t and lean body mass measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry was analyzed as z scores.

283 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed at baseline and 24-we

284 on body composition assessed by Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry was performed.

285 e change in body fat measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was smaller (P = 0.001) in the CLA

286 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess body composition

287 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to assess body composition

288 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure total bone mine

289 BMD, measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, was assessed at the lumbar spine,

290 Using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, we compared lumbar spine, total hi

291 Cycle ergometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were obtained in 50 TX and 70 contr

292 Laboratory analysis and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry were performed at baseline and ever

293 ary records, accelerometers, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were used to assess diet, activity,

294 y magnetic resonance imaging and dual-energy x ray absorptiometry) were assessed using multivariable

295 ic clamp), and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were examined.

296 ody composition (BC, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were measured at 3M-PP and 9M-PP (

297 rformance, and body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were measured before and after 5 a

298 ilable body-composition data (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) were used.

299 t and fat-free mass, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, were converted to calorie equivale

300 l body fat was measured by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, whereas abdominal VAT and SAT cros