コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 lar disease, and 1.93 (95% CI 1.47-2.53) for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
2 beer, was associated with a lower hazard of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
3 they underwent elective EVAR for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.
4 flammation as well as apoptosis in models of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
5 y artery disease, diabetes, cholesterol, and abdominal aortic aneurysm.
6 icant association between MMP-9 genotype and abdominal aortic aneurysm.
7 ) has been associated with the occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
8 ependent M2-polarization in a mouse model of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
9 the United States underwent repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms.
10 dovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
11 to the site of an aneurysm in a rat model of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
12 ajor cause of development and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
13 As might serve as a noninvasive biomarker of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
14 sponse with a faster recovery after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
15 gical risk patients with symptomatic complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.
16 ic lymphocytic leukemia, sarcoidosis, and 13 abdominal aortic aneurysms.
17 to open surgery for juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.
18 progression in two different mouse models of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
19 doxycycline for reducing the growth of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.
20 ally yet to identify individuals at risk for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
21 sealing is a new technique for the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
22 42-1.67]), but was inversely associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (0.46 [0.35-0.59]) and subarac
23 54 1.42-1.67), but inversely associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (0.46, 0.35-0.59) and subarach
27 ase (MMP)-12] is the most upregulated MMP in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and, hence, MMP-12-targe
29 ary factors affecting the risk of developing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are scarcely investigate
31 dherence to the EVAR-1 scan protocol reduced abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) deaths by 3% and increas
35 As such, they may have a role in modifying abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) expansion, the pathophys
43 ealand, and Sweden have reported declines in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) incidence, prevalence, a
63 nown limitations, the decision to operate on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is primarily on the basi
67 estern populations suggest steep declines in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) mortality; however, inte
69 receptor 2) axis plays an important role in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) pathogenesis, with effec
71 mortality in physically frail patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) randomized to either ear
72 Recent reports of rupture in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) receiving B-cell depleti
76 ients from age 65 to 100 years who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n = 71,422), pul
78 fecting outcomes after open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair are each well des
81 going 6 common elective surgical procedures [abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, coron
82 2012 identifying all patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, total
83 ality measure for pancreatic resection (PR), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, esophageal resec
84 ent of the renal arteries in open juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, the volume effec
90 the cases described in literature are due to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture into the left re
94 aracterized murine model of elastase-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that recapitulates many
96 variation in the contemporary management of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with relation to recomme
97 ation in VSMCs is correlated with rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), an age-related vascular
98 rction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and cerebrovascular acc
99 ter elective open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), cost may be an importan
101 has become ubiquitous in the modern care of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), yet broad estimates of
113 The rates of growth of medically treated abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are difficult to determ
114 the utility of geometric features for future abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) growth prediction.
115 n and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may not be applicable t
117 ventional open abdominal aneurysm repair (OR-abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA]), and 16 patients underg
123 Stent graft devices for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are being increasingly
124 ary artery disease (CAD) are risk traits for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) but not for intracrani
125 air (EVAR) is often offered to patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) considered preoperativ
128 s of open and endovascular (EVAR) repairs of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) have not been studied
129 ycline inhibits formation and progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in preclinical models
133 s (RCTs) has demonstrated that screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) measuring 3 cm or grea
136 ecommend surgical treatment for asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) with a diameter of at
137 s have an unclear function on development of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), although a pharmacolo
138 ne has been implicated in the development of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), but its effect on AAA
139 e high mortality rate after rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), surveillance is recom
142 peripheral artery disease (PAD; P=0.090) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs; P=0.12), and the varia
145 owering LDL-cholesterol is likely to prevent abdominal aortic aneurysm and aortic stenosis, in additi
146 in and elevated amylase in the context of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and generalized atheromatosis.
149 ve proven effective in preclinical models of abdominal aortic aneurysm and show great potential for c
153 ymptomatic human atherosclerotic plaques and abdominal aortic aneurysms and correlated with decreased
154 ymptomatic human atherosclerotic plaques and abdominal aortic aneurysms and correlated with decreased
155 wall cellular inflammation in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and predicts the rate of aneu
156 cial and ethnic differences in prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms and showed more complex iliac
157 s, ranging from low-shear-rate conditions in abdominal aortic aneurysms and thoracic aortic dissectio
158 ysms with only abdominal aortic involvement (abdominal aortic aneurysm), and 1091 (86%) had TAA.
159 sterol reduction, colonoscopy, screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and HIV testing (each adding
160 esidential status, hospital volume, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms, and all preexisting comorbid
161 edly increased the incidence and severity of abdominal aortic aneurysms, and caused aortic arch ruptu
162 te to abnormal dilation of aorta, leading to abdominal aortic aneurysms, and matrix metalloproteinase
163 d with 1 of 7 surgical emergencies (ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, appendicit
164 7, 2.22, 1.65, 2.7, 4.46, 3.22) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, appendicit
168 n fraction, peripheral arterial disease, and abdominal aortic aneurysms, are also briefly reviewed.
169 imates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with physical activ
170 ar stress was associated with enlargement of abdominal aortic aneurysms at 1 year, particularly in an
171 data presented for each sex separately, with abdominal aortic aneurysms being assessed for aneurysm r
172 ntial association between MMP-9 genotype and abdominal aortic aneurysm, but these studies have been l
175 of abdominal aortic aneurysm, open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, colectomy, and hip replacemen
177 r open-label cohort study, 342 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (diameter >/=40 mm) were class
180 ng follow-up after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVAR) is mainly aimed at det
182 minal aortic aneurysms (SaAAAs) and fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysms (FuAAAs) regarding patient ch
183 schemic pancreatitis, pancreatic pseudocyst, abdominal aortic aneurysm, generalized atheromatosis.
185 bypass grafting, congestive heart failure or abdominal aortic aneurysm, glomerular filtration rate, a
188 iation between physical activity and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been inconsistent with som
190 m repair (EVAR) versus open repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms have been shown in randomised
191 her physical activity may reduce the risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm, however, further studies are
192 Pulse pressure associations were inverse for abdominal aortic aneurysm (HR per 10 mm Hg 0.91 [95% CI
193 nary death (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.51 to 2.10), abdominal aortic aneurysm (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.34 to 2.2
195 resonance imaging are 2 novel approaches to abdominal aortic aneurysm imaging evaluated in clinical
196 cular repair as compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in propensity-score-matched co
201 frequency of repair of intact (nonruptured) abdominal aortic aneurysms, in-hospital mortality among
203 ent of a midline laparotomy in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm is safe and effectively preven
209 ng (age-adjusted hazard ratios, 3.6-5.0) for abdominal aortic aneurysm, myocardial infarction, and un
210 peripheral arterial disease (n(e) = 5,215); abdominal aortic aneurysm (n(e) = 4,572); venous thrombo
211 gnificant differences in wall stress between abdominal aortic aneurysms of similar size and may bette
212 pulmonary lobectomy, endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, open repair of abdominal aort
213 operated via midline laparotomy, and had an abdominal aortic aneurysm or a body mass index of 27 or
214 f genetically predicted LDL-cholesterol with abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.40-2.17])
215 (OR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.00-1.37]; P=0.050), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.15-5.89];
216 y disease (OR: 1.47; p = 2.9 x 10(-14)), and abdominal aortic aneurysm (OR: 1.23; p = 6.0 x 10(-5)),
217 al disease (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.32), abdominal aortic aneurysms (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.
218 of fragment concentrations with TAA (versus abdominal aortic aneurysm) or with dissection (versus no
219 vascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (r-AAA) requires advanced infr
222 ted differences in timely repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) were associated with ex
224 tcomes of patients hospitalized for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) by conducting a retros
225 Whether elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm reduces long-term morbidity an
226 so higher for colectomy ($2719 per patient), abdominal aortic aneurysm repair ($5279), and hip replac
227 n at the lowest cost-of-rescue hospitals for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair ($60456 vs $23261; P <
228 ard approach), colon resection (33% vs 14%), abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (51% vs 38%), and lower
229 of the following general elective surgeries: abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (AAA), coronary artery
231 ferent types of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (endovascular aneurysm
232 patients aged 65 to 100 years who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (n = 69207), colectomy
233 vestigate the existence and outcomes of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (OAR) and carotid endar
234 eliability for overall morbidity was low for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (reliability, 0.29; sam
235 ery bypass grafting, aortic valve repair, or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between January 1, 2005
236 ation on the outcomes of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a vascular network i
241 n 210 (79.8%), and percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or thoracic endovascula
242 as conducted on patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair through a midline lapar
244 ents scheduled for lower limb bypass or open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were randomly assigned,
245 ged from 37% (total hip replacement) to 77% (abdominal aortic aneurysm repair), and most patients wer
246 lective care was $8741.22 (30% increase) for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, $5309.78 (17% increase
247 colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, abdominal aortic aneur
248 urgery, cholecystectomy, colectomy, elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and lower extremity am
249 copic gastric bypass, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and lower extremity by
250 008-2009): colectomy, ventral hernia repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and lower extremity by
251 valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and thoracic endovascu
252 dy examining outcomes of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, based on prospectively
253 death in patients with ESRD undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomi
254 procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy
255 cular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip rep
256 cular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, and hip rep
257 undergoing 1 of 7 common surgical procedures-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, colectomy, cystectomy,
258 geted procedures (colectomy, lung resection, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass
259 atients aged 18 years or older who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, coronary artery bypass
260 spital readmission within 30 days after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, infrainguinal arterial
261 grafting, pulmonary lobectomy, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic
262 grafting, pulmonary lobectomy, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, open abdominal aortic
263 artery bypass graft, total hip replacement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or colectomy procedure
264 valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or percutaneous thorac
265 valve replacement, percutaneous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, or thoracic endovascul
266 ng all patients and subsets of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pancreatic resection,
268 grafting, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, total hip arthroplasty
269 efined as the percentage of patients who had abdominal aortic aneurysm-repair without intraoperative
270 ominal aortic aneurysm ruptures, 126 (36.8%) abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs, and 48 (14.0%) deaths
273 uring follow-up (1005+/-280 days), 17 (5.0%) abdominal aortic aneurysm ruptures, 126 (36.8%) abdomina
274 analyze differences between saccular-shaped abdominal aortic aneurysms (SaAAAs) and fusiform abdomin
275 lusion The maximal diameter and volume of an abdominal aortic aneurysm sac can be used for temporal m
276 the reconstructed centerline; volume of the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac; and volume from the lowes
277 udy was to assess changes in the size of the abdominal aortic aneurysm sack using CT angiography (CTA
281 tributory role to atherosclerotic plaque and abdominal aortic aneurysm stability are poorly understoo
282 els of miR-195 were reduced in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms suggesting that microRNAs mig
285 tolic blood pressure had a greater effect on abdominal aortic aneurysm than did raised systolic press
286 tality are lower with endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm than with open repair, but the
288 randomly assigned patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms to either endovascular repair
289 31 patients who underwent surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, urinary Fg increased earlier
290 nd women being assessed for repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm using data from study periods
293 lar repair, as compared with open repair, of abdominal aortic aneurysm was associated with a substant
297 s, atherosclerotic carotid artery specimens, abdominal aortic aneurysms) were obtained from patients
298 c aortic aneurysms versus 0.25 (14 of 57) in abdominal aortic aneurysms, whereas the mean number of i
299 omly assigned 881 patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms who were candidates for both
300 static and dynamic regimes, acting on sealed abdominal aortic aneurysms, with references to real case